> From: "Terry Blanton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 1:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [Vo]: Now what? An important theoretical question.
>
>
>> On 2/1/07, Stiffler Scientific <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> This is my last
ns control their pollution.
More... http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/world/4520802.html
--
Michel
- Original Message -
From: "Terry Blanton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 1:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Now what? An important theoretical questio
On 2/1/07, John Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jed, you strike me as the perfect person to have a crack at this..
Jed addresses this in his book:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJcoldfusiona.pdf
Terry
On 2/1/07, Stiffler Scientific <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is my last comment on this thread as I for sure live in a different
world than the rest of you.
Wanna bet? :-)
PV's Oh yes if you want a 35 year recover, unless you will settle for 10-20%
energy offset which can be wiped out in 2
John Berry wrote:
Still no one has really answered the whole question, which is basically what
would happen to this world where it currently is if it was suddenly given
technology which is at a level seen in Star Trek?
Depends what you mean by "suddenly". Over night, over years, over decades?
Th
StifflerScientific wrote:
> Harry!
>
> Where do you live anyway, and do you have more than a 100W light? :-)
>
> Here in Humble TX, during the summer I pay on average $320 per month for AC
> when I keep the temp at 77' with new 13 SEER AC units and solar screens,
> roof ridge vents, electric att
Another problem which comes to mind is that they don't work :)
Michel
- Original Message -
From: "Terry Blanton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 1:14 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Now what? An important theoretical question.
> On 2/1/07, Harry
John Berry wrote:
> Still no one has really answered the whole question, which is
basically what
> would happen to this world where it currently is if it was suddenly given
> technology which is at a level seen in Star Trek?
I already answered. Change equals pain, or energy depending how you
StifflerScientific wrote:
>>> Hogwash! You left out one major aspect; goodness will prevail in the
>>> long run. The government you speak of will one day be replaced with
>>> something wonderful. You're looking at an uprising in people against
>>> controlling governments. The people cannot be en
On 2/2/07, Stiffler Scientific <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is my last comment on this thread as I for sure live in a different
world than the rest of you.
Move.
Plus I just don't see New Zealand taxing people based on the power they
would have used if connected to the grid.
ROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 6:14 PM
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Subject: Re: [Vo]: Now what? An important theoretical question.
>
>
> On 2/1/07, Harry Veeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > FE won't eliminate the energy grid.
> > But
Still no one has really answered the whole question, which is basically what
would happen to this world where it currently is if it was suddenly given
technology which is at a level seen in Star Trek?
Would it be likely to play out well or poorly?
And what could be done to ensure it's more good t
On 2/1/07, Harry Veeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FE won't eliminate the energy grid.
But it will change how we use the energy grid.
PVs are already doing it. That is what lead to the safety cutout
device to prevent reverse feeding the grid.
The problem with the Magnetic Motors that I know
will all come together, then I want what you are
smokin :-) No disrespect ment, but what is the basis of you idea that
sometning is close after all these thousands of years??
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 5:32 PM
To:
ee 50hp X 746 = 3.73E4 or 37,300 watts nice if it could run a
> genset at 100%/ 24/7? Nice, but show me its real and you could avoid the
> politicians.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Thursday, February 01
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 5:42 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Now what? An important theoretical question.
I think this also resolves Stiffler's concern about government losing
tons of tax revenue.
If you remain connected, that $60 you get back from the pow
I think this also resolves Stiffler's concern about government losing
tons of tax revenue.
If you remain connected, that $60 you get back from the power company
can be taxed by the government.
Harry
Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. wrote:
>
> Rather than taking off the grid, put power back into the grid
at
sometning is close after all these thousands of years??
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 5:32 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Now what? An important theoretical question.
John Berry wrote:
> Ok, let's say th
"Hoyt A. Stearns Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rather than taking off the grid, put power back into the grid.
I think the cost would be much less. Get a 50 HP Steorn motor (and I now think
I understand how it works, and it's simple).
For God's sake, man, tell us the details!
John Berry wrote:
> Ok, let's say that one of us (I haven't BTW) finds out how to crack this
> Free Energy nut.
> And Antigravity, and Healing/Rejuvenation.
>
> By discovering a new branch of physics which makes the things above
and more
> easily doable.
> Obviously like any technology it could
r. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 4:52 PM
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Subject: RE: [Vo]: Now what? An important theoretical question.
>
>
>
> Rather than taking off the grid, put power back into the grid.
>
> I think the cost would be much less. G
rom: Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 4:52 PM
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Subject: RE: [Vo]: Now what? An important theoretical question.
>
>
>
> Rather than taking off the grid, put power back into the grid.
>
> I think the
Rather than taking off the grid, put power back into the grid.
I think the cost would be much less. Get a 50 HP Steorn motor (and I now
think I understand how it works,
and it's simple), and drive a cheap surplus 50 HP induction motor above
synchronous speed (induction generator). Your power met
day, February 01, 2007 3:56 PM
To: vortex-L@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]: Now what? An important theoretical question.
Ok, let's say that one of us (I haven't BTW) finds out how to crack this
Free Energy nut.
And Antigravity, and Healing/Rejuvenation.
By discovering a new branch of
Yes, obviously it depends on the subtleties of such a device.
If Joe Blogs can put one together for $100 and have it generate all the
power he needs at the right voltage & freq that's a very different equation.
I am interested in the issue of selling energy back to the grid, please
elaborate on w
On 2/1/07, John Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, let's say that one of us (I haven't BTW) finds out how to crack this
Free Energy nut.
There are still economics associated with FE. Let's suppose I can
generate FE of 2 kW continuous. Can I take my home off grid?
The average home has a pea
Ok, let's say that one of us (I haven't BTW) finds out how to crack this
Free Energy nut.
And Antigravity, and Healing/Rejuvenation.
By discovering a new branch of physics which makes the things above and more
easily doable.
Obviously like any technology it could be misused too.
So what would yo
27 matches
Mail list logo
