In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 12 Aug 2015 21:16:36 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Let me backtrack
If we follow the credo that experiment rules and that
Holmlid appears to be making muons, then the scenario which makes the most
sense could be that SPP are indeed extending the life of cosmic
This is the reason that many physicists are skeptical of Holmlid.
The problem is that plasmons have no real mass, yet can couple with a photon to
create the quasiparticle we call the plasma polariton or SPP, which also has no
rest mass. If SPP have enough energy, perhaps they can convert to
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 9:45 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
Perhaps more to the point, where does the energy come from to create the
muon in
the first place?
I didn't want to be a downer and ask the obvious question as to where the
energy was coming to create muons and pions. ;)
Eric
The Muon comes from the SPP. In the Holmlid paper, the muons increased when
the lights in the lab were turned on. In order to minimize muon production,
the Rydberg matter had to be covered to exclude light.
The sources give a slowly decaying muon signal for several hours and days
after being used
-Original Message-
From: mixent@bigpond
Perhaps more to the point, where does the energy come from to create the
muon in the first place? A muon has a mass of 105.7 MeV. The only nuclear
reaction that can produce that sort of energy in one go is a heavy element
fission reaction. Even if
The SPP can gather energy from two possible sources, the vacuum and fusion.
What proportion of energy can be extracted from each of those sources is
not yet knowable, but that energy could be enough to produce muons.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 1:04 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
From the
Muons, SPP, DDL RPFMuon decay rate is not a constant but is influenced by
various parameters. Spin and angular momentum vectors respectively, associated
with the muon and electron or positron resulting from the decay, respectively,
are coupled in the decay process. In this regard a magnetic
Let me backtrack… If we follow the credo that “experiment rules” and that
Holmlid appears to be “making” muons, then the scenario which makes the most
sense could be that SPP are indeed extending the life of cosmic muons, which
then accumulate – giving the appearance that they are being made.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
D+D + muon → helium-4 + muon (instead of gamma)
… where the fist muon can be a cosmic muon which can catalyze a reaction
and then be rejuvenated, renewed or replaced by the same fusion reaction
that it catalyzes.
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Wed, 12 Aug 2015 21:18:24 -0500:
Hi,
Perhaps more to the point, where does the energy come from to create the muon in
the first place? A muon has a mass of 105.7 MeV. The only nuclear reaction
that can produce that sort of energy in one go is a heavy element
From the Holmlid paper as follows:
This means a total intensity of 1.5 × 109 s−1 sr−1.
That intensity of muon production is too high for the source of muons to be
coming from space..
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 12:52 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
From the Holmlid paper as follows:
Muons forms from decay of pions. There are different pions and ways
of decays but some without gamma, for example Pi+=U`+ neutrino.
The
Pions are involved in nuklear reactions as proton neutron exchange.
_https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pion_
The Muons in Holmlids
measurements may come from
The muon or maybe its father the pion is the connection between physics and
chemistry that typifies LENR. If there is a swarm of pions in and around
the nucleus, nuclear reactions are sure to occur. Pions may be more
pernicious then neutrons in terms of nuclear disruption.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at
13 matches
Mail list logo
