Re: New search engine

2005-06-18 Thread RC Macaulay
R.C Macaulay wrote.. > Having mentioned in prior posts my interest in "quadratic computing" ( > use of 4 computers rather than 2 ( parallel computing), Stephen Lawrence wrote... >4 computers?  I don't understand. The concept of using 4 computer in quad form rather than parallel. The thought b

Re: New Search Engine

2005-06-17 Thread Jed Rothwell
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: Thinking of this makes me wonder why I haven't read anything about computational cold fusion experiments. There have been no such experiments for two reasons: 1. We still have no clear idea how CF works. The models that do exist are not detailed enough to require a

Re: New Search Engine

2005-06-17 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: For ~ $10,000 you can build a Beowolf cluster in your basement with at least a dozen computers running in parallel (but you'll need some pretty serious air conditioning). Oops -- that's Beow_u_lf, not Beow_o_lf. Like in http://www.beowulf.org/ Thinking of this

Re: New Search Engine

2005-06-17 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence
RC Macaulay wrote: Stephen Lawrence wrote >I'm over at http://www.physicsinsights.org/ The Glue Function is a fascinating study. Did you compose these works Stephen? Thanks; I'm glad you like it! Yes, the words are all mine. The concepts, glue function included, are standard math & physi

Re: New Search Engine

2005-06-16 Thread RC Macaulay
Stephen Lawrence wrote >I'm over at http://www.physicsinsights.org/The Glue Function is a fascinating study. Did you compose these works Stephen? Having mentioned in prior posts my interest in "quadratic computing" ( use of 4 computers rather than 2 ( parallel computing), I am elated to find s

Re: New Search Engine

2005-06-16 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence
Grimer wrote: At 07:18 am 16/06/2005 -0700, you wrote: Is this your homepage, Stephen ? http://www.mimas.ltd.uk/ S.A. Lawrence (1997). Novel active ingredients for skin care formulations. In Active Ingredients Conference Proceedings 1996, pp. 185-189. H. Zoilowsky GmbH. Ooo! I

Re: New Search Engine

2005-06-16 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence
Jones Beene wrote: - Original Message - From: "Stephen A. Lawrence" I'm puzzled. I checked it out, expecting to find a partly populated database, but the search engine appears to be riding on the Google database. Specifically, it has my site indexed in exactly the same peculiar,

Re: New Search Engine

2005-06-16 Thread Grimer
At 07:18 am 16/06/2005 -0700, you wrote: >- Original Message - >From: "Stephen A. Lawrence" > >> I'm puzzled. I checked it out, expecting to find a partly >> populated database, but the search engine appears to be riding >> on the Google database. Specifically, it has my site indexed i

Re: New Search Engine

2005-06-16 Thread Jones Beene
- Original Message - From: "Stephen A. Lawrence" I'm puzzled. I checked it out, expecting to find a partly populated database, but the search engine appears to be riding on the Google database. Specifically, it has my site indexed in exactly the same peculiar, fragmentary fashion as

Re: New Search Engine

2005-06-16 Thread Terry Blanton
> From: "Stephen A. Lawrence" > So, what's the story -- is this a different front end for Google, or what? Search algorithms are valuable intellectual property not unlike the Prius hybrid algorithm. Do you remember google before it was polluted by commercialism? Anyway, I can't say much more

Re: New Search Engine

2005-06-15 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence
Terry Blanton wrote: Some friends have started: http://www.use.com for the way Google used to be. It's not public yet. Check it out. Feedback welcome. I'm puzzled. I checked it out, expecting to find a partly populated database, but the search engine appears to be riding on the

New Search Engine

2005-06-15 Thread Terry Blanton
Some friends have started: http://www.use.com for the way Google used to be. It's not public yet. Check it out. Feedback welcome.