Re: [Vo]:Physics Forums discussion of Rossi with comments by Brian Josephson

- Original Message > From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; vortex-l@eskimo.com > Sent: Wed, March 30, 2011 9:15:53 PM > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Physics Forums discussion of Rossi with comments by Brian >Josephson > > At 12:50 PM 3/30/2011, Jed Rothw

Re: [Vo]:Physics Forums discussion of Rossi with comments by Brian Josephson

Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: > Discussion of Rossi is pretty useless at this time, my opinion. It's just > going to bring up all the same old same old, and we, as those who accept the > reality of cold fusion, have *nothing to show* for Rossi. Says who? Why do you doubt the independent investiga

Re: [Vo]:Physics Forums discussion of Rossi with comments by Brian Josephson

At 12:50 PM 3/30/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote: A well-known skeptic shown up in this discussion. See: http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=484427&page=5 Joshua Cude is a joke. Physics Forums shuts down cold fusion threads, I've

Re: [Vo]:Physics Forums discussion of Rossi with comments by Brian Josephson

mix...@bigpond.com wrote: Since he is paying for it, I wouldn't count on the results being made public. I refer to the experiments underway at U. Bologna. Levi et al. said they would publish the results, probably in about a year. I assume he is counting on getting a patent by then. I do no

Re: [Vo]:Physics Forums discussion of Rossi with comments by Brian Josephson

In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:47:31 -0400: Hi, [snip] >But Rossi has paid a million euros to have a top-notch >university and national lab test his machine and subject the catalyst to >mass spectroscopy! People have lined up 200 million euros in capital to >manufacture

Re: [Vo]:Physics Forums discussion of Rossi with comments by Brian Josephson

on Wednesday, March 30, 2011 3:48 PM Jed Rothwell wrote [snip] He now has a good patent attorney working on that. [/snip] Any more info on the patent attorney?

Re: [Vo]:Physics Forums discussion of Rossi with comments by Brian Josephson

Jed sez: ... > Really, there isn't much more we can ask for. Well, I was thinking about that. Maybe when Rossi starts marketing the E-Cat in the United States he should trademark and then rename his energy catalyzer "Mr. Fusion" (I bet Mr. Spielberg wouldn't mind sharing his trademark one bit!)

Re: [Vo]:Physics Forums discussion of Rossi with comments by Brian Josephson

I wrote: > As soon as the test was reported, Crude . . . > Cude. Sorry about that. A spell check error? Freudian slip? Wasn't voice input -- I can't blame that. On the last page he writes: "Would you like to approach Rossi about getting one of his proprietary reactors to me for testing? I have

Re: [Vo]:Physics Forums discussion of Rossi with comments by Brian Josephson

>From Jed: > A well-known skeptic shown up in this discussion. See: > > http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=484427&page=5 > He is intellectually dishonest. He described experiment 1 as follows: ... > He also demands an "independent" test. That was an independent test. > Levi had no con

Re: [Vo]:Physics Forums discussion of Rossi with comments by Brian Josephson

A well-known skeptic shown up in this discussion. See: http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=484427&page=5 He is intellectually dishonest. He described experiment 1 as follows: "Which figures are you questioning? A flow rate of 4.9 g/s water, and a temperature increase of 88 degreesC cor

Re: [Vo]:Physics Forums discussion of Rossi with comments by Brian Josephson

On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > See: > > http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=484427 BJ: By the way, I'm now doing an experimental investigation -- which will happen first, pigs flying, or Nature publishing something relating to the Rossi reactor? ROFL! Thanks fo

[Vo]:Physics Forums discussion of Rossi with comments by Brian Josephson

See: http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=484427