On 11-12-15 06:19 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:
I don't understand any of that in the slightest. The device as it is
supposed to be would immediately and without any changes be an
excellent heat source. ...
But this is very silly conjecture. If the device worked, which is
very doubtful at this poi
Apparently you don't understand LCOE (Levelized Cost Of Energy)? May I
suggest you do some googling. ALL of the ways we generate energy have an
infinite COP if you take away the energy content of the fuel that you
need to supply to the generator. With some generators such as wind,
solar, tidal,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
>
> Then I suggest you read Christensen and some other books about business.
> Some of these ideas are complicated. You have to do your homework.
>
An amazing new revolutionary technology promising to replace fossil
fuels... but it's useless i
Mary Yugo wrote:
I don't understand any of that in the slightest.
>
Then I suggest you read Christensen and some other books about business.
Some of these ideas are complicated. You have to do your homework.
> The device as it is supposed to be would immediately and without any
> changes be
That is why I'm not fussed about why it works as long as it works and
the LCOE fits my target market. When either Leonardo or DGT announce
their Ac kWh devices, with prices, then we can determine into which
markets these devices can and can not be sold. For any new energy
generation technology,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote:
>
> For the E-Cat or any other LENR generator to make inroads into the global
>> energy generation market, the LCOE per kWh of delivered energy must be
>> lower than from any other comparable energy sources or there i
Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote:
For the E-Cat or any other LENR generator to make inroads into the global
> energy generation market, the LCOE per kWh of delivered energy must be
> lower than from any other comparable energy sources or there is simply no
> market for it.
Yup. That's a key point.
You m
When you feed the output back into the input and there is additional
power to supply energy to an external load, then the COP is infinite as
also occurs in a Fossil or Nuclear plant which also have infinite COPs
if you exclude the energy obtained from the fuel. So claiming a LENR
generator has
by the way the COP=6 is first conservative, but the need is not of
electricity but of heat...
of course today he use electricity because it is easy to control. in fact
it seems that hyperion, and maybe soon e-cat will self sustain quite long.
also as said here, if you can produce electricity, juste
From: robert.leguil...@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:eCat Electric COP : 2
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 11:47:41 -0600
Obviously, you just buy three 1MW reactors, and feed the output of the first to
the inputs of the other two. Voila! COP=4
Simply buy 15 E-Cats, feed 1 into
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
>
>
> I haven't run the numbers, but that seems marginally economical to me. Of
> course, you still get COP 4 of (lower grade) heat out of it, so as a mixed
> system it may be OK.
> **
>
> ** (lenr.qumbu.com -- analyzing the Rossi/Focardi eC
Obviously, you just buy three 1MW reactors, and feed the output of the first to
the inputs of the other two. Voila! COP=4
Simply buy 15 E-Cats, feed 1 into 2, into 4, into 8 and you'll have a COP of
16.
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:39:17 -0800
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
From: a...@well.com
Subje
12 matches
Mail list logo
