On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 10:40 PM, Rich Murray wrote:
> This year I have warned that any unknown nuclear physics has to be
> immediately and fully explored . . .
And for that, we are extremely grateful.
T
This year I have warned that any unknown nuclear physics has to be
immediately and fully explored, because the world security
implications re weaponry for nations, terrorists, and criminals has to
be quickly assessed and answered practically and effectively
world-wide -- certainly we all have to kn
Jed, you are right.
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> pca wrote:
>
>>
>> Deploying one, let alone millions, of Hyperion units in unsecured places
>> gives plenty of opportunity for competitors to acquire the device and
>> reverse engineer its secret. Defkalion's attempts t
Harry Veeder wrote:
Governments and Corporations don't have to over rule public opinion, as
> long as they can shape public opinion to suit their own interests. (Noam
> Chomosky's concept of manufactured consent).
>
No one denies that powerful institutions and people with money have great
influ
hange. (Eg. Public opinion was against giving women the right to
vote and interracial marriage).
Harry
From: Jed Rothwell
>To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
>Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2011 2:46:34 PM
>Subject: Re: [Vo]:more speculations on break-up
>
>
>I wrote:
>
>
>It's much be
Alan Fletcher wrote:
> Defkalion believes they will be allowed to distribute these things in
> Europe before the devices have been vetted by nuclear experts worldwide and
> before there is complete understanding the the reaction.
>
> But hasn't Rossi has always said that mini-eCats will be sold i
From: Jed Rothwell
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2011 2:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:more speculations on break-up
I wrote:
It's much better for Rossi to have licencee(s) build a few large
electricity-generating units in well-garded p
From: Jed Rothwell
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2011 2:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:more speculations on break-up
pca wrote:
Deploying one, let alone millions, of Hyperion units in unsecured places gives
plenty of opportunity for
I'm struggling with my web mailer (zimbra). I couldn't get it it interleave the
original mail and comments. My reply: But hasn't Rossi has always said that
mini-eCats will be sold in the US in 2012? (Or was it that orders would be
taken?). - Original Message -
Jed said: > > Defkalion bel
> Defkalion believes they will be allowed to distribute these things in Europe
> before the devices have been vetted by nuclear experts worldwide and before
> there is complete understanding the the reaction. But hasn't Rossi has always
> said that mini-eCats will be sold in the US in 2012? (Or
I wrote:
> It's much better for Rossi to have licencee(s) build a few large
>> electricity-generating units in well-garded places, and sell the electricity
>> to resellers.
>>
>
> The strategy would not work, and it would not be allowed. It would not work
> because "security by obscurity" for suc
pca wrote:
> Deploying one, let alone millions, of Hyperion units in unsecured places
> gives plenty of opportunity for competitors to acquire the device and
> reverse engineer its secret. Defkalion's attempts to add security within
> the Hyperions are not credible. It's much better for Rossi
Yeah, there's no excess heat, and so no catalyst... nothing going on
but increasingly desperate hot air...
within mutual service, Rich Murray
rmfor...@gmail.com 505-819-7388
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 11:26 PM, pca wrote:
> While this would explain much, I'm still totally puzzled as to why Ross
For what it's worth, here are some more speculations on the Rossi-Defkalion
break-up. It explains why the break-up was originated by Rossi, and why
Defkalion failed to resolve the dispute.
I would suggest that Rossi realized that Defkalion's approach would not let
him protect his industrial secre
14 matches
Mail list logo
