[Vo]:First video from the October 28th, 1 MW E-Cat test event

Hello group, This is from PESN. Great video quality: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sZHOQ6P-Rw Possibly more coming soon. Cheers, S.A.

Re: [Vo]:ideal client

On 2011-10-28 23:56, Jed Rothwell wrote: Ah! Finally some technical details. That sounds good. Six large heat exchangers sounds like what you would need. Where did you read that? URL please! I read it in one of the latest comments of 22passi Blog user "nemo" here: http://22passi.blogspot.com/

Re: [Vo]:Photos of test report and a spreadsheet

On 2011-10-29 00:23, Sean True wrote: have been posted on Rossi's blog (JONP). Download link in ZIP format: http://db.tt/wu4OLbgk Cheers, S.A.

Re: [Vo]:Photos of test report and a spreadsheet

On 2011-10-29 01:25, Michele Comitini wrote: Take a close look at the dashed words at page 3. You can find the 2 parties involved. One the second one is readable and easy guessing : Leonardocorp. Yes: Leonardo Corporation is the seller, as clearly stated on page 1. Now, as for the customer..

Re: [Vo]:First video from the October 28th, 1 MW E-Cat test event

On 2011-10-28 23:41, Akira Shirakawa wrote: Possibly more coming soon. Two more videos: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGvsuAYLbnA http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rLAdGduQ50A Cheers, S.A.

Re: [Vo]:Spreadsheet author is Manutencoop Facility Management

On 2011-10-29 02:25, Jed Rothwell wrote: An Observant Person points out that the excel spreadsheet found here: http://db.tt/wu4OLbgk . . . has Properties is set to: "Manutencoop Facility Management" Could this be a hint? This likely means that the Excel copy they have is pirated or that it i

Re: [Vo]:Spreadsheet author is Manutencoop Facility Management

On 2011-10-29 02:34, Akira Shirakawa wrote: This likely means that the Excel copy they have is pirated or that it is property of Manutencoop worker cooperative. It's common practice in Italy for small businesses to hire personnel for temporary employment from worker cooperatives. By th

Re: [Vo]:Spreadsheet author is Manutencoop Facility Management

On 2011-10-29 02:48, Jed Rothwell wrote: This company does large facility HVAC as Alan Fletcher pointed out. They are a prime customer for this machine. It does not appear to be a "large, well-known worldwide industrial group", however. Cheers, S.A.

[Vo]:22passi report

Daniele Passerini (22passi) posted a brief non-technical report here (in Italian): http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/10/bologna-28-ottobre-primo-resoconto-del.html He also added a semi-complete list of people present during the event. Oddly, the engineers/consultants of the anonymous customer wer

Re: [Vo]:First video from the October 28th, 1 MW E-Cat test event

On 2011-10-28 23:41, Akira Shirakawa wrote: Hello group, Two more videos by PESN: Andrea Rossi Reports on 1 MW E-Cat Test October 28 2011 Part 1: http://youtu.be/nc5K090SZFg Part 2: http://youtu.be/1UmoBoAcvxg Part 3: [to be uploaded soon] Part 4: [to be uploaded soon] Cheers, S.A.

Re: [Vo]:Daily Mail reports on Rossi's Oct 28 demo.

On 2011-11-03 22:21, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote: www.msnbc.msn.com reports on Rossi's Oct 28 demo. Hagelstein is quoted. All in all, seems to be a fairly positive report. No blatant misinformation or stupid misrepresentations that I could spot. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/ar

Re: [Vo]:Wired UK / Nov 6 - Mills,Crude,Maryugo,Krivit chime in ...

On 2011-11-08 23:10, Alan J Fletcher wrote: Hank Mills v Crude,Maryugo,Krivit in the comments Krivit also posted a comment in today's Physorg.com article on Rossi here: http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-11-rossi-e-cat-customers.html Cheers, S.A.

[Vo]:National Instruments signs to do E-Cat controls

Via PESN: "Today, Leonardo Corporation, led by Andrea Rossi, inventor and developer of the one-megawatt cold fusion E-Cat plant, signed an agreement with National Instruments (NI), to have them make all the instrumentation for the E-Cat plants, which began commercial sales on October 28, foll

Re: [Vo]:National Instruments signs to do E-Cat controls

On 2011-11-11 00:53, Akira Shirakawa wrote: "Today, Leonardo Corporation, led by Andrea Rossi, inventor and developer of the one-megawatt cold fusion E-Cat plant, signed an agreement with National Instruments (NI) By the way, Daniele Passerini (22passi) knew about this partnership since

Re: [Vo]:National Instruments signs to do E-Cat controls

On 2011-11-11 10:59, Daniel Rocha wrote: Do you know whether or Daniele knows who is the secret customer? In case you don't know, can you ask him? I think Daniele knows (quotes about a customer that "cannot be fooled" were from him) but he is definitely not going to reveal who it is before ot

Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

On 2011-11-12 00:34, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote: http://www.leonardo-ecat.com It feels like it's from the '90s. Very amateurish looking. I guess they don't know about modern web content management systems. By the way, it appears that Rossi made an agreement with Hank Mills and Sterling Allan from

Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

On 2011-11-12 00:39, Jouni Valkonen wrote: For me this looks like a bad joke. It is not nice to do a fan page that superficially looks like authentic page. It turns out it's really an official website: * * * http://peswiki.com/index.php/Main_Page Leonardo-ECat.com Official Website Launched -

Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

On 2011-11-12 02:26, Jed Rothwell wrote: [...] You got a problem with retro-looking HTML? You got a problem with old programs, and old programmers? The problem is not only that it's retro-looking (it actually is, however, since this is definitely not an intentional thing), but mainly that it

Re: [Vo]:ECAT.com lunch new website in association with andrea rossi.

On 2011-11-16 21:49, David ledin wrote: look professional http://ecat.com/ This one does look like a proper corporate website. It's also surprisingly informative and it seems it will be regularly updated too on this aspect. Way to go! I wonder if it's Rossi-approved, just to be sure.

Re: [Vo]:ECAT.com lunch new website in association with andrea rossi.

On 2011-11-16 22:57, Peter Heckert wrote: [...] This is not a professional commercial site, regardless if Rossi approves it or not. I see there still are problems. What I meant however is that this one not only looks better than Allan's, but shows the information I'd expect to see in the rig

Re: [Vo]:ECAT.com lunch new website in association with andrea rossi.

On 2011-11-17 00:09, Terry Blanton wrote: I do not think this is AR's web site. Well, it appears it is: http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510&cpage=33#comment-121582 Dear Frank Acland: Yes, it is the website of our North Europe commercial Branch. Warm Regards, A.R. Cheers, S.A.

Re: [Vo]:Stremmenos seems to be upset at U of Bologna

On 2011-11-17 01:32, Mary Yugo wrote: Google translate is difficult -- maybe we have an Italian speaker here? Stremmenos is perplexed at the matters regarding the contract signed between EFA and the University of Bologna, and the pressure the University is receiving from many to rescind from

[Vo]:Interesting *English* article from Focus.it - letter by Celani to Rossi and Rossi's answer

Hello group, I just received this from Google Alerts. Have a read at the latest article from Focus.it on Rossi's E-Cat, in English: Part 1: Where is the E-Cat? http://www.focus.it/scienza/dove-va-l-e-cat-e-la-risposta-di-rossi-alla-proposta-di-celani-1203/where-is-the-e-cat_PC12.aspx Part 2:

[Vo]:Ahern to announce LENR findings on December 7 in New York City

Hello group, The source for this information isn't very well known (Citi5 group?), but the story appears to be true (still, I'd like it to be confirmed by others as well). Brian Ahern of Ames National Laboratory is going to announce his findings and a new theory on LENR in December. Some exc

Re: [Vo]:Ahern to announce LENR findings on December 7 in New York City

On 2011-11-18 04:07, Terry Blanton wrote: Keyword, 'oscillon'. Jones Beene gets credit for the first posting. For those not paying attention: http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg55636.html I see, sorry for the duplicate thread! However, more descriptive thread titles (subject

Re: [Vo]:Ahern to announce LENR findings on December 7 in New York City

On 2011-11-18 04:37, Terry Blanton wrote: Check this link from their main site: http://citi5.org/launch/?p=1833 they are watching us! LOL! I'm quoting the message from the comment section below for the sake of clarity. They're indeed watching! Citi5Fund Moderator 10 hours ago Note to our

Re: [Vo]:Rossi meeted Piantelli, seeking his cooperation?

On 2011-11-20 12:25, Peter Heckert wrote: They write: *2007:* Rossi meets Piantelli and seek its cooperation. He *refuses,* but Rossi associate itself with the Focardi. This is a really important piece of information if confirmed, thanks for sharing. Cheers, S.A.

Re: [Vo]:Help in testing a E-Cat

On 2011-11-20 08:08, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote: I have just emailed Rossi with my interest in purchasing a 100 kW E-Cat plant. [...] Just to be clearer: have you only asked Rossi that you're interested in purchasing an E-Cat plant, or has he already replied back and agreed for a meeting? Cheer

Re: [Vo]:Help in testing a E-Cat

On 2011-11-20 18:07, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote: As I stated, I have sent an introductory and request to purchase a 100 kW plant email to i...@leonardocorp1996.com with details of the existing business structure and the proposed business model. I expect it will take several days to get an initial rep

Re: [Vo]:A new article mostly about Defkalion in Greek

On 2011-11-20 18:30, Jed Rothwell wrote: That looks like one of Piantelli's experiments. Not sure, but I think that's what it is. I think that is a photograph of the very expensive equipment Piantelli uses to make his nickel powder. I remember seeing that somewhere else. Cheers, S.A.

Re: [Vo]:A new article mostly about Defkalion in Greek

On 2011-11-20 18:44, Peter Gluck wrote: The test chamber is indeed very similar to Piantelli's high vacuum installation of Molecular Beam Epitaxy (see my 3rd paper abou Piantelli in my Blog). It looks like the very same one to me: http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2008/29img/PiantelliKnudsenMac

Re: [Vo]:A new article mostly about Defkalion in Greek

On 2011-11-20 19:15, Terry Blanton wrote: Consider the possibility that, having failed in the deal with Rossi, Defkalion made a deal with Piantelli. Interesting speculation. We might know if it's really the case in about two weeks of time (Defkalion GT announcement). It would be a tragicomic

Re: [Vo]:A new article mostly about Defkalion in Greek

On 2011-11-20 19:26, Mary Yugo wrote: Anyone know when the countdown to this event started? Just curious when to look for it. On November 14th DGT announced: "We will release a complete outline of our developments within the next two weeks". http://www.defkalion-energy.com/files/DGT_PRESS

Re: [Vo]:its been great

On 2011-11-21 00:33, Daniel Rocha wrote: Jed, that is NOT possible. He would still see people answering the same things over and over again. What makes MY annoying is not the arguments, but the repetition. But the repetition is not only hers, it is also from whoever answer. So, it won't work just

Re: [Vo]:its been great

On 2011-11-21 00:56, Charles Hope wrote: Agreed. Also, new threads should not be renamed replies to other threads, because some smart email clients are not fooled by subject changes, and the new thread is hidden in the original. I often do this when there's a more or less slight change of to

Re: [Vo]:Rossi replies to my email

On 2011-11-21 02:35, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote: "Dear Sirs, We are selling only 1 MW thermal plants, so far. Warm Regards, A.R." That's too bad. While I do understand what a full order book can do, it is disappointing to say the least. So much for his 100 kW min size offer. May still be doable b

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion did not deny to use Piantelli technology!

On 2011-11-21 12:41, peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote: Ok, its time to spread some new rumours, to avoid boredness: http://www.tovima.gr/files/1/2011/11/18/Piantelli-engine%5B1%5D.jpg Also add, from this article, the information that Rossi sought collaboration with Piantelli in 2007, but in the e

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion did not deny to use Piantelli technology!

On 2011-11-21 12:41, peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote: Ok, its time to spread some new rumours, to avoid boredness: http://www.tovima.gr/files/1/2011/11/18/Piantelli-engine%5B1%5D.jpg http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=508 By the way, it appears that Christos Stremmenos wrot

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion did not deny to use Piantelli technology!

On 2011-11-21 13:54, Daniel Rocha wrote: What did he mean by that? I don't know how should a view that message. In very few words, that he is not happy with what Defkalion GT is doing and has been doing so far. Sorry, this is not really related with the OP regarding a possible Piantelli invol

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion did not deny to use Piantelli technology!

On 2011-11-21 14:10, Daniel Rocha wrote: What I don't really understand is if he is implying that Defkalion "stole" Rossi's invention or if they are just making a scam using Rossi's invention, which means bad publicity. I don't know myself. That's not clear from what he's written in his latest

[Vo]:Open letter from Brian Josephson to Andrea Rossi (Focus.it)

Hello group, Have a read at the latest English article from Focus.it on the E-Cat. This time it's Brian Josephson who's written an open letter to Andrea Rossi: http://bit.ly/josephson-rossi-uk (credits to 22passi for the news: http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/11/lettera-aperta-da-brian-jose

Re: [Vo]:Open letter from Brian Josephson to Andrea Rossi (Focus.it)

On 2011-11-21 18:26, Akira Shirakawa wrote: Hello group, [...] Well, given this answer he just gave a reader on JONP, I doubt he will accept Josephson's suggestion: http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=516&cpage=14#comment-126526 Andrea Rossi November 21st, 2011 at 4:58

Re: [Vo]:Stremmenos comments on Rossi and Deflakion

On 2011-11-22 03:13, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote: http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=516&cpage=14#comment-125963 I posted a clearer version here: http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg56332.html Cheers, S.A.

Re: [Vo]:Stremmenos comments on Rossi and Deflakion

On 2011-11-22 18:43, Mary Yugo wrote: "The poor's lamb can't become a ram". What could that mean? (Sorry if I'm especially dense this morning) Probably that, according to Stremmenos, Defkalion GT don't have the resources (not necessarily economic) to develop an idea into something big and w

[Vo]:Rossi to come to the Massachusetts State House tomorrow

Hello group, This is again via 22passi: http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/11/domani-rossi-alla-state-house-del.html According to Sen. Bruce Tarr, Andrea Rossi, "the Italian scientist who claims to have developed the world's first nuclear cold fusion reactor is coming to the State House tomorro

Re: [Vo]:Re: Randi Video

On 2011-11-22 21:49, Jed Rothwell wrote: [...] because he and others refuse to let me upload photos of his heater that ran for years, Would the photos you mention by any chance be those that can be seen in this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGmgTo2Kw1U At minute 2:11, 3:16, 4:03 ? I

Re: [Vo]:Rossi to come to the Massachusetts State House tomorrow

On 2011-11-22 20:18, Akira Shirakawa wrote: According to Sen. Bruce Tarr [...] This is Sen. Bruce Tarr's blog where probably the story originated: http://www.tarrtalk.com/2011/11/cold-fusion-inventor-comes-to-boston.html According to him, Rossi's already arrived in Boston this m

Re: [Vo]:Rossi to come to the Massachusetts State House tomorrow

On 2011-11-22 20:18, Akira Shirakawa wrote: Hello group, By the way, I wonder if he's met with prof. Hagelstein. A few months ago he wrote this on JONP: "I thank anyway Prof. Peter Hagelstein for his attention. If the MIT is interested to our product, they can buy a plant, an

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion did not deny to use Piantelli technology!

On 2011-11-21 12:41, peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote: Ok, its time to spread some new rumours, to avoid boredness: I just found this on the Facebook Rossi Cold Fusion fan page: Giuliano Bettini On the Defkalion - Piantelli connection. http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/11/domani-rossi-alla-state-h

[Vo]:Andrea Rossi replies to Nobel prize winner Brian Josephson (Focus.it)

Hello group, Here is Rossi's answer to Brian Josephson on an English article from Focus.it. (Brian Josephson joins Francesco Celani's call for further scientific tests of Andrea Rossi's E-Cat, but Rossi has different plans) http://www.focus.it/scienza/ecat-cold-fusion-andrea-rossi-replies-t

Re: [Vo]:Andrea Rossi replies to Nobel prize winner Brian Josephson (Focus.it)

On 2011-11-23 19:51, Mary Yugo wrote: Does anyone still believe that after all the equivocations Rossi is going to produce an E-cat for independent testing anywhere? If so, when? To whom? Anyone think he's going to produce a credible customer with some results? Same question: when? Regardin

Re: [Vo]:Andrea Rossi replies to Nobel prize winner Brian Josephson (Focus.it)

On 2011-11-23 20:06, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint wrote: Akira: Just want to thank you for taking time to monitor what's being said at various websites and then taking time to update the Vort Collective... it is much appreciated! It's not hard work at all - If you know where to look! Cheers, S.A.

Re: [Vo]:Andrea Rossi replies to Nobel prize winner Brian Josephson (Focus.it)

On 2011-11-23 21:15, Alan J Fletcher wrote: Details that do not interest to researchers. "With our equipment we will go in the shed that Rossi makes available to make the measurements - Campari says - will be free and independent measurements to verify whether the system produces a large amount

[Vo]:Short report on Kullander's cold fusion lecture

Hello group, Few know that Sven Kullander of the University of Uppsala today held a lecture on cold fusion in Örebro, Sweden. A person named Hampus Ericsson has made a short, informal report of what happened on the unofficial Andrea Rossi Facebook group page: http://www.facebook.com/EnergyCa

Re: [Vo]:Report on Rossi's visit to Boston

On 2011-11-23 22:31, Jed Rothwell wrote: Someone from Boston just called me to say that Rossi met with Peter Hagelstein at the state capital, and Rossi said exactly what he's been saying all along: I actually had some hope for this meeting. It looks like I'll have to lower my expectations next

Re: [Vo]:New Youtube videos from SRI features a lecture by McKubre

On 2011-11-24 23:47, Mary Yugo wrote: don't know. If someone has time, I'd like to know where the Rossi coverage is. I watched the first video and he promises to give some time to that issue: I've seen these videos a few days ago. They're quite interesting as a whole. I've also found out tha

Re: [Vo]:Andrea Rossi Working with Domenico Fioravanti on Electrical Power from E-Cat

On 2011-11-25 14:50, vorl bek wrote: Since lead melts at 327 Celsius, is there some lead alloy that would keep it solid at 450? I think that, more simply, the reactor core could be surrounded by a jacket made of a metal/alloy of a higher melting temperature, containing lead which would safel

Re: [Vo]:Official 1 MW E-Cat brochure is released

On 2011-11-25 18:00, Jones Beene wrote: I'm 99% certain that Bushnell has not authorized that his name be used for this[...] I was thinking the same. That phrase has also been taken out of context. This brochure lacks substance by the way. There are no complete real photos of the 1MW power pl

Re: [Vo]:bit.ly/cold-fusion

On 2011-11-27 21:52, Peter Gluck wrote: [...] As regarding Transition Metals-H LENR (not only Ni works)... It's interesting to know that not only Ni (in addition to Pd) works. I assume that Fe-H LENRs could be possible, at least in theory; I wonder at what efficiency, compared to Nickel. Che

[Vo]:Defkalion: “We have Rossi’s formula”

Hello group, Have a read at this article posted today on NyTeknik. It's about the backstage of tomorrow's Defkalion Announcement: http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3353181.ece A short excerpt: “Let’s say I have the formula of Rossi, but I’m not saying it officially.

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion: “We have Rossi’s formula”

On 2011-11-29 12:14, Akira Shirakawa wrote: Hello group, For what it's worth, Daniele Passerini on a recent comment in his Blog [1] is saying that when Roy Virgilio denied any relationship between Piantelli and DGT, he answered him privately that according to his sources both do ha

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion: ?We have Rossi?s formula?

On 2011-11-29 13:01, peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote: If this is true they are gangsters and Rossi has my full support. And also at University of Siena they have gangsters, if this is true. I guess if this turns out to be true, Rossi was not wrong about snakes and competitors lurking everywhere,

Re: [Vo]:Uploaded McKubre slides and YouTube links

On 2011-11-29 16:43, Jed Rothwell wrote: A copy of the slides in Acrobat format and a convenient list of the YouTube links are here: http://lenr-canr.org/News.htm Thanks for the slides, I was wondering if they were available somewhere. Cheers, S.A.

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion: “We have Rossi’s formula”

On 2011-11-29 16:46, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: Exactly how do we square this with Rossi's claim that he ran a reactor for *two years*, heating a factory? Perhaps they meant that in self-sustaining mode? Just guessing. Cheers, S.A.

Re: [Vo]:Piantelli's amazing claims

On 2011-11-29 20:38, Jed Rothwell wrote: Original source in Italian: http://www.energeticambiente.it/sistemi-idrogeno-nikel/14742857-novita-cella-piantelli.html Hopefully we will have additional news on Piantelli by Roy Virgilio soon. There were supposed to be some by the second half of Novem

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion: “We have Rossi’s formula”

On 2011-11-29 13:32, Akira Shirakawa wrote: On 2011-11-29 12:14, Akira Shirakawa wrote: Hello group, http://www.energeticambiente.it/sistemi-idrogeno-nikel/14742857-novita-cella-piantelli-5.html#post119273029 Roy Virgilio states again and confirms that there are no agreements between the

Re: [Vo]:Padua University not Siena made the analysis

On 2011-12-01 16:31, Peter Gluck wrote: I was about to write the same post. [...] And Prof. Piantelli is not involved in any way. Prof. Stremmenos too stresses (again) that he is absolutely not involved in this, and hasn't been for quite some time: http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article33

Re: [Vo]:Padua University not Siena made the analysis

On 2011-12-01 17:20, Jones Beene wrote: Tomorrow, when Padua complains, DGT will say that the results came from Genoa instead. No one in their right mind believes Rossi would ever send powder out for testing, especially not to Padua which has a competing program. Actually yes, it happened. I r

Re: [Vo]:Padua University not Siena made the analysis

On 2011-12-01 17:24, Akira Shirakawa wrote: Actually yes, it happened. I remember Sergio Focardi mentioning that in an interview, that's how they found copper in the powder. I think Rossi mentioned that a couple of times as well, earlier this year. Have a look here for example, on p

Re: [Vo]:Rossi clarification on Bianchini

On 2011-12-02 02:38, Giovanni Santostasi wrote: Rossi needs to stop to call himself a Doctor. This is one of the things that shows me how fake he is, exactly as his degree. So, is this degree fake? http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3197200.ece/BINARY/Rossi_degree_University_Milan.pdf Chee

Re: [Vo]:LENR presentation by Dennis Bushnell

On 2011-12-02 22:35, Jed Rothwell wrote: http://www.ecatplanet.net/content.php?123-LENR-Presentation-by-Dennis-Bushnell-Chief-Scientist-NASA-Langley This is very interesting, I wonder if there's the .pdf or .ppt presentation around, or in other words the original source. That must be from t

Re: [Vo]:LENR presentation by Dennis Bushnell

On 2011-12-03 04:25, ecat builder wrote: The original PowerPoint presentation file is available at the same link if you're a registered user of ecatplanet.net. We're starting to add some original content for members. Yes, the text is from the Sept. 22, 2011 GRC LENR conference. I have one more p

Re: [Vo]:translation

On 2011-12-04 16:19, Peter Gluck wrote: Translated in English this is: "you will not see soon working E-cats" Reason- they cannot stop the ... webcam when making confidential operations as mixing pixie dust and aqua Tofana to nickel. Should we believe this? That he doesn't want the general pub

Re: [Vo]:LENR Presentation by Joseph Zawodny, NASA Langley Research Center Edit

On 2011-12-05 01:44, ecat builder wrote: I just posted a slideshow from Dr. Joseph M. Zawodny of NASA Langley Research Center from the September 22 LENR Workshop. http://www.ecatplanet.net/content.php?133-LENR-Presentation-by-Joseph-Zawodny-2011 Its a 35 page PowerPoint presentation that covers

Re: [Vo]:Nasa LENR slides

On 2011-12-05 01:48, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote: http://newenergytimes.com/v2/government/NASA/20110922NASA-Bushnell-GRC-LENR-Workshop.pdf http://newenergytimes.com/v2/government/NASA/20110922NASA-Nelson-GRC-LENR-Workshop.pdf http://newenergytimes.com/v2/government/NASA/20110922NASA-Zawodny-GRC-LENR

[Vo]:Nichenergy-sponsored workshop on LENR?

Hello group, It has come to my attention that the 10th International Workshop on Anomalies in Hydrogen Loaded Metals on April 2012 will be organized by Piantelli and sponsored by Nichenergy srl, a newly founded company representing his investors and which will supposedly manufacture Ni-H devi

Re: [Vo]:a long paper about and mainly against the E-cat

On 2011-12-06 14:44, Peter Gluck wrote: http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2011/12/the_nuclear_physics_of_why_we.php?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ScienceblogsChannelEnvironment+%28ScienceBlogs+Channel+%3A+Environment%29

Re: [Vo]:LENR-CANR Theory Papers

On 2011-12-06 20:15, Alan J Fletcher wrote: I've just finished a marathon multi-day session of skimming through the excellent http://lenr-canr.org library. Good job, but I'll play the devil's advocate by saying that many of them are not peer reviewed papers and because

[Vo]:Brian Ahern Will Not Be Presenting on December 7, 2011

From NextBigFuture: http://nextbigfuture.com/2011/12/brian-ahern-will-not-be-presenting-on.html This is unexpected. Does anybody know why Dr. Brian Ahern won't be presenting his findings on LENR tomorrow as originally planned? Cheers, S.A.

Re: [Vo]:Brian Ahern Will Not Be Presenting on December 7, 2011

On 2011-12-07 01:43, Akira Shirakawa wrote: From NextBigFuture: http://nextbigfuture.com/2011/12/brian-ahern-will-not-be-presenting-on.html This is unexpected. Does anybody know why Dr. Brian Ahern won't be presenting his findings on LENR tomorrow as originally planned? The orga

Re: [Vo]:Brian Ahern presentation with comments

On 2011-12-08 05:53, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote: http://citi5.org/launch/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Energy-Localization-No8-11.ppt It appears you can see the notes only if you DON'T view the slides in "presentation" mode. This might not be possible on all programs that can read this file. For cla

Re: [Vo]:Brian Ahern Will Not Be Presenting on December 7, 2011

On 2011-12-08 04:49, Joshua Cude wrote: Looking at the slides, it's not surprising he bailed. The talk doesn't look finished. Like he never got past the introduction. If you check out presenter slide notes with PowerPoint (not PowerPoint reader) or OpenOffice/LibreOffice, you can get access t

Re: [Vo]:LENR-CANR Theory Papers

On 2011-12-06 20:15, Alan J Fletcher wrote: I've just finished a marathon multi-day session of skimming through the excellent http://lenr-canr.org library. Another link for you. It contains documents not included in http://lenr-canr.org : http://jcfrs.org/pubs.html C

Re: [Vo]:Rossi plans to muzzle the university project for at least a year

On 2011-12-11 18:46, Harry Veeder wrote: Rossi did not even answer the question. lol I think we should now expect Rossi to not "activate" (i.e. pay) his contract with the University of Bologna in January, and see him come out at some point with a [mostly] undisclosed report of an undisclosed

Re: [Vo]:Rossi plans to muzzle the university project for at least a year

On 2011-12-11 19:28, Mary Yugo wrote: [...] Is there any reason to believe anything Defkalion claims at this point? Basing on recently disclosed information, independent testing should occur within the first months of next year. Confidential information at my disposal also leads me to believe

Re: [Vo]:Crowd-funded test? List of pro-LENR scientists

On 2011-12-15 19:08, Jed Rothwell wrote: If you have $1 million burning a hole in your pocket, give it to me that I will have this thing replicated in no time. People such as Miley could replicate most of it in a short time if they had ~$50,000 in funding. Or $5,000. Would he really be able to

Re: [Vo]:LENR and Cold Fusion from a critical logical point of view.

On 2011-12-16 14:49, Peter Heckert wrote: LENR - Low Energy Nuclear Reactions, is this possible? What about LENR - Lattice Enabled Nuclear Reactions? Personally I Like it more than "Low Energy". Cheers, S.A.

Re: [Vo]:e-cat replication by Celani

On 2011-12-16 16:43, David ledin wrote: some of his reactions has exceeded 1400 watts per gram of nickel, which is higher than that of uranium fission in the “cladding” Zirconium. Although Celani you hear talk about “technological reality”, as it has exceeded 200% yield for two weeks. Well, th

Re: [Vo]:Royal Dutch Shell will invest in lenr research

On 2011-12-17 05:10, David ledin wrote: http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/12/16/shells-interest-indicates-major-shift-for-lenr/?utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=NewEnergyTimesBlog In the comments: Steven B. Krivit says: December 17, 2011 at 00:21 Received via e–mail: I ask you take down the

Re: [Vo]:Royal Dutch Shell will invest in lenr research

On 2011-12-17 17:38, Terry Blanton wrote: [...] Me, I wouldn't want to be a part of a group who would have me as a member. :-) Personally I think I would find very interesting to even just read (I don't think I'd even dare trying to post, to be honest!) what's going on there, even if I wou

Re: [Vo]:Miley and other professors can only take money from official sources

On 2011-12-18 17:18, Terry Blanton wrote: It wouldn't hurt to fill out this form: http://www.shell.com/home/content/innovation/innovative_thinking/game_changer/submit_idea/ This might actually be a good idea. By the way, until Krivit leaked that email from the ISCMNS mailing list, I've never

Re: [Vo]:A competent observer's assessment of Defkalion

On 2011-12-20 21:09, Jed Rothwell wrote: The expert has examined the machines and discussed their business plans. He has made an independent in-depth evaluation lasting several days. He Do you mean that this person actually went there an examined the machines in person? Sorry if I'm being pic

[Vo]:US Senate candidate Randy Hekman puts LENR first

Hello group, It looks that Tarr and Romney aren't the only US politicians seemingly open on LENR. From now, you can add to the list Randy Hekman, US Senate candate from Michigan. Have a read at this article from "Cold Fusion Now" blog. It contains an original interview to Hekman. He appears

Re: [Vo]:Celani's Coherence 2011 PowerPoint slides (in Italian)

On 2011-12-21 20:48, Jed Rothwell wrote: http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/CelaniFsviluppodi.pdf Thanks. This has also been posted on 22passi blog some time ago, but it's good to see it on lenr-canr.org as well. By the way, in the last page: Ahern e Rossi lavorano insieme in USA, DoD, progetto

Re: [Vo]:Krivit goes Berserk against "Cold Fusion" research to promote WL theory.

On 2011-12-22 12:08, Daniel Rocha wrote: McKubre's M4 bogus experiment index: http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/McKubreM4/McKubre-Experiment-M4.shtml http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/McKubreM4/20111221ToWhomItMayConcern.shtml In the above link it appears to me that Krivit is not just attacking

Re: [Vo]:Celani replication boosts Rossi patent

On 2011-12-22 14:09, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote: Dear Sterling Allan: The work of Celani (congratulations) shows that in my patent application I gave enough information to allow to an expert to reproduce the effect. What Rossi is implying here is that the information disclosed in his patent applic

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion comments on the "competent observer" visit

On 2011-12-22 16:44, Jed Rothwell wrote: See: http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=4956#p4956 On a side note, speaking of Defkalion GT, while reading E-Cat related comments on a different website I found this image originating from PESN [1]: http://i.imgur.com/lFWUT.gif I

[Vo]:US DoE believes in LENR after all?

Hello group, Have a read at this. I can't tell whether these emails are to be trusted or not (personally I believe they're authentic), but it appears that some individuals in the US Department of Energy believe that LENRs are possible, after all. Might this be a good thing? McKubre recently

Re: [Vo]:We have FPE cells

On 2011-12-26 19:23, Mary Yugo wrote: Want respect, not mention tons of fame and fortune? Close the loop and make them self running except for (rare) refueling. You'd be the first. That's for sure. With a small thermal excess power it's not trivial to close the loop in my opinion. It would

Re: [Vo]:US DoE believes in LENR after all?

On 2011-12-27 02:31, Ahsoka Tano wrote: Looks like it may have been a fake letter. The original site about the September letter has already taken it down: The URL you provided appears to be wrong. This one works: http://coldfusionnow.wordpress.com/2011/09/20/department-of-energy-policy-contin

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >