Re: [Vo]:Mizuno presentation at ICCF-21

. The setup I have suggested would confirm anomalous heat without any doubt, if the kind of COP Misuno has achieved is replicated. On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 9:05 PM Jed Rothwell wrote: > Alberto De Souza wrote: > > I would like to suggest a setup for the replication of Misuno’s resul

Re: [Vo]:Mizuno presentation at ICCF-21

I would like to suggest a setup for the replication of Misuno’s results. In this setup we would have two reactors operating side-by-side at the same time: one active and one dummy (mounted without the nickel meshes inside it). The sheath heater of these reactors would be connected in series and to

[Vo]:What not to do with your amazing invention...

https://www.bbc.com/reel/playlist/searching-for-starlite?vpid=p06llpln&ocid=ww.social.link

[Vo]:LION experiments

This forum is rather silent about the LION experiments, currently being examined by MFMP... Anyone care to comment? https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/5518-mfmp-lfh-lion2-100-replication-well-beyond-lion1/?postID=81031#post81031

[Vo]: I.H. is good at calorimetry but bad at doing business

Based on what Jed said so far, I.H. is very good at calorimetry but very bad at doing business. I would expect the opposit. Rossi on the other hand... Alberto.

[Vo]: MFMP have seen termal neutrons in GS5.3

From http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/home/mfmp-blog/522-glowstick-5-3 "Robert Greenyer, 2016-04-14 14:19 Hi All, So, just as we went through approximately 250ºC in the core from calibration (the temp at which excess heat onset occurs according to IH patent application) we saw the TCs and

Re: [Vo]: MFMP GS5.3 - a replication

Great views of the MFMP's experimental setup: https://theta360.com/s/mec8ROR65Uae7hy44vQSN991s and https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bz7lTfqkED9WQW5OTG5QWENPRTg/view?usp=sharing Alberto. On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Teslaalset wrote: > Yes, that may be the confusion. I found that quote, i

[Vo]:Rossi's response do IH

It seems that IH is responsible for a lot of what we have seen as Rossi's doing. Dear Janne: I have to comment the press release of IH, being a press release and not a forensic act. They made the Lugano reactor ( they also signed it ) they made many replications of which we have due record and wit

Re: [Vo]:Something big is happening

Most of what MFMP mentions in their message to the donnors can be found in the chat at: http://magicsound.us/MFMP/video/ It stops Friday, February 19, 7:28:31pm, though. It looks like interesting stuff (their c

[Vo]:Something big is happening

A post I just put up on the MFMP Facebook page that might interest some of you: "I have learned a lot reading the chat at http://magicsound.us/MFMP/video/ (backwards; pretty hard to do). But it stops at Friday, February 19, 7:28:31pm. So, I could not get to last Wednesday. I read your discussion ab

Re: [Vo]:MFMP has presented the strongest evidence of excess heat due to LENR so far

y find the right parameters, if there are any... Alberto. On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 12:23 AM, Eric Walker wrote: > On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 7:46 AM, Alberto De Souza < > alberto.investi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It is important to note, though, that this offset was not ob

Re: [Vo]:MFMP has presented the strongest evidence of excess heat due to LENR so far

nately Heat Capacity is a function of temperature and we will > have to dig up some data on that, to make a better estimate. > > Thanks and keep up the good work! > > - Mark > > > *From:* Alberto De Souza > *Sent:* Monday, June 01, 2015 8:30 PM > *To:* vortex-l@eski

[Vo]:MFMP has presented the strongest evidence of excess heat due to LENR so far

In the graph attached, I have plotted data made public by the MFMP. The graph shows the temperature in a (null hypothesis) empty reactor (that was run in series with a loaded reactor), the temperature of the loaded reactor, and the power applied to both; both reactors were heated by the resistances

Re: [Vo]:MFMP in replication battle/siege again!

Fran, On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 6:17 AM, Roarty, Francis X wrote: > Alberto, the series current is constant thru both but the loaded reactor > heating coil becomes shunted by the plasma environment . E^2/R is going to > be different and the power distribution will be different > If so (I can't s

Re: [Vo]:MFMP in replication battle/siege again!

MFMP is performing a very interesting live experiment now. The first that I know of in LENR that test for excess heat with a null hypothesis: they are running a loaded reactor in series with a empty reactor and the loaded reactor is tens of degrees Celsius hotter than the empty one (very good signa

Re: [Vo]:*GlowStick* GS2 LIVE NOW

> http://bit.ly/1DzPIM2 > > This will allow you to actually read the temperatures and pressures in the > graphs. > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Alberto De Souza < > alberto.investi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> http://youtu.be/zMs8XwF22Dk >> > >

[Vo]:*GlowStick* GS2 LIVE NOW

http://youtu.be/zMs8XwF22Dk

Re: [Vo]:Re: Am I the only one..

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 4:46 PM, wrote: > In reply to Alberto De Souza's message of Sun, 22 Mar 2015 20:59:30 -0400: > Hi, > [snip] > >If we see resistance variation, it > >is all the better, more new physics. > > I have already provided two reasons why the resistance might vary:- > 1) Aluminium

Re: [Vo]:Experimental methodology employing two reactors in series

On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 10:05 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote: > A self feeding with some extra output energy reactor would overcome all > this, it's much more convincing and any "magic trick" to input energy into > it, like current inductance, can be easily be detected by a magnetometer. > It can be used

[Vo]:Experimental methodology employing two reactors in series

I would like to propose examining this binary (yes/no) hypothesis: "A reactor loaded with LENR fuel produces excess (non-chemical) heat". To test this hypothesis, one has to run an experiment to test exactly that: is the reactor with fuel hotter? Is it hotter for a long enough period of time so as

Re: [Vo]:Re: Am I the only one..

On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 4:58 PM, wrote: > In reply to Alberto De Souza's message of Sat, 21 Mar 2015 23:16:09 -0400: > Hi, > [snip] > >I completely agree. But I do not believe we are going to see large > >differences between resistances, except in cases of heater failure. But > >even if we see l

Re: [Vo]:Re: Am I the only one..

> If the objective is to compare the temperatures, then one has to ensure > that the > input _power_ to both coils is identical. It is not enough to just > _measure_ the > input power. It needs to be _actively controlled_ to ensure that it is > identical. > I beg to disagree. If we have a large CO

Re: [Vo]:fast LENR news about Parkhomov, etc.,

On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Jack Cole wrote: > I agree Axil. If I were to design this, I would work out a constant power > supply algorithm for each unit. I think it would be difficult to wire them > in series and have them behave the same. A control system that adjusts the > power level

Re: [Vo]:fast LENR news about Parkhomov, etc.,

On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > The heat generated by any section of the wire that does not come into > contact with the reactor core to transfer heat to the reactor must be > subtracted from the total power consumed by the heater. This includes any > inter reactor wire runs b

Re: [Vo]:fast LENR news about Parkhomov, etc.,

> You just need to ensure that the voltage measurements are taken at the > connections to the reactors themselves. This measurement is used both for > the > measurement log, and in the control of the power level. > Because modern voltmeters have very high input resistances, the current > drain > th

Re: [Vo]:Re: Am I the only one..

> Since your simpler approach does not obtain an integrated measurement, one > complication would be significant swings in the temperature of either the > device in test or the control, with the control running hotter than the > functional unit for stretches of time. > That would be bad. But, if P

Re: [Vo]:Re: Am I the only one..

ina along the heating element. This certainly could change the > electrical resistance of the circuit in the hot zone of the heater element > and make understanding of the power deposited difficult as a function of > time. > > Bob > > - Original Message - > *From:* Albe

Re: [Vo]:Re: Am I the only one..

. Alberto. On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 2:23 AM, Axil Axil wrote: > When the resistance drops on the LENR reactor heater coil by three times, > how will that effect the current going through the null reactor's heating > coil? > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 2:10 AM, Alberto De Souza

Re: [Vo]:fast LENR news about Parkhomov, etc.,

wrote: > In the Lagano experiment, the resistance of the heater decreased to one > third of its initial startup value. Riddle that one batman. > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 1:33 AM, Alberto De Souza < > alberto.investi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Bob, >> >>

Re: [Vo]:Re: Am I the only one..

Calorimetry is always a problem in LENR context because it is being used to try and prove that LERN is real. But it is very hard to use it for that. Calorimetry is good for evaluating how much one would gain with LENR, once it is proved that we have excess heat (one might argue that this was alread

Re: [Vo]:fast LENR news about Parkhomov, etc.,

Hi Bob, On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 9:21 PM, Bob Cook wrote: > Alberto-- > > You are correct that voltage and current gives integrated power in the > section of the coil between the voltage drop measurements. However, if > your are interested in local power generation in the active region where

Re: [Vo]:fast LENR news about Parkhomov, etc.,

null hypothesis." On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:03 PM, wrote: > If I not remember wrong, Swartz had serial tests of nanors. > > > > > > On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 17:25:40 -0400, Alberto De Souza < > alberto.investi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I mean "(very truthful,

Re: [Vo]:fast LENR news about Parkhomov, etc.,

I mean "(very truthful, but we need two ammeters, therefore, problems with skeptics)". On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Alberto De Souza < alberto.investi...@gmail.com> wrote: > If we put the heaters in series, we are sure the current is the same in > both. It is easy to

Re: [Vo]:fast LENR news about Parkhomov, etc.,

ammeters connected to the heater coil of each reactor. > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > >> Would we not want to wire the reactors in parallel to avoid a voltage >> drop between the two reactors if they were connected in series? >> >> On Fr

Re: [Vo]:fast LENR news about Parkhomov, etc.,

Alain, you are right in your analysis. A skeptic may point out all the problems you have mentioned. But we have something new now: MFMP and their live science approach. If they show (live) the complete process of puting the two reactors in series and the reactor with fuel shows significantly higher

Re: [Vo]:Am I the only one..

To eliminate doubts about the current used on each of the two reactors, one just needs to put the two heater coils in series; the current will be exactly the same (at DC or, to a very good approximation, 60Hz). If the coils are made with the same type of wire and the wires have the same size, we ha

Re: [Vo]:fast LENR news about Parkhomov, etc.,

heater (assuming >> he didn't use more than one TC). >> >> There would be some fairly obvious indications that something was wrong >> if this was a big problem (e.g., incandescence level differences). It >> seems unlikely that Parkhomov would have missed something li

Re: [Vo]:fast LENR news about Parkhomov, etc.,

. > > Overall, it seems to support his previous findings. Looking forward to > more details. > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Alberto De Souza < > alberto.investi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I would suggest running two identical reactors in the same room (on

Re: [Vo]:fast LENR news about Parkhomov, etc.,

I would suggest running two identical reactors in the same room (one without fuel) with heating resistances (identical) in series. If the fueled reactor becomes hotter, we have excess heat. One can film (MFMP style) the measurement of the resistance of the heaters before, and the voltage on them du

[Vo]:The Hunt for the Magnetic Monopole

See: http://spectrum.ieee.org/semiconductors/materials/the-hunt-for-the-magnetic-monopole/?utm_source=techalert&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=081513 Alberto.

[Vo]:MFM Project

I belive it would be better to do a comparison between cells. The idea is to build four cells: 2 exactly as Celani's; and 2 again exactly as Celani's, but without active wires. With proper mounting, the four cells can have wires almost identical (size and initial resistance). Therefore, they could

Re: [Vo]:MFM air-flow calorimeter

I wonder if it would not be better to do a simple comparison between cells... For that, one could build four cells (just to be certain): 2 exactly as Celani's; and 2 again exactly as Celani's, but without active wires. As you know, in the Celani's cells there are two wires: one active and another j

Re: [Vo]:We have FPE cells

way we live. Aussie Guy: please build your kits. They will sell a lot. Cheers, Alberto. On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Alberto De Souza < alberto.investi...@gmail.com> wrote: > After some calculations, I think it is better to use the MPG-D751. See > below. > > On Tue, Dec 2

Re: [Vo]:We have FPE cells

eventualy needed during reaction startup and/or control). Cheers, Alberto. > AG > > > > On 12/27/2011 2:42 PM, Alberto De Souza wrote: > >> I'm a new member of the list, but I'm reading the posts since January. >> I'm addicted... >> >> If w

Re: [Vo]:We have FPE cells

I'm a new member of the list, but I'm reading the posts since January. I'm addicted... If we have a large COP (10-100), I believe we can use thin film thermogenerators (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermoelectricity) such as these http://www.micropelt.com/down/datasheet_mpg_d651_d751.pdf to make a