mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
It should be possible to just shut down just the individual reactor that needs
to be maintained, and swap it out. That way the entire setup doesn't need to be
shut down.
I envision them in a tight array, close to one another, each radiating a
lot of heat, like an aut
The plant can be made by many modules each one with its own control
electronics. Each module would be a box with something like 6-10
reactors inside in parallel with just one input for the water and one
output for the steam, fuel included. They would be connected to each
other so that
they can be
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Thu, 5 May 2011 17:54:35 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>If the 2.5 kw unit can only run for 6 months, then having 50 replacement
>sockets wont matter, since after 6 months all 300 modules must ALL be
>replaced.
That depends on how long it takes to swap a module. If the com
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Thu, 5 May 2011 15:32:13 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>With all those hundreds of modules, unless this is done, the reactor will be
>down for maintenance about 90% of the time.
It should be possible to just shut down just the individual reactor that needs
to be maintained,
You will find that the internal heater will be the single point of failure
that can cause a 2.5 kw module to fail and not fuel fatigue. High pressure
hot hydrogen will reek havoc with the high temperature heater element and
erode the element metal quickly. The heater is the weak spot in the Rossi
d
It depends on the kind of reactor you consider. In a CANDU heavy water
reactor, the nuclear fuel can be replaced on-the-fly. This is a big
advantage that the CANDU’s have over the light water nuclear reactor designs
which in my opinion are very poor.
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Jed Rothwe
Axil Axil wrote:
System modularity is a very old and accepted way to configure a
system. Power reactors must be highly reliable and modularity is how
you do it.
On the other hand, you do not remove and replace one fire tube or one
fission reactor rod at a time, without turning off the whol
System modularity is a very old and accepted way to configure a system.
Power reactors must be highly reliable and modularity is how you do it.
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Man on Bridges wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 5-5-2011 23:20, Jed Rothwell wrote:
>
> Axil Axil wrote:
>
> There is a concep
Jed, hot swapping can be done. I am certain that utilities will not buy a
Lenr reactor or any other type of reactor for that matter that must be
totally replaced in just 6 month.
If the 2.5 kw unit can only run for 6 months, then having 50 replacement
sockets won’t matter, since after 6 months a
Hi,
On 5-5-2011 23:20, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Axil Axil wrote:
There is a concept called “hot swaping” where a module is replaced
without disabling the entire assemblage. . . .
This is how the Rossi reactor should be built where hot swapping of
the small modules is possible.
I do not think
Axil Axil wrote:
There is a concept called “hot swaping” where a module is replaced
without disabling the entire assemblage. . . .
This is how the Rossi reactor should be built where hot swapping of
the small modules is possible.
I do not think hot swapping is practical when the cells are
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Man on Bridges wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 5-5-2011 21:57, Man on Bridges wrote:
>
>> Wow, they are really planning for taking over the energy-market.
>>
>
> Based upon their name it looks like they are really purposely planning to
> create a new type of cataclysm of the c
Hi,
On 5-5-2011 21:57, Man on Bridges wrote:
Wow, they are really planning for taking over the energy-market.
Based upon their name it looks like they are really purposely planning
to create a new type of cataclysm of the current oil-based industry.
With some help of Google I found this inf
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 12:09 PM
In the video, they said they have the 20 kW prototype sewn up and ready to
go. So why on earth is Rossi doing this 1 MW extravaganza!?! - Jed[Hoyt A.
Stearns Jr.] ...
[H
Yes, Defkalion is reportedly fitting out a factory that will be capable
of manufacturing 300,000 units per year. Not the first year, I assume.
These are reportedly 20 kW units, according to the Greek financial press.
- Jed
>From MoB:
>> But, did I hear David from Defkalion say it right, that they are aiming at
>> producing 300.000 units per year?
>>
> Oeps, that should read 300,000 (three hundred thousand)
Not by certain European standards. ;-)
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orion
On 5-5-2011 21:57, Man on Bridges wrote:
But, did I hear David from Defkalion say it right, that they are
aiming at producing 300.000 units per year?
Oeps, that should read 300,000 (three hundred thousand)
Hi,
On 5-5-2011 19:45, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
On 2011-05-03 18:46, Michele Comitini wrote:
www.rainews24.rai.it/canale-tv.php?id=23074
Now available in English:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzL3RIlcwbY
http://www.rainews24.rai.it/it/video.php?id=23096
Cheers,
S.A.
Thanks for the links,
There is a concept called “hot swaping” where a module is replaced without
disabling the entire assemblage.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hot_swapping
A super computer is configured where a computer board or a disk drive is
replaced without disrupting its overall operation.
This is how the
I wrote:
> As I said, it reminds me of those gigantic multi-engined airplanes so
> popular in the 1920s and 30s . . .
>
Here is the classic example of one that actually flew commercially, the
Dornier DO X. Look at the pictures:
http://www.century-of-flight.net/Aviation%20history/coming%20of%20a
The MeV reactor needs years of development. For example, the 2.5 kw module
should be encapsulated in a tube that is replaceable on-the-fly to maximize
reactor availability.
With all those hundreds of modules, unless this is done, the reactor will be
down for maintenance about 90% of the time.
Axil Axil wrote:
The control system for the 1 MeV mature Rossi reactor would be
completely computerized and directed. A SCADA system would monitor the
temperature of the water, reaction vessel, and catalyst on all 300
units. . . .
Such an automated control system would take a year or two t
“the final design for the control system is not in place yet,”
This fact has crossed my mind.
The control system for the 1 MeV mature Rossi reactor would be completely
computerized and directed. A SCADA system would monitor the temperature of
the water, reaction vessel, and catalyst on all 30
Jones Beene wrote:
The further problem for believing the story of 170 mew reactors is that it is
probable that the final design for the control system is not in place yet, AND
he says he is still working on the catalyst, as well. Do you build lots of
units when your final design is not in pla
The last part is a slime-job deluxe. Even in my estimation, being no Rossi
fan-boy, it is disproportionate in emphasis, due to the time delay, and the
possibility of Mafia involvement. I saw the long version, and it may have been
shortened since then.
If they really wanted to slime him so badly
Ridiculous voice over text, but great close-ups!
Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Now available in English:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzL3RIlcwbY
http://www.rainews24.rai.it/it/video.php?id=23096
This is the same video at two different sites.
- Jed
On 2011-05-03 18:46, Michele Comitini wrote:
www.rainews24.rai.it/canale-tv.php?id=23074
Now available in English:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzL3RIlcwbY
http://www.rainews24.rai.it/it/video.php?id=23096
Cheers,
S.A.
Its a bit confusong: Rainews24 is the old name.
Today it is Rainews. It is on my satellite list, Hotbird 6, 10.992 MHz.
--
Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir
belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de
www.rainews24.rai.itit/canale-tv.php?id=23074
29 matches
Mail list logo
