Hi all,
after reading the book of Beaudette, who clearly investigated better than
me until 2001, I started to ask for any non refuted/addressed critic agains
FP calorimetry, and I will add agains followers.
According to beaudette there is only 4 critics :
- Lewis who claim the cell is not well
better than
me until 2001, I started to ask for any non refuted/addressed critic agains
FP calorimetry, and I will add agains followers.
According to beaudette there is only 4 critics :
- Lewis who claim the cell is not well stirred
- hansen who claim there is huge recombination
- morrison
Foks0904 . foks0...@gmail.com wrote:
I've asked Charles if he'd seen/heard of any new arguments since he wrote
the book (beside Shanahan of course). He said he had seen/heard of none.
I do not know know of any either. However --
* The skeptics stopped paying attention to this field 20 years
After reading Beaudette's book (Excess Heat) I would like to list, details
the critics that were published on LENR calorimetries.
Forget about theory, neutrons, isotopic shifts... just calorimetry.
corrst me if I'm wrong
He talk of 4 critics.
1- Nathan Lewis, who was unable to stirr his cell
: Crass Ignorance and Intellectual
Virtuosity..fortunately. Vortex-L
has the intellectual virtuosity advantage. As for the otre group...grass is
a gentle word.
The research of Rossi has been a great trip.
For the Mindless Rossi critics I also remember the term GIGO.
Life beyond palladium ..sounds
At 06:30 AM 8/11/2011, Jouni Valkonen wrote:
Therefore if someone knows some high impact factor journals that has
published recent could fusion findings, I would appreciate to have
some examples.
See http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Cold_fusion/Recent_sources
This is a list of journal and
From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 3:12:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:How to present arguments against cold fusion critics
At 06:30 AM 8/11/2011, Jouni Valkonen wrote:
Therefore if someone knows some high impact
Thanks great many Abd ul-Rahman and also Jed. I presented devastating
counter-argument to Finnish pseudoskeptics. That Naturwissenschaften
article:
Status of Cold-Fusion (Storms 2010)
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StormsEstatusofcoa.pdf
was something that might be worthy of reading while I find
Hallo!
I have discussed on other forum about cold fusion. I have, however
some problems with arguments, because those critics used very powerful
sounding, but probably false argument, that if cold fusion is real,
why it is published on B-rate scientific journals? I tried to explain
.
It is time to stop the biased, self-defeating practice of labeling and
excluding participation of critics by calling them pathological --
if anyone who chooses to be a prominent player in public discussions
wants to encourage participation by a wide spectrum of motivated,
qualified other players
Jouni Valkonen wrote:
In summary, how do I disproof claim that all cold fusion researchers
are crackpotters and all magazines that publish cold fusion are B-rate
or less journals?
If those are the best arguments your opponent can come up with, they
have lost the debate. There is no point to
Thanks for the posts.
For better or worse, Rossi strikes me as the ultimate micromanager.
Perhaps it part of an engineer's internal makeup - to want to stay in
control of everything, including the purse strings.
I can dig it.
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
On 02/08/2011 08:52 AM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
Thanks for the posts.
For better or worse, Rossi strikes me as the ultimate micromanager.
Perhaps it part of an engineer's internal makeup - to want to stay in
control of everything, including the purse strings.
It's a
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=360#comments
February 7th, 2011 at 6:06 PM
A LOT OF BLOGS ARE SAYING, AMONG INSULTS TO ME, THAT THERE ARE IN THE WORLD
SOME
LOTS OF “COLD FUSION” PROCESSES WHICH WORK PERFECTLY AND WHICH ARE FAR BETTER
THAN THE ONE THAT, MODESTLY, I MADE. GOOD.
This, and other words and actions of Rossi show that he is NOT an idealist.
On the contrary.
Idealist has three opposites: materialist, realist and pragmatist- and Rossi
tries to be these all, it seems.
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Harry Veeder hlvee...@yahoo.com wrote:
Wesley,
The last time I confronted someone who was adamantly opposed to cold fusion
was about a year ago. The playing field was the Amazon reader review
section. This guy posted something that was so viscous, it was actually
entertaining to see how angry the whole cold fusion issue made him.
One way to defuse the hot fusion critics is to point out how close they
are to having a workable plasma rocket. Their skills in plasma
engineering could be so usefully if they stopped banging their head
against the wall of stable fusion breakeven and simply uses cold fusion
powered plasma
.ZPE is real and Pulsed Plasma can tap it - which is covered in my US patent.ChrisWesley Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One way to defuse the hot fusion critics is to point out how close they are to having a workable plasma rocket. Their skills in plasma engineering could be so usefully if they stop
For the past couple of months I have been writing a book titled, Cold
Fusion and the Future. It is based upon some of the articles I wrote in
I.E., comments I have made here, and blue sky speculation by people here
and elsewhere. Soo Seddon has been assisting me as editor.
It is short -- 140
19 matches
Mail list logo
