-Original Message-
From: Steven Krivit [mailto:stev...@newenergytimes.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 10:44 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:First commercial license
Well-timed PR
http://money.cnn.com/video/#/video/news/2008/07/02/news.energyfix.07022008.cnnmoney
No virus
After rereading it, this sounds like an uninformed skeptic posting a sarcastic
comment...
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Mark Iverson [mailto:zeropo...@charter.net]
Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2008 12:20 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:First commercial license
: August 15, 2008 2:26 pm
-Original Message-
From: Steven Krivit [mailto:stev...@newenergytimes.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 10:44 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:First commercial license
Well-timed PR
http://money.cnn.com/video/#/video/news/2008/07/02
- Original Message -
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
Date: Thursday, December 11, 2008 5:42 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:First commercial license
I expect most scientists would say it is not merely theory but a
fact
that hydrogen atoms do not shrink. This, I think we all agree
This is very impressive! I hope it works. As I have often said, it
does seem unlikely that hard-nosed power company engineers would
invest time and money in something like this if it did not work. That
is not proof that it works but it sure is good evidence -- in the
legal, not scientific,
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:43:16 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
This is very impressive! I hope it works. As I have often said, it
does seem unlikely that hard-nosed power company engineers would
invest time and money in something like this if it did not work. That
is not
Jed
I do not think any scientist or engineer will reject or embrace BLP
based on the liberalism of the Huffington Post. That is absurd.
Of course it is absurd!
That is the point of my (apparently failed) attempt at injecting some cynical
humor into the sad situation - i.e. where many
Jones Beene wrote:
Of course it is absurd!
That is the point of my (apparently failed) attempt at injecting
some cynical humor into the sad situation . . .
Shoulda caught that . . . my humor index must be low.
Nearly every scientist rejects it because it violates the theory that
atoms
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Seriously folks! If Estacado Energy Services, Inc. begins generating 250 MW
of electricity, it makes no difference whether it comes from shrinking
hydrogen, shrinking violets, ZPE, or from Mars via a leak from the 14th
Robin wrote:
snip
I think they are anticipating a bit. A real live system where 2/3 of the
energy
needs to be recirculated, just to keep it going, is going to be a real
handful
to engineer if you ask me. If a significant proportion of that recycled
energy
needs to be in the form of electric
Jed Rothwell wrote:
Seriously folks! If Estacado Energy Services, Inc. begins generating 250
MW of electricity,
Just one minor point -- As far as I can tell from the article, the 250
MW number doesn't reflect anyone's plans for actually doing anything.
Rather, it's the power limit in the
Well-timed PR
http://money.cnn.com/video/#/video/news/2008/07/02/news.energyfix.07022008.cnnmoney
At 12:06 PM 12/11/2008, you wrote:
BlackLight Power Inc. today announced its first commercial license
agreement with Estacado Energy Services, Inc. in New Mexico, a
wholly-owned subsidiary of
12 matches
Mail list logo
