When the lattice melts or vaporizes, the NAE stored in that portion of the
lattice would according to Ed Storms theory would be removed from heat
production, so the meltdown should be self limiting and terminat. In other
words, when a proportion of the NAE is removed, then the LENR reaction
should
Axil Axil wrote:
Why Peter Gluck is correct about in situ NAE production and Ed Storms is
> wrong. The LENR reaction has produced meltdown conditions where all lattice
> based NAE storage was destroyed and yet the LENR reactor continued to melt
> through lab tables and concrete floors.
>
How do
Why Peter Gluck is correct about in situ NAE production and Ed Storms is
wrong. The LENR reaction has produced meltdown conditions where all lattice
based NAE storage was destroyed and yet the LENR reactor continued to melt
through lab tables and concrete floors.
ERGO, the LENR reaction can exist
ystem is conserved.
> It may be that a strong magnetic is the coupling force that assures that
> the angular momentum is conserved in the production of appropriate EM
> radiation carrying angular momentum away from the remaining coherent system
> before disintegration occurs.
>
> Bob Coo
vortex-l
Sent: Fri, Feb 10, 2017 1:11 am
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Defining the active particle of an LENR runaway
Dave—
I think the reaction time for the mechanism you suggest if too long to explain
the results of the “run-away” phenomena. It seems to me that an entire
coherent system must chang
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 11:41 PM, wrote:
> Jones –
>
>
>
> Good questions and fair to midland conclusions.
>
http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/fair-to-middling.html
Interesting; but, then again, I have always considered myself a cunning
linguist. ;)
Terry
Bob Higgins wrote:
The problem with the phonon is that its wavelength is extremely
short. The attenuation coefficient for waves, in general, is
typically quoted in dB/wavelength; and nature abhors a too small value
for such a number.
Come to think of it, isn't it arguable that wavelength en
DavidMy e-mail is: ahern_br...@msn.com
From: David Roberson
Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2017 9:01 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Defining the active particle of an LENR runaway
Brian,
The Manelas device is an interesting subject that I would
momentum away from the remaining coherent system before
disintegration occurs.
Bob Cook
From: David Roberson
Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2017 6:01 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Defining the active particle of an LENR runaway
Brian,
The Manelas device is an interesting subject that I
structure to come apart—vaporize—as indicated in the
paragraph above.
Bob Cook
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Axil Axil
Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2017 1:35 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Defining the active particle of an LENR runaway
LENR has been found to exist under laser
Jones –
Good questions and fair to midland conclusions.
What was the nature of the reactants in each of the run-away reactions?
--Pd-D, Ni-H, Li involved, Ti involved etc?
Was the size of the likely coherent system in the various cases limited?
Were sharply peaking resonance conditions like
: Brian Ahern
To: vortex-l
Sent: Thu, Feb 9, 2017 6:40 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Defining the active particle of an LENR runaway
David, I like your admission that we are brainstorming. I had several mentors
in the last 20 years. One of them was Henry Kolm, Wayland MA. He was a
co-founder of the
Manelas energy output
> with ferromagnetic ferrite cores is also fascinating and not understood by
> anyone yet.
>
>
> --
> *From:* David Roberson
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 9, 2017 6:12 PM
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo
.
From: David Roberson
Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2017 6:12 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Defining the active particle of an LENR runaway
Bob,
When you mention the attenuation coefficient for waves I think it should be
pointed out that the original
-Original Message-
From: Bob Higgins
To: vortex-l
Sent: Thu, Feb 9, 2017 3:37 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Defining the active particle of an LENR runaway
The problem with the phonon is that its wavelength is extremely short. The
attenuation coefficient for waves, in general, is
LENR has been found to exist under laser irradiation of gold nanoparticles
in a colloidal suspension of thorium salts.
The nanoparticles are far to small to support any lattice vibration, but
they can support subwavelength EMF.
Initiation of nuclear reactions under laser irradiation of Au nanopar
The problem with the phonon is that its wavelength is extremely short. The
attenuation coefficient for waves, in general, is typically quoted in
dB/wavelength; and nature abhors a too small value for such a number.
Hence you only have to propagate a limited number of wavelengths and the
energy in
17 matches
Mail list logo
