The Hydrino Study Group was a group of Mills supporters who spent many years
trying to understand his math and eventually closed down without reaching any
sort of resolution (except converting most of them to skeptics).
BLP spun out a separate company to license Mills revolutionary molecular
m
*From:* Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net ]
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 23, 2014 9:21 PM
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Subject:* RE: [Vo]:Mill's theory behind the hydrino
>
>
> *From:* Mike Carrell
>
> First, BLP is **chemistry**, dealing with electrons, not nuclei
e pieces of the
> new reality which is emerging
>
> Mike Carrell
>
> *From:* Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 23, 2014 9:21 PM
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Subject:* RE: [Vo]:Mill's theory behind the hydrino
>
>
>
>
>
>
Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 9:21 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Mill's theory behind the hydrino
From: Mike Carrell
First, BLP is *chemistry*, dealing with electrons, not nuclei, which
is the province of LENR.
This is Mike’s opinion
l.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 9:21 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Mill's theory behind the hydrino
From: Mike Carrell
First, BLP is *chemistry*, dealing with electrons, not nuclei, which is the
province of LENR.
This is Mike's opinion, and he has follo
s for each case,
just the result. His calculations are verified by an external mathematician.
Mike Carrell
From: Stefan Israelsson Tampe [mailto:stefan.ita...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 2:00 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mill's theory behind the hydri
which it not.
Mike Carrell
From: Stefan Israelsson Tampe [mailto:stefan.ita...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 1:48 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mill's theory behind the hydrino
Hmm,
Actually I'm not entirely after hydrinos, it's the mathemati
From: Mike Carrell
First, BLP is *chemistry*, dealing with electrons, not nuclei, which is the
province of LENR.
This is Mike's opinion, and he has followed BLP as long as any of us.
However, it is not fact. Remember that early on, Mills himself reported
tritium.
For many of u
be a landmark on the path forward.
Mike Carrell
From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 12:33 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mill's theory behind the hydrino
I have a hard time in accepting the way that the hydrino is formed and what
it can
ent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 1:04 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mill's theory behind the hydrino
I think Axil is correct, it is the initial energy burst energizing the
surrounding vacuum component. I perceive dark/vacuum energy to ionize oxygen
in the atmosphere to (O--)
Have you considered setting up a sage calculation sheet on a webserver with
formulas and equations
easy verifiable in the sheet, that would be impressive way to show that the
math works and could be a nice companion to the actual textbook.
/Stefan
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Jeff Driscoll
Hmm,
Actually I'm not entirely after hydrinos, it's the mathematical tool that
Mill's developed that interests me. What if you can use that math to prove
LENR? He does use an elegant way to calculate a lot of chemestry, why not
apply it to condensed matter?
/Stefan
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 6:33
I think Axil is correct, it is the initial energy burst energizing the
surrounding vacuum component. I perceive dark/vacuum energy to ionize
oxygen in the atmosphere to (O--) (or dissolved in water) and as dark
energy decays to protons (2H+) it forms "nascent" H2O.
It appears to me 3-5 megawatts o
I have a hard time in accepting the way that the hydrino is formed and what
it can do. First of all according to the Mills doctrine, hydrogen and/or
water is/are required. But LENR can occur without hydrogen and/or water. We
can produce transmutation in a pure element; say copper or titanium by
exp
From: Stefan Israelsson Tampe
Also if there any serious issues with his math I would like to know, else he
deserves respect, with or without the hydrino.
He is a brilliant thinker, yet the great disappointment in Mills (from most
of us on this forum) has been in is his failure to del
have you looked at my website?
I describe many details of Mills's theory:
http://zhydrogen.com/
Jeff
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <
stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After skimming Mill's book about how he treats the atom physics, I am
> pretty amazed.
16 matches
Mail list logo
