Re: [Vo]:E-cat impact

2011-12-16 Thread Harry Veeder
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: > > > On 11-12-16 06:07 AM, Joshua Cude wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 2:20 AM, Axil Axil wrote: >> >> Following this line of reasoning, it is logical to assume that MY is more >> likely than not a male. I would guesstimate that

RE: [Vo]:E-cat impact

2011-12-16 Thread Jones Beene
From: Susan Gipp Axil: I would guesstimate that the odds on this speculation are 70/30 that MY is a man. Are M.Y. two people ? Mary - y (=and) - Ugo ? Hmmm ... Out of curiosity - did Ugo Fano (RIP) have a son? - or are you just speculating about naming possibilities... Come to think of it

Re: [Vo]:E-cat impact

2011-12-16 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
>From Mr. Lawrence: > However, I do have an observation: When a woman (or apparent woman) shows up, > she gets *far* more responses to her posts than a man (or apparent man) would > by posting the same sort of material. So, being a woman on the fringe lists > is enough to garner an awful lot of

Re: [Vo]:E-cat impact

2011-12-16 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence
On 11-12-16 06:07 AM, Joshua Cude wrote: On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 2:20 AM, Axil Axil > wrote: Following this line of reasoning, it is logical to assume that MY is more likely than not a male. I would guesstimate that the odds on this speculation are 70/

Re: [Vo]:E-cat impact

2011-12-16 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence
On 11-12-16 04:29 AM, Man on Bridges wrote: Hi, On 15-12-2011 19:13, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote: I wonder if MY is taking lessons from Mr. Krivit. I wonder if MY is one and the same Mr. Krivit. NO, no way. When it comes to science, Krivit's something approximating an idiot. MY

Re: [Vo]:E-cat impact

2011-12-16 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence
On 11-12-16 03:20 AM, Axil Axil wrote: Following this line of reasoning, it is logical to assume that MY is more likely than not a male. I would guesstimate that the odds on this speculation are 70/30 that MY is a man. I already pointed this out, but I did it in a jocular way, and "she"

Re: [Vo]:E-cat impact

2011-12-16 Thread Joshua Cude
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 2:20 AM, Axil Axil wrote: > Following this line of reasoning, it is logical to assume that MY is more > likely than not a male. I would guesstimate that the odds on this > speculation are 70/30 that MY is a man. > Who the hell cares?

Re: [Vo]:E-cat impact

2011-12-16 Thread Man on Bridges
Hi, On 15-12-2011 19:13, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote: I wonder if MY is taking lessons from Mr. Krivit. I wonder if MY is one and the same Mr. Krivit. Could that explain the secrecy in the identity game? B.t.w. for those who say I do the same thing, look at the characters in my name

Re: [Vo]:E-cat impact

2011-12-16 Thread Peter Gluck
Humor is an sadly complex and intricate subject, I have studied is an amateur, starting with Bergson's "La rire" In my former newsletter Info Kappa I wrote two editorials, 358 and 359 about Humor. This theory is very important I think: http://www.pyrrhichouse.co.uk/book-info/alastair-clarke.php Ot

Re: [Vo]:E-cat impact

2011-12-16 Thread Susan Gipp
2011/12/16 Axil Axil > Following this line of reasoning, it is logical to assume that MY is more > likely than not a male. I would guesstimate that the odds on this > speculation are 70/30 that MY is a man. > > Are MY two people ? Mary - y (=and) - Ugo ?

Re: [Vo]:E-cat impact

2011-12-16 Thread Axil Axil
Humour is an act of aggression. A German academic sees humour as an act of aggression, and says that people who make others laugh think that they are higher up the social ladder than their audiences. Helga Kotthoff, of the Frieburg University of Education, claims that dominant people exploit the

Re: [Vo]:E-cat impact

2011-12-15 Thread Mary Yugo
It was joke-- pls. lighten up!

Re: [Vo]:E-cat impact

2011-12-15 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
I'd be dead without spell checker. I suspect I'm not alone on that. I wonder if MY is taking lessons from Mr. Krivit. Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks

Re: [Vo]:E-cat impact

2011-12-15 Thread Jed Rothwell
Mary Yugo wrote: Meanwhile, Rossi continues to enrich the English language. His latest > contribution is "cinfudential". It is a typo for crying out loud. Don't be such a pill. Rossi's English is probably better than your Italian, so do not criticize. As Peter said, this is inelegant. It is u

Re: [Vo]:E-cat impact

2011-12-15 Thread Peter Gluck
Dear Mary, it is not elegant to pick such minor things.Do not forget what has told Buffon about Style. The letters u, i and o are adjacent on QWERTY so this is a natural typo. I do similar things when in hurry, my cataract is of great help. Please focus on the essentials. Peter On Thu, Dec 15, 201

Re: [Vo]:E-cat impact

2011-12-15 Thread Mary Yugo
Meanwhile, Rossi continues to enrich the English language. His latest contribution is "cinfudential". I assume it has something to do with Elmer Fudd but I am not sure what. "Andrea Rossi December 14th, 2011 at 6:02 PM Dear Paolo Accomazzi: I will publish the theory when I will have the protect

[Vo]:E-cat impact

2011-12-15 Thread Peter Gluck
Found this: http://au.ibtimes.com/articles/267375/20111215/cold-fusion-impact-rossi-s-e-cat.htm -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com