Sorry, I should have said Pu238
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:52 PM, wrote:
> In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 29 Apr 2013 03:24:23 -0400:
> Hi,
> [snip]
> >U232 is highly dangerous stuff. It has an alpha activity that is 10 times
> >that of U238 which is itself also very dangerous.
>
> The
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 29 Apr 2013 03:24:23 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>U232 is highly dangerous stuff. It has an alpha activity that is 10 times
>that of U238 which is itself also very dangerous.
The half life of U232 is 69 years, That of U238 is 4.47 billion years.
U232 is 65 million ti
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> Here is what the NAE really looks like up close – a 3.5 micron cluster that
> gobbles up protons like they were gummy drops …
Whereupon they are chased by solar neutrinos, the ghost particle.
age decay
rate of all the gas present.
Fran
-Original Message-
From: pagnu...@htdconnect.com [mailto:pagnu...@htdconnect.com]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 2:51 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Re: CMNS: just published on my Blog
Francis,
This is an important q
*Experimentally measuring hot spot energy concentration.* In a seminal
Nanoplasmonics paper, the ability of hot spots to concentrate power is
experimentally determined for the first time.
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&sqi=2&ved=0CD4QFjAB&url=http%3A%2
Francis,
This is an important question.
Probably related are Reifenschweiler's observation that tritium decay time
is modulated in Ti-microparticle emulsions. especially when they form
chains, and (if I recall correctly) the notes in Brian Ahern's patent
application that proximity of micro-/nano-
From: David Roberson
Since the reactions appear to have a positive temperature coefficient, I would
guess that the size can be optimized for the best case operation which is
maximum energy release before melting destroys the NAE.
Here is what the NAE really looks like up close
: vortex-l
Sent: Mon, Apr 29, 2013 9:01 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: CMNS: just published on my Blog
On Sunday 4/28 Ed said [snip]The Rossi secret is exposed by these types of
experiments with nanoparticles. He does not use nano-particles. The Ni used is
shown to be near 3 micron in size. [/snip
mailto:peter.gl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 9:17 AM
To: VORTEX
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Re: CMNS: just published on my Blog
Dear Fran,
I wamly recommend you to take in consideration what our
colleague AXIL says, he is stepwise developing the holistic\
view of the phenomena taking place- vi
Terry Blanton wrote:
> I agree and; furthermore, believe that we do not currently possess the
> machines which will be necessary to follow the complex reactions which
> are occurring with LENR. We will need better "eyes".
>
Perhaps that is true. Many breakthroughs did not occur until instrumen
ar 3 micron in
size.
From: Edmund Storms [mailto:stor...@ix.netcom.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2013 9:04 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Edmund Storms
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Re: CMNS: just published on my Blog
Axil, you would make a more useful contribution if you read and used what has
been
U232 is highly dangerous stuff. It has an alpha activity that is 10 times
that of U238 which is itself also very dangerous.
If U232 gets into the air as particles, the particles pop around in the air
like little jets propelled by its own intense alpha activity and it tends
to break apart into smal
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sun, 28 Apr 2013 18:02:15 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>In this experiment, the half-life of 232U in the induced Nanophotonic
>electrical field induced within the influence of the laser field is *5
>milliseconds instead of 69 years.*
>
That should be 5 micro-seconds, not m
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Edmund Storms wrote:
> The light hydrogen system does produce tritium occasionally.
>
> As you might well know, the production of tritium by any nuclear system
would be very problematical, and this is also true for a commercial Ni/H
LENR system.
Tritium is the ban
Axil, you would make a more useful contribution if you read and used
what has been observed.
On Apr 28, 2013, at 6:24 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
The connection between the referenced experiment and the Ni/H
reactor is stronger than you state.
The Ni/H reactor does not produce tritium, it produce
The connection between the referenced experiment and the Ni/H reactor is
stronger than you state.
The Ni/H reactor does not produce tritium, it produces the majority of its
transmutation products as very light elements, and an alpha particle is
helium.
The experiment does not produce gamma radiati
Yes, Axil, radioactive decay can be affected several different ways,
but this is not LENR as normally defined. The discussion involves
creation of helium, tritium, and transmutation using isotopes of
hydrogen without application of extra energy and without significant
radiation being emitte
*Does LENR result from single basic nuclear process that occurs in the same
NAE, or is LENR a collection of independent processes that occur in various
locations in a material, depending on a complex collection of conditions? *
Let us get down to basics. Here is an experiment that shows LENR nucle
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Edmund Storms wrote:
The answer a person makes to this question determines the rest of the
> discussion. Consequently, this conflict in basic belief must be resolved
> before any discussion is possible. I get the impression that a great deal
> of conflict has be
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Edmund Storms wrote:
> OK Peter, let's discuss. I view the LENR process like I would a complex
> machine in which all the parts have a function, but each must work with the
> other parts for the entire machine to work properly.
I agree and; furthermore, believe th
OK Peter, let's discuss. I view the LENR process like I would a
complex machine in which all the parts have a function, but each must
work with the other parts for the entire machine to work properly. No
part can be examined to determine its function without considering how
it relates to e
The enemy of LENR is scientific focus. Development of LENR requires good
knowledge levels in a dozen fields of science and engineering to support
any progress in the subject.
For example, it is unrealistic to ask a chemist to design a car. The
chemist has a focused view of his particular subject c
Dear Ed,
Thank you very much for this bright answer.
It seems to me that in the implicit mode you agree with the idea that CF
has arrived before its time- and this is the reason of its slow and hesitant
development.
For example re understanding of LENR you had sufficient data to work
out your theo
23 matches
Mail list logo
