[Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:A competent observer's assessment of Defkalion‏ - Revisited

2012-01-04 Thread Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
, 2012 10:36 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:A competent observer's assessment of Defkalion‏ - Revisited 2012/1/4 Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net Mary Yugo stated, for the millionth time, “A much better theory is that, as Rossi says, they have nothing

Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:A competent observer's assessment of Defkalion‏ - Revisited

2012-01-04 Thread Charles Hope
of this forum, I don’t want to repeat what I have already stated. What part of that don’t you understand? -Mark From: Mary Yugo [mailto:maryyu...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 10:36 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:A competent observer's assessment

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:A competent observer's assessment of Defkalion‏ - Revisited

2012-01-04 Thread Mary Yugo
2012/1/4 Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net Mary Yugo stated/asked, “Same response to the same repetition of absolute nonsense about Rossi and Defkalion. You always seem to object to my response but not to the inanity that spawned it. Why do you think that is?” ** **

[Vo]:RE: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:A competent observer's assessment of Defkalion‏ - Revisited

2012-01-04 Thread Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
to previous postings which have her comments/explanations. -m From: Charles Hope [mailto:lookslikeiwasri...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 11:01 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:A competent observer's assessment of Defkalion‏ - Revisited

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:A competent observer's assessment of Defkalion‏ - Revisited

2012-01-04 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence
On 12-01-04 01:35 PM, Mary Yugo wrote: 2012/1/4 Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net mailto:zeropo...@charter.net Mary Yugo stated, for the millionth time, “A much better theory is that, as Rossi says, they have nothing to show.” Same old tired repetition,