On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 10:40 PM, Rich Murray rmfor...@gmail.com wrote:
This year I have warned that any unknown nuclear physics has to be
immediately and fully explored . . .
And for that, we are extremely grateful.
T
For what it's worth, here are some more speculations on the Rossi-Defkalion
break-up. It explains why the break-up was originated by Rossi, and why
Defkalion failed to resolve the dispute.
I would suggest that Rossi realized that Defkalion's approach would not let
him protect his industrial
Yeah, there's no excess heat, and so no catalyst... nothing going on
but increasingly desperate hot air...
within mutual service, Rich Murray
rmfor...@gmail.com 505-819-7388
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 11:26 PM, pca pierre.carbonne...@gmail.com wrote:
While this would explain much, I'm still
pca pierre.carbonne...@gmail.com wrote:
Deploying one, let alone millions, of Hyperion units in unsecured places
gives plenty of opportunity for competitors to acquire the device and
reverse engineer its secret. Defkalion's attempts to add security within
the Hyperions are not credible.
I wrote:
It's much better for Rossi to have licencee(s) build a few large
electricity-generating units in well-garded places, and sell the electricity
to resellers.
The strategy would not work, and it would not be allowed. It would not work
because security by obscurity for such a
Defkalion believes they will be allowed to distribute these things in Europe
before the devices have been vetted by nuclear experts worldwide and before
there is complete understanding the the reaction. But hasn't Rossi has always
said that mini-eCats will be sold in the US in 2012? (Or was
I'm struggling with my web mailer (zimbra). I couldn't get it it interleave the
original mail and comments. My reply: But hasn't Rossi has always said that
mini-eCats will be sold in the US in 2012? (Or was it that orders would be
taken?). - Original Message -
Jed said: Defkalion
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2011 2:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:more speculations on break-up
pca pierre.carbonne...@gmail.com wrote:
Deploying one, let alone millions, of Hyperion units in unsecured
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2011 2:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:more speculations on break-up
I wrote:
It's much better for Rossi to have licencee(s) build a few large
electricity-generating units
Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
Defkalion believes they will be allowed to distribute these things in
Europe before the devices have been vetted by nuclear experts worldwide and
before there is complete understanding the the reaction.
But hasn't Rossi has always said that mini-eCats will
. Public opinion was against giving women the right to
vote and interracial marriage).
Harry
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2011 2:46:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:more speculations on break-up
I wrote:
It's much better for Rossi to have
Harry Veeder hlvee...@yahoo.com wrote:
Governments and Corporations don't have to over rule public opinion, as
long as they can shape public opinion to suit their own interests. (Noam
Chomosky's concept of manufactured consent).
No one denies that powerful institutions and people with money
Jed, you are right.
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
pca pierre.carbonne...@gmail.com wrote:
Deploying one, let alone millions, of Hyperion units in unsecured places
gives plenty of opportunity for competitors to acquire the device and
reverse
This year I have warned that any unknown nuclear physics has to be
immediately and fully explored, because the world security
implications re weaponry for nations, terrorists, and criminals has to
be quickly assessed and answered practically and effectively
world-wide -- certainly we all have to
14 matches
Mail list logo
