Harry Veeder wrote:
2009/5/7, Jed Rothwell :
I wrote:
This is rather frustrating to me. Here we have a
drop it down a well, because practically no one
is going to pay that kind of money for information on cold fusion.
Have they considered selling a CD version or making it
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 08 May 2009 11:07:04 -0400:
Hi Jed,
[snip]
>I should add that Martin Fleischmann also thinks
>highly of Mengoli. He considers him one of the
>world's top electrochemists. Mengoli retired several years ago.
>
>At issue has arisen in the discussion of thi
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sat, 9 May 2009 06:04:41 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
>By "always there" - this would imply that it serves as a "trigger" for D+D
>fusion, where the hot alpha from the Pd reacts with an adjacent 'target
>deuteron' - which is kind of a like nanoscale inertial confi
- Original Message
> From: Robin van Spaandonk In reply to Jones Beene's message
> >IOW - the simplest explanation for LENR is that it is the result of a
version of the Oppenheimer-Phillips effect - such that the neutron is
"stripped" non-thermally from deuterium, due to containment a
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 8 May 2009 08:29:33 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>IOW - the simplest explanation for LENR is that it is the result of a
>version of the Oppenheimer-Phillips effect - such that the neutron is
>"stripped" non-thermally from deuterium, due to containment and near field
2009/5/8 Jed Rothwell :
> Michel Jullian wrote:
>
>> The results look too good to be true
>
> These people do excellent work. Melich and I have a high opinion of them.
So did one of the 2004 DOE reviewers I see (
http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/DOEusdepartme.pdf ), here is a quote
of reviewer #4
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell
"the palladium isn't the fuel, it's just a catalyst." That is true. Or at
least, we hope that is true.
I am NOT a big believer in Ockhams razor, but it firmly suggests that
palladium is the fuel.
IOW - the simplest explanation for LENR is that it i
I should add that Martin Fleischmann also thinks
highly of Mengoli. He considers him one of the
world's top electrochemists. Mengoli retired several years ago.
At issue has arisen in the discussion of this
paper and in my earlier message "Rough comparison
of cold fusion Pd to UO2." The questi
In reply to grok's message of Thu, 7 May 2009 15:13:47 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>
>> The major achievement of this work is to have devised a temperature
>> range in which the generation of excess power is a totally reproducible
>> phenomenon. In fact, onl
>
> 2009/5/7, Jed Rothwell :
> > I wrote:
> > This is rather frustrating to me. Here we have a
> > spectacular paper buried in the literature, and
> > unavailable on the net. Add to this the set of
> > papers edited and published in a hardback book by
> > Marwan and Krivit at last year's ACS, an
Michel Jullian wrote:
The results look too good to be true
These people do excellent work. Melich and I have a high opinion of them.
These results are not "too good" at all; they are in line with Roulette,
Fleischmann and Pons' high heat results.
. . . if excess heat of this magnitude
> had be
The results look too good to be true, if excess heat of this magnitude
had been reproducible since 1998 the fight for recognition of CF
would have been won ten yrs ago obviously.
Regarding notation, with all the papers you've been editing I just
can't believe you can be so unit-challenged! In any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> The major achievement of this work is to have devised a temperature
> range in which the generation of excess power is a totally reproducible
> phenomenon. In fact, only a reproducible phenomenon can be investigated
> successfully, due to its depend
I wrote:
Important results:
Table 3, describing run 3:
There are many other important results. I am
working on understanding run #3, or what they call "Exp. 3" now.
Their comments:
"3.2.3. Exp. 3
Pd strip cathode characteristics: dimensions,
(1.27 x 4.16 × 0.02) cm3; weight, 1.226 g.
E
Okay, I figured out the notation in this Mengoli
paper, that I accidentally discussed here this morning. Title:
Mengoli, G., et al., Calorimetry close to the
boiling temperature of the D2O/Pd electrolytic
system. J. Electroanal. Chem., 1998. 444: p. 155.
The notation must be European I suppo
15 matches
Mail list logo
