Re: [Vo]:The Ecliptic and Mass Extinctions

2007-05-07 Thread Horace Heffner
On May 6, 2007, at 8:27 AM, Jones Beene wrote: Horace Heffner wrote: The Northern exposure idea would require a full galactic N-S traversal (bobbing up and down) period, or about 130-200 M years, while the period between extinctions is often roughly half that. Hmmm ...Are you reading

Re: [Vo]:The Ecliptic and Mass Extinctions

2007-05-06 Thread Horace Heffner
On May 5, 2007, at 7:04 PM, Jones Beene wrote: Once upon a time ... it was believed that our sun was paired with a hypothetical companion star, 'Nemesis' which might orbit at a distance of a light year or so. Nemesis was introduced to explain an apparent periodicity in the occurrence of

Re: [Vo]:The Ecliptic and Mass Extinctions

2007-05-06 Thread Michel Jullian
photon pressure as was discussed here some time ago. Michel - Original Message - From: Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2007 5:04 AM Subject: [Vo]:The Ecliptic and Mass Extinctions Once upon a time ... it was believed that our sun

[Vo]:Re:The Ecliptic and Mass Extinctions

2007-05-06 Thread Jones Beene
Michel Jullian wrote: No Jones, the 62My period vertical oscillation superimposed on the horizontal circular orbit of the sun round the galactic center has nothing to do with the inclination of the solar system plane wrt the galactic plane. It is a purely gravitational effect due to the

Re: [Vo]:Re:The Ecliptic and Mass Extinctions

2007-05-06 Thread Terry Blanton
On 5/6/07, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But Michel, the fact that in crossing the galactic plane recently (in cosmological time), there has been no apparent increase in what could be considered 'danger' or hazardous debris impacting earth - doesn't that argue against your conclusion?

Re: [Vo]:The Ecliptic and Mass Extinctions

2007-05-06 Thread Horace Heffner
On May 6, 2007, at 3:15 AM, Michel Jullian wrote: No Jones, the 62My period vertical oscillation superimposed on the horizontal circular orbit of the sun round the galactic center has nothing to do with the inclination of the solar system plane wrt the galactic plane. It is a purely

[Vo]:Re:The Ecliptic and Mass Extinctions

2007-05-06 Thread Michel Jullian
Jones wrote: But Michel, the fact that in crossing the galactic plane recently (in cosmological time), there has been no apparent increase in what could be considered 'danger' or hazardous debris impacting earth - doesn't that argue against your conclusion? I don't think so, crossing the

Re: [Vo]:The Ecliptic and Mass Extinctions

2007-05-06 Thread Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Sun, 6 May 2007 02:41:17 -0800: Hi, [snip] Further, the hypothesis doesn't give a reason the major extinctions start about 600 My ago. I didn't think there was much life around to extinguish prior to 600 MY ago. (Or if there was, then probably mostly

[Vo]:The Ecliptic and Mass Extinctions

2007-05-05 Thread Jones Beene
Once upon a time ... it was believed that our sun was paired with a hypothetical companion star, 'Nemesis' which might orbit at a distance of a light year or so. Nemesis was introduced to explain an apparent periodicity in the occurrence of mass extinctions of around 65 million years. In the