managing radiation risk is important, at least for "human factors".
in fact we can easily detect radiation burst much before the radiation get
dangerous, and even before they get above the crazy regulation of today.
(regulation is totally off the reality, ignoring the now multiple proved
threshold
If the released radiation is in the soft x-ray range, like 2KeV detection
will be extremely hard. Even kw of x rays will be stopped by less than
a millimeter of lead. I think it will hardly escape the powder itself.
Did anyone tryto detect that? Takahashi suggested something around that
wavelength
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
>
> As to what is politically expedient for Levi, he'd better think of
>> something. I suspect his career at U of Bologna is going to be curtailed
>> some time soon unless Rossi coughs up some miracle such as $500K and a
>> device to test.
>>
>
Mary Yugo wrote:
> No radioactivity at all has ever been found in any other than the very
> first Rossi experiment and it has been looked for each time.
>
There are several problems with this:
1. Only a few tests of Rossi reactor have been done. We need thousands of
hours in hundreds of labs b
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Mary Yugo wrote:
>
> And by the way, it's expensive.
>>>
>>
>> It is much cheaper than inadvertently irradiating hundreds of thousands
>> of people.
>>
>
> What's wrong with ordinary radiation detectors?
>
>
> You can measure radioacti
FWIW, I use tritium-illuminated sights on my compound bow.
See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tritium_illumination
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 17:48:58 -0500
From: jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:The biological effects of radiation are difficult to quantify
6 matches
Mail list logo
