MF wrote:-
I think you guys missed my point. Whether you like it or not, mass media
reporters, politicians, and amateur environmentalists *are* the
environmental movement in the mind of the public. Their clownish antics
will eventually discredit serious environmental efforts
Ah! I see what
In reply to Nick Palmer's message of Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:14:01 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
The sad fact is that serious environmental efforts quietly applied
behind the scenes are just ignored by the forces we have to contend with who
just hire very smart, very well paid, but morally bankrupt people who
Michael Foster sez:
Just for the record, now that they are all running for
cover and ducking the tough questions, those so-called
enviromentalists and global warming twinkies who
initially promoted biofuels need to be held
accountable. They won't, of course, since they'll be
responsible for the
I concur with Nick Palmer. I do not now of any knowledgeable
environmental scientists in favor of ethanol. Some amateur
environmentalists and politicians favor it. Most mass media reporters
and editorial writers were in favor of it until a few months ago, but
as Truman said of the 50 most
Jed wrote:
I concur with Nick Palmer. I do not now of any knowledgeable
environmental scientists in favor of ethanol. Some amateur
environmentalists and politicians favor it. Most mass media
reporters
and editorial writers were in favor of it until a few
months ago, but
as Truman
Michael Foster wrote:
I think you guys missed my point. Whether you like it or not, mass
media reporters, politicians, and amateur environmentalists *are*
the environmental movement in the mind of the public.
I don't like it, but what can I do about it? Thanks to the mass
media, the public
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 6:24 PM, OrionWorks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not all are ducking
There is absolutely nothing wrong with making ethanol from corn. Our
forefathers certainly did it.
They were not so foolish as to use it for transportation, however.
Terry
Alcohol and driving don't
Just for the record, now that they are all running for cover and ducking the
tough questions, those so-called enviromentalists and global warming twinkies
who initially promoted biofuels need to be held accountable. They won't, of
course, since they'll be responsible for the death of hundreds
Michael Foster sez:
Just for the record, now that they are all running for
cover and ducking the tough questions, those so-called
enviromentalists and global warming twinkies who
initially promoted biofuels need to be held
accountable. They won't, of course, since they'll be
responsible for
The simple thing is, if acreage is used to generate fuel that WASNT
being used to generate food, you can not count it as, well we could
make food here instead. That is short sited and beside the point.
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 4:24 PM, OrionWorks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Foster sez:
10 matches
Mail list logo
