Re: [Vo]:Next customer -- public, NE USA

Way to go Rossi. Congratulations. Bit sad they beat us but then we need Ac kWs. AG On 11/29/2011 11:03 AM, Alan J Fletcher wrote: Andrea Rossi November 28th, 2011 at 6:48 PM

Re: [Vo]:Next customer -- public, NE USA

"visitable by the qualified public" who qualifies? harry On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Alan J Fletcher wrote: > Andrea Rossi > November 28th, 2011 at 6:48 PM November 28th, 2011 at 6:48 PM > > Dear Herb Gills: > Today we sold in the USA a 1 MW plant which will go to a normal Customer. > This

Re: [Vo]:Next customer -- public, NE USA

Harry Veeder wrote: "visitable by the qualified public" > > who qualifies? > My guess is: people who feel at home in equipment rooms with 1 MW reactors. That would not include me. Seriously, as I have often said, engineers and HVAC professionals are who we should depend upon to evaluate this th

Re: [Vo]:Next customer -- public, NE USA

On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Harry Veeder wrote: > > "visitable by the qualified public" >> >> who qualifies? >> > > My guess is: people who feel at home in equipment rooms with 1 MW > reactors. That would not include me. > My guess is nobody who can test it properly a

Re: [Vo]:Next customer -- public, NE USA

My guess is you are very wrong. AG On 11/29/2011 1:05 PM, Mary Yugo wrote: On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Jed Rothwell > wrote: Harry Veeder mailto:hveeder...@gmail.com>> wrote: "visitable by the qualified public" who qualifies?

Re: [Vo]:Next customer -- public, NE USA

On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > My guess is: people who feel at home in equipment rooms with 1 MW reactors. > That would not include me. > Seriously, as I have often said, engineers and HVAC professionals are who we > should depend upon to evaluate this thing. I know severa

Re: [Vo]:Next customer -- public, NE USA

Mary Yugo wrote: > My guess is: people who feel at home in equipment rooms with 1 MW >> reactors. That would not include me. >> > > My guess is nobody who can test it properly and my second guess is that it > won't ever happen anyway. > Everyone who has tested it so far has been eminently quali

Re: [Vo]:Next customer -- public, NE USA

On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Mary Yugo wrote: > > >> My guess is: people who feel at home in equipment rooms with 1 MW >>> reactors. That would not include me. >>> >> >> My guess is nobody who can test it properly and my second guess is that >> it won't ever happen anyw

Re: [Vo]:Next customer -- public, NE USA

Mary Yugo wrote: Well, you see, the problem is that there are many possible errors in their > determinations and they did not do what was need to rule them out. > No, there are not. This is your imagination. If they had said "there is no heat" you would insist this was a bullet-proof test. Afte

Re: [Vo]:Next customer -- public, NE USA

This guy was interested in buying a E-Cat: http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510&cpage=32#comment-118944 Wonder if he is Rossi’s newest customer? AG On 11/29/2011 11:03 AM, Alan J Fletcher wrote: Andrea Ro

Re: [Vo]:Next customer -- public, NE USA

Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote: This guy was interested in buying a E-Cat: http://www.journal-of-nuclear-** > physics.com/?p=510&cpage=32#**comment-118944< > http://www.journal-of-**nuclear-physics.com/?p=510&** > cpage=32#comment-

Re: [Vo]:Next customer -- public, NE USA

NE is like 25% of the US. As you have said, sometime Rossi does mislead. The guy sure seemed interested to get involved at an early stage of the development and I would suggest, from researching Charlie Sutherland, that he would be a good and knowledgeable early adopter. Just what Rossi and the

Re: [Vo]:Next customer -- public, NE USA

Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote: NE is like 25% of the US. But North Carolina is definitely not part of it. This company does not appear to have facilities anywhere else. One source says: Sutherland Products Inc in Mayodan, NC is a private company categorized under Cleaning or Polishing Preparations, N

RE: [Vo]:Next customer -- public, NE USA

Wouldn't that be a hoot if it was good ol Dr. Mills. I hear BLP had to cut back on space heating to save money, and their technology is a little behind schedule, and over budget! :-) -Mark

RE: [Vo]:Next customer -- public, NE USA

Wait a minute... Hey, AussieGuy, is Aussie your first or last name? :-) Can't remember if you've identified yourself to the Vort Collective or not!! Come on, what's good for the goose is good for the gander! Or vice-a-versa... -Mark

Re: [Vo]:Next customer -- public, NE USA

On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Mary Yugo wrote: > > It is true that the tests witnessed by E&K were somewhat sloppy. They > could have used better instrumentation. However, E&K are good scientists > and they understand that no experiment is perfect and that these > instru

Re: [Vo]:Next customer -- public, NE USA

On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint < zeropo...@charter.net> wrote: > Wait a minute... > > Hey, AussieGuy, is Aussie your first or last name? > :-) > > Can't remember if you've identified yourself to the Vort Collective or > not!! > Come on, what's good for the goose is good fo

RE: [Vo]:Next customer -- public, NE USA

On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 20:35 -0800, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint wrote: > Wouldn't that be a hoot if it was good ol Dr. Mills. > > I hear BLP had to cut back on space heating to save money, and their > technology is a little behind schedule, and over budget! > :-) > > -Mark What is their technology? A

Re: [Vo]:Next customer -- public, NE USA

On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Mary Yugo wrote: > > Well, you see, the problem is that there are many possible errors in their >> determinations and they did not do what was need to rule them out. >> > > No, there are not. This is your imagination. > Take away the heat o