Mike Carrell writes:
> Wise remarks from Hoyt. Jed is a programmer, and in his logical world one
> can reverse engineer code, in fact there are programs that will give one a
> good start.
Of course I realize that machines or experiments can be much more difficult
to reverse engineer than software,
Wise remarks from Hoyt. Jed is a programmer, and in his logical world one
can reverse engineer code, in fact there are programs that will give one a
good start. An added note about one of Hoyt's examples:
> Rolls Royce bought the design of an automatic transmission from an
> american company.
> T
On Sun, 4 Jul 2004, Mark Goldes wrote:
> I'm surprised at your rant.
Well, I'm suprised that you're suprised (and I'm also suprised that you're
confident that OU development is just another example of normal inventions
and normal patent procedures.)
> Companies and inventors who have not releas
Steam engines were developed before the science of thermodynamics. In
fact, as I recall,
thermodynamics was a result of the steam engine.
I have worked on several projects where reverse engineering would have
been unlikely.
There are many subtleties of some devices that are almost impossible to
Nick Palmer writes:
> People like Bill and Jed retain their scepticism for a very
> good reason. They have had experience, or have knowledge, of how literally
> hundreds of "free energy" type schemes have worked out.
Yup. Bill's essay is excellent. The Manning book describes many examp
he vortex list.
K.
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 11:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Secrecy for a short time, it might be wise.
Nick Palmer writes:
> engineerable" by a competitor but this is not import
Nick Palmer writes:
> engineerable" by a competitor but this is not important. As long as you keep
> the THEORY behind the construction of the machines secret (unless it would
> be very obvious to infer it from the machines themselves) . . .
The machine would be an expression or embodiment of the t
At 10:08 am 05-07-04 +0100, you wrote:
>Sorry about the capitalisation later on...
>
>Bill Beatty wrote to Mark G
>opinions you express here are a rare lack of good judgement>>
>
>Hi Mark,
> People like Bill and Jed retain their scepticism for a very
>good reason. They have had ex
Sorry about the capitalisation later on...
Bill Beatty wrote to Mark G
<>
Hi Mark,
People like Bill and Jed retain their scepticism for a very
good reason. They have had experience, or have knowledge, of how literally
hundreds of "free energy" type schemes have worked out. They are
p
Dear Bill,
I'm surprised at your rant.
Companies and inventors who have not released results publically have patent
lawyers who understand the law.
I assure you there will be no secrecy on our part once machines are in
production and I believe that will be next year.
There is every intention of
10 matches
Mail list logo
