Re: [Vo]:What will convince Joshua Cude?

2011-02-21 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence
On 02/21/2011 12:39 PM, Peter Gluck wrote: In any case, a test as today's unofficial Bologna test (18 hours 15 KW) Any documentation, or reports by witnesses? Any clear measurements which give substance to the 15 kW number? Did anybody write it up? I'm not sure what an official test would

Re: [Vo]:What will convince Joshua Cude?

2011-02-21 Thread Horace Heffner
On Feb 21, 2011, at 8:47 AM, Joshua Cude wrote: So, we have someone who is not a scientist, who doesn't know that the temperature of steam can exceed 100C at atmospheric pressure, saying that vast majority of people who do science are not scientists. But let's look at scientific progress

Re: [Vo]:What will convince Joshua Cude?

2011-02-21 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence
On 02/21/2011 01:28 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: On 02/21/2011 12:39 PM, Peter Gluck wrote: In any case, a test as today's unofficial Bologna test (18 hours 15 KW) Any documentation, or reports by witnesses? Any clear measurements which give substance to the 15 kW number? Did

Re: [Vo]:What will convince Joshua Cude?

2011-02-21 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence
On 02/21/2011 01:33 PM, Horace Heffner wrote: On Feb 21, 2011, at 8:47 AM, Joshua Cude wrote: [a bunch of sneering jeers directed at Jed] Here specifically is rule 2: 2. NO SNEERING. Ridicule, derision, scoffing, and ad-hominem is banned. Pathological Skepticism is banned (see the

Re: [Vo]:What will convince Joshua Cude?

2011-02-21 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 10:52 AM 2/21/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.coma...@lomaxdesign.com wrote: This discussion has been about the Rossi work, which is based on a secret process, and which is inadequately confirmed . . . I think the confirmation is better than most

Re: [Vo]:What will convince Joshua Cude?

2011-02-21 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 12:47 PM 2/21/2011, Joshua Cude wrote: On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Jed Rothwell mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.comjedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: Cude has added that he is not convinced that nuclear reactions in cold fusion experiments have produced measurable heat. From my point of view

Re: [Vo]:What will convince Joshua Cude?

2011-02-21 Thread Jed Rothwell
Rich Murray wrote: Since 1989... No replication... By independent groups... By associated groups... By the same group, on the scale of days, weeks, years... By the same group with a single device, on the scale of days, weeks, years... That's ridiculous. The bulk Pd-D experiment has been

Re: [Vo]:What will convince Joshua Cude?

2011-02-21 Thread Horace Heffner
On Feb 21, 2011, at 10:09 AM, Rich Murray wrote: Rich, a floating shiny brown anomaly in the punch bowl Agreement at last! 8^) Best regards, Horace Heffner http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/

Re: [Vo]:What will convince Joshua Cude?

2011-02-21 Thread Horace Heffner
On Feb 21, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: On 02/21/2011 01:33 PM, Horace Heffner wrote: On Feb 21, 2011, at 8:47 AM, Joshua Cude wrote: [a bunch of sneering jeers directed at Jed] Here specifically is rule 2: 2. NO SNEERING. Ridicule, derision, scoffing, and ad-hominem

Re: [Vo]:What will convince Joshua Cude?

2011-02-21 Thread Joshua Cude
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.netwrote: On Feb 21, 2011, at 8:47 AM, Joshua Cude wrote: Your faith is irrelevant to the purpose, and as voiced above actually contrary to the stated purpose, of this list. Yes, I am aware that I do not belong here. I

Re: [Vo]:What will convince Joshua Cude?

2011-02-21 Thread Joshua Cude
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote: At 10:33 AM 2/21/2011, Joshua Cude wrote: On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax mailto: a...@lomaxdesign.coma...@lomaxdesign.com wrote: So I'm going to ask, as to cold fusion in general, what

Re: [Vo]:What will convince Joshua Cude?

2011-02-21 Thread Jed Rothwell
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: But Rossi is not a clear confirmation of any prior work, since we don't know what's inside. Sure he is. This is a confirmation of Piantelli and Focardi, and Mills for that matter. We know approximately what is inside: finely divided Ni and two other elements in

Re: [Vo]:What will convince Joshua Cude?

2011-02-21 Thread Joshua Cude
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote: At 12:47 PM 2/21/2011, Joshua Cude wrote: On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Jed Rothwell mailto: jedrothw...@gmail.comjedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: Cude has added that he is not convinced that nuclear reactions

Re: [Vo]:What will convince Joshua Cude?

2011-02-21 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 03:28 PM 2/21/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: But Rossi is not a clear confirmation of any prior work, since we don't know what's inside. Sure he is. This is a confirmation of Piantelli and Focardi, and Mills for that matter. We know approximately what is inside:

Re: [Vo]:What will convince Joshua Cude?

2011-02-21 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 01:41 PM 2/21/2011, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: I don't know about Joshua, but a report of an experiment with no details given sure doesn't convince *me*, but maybe that makes me a pathological skeptic, too, eh? Of course not. That was hyperbole on Jed's part. He might be right, if Joshua

Re: [Vo]:What will convince Joshua Cude?

2011-02-21 Thread Joshua Cude
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote: If you examine what's being published, you don't find an attempt to prove it's real, not lately, anyway. You find, in primary research, reports of phenomena that imply reality, discussion of possible explanations

Re: [Vo]:What will convince Joshua Cude?

2011-02-21 Thread Jed Rothwell
Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote: Given that the experiments are working close to detection limits for helium, a little cognitive bias could explain the correlation. 1. They were not close to the detection limit. 2. As Abd noted, they were blind tests. So it would not be cognitive

Re: [Vo]:What will convince Joshua Cude?

2011-02-21 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence
On 02/21/2011 03:28 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: This was a test without steam (with the Delta-T deliberately well below those achieved last January 14). That's what Celani was looking for. That's good. Good? That's *great*! Is there a paper on it, either present or forthcoming, I hope, I

Re: [Vo]:What will convince Joshua Cude?

2011-02-21 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 03:01 PM 2/21/2011, Joshua Cude wrote: On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.coma...@lomaxdesign.com wrote: At 10:33 AM 2/21/2011, Joshua Cude wrote: On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax

Re: [Vo]:what our post industrial society may look like

2010-08-11 Thread Jed Rothwell
I honestly do not understand much about economics or employment. Accepted theories seem contradictory. For example, economists are always telling us Americans need to save more, then when people save more -- as they are doing now -- economists say we need to spend more to stimulate the

RE: [Vo]:what our post industrial society may look like

2010-08-11 Thread Mike Carrell
...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 6:47 PM To: vortex-L@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:what our post industrial society may look like I wrote: We will have to find a way to give everyone what they need and want with a new kind of economy. Not communism, socialism or capitalism. All three

RE: [Vo]:what our post industrial society may look like

2010-08-11 Thread Jed Rothwell
Mike Carrell wrote: I spent an appreciable fraction of my career in the early days of robotics with mechanization and robotics applications at RCA. Naïve chatter about human-less culture and artificial intelligence overlooks fundamental things. 1] brains are fundamentally different from

Re: [Vo]:what our post industrial society may look like

2010-08-11 Thread Jed Rothwell
Mark Goldes wrote: The Brooklyn Project: see www.aesopinstitute.com includes the statement: That's dot-org, not dot-com. Direct link: http://www.aesopinstitute.org/the-brooklyn-project.html - Jed

Re: [Vo]:what our post industrial society may look like

2010-08-10 Thread Jed Rothwell
I wrote: We will have to find a way to give everyone what they need and want with a new kind of economy. Not communism, socialism or capitalism. All three are ways of allocating human labor, and they would be equally unworkable in a world where human labor is useless. I did not mean to

Re: [Vo]:what our post industrial society may look like

2010-08-10 Thread Mark Goldes
Subject: Re: [Vo]:what our post industrial society may look like I wrote: We will have to find a way to give everyone what they need and want with a new kind of economy. Not communism, socialism or capitalism. All three are ways of allocating human labor, and they would be equally unworkable

Re: [Vo]:what our post industrial society may look like

2010-08-10 Thread fznidarsic
and Johnstown is becoming a town of old people. I do see help wanted signs at, Lows, Panerra Bread, and Lonestar. Frank Z -Original Message- From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com To: vortex-L@eskimo.com Sent: Tue, Aug 10, 2010 6:46 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:what our post

Re: [Vo]:what our post industrial society may look like

2010-08-10 Thread fznidarsic
, 2010 8:18 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:what our post industrial society may look like The Brooklyn Project: see www.aesopinstitute.com includes the statement: “the current economic turmoil is lighting up the huge errors and abuses in the financial system. Correcting these problems at their root could

Re: [Vo]:what our post industrial society may look like

2010-08-10 Thread Mark Goldes
I'm not suggesting any limit would apply to work you choose. Only to work you do not care to do. From: fznidar...@aol.com fznidar...@aol.com To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Tue, August 10, 2010 5:58:41 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:what our post industrial society may

Re: [Vo]:what our post industrial society may look like

2010-08-09 Thread Esa Ruoho
Jones, what is a Mac job? iPoni sent dis message. Esa Ruoho wrote it. On 8 Aug 2010, at 18:57, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote: From: fznidar...@aol.com the end of Mac-jobs, and the end of despair for middle class youth who have no real future.

RE: [Vo]:what our post industrial society may look like

2010-08-09 Thread Jones Beene
From: Esa Ruoho …. what is a Mac job? This is my misspelled version of the entry-level service job in the USA – usually in food service: i.e. McDonalds. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McJob From: John Berry ….Ok, I'm missing something here, how does having robotic factories give

Re: [Vo]:what our post industrial society may look like

2010-08-09 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jones Beene wrote: The new paradigm for a factory job, and there can be tens of millions of this type of job - will be to own, maintain, and supervise a handful of industrial robots 24/7. We can give every worker a personal stake in this by forcing business to give equity stakes to workers

RE: [Vo]:what our post industrial society may look like

2010-08-08 Thread Jones Beene
From: fznidar...@aol.com http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/careers/japans-economic-stagnation-is-crea ting-a-nation-of-lost-youths/19580780/ This is scary, and sadly it is not unlike the way the USA is heading. However, as an optimist I can see that Japan is poised to lead the way

Re: [Vo]:what our post industrial society may look like

2010-08-08 Thread Jed Rothwell
I think this report is accurate. It is in line with reports in the Japanese mass media. Perhaps it is too pessimistic. Mass media reports in both Japan and the U.S. tend to be lurid and they generalize from anecdotal evidence. - Jed

Re: [Vo]:what our post industrial society may look like

2010-08-08 Thread John Berry
Ok, I'm missing something here, how does having robotic factories give people jobs? Oh wait, I know http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFR07vsnWjA On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote: *From:* fznidar...@aol.com

RE: [Vo]:What!! they now feature my work on the pron channel in Russia

2010-05-13 Thread OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
Frank sez: Don't look if it offends you. How did this happen? http://cmex-ok.ru/video/1-ruFNzr7kk/QWxpZW5TY2llbnRpc3QgSW50ZXJ2aWV3IHdpdGgg RnJhbmsgWm5pZGFyc2ljIFBhcnQgMiBvZiAy.html Thanks, Frank! As your interviewer states: This is fascinating stuff, Frank! Perhaps the Russian porn industry

Re: [Vo]:What!! they now feature my work on the pron channel in Russia

2010-05-13 Thread Alexander Hollins
::rolls eyes:: bad pun On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 6:28 AM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson orionwo...@charter.net wrote: Frank sez: Don't look if it offends you. How did this happen? http://cmex-ok.ru/video/1-ruFNzr7kk/QWxpZW5TY2llbnRpc3QgSW50ZXJ2aWV3IHdpdGgg

Re: [Vo]:What!! they now feature my work on the pron channel in Russia

2010-05-13 Thread Alexander Hollins
A better pun would have been, Well, they HAVE been specializing at room temperature fusion for a long time. On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Alexander Hollins alexander.holl...@gmail.com wrote: ::rolls eyes::  bad pun On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 6:28 AM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson

Re: [Vo]:What do the Eartchtech CR-39 results show?

2009-10-27 Thread Horace Heffner
On Oct 27, 2009, at 3:19 AM, Michel Jullian wrote: What they demonstrate, IMHO, is that the SPAWAR pits occur: 1/ when the deposit is dendritic, not when it is spongy, and Which, in view of large etching effects from minor scratching, places into serious question any results in the

Re: [Vo]:What do the Eartchtech CR-39 results show?

2009-10-27 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 07:19 AM 10/27/2009, Michel Jullian wrote: What they demonstrate, IMHO, is that the SPAWAR pits occur: 1/ when the deposit is dendritic, not when it is spongy, and 2/ when the CR-39 chip is in direct contact with the cathode wire, not when a 6 micron mylar is interposed Result 2/ does NOT

Re: [Vo]:what is the use of twitter

2009-09-08 Thread Terry Blanton
Twitter is broadcast texting using an intermediary server to relay your cell phone text messages. It's limited to 140 characters per message, or SMS (short message service) because it uses the data channel your cell phone uses for signalling. Although, due to 3G and now 4th Generation cell

Re: [Vo]:what is the use of twitter

2009-09-08 Thread Alexander Hollins
err, computer, not phone, terminally. On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 7:38 AM, Alexander Hollinsalexander.holl...@gmail.com wrote: it is able to use cell phones, but its not just for cells. many if not most twitterers do so from their phone. On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 6:58 AM, Terry

Re: [Vo]:what is the use of twitter

2009-09-08 Thread Alexander Hollins
it is able to use cell phones, but its not just for cells. many if not most twitterers do so from their phone. On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 6:58 AM, Terry Blantonhohlr...@gmail.com wrote: Twitter is broadcast texting using an intermediary server to relay your cell phone text messages.  It's limited

Re: [Vo]:what is the use of twitter

2009-09-07 Thread Craig Haynie
I have been invited by some cold fusion scientists to join them on Twitter. Why twitter? What is wrong with email? Twitter is much more fluid and dynamic. You really have to try it to see the difference. For instance, Kirsty Alley, the actress, has several thousand followers on Twitter,

Re: [Vo]:what comes out of the stack

2009-06-03 Thread OrionWorks
From Frank: What actually comes out the stack when the scrubber is in use?  (For that matter, *is* there still a stack?) nitrogen Wow! Pretty neat trick! I assume ammonia is being consumed sequestering the CO2. Is that a correct assumption? Is ammonia also being pumped underground? I would

Re: [Vo]:What about that paper Response to DoE?

2009-05-07 Thread Jed Rothwell
Oops. I sent that to the wrong address. However, anyone who would like to help me untangle Mengoli is welcome to contact me. I will send you a copy and you can try to figure this out. - Jed

Re: [Vo]:What about that paper Response to DoE?

2009-05-07 Thread Jed Rothwell
FYI, the Mike in that message is Mike Melich and the Mengoli paper is excellent -- despite the confusing notation -- but I am not allowed to upload it to LENR-CANR.org, because of copyright restrictions. We do not have any Mengoli papers. It is a darn shame. I am thinking of writing a review

Re: [Vo]:What does processed uranium oxide cost?

2009-04-21 Thread Jones Beene
Turns out that yellowcake was an integral part of the banking bomb that brought the vaunted Lehman to its knees.. http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103sid=aVgwamEW_98Irefer=news Hmm. that was metaphorically another kind of 'critical mass' no? IOW 'Leverage' seems to have its own

Re: [Vo]:What does processed uranium oxide cost?

2009-04-20 Thread Terry Blanton
http://www.uraniumseek.com/news/UraniumSeek/1175092156.php The uranium used in nuclear power plants comes in pellets. Typically, a pellet of uranium weighs around seven grams or 0.24 ounces. This pellet is capable of generating as much energy as three and a half barrels of oil. At $60 a barrel,

RE: [Vo]:What happend to our TEC expert?

2008-10-28 Thread Remi Cornwall
It's good but I can do better. I didn't feel the need to comment. -Original Message- From: Jones Beene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 October 2008 21:57 To: vortex Subject: [Vo]:What happend to our TEC expert? There was a time, not to long ago, when Remi was somewhat of a resident

Re: [Vo]:What are the best papers on cold fusion and their web links?

2008-06-14 Thread Jones Beene
--- Edmund Storms wrote: Jeff, I suggest you get a copy of my book The Science of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction available from World Scientific. In addition to Ed's fine book, which is a treasure trove of information - but assuming you want to stick with protium - light water - instead of

Re: [Vo]:What are the best papers on cold fusion and their web links?

2008-06-13 Thread Edmund Storms
Jeff, I suggest you get a copy of my book The Science of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction available from World Scientific. I spent 6 months providing an answer to your question, which is not worth repeating. Ed Jeff Driscoll wrote: What are the best papers in cold fusion and what are the web

Re: [Vo]:What it all means

2007-07-04 Thread Horace Heffner
I say the probability of success is inversely proportional to the hoopla. If you already have a genuine success you don't need the hoopla. Given the amount of hoopla the probability of a genuine success is about nil. This will likely end up as yet another example of bad science. What

Re: [Vo]:what is Cold?

2007-05-09 Thread Terry Blanton
Congratulations, Harry. You have discovered zero point energy (negative temperature). Terry On 5/9/07, Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Cold is normally conceived as a lack of heat or a lack of motion in the case of the kinetic theory of heat. Modern science teaches that cold is not a

RE: [Vo]: What Energy Crisis?

2006-12-31 Thread R Stiffler
With or without 1000 years of reserves, one can only assume that ultimate control of a populace is imminent. Why? Because the information being given out to the people is nothing but doom and gloom. Thinking the sky is falling causes one to run for cover. For one I have been sick and tired of the

Re: [Vo]: What Energy Crisis?

2006-12-31 Thread Jed Rothwell
thomas malloy wrote: Over the past year we have discussed a number of areas which might provide an unlimited source of pollution free energy. Among them are the writings of Hal Puthoff, last week I posted a review of his paper on EVO's . . . These are worthy ideas, but speculative and

Re: [Vo]: What Energy Crisis?

2006-12-31 Thread Jones Beene
GreenFuel's president Dr. Isaac Berzin would also agree that there is no overwhelming energy crisis - but in a different sense. Oy veh! the good doctor doesn't need to drastically inflate petroleum reserves to imaginary levels to make a point, but instead offers the following data on the

Re: [Vo]: What Energy Crisis?

2006-12-31 Thread thomas malloy
R Stiffler wrote: For one I have been sick and tired of the _STUPID_ conservation mantra for many years now. I can sweat thought a shirt a day and freeze my ass of in the winter only to see my bill raise by (so far) 58% per year. Isn't there something fundamentally wrong with what is

Re: [Vo]: What happened?

2006-10-16 Thread Steven Krivit
Yang's going strong, as far as I know...but flying way below the radar. Stringham's probably got something viable but I suspect he's trying to negotiate his fair share of the bucket of gold. I've heard no details from Energetics but they're a wildcard...they have a large and dynamic team and

Re: [Vo]: What is bam BAM Please

2006-07-19 Thread Terry Blanton
He was speaking to John Steck. BAM is what one TV chef says when he kicks it up a notch by adding spices to his recipes. See: http://www.everythingemeril.com/emerilsbambq.html Terry On 7/19/06, john herman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Vo., On 7/19/06, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [Vo]: WHAT is the response? what is the site Puthoff responds

2006-07-03 Thread thomas malloy
john herman wrote: Dear Vo., At a loss here. what is-are the site or sites? What address? What is the response? Thank you, JH On 7/2/06, thomas malloy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I emailed Hal Puthoss the link to the ZPE Energy site which one of you Vortexians

<    1   2   3   4   5   6