Re: [Vo]:Gravity helps overcome Coulomb barrier with 223 ev kinetic energy for H ion

On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 1:50 PM, bobcook39...@hotmail.com < bobcook39...@hotmail.com> wrote: > http://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2016/0118144.html > > The following is taken from the link noted above: > Hey, Jones, we've been here before: https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg102870.

Re: [Vo]:Gravity helps overcome Coulomb barrier with 223 ev kinetic energy for H ion

And here: https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg105019.html On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Terry Blanton wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 1:50 PM, bobcook39...@hotmail.com < > bobcook39...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> http://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2016/0118144.html >> >> The

RE: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Article: This Overlooked Theory Could Be The Missing Piece That Explains How The EM Drive Works

It seems that exchanging the dimensions of time for space as suggested would imply no way to physically measure either dimension, since the dimensions have some physical (measurable) characteristic by definition. Logically I do not follow this proposal. Bob Cook Sent from Mail

RE: [Vo]:Gravity helps overcome Coulomb barrier with 223 ev kinetic energy for H ion

Terry— I agree. The new stuff is the extra data that seems to support the theory. Bob Cook Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Terry Blanton Sent: Monday, November 6, 2017 8:37:59 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subje

RE: [Vo]:Gravity helps overcome Coulomb barrier with 223 ev kinetic energy for H ion

The General Fusion has many more problems with it INHO than the Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Terry Blanton Sent: Monday, November 6, 2017 8:37:59 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Gravity helps ove

RE: [Vo]:Gravity helps overcome Coulomb barrier with 223 ev kineticenergy for H ion

This is a local company to me - and I would be more excited about them if they weren’t more secretive and made more sense. They do have good credentials, but not so good as far as the theory of operation goes. Having a patent means nothing - and I’m not buying the two kinds of gravity concep

RE: [Vo]:Gravity helps overcome Coulomb barrier with 223 ev kinetic energy for H ion

My previous comment was not complete. It should be: The General Fusion has many more problems with it INHO than the Unified Gravity device appears to present. No gammas and only charged particles is the big difference that favors Unified Gravity. Bob Cook Sent from Mail

RE: [Vo]:Gravity helps overcome Coulomb barrier with 223 ev kineticenergy for H ion

I would agree with the idea of secrecy—at least some obfuscation in the patent. For example, I could not find a sure statement regarding the makeup of the Lithium targets and their differences. I would guess they do not have a pure plasma of ionized particles. It is probably a dusty plasma as

Re: [Vo]:Gravity helps overcome Coulomb barrier with 223 ev kineticenergy for H ion

What is this? gravity paper? where is it? From: JonesBeene Sent: Monday, November 6, 2017 12:42 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Gravity helps overcome Coulomb barrier with 223 ev kineticenergy for H ion This is a local company to me - and I w

Re: [Vo]:Gravity helps overcome Coulomb barrier with 223 ev kineticenergy for H ion

Proton-proton chain The p-p chain begins, as described above, by two protons reacting to form a deuteron, D2. At low temperatures (less than about 14 ×106 K), we have the following sequence (termed ppI) ppI: reactionp + p ® D2 + e+ + ne (1.4 ×1010 yr)

[Vo]:Theoretical quark fusion found to be more powerful than hydrogen fusion

https://phys.org/news/2017-11-theoretical-quark-fusion-powerful-hydrogen.html

RE: [Vo]:Gravity helps overcome Coulomb barrier with 223 ev kineticenergy for H ion

Brian— The following vortex message has links to the theory and the patent as well. On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 1:50 PM, bobcook39...@hotmail.com mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com>> wrote: http://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2016/0118144.html The following is take

RE: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Article: This Overlooked Theory Could Be The Missing Piece That Explains How The EM Drive Works

It seems that exchanging the dimensions of time for space as suggested would imply no way to physically measure either dimension, since the dimensions have some physical (measurable) characteristic by definition. Logically I do not follow this proposal. Bob Cook From: Roarty, Francis X Sent