On Wednesday 24 April 2002 11:11 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 11:04:01PM -0700, Ryan wrote:
The following seems to be happening...
connections to a udp server on nat work fine both ways.
connections to a udp server on bob only work for sending data to bob.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 03:27:54PM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
unfortunately, afaics, debian sid still uses 4.1.0. if anyone knows of
someone packaging a more recent X for debian, i'd like to know about it.
For more explanation about 4.2 and debian see here...
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 11:21:56PM -0700, Ryan wrote:
On Wednesday 24 April 2002 11:11 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 11:04:01PM -0700, Ryan wrote:
The following seems to be happening...
connections to a udp server on nat work fine both ways.
connections to
begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 03:27:54PM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
unfortunately, afaics, debian sid still uses 4.1.0. if anyone knows of
someone packaging a more recent X for debian, i'd like to know about it.
For more explanation about 4.2 and
Well, I've noticed that the demo machine has the following artifact:
- when running the 2.4.18 kernel and
- when the console is in standard VGA 80x25 resolution and
- cursor is in column position 64,
then
a ghost of the cursor appears on line up and in column position 0.
The effect is
Well, after something like 16 months at the same IP, the ISP has
decided to issue a new address to moria so DNS information is
broken, and I'm not going to receive any email until it is fixed...
worse yet if someone acquires the previous address email to me
may begin to bounce.
If anyone
mike,
as always, this was a very informative post! i think i may have
something to add.
begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you send a kill -9 and the process does not die instantly, then
you have a kernel bug... there is no way to block or hide from kill -9.
So you have a
Kai,
I'm going to rearrange some things...
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 09:15:51PM -0700, Kai Harris wrote:
1. the ac97 device driver is being loaded on startup:
Via 686a audio driver 1.9.1
ac97_codec: AC97 Audio codec, id: 0x414c:0x4710 (ALC200/200P)
via82cxxx: board #1 at
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
mike,
as always, this was a very informative post! i think i may have
something to add.
begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you send a kill -9 and the process does not die instantly, then
you have a kernel bug... there is
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 11:05:43AM -0700, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you send a kill -9 and the process does not die instantly, then
you have a kernel bug... there is no way to block or hide from
kill -9.
as you point out, processes in
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 12:36:02PM -0700, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you send a kill -9 and the process does not die instantly, then
you have a kernel bug... there is no way to block or hide from
People interested showing at the demo or who have some favorite pet
applications should speak-up now with what other applications should
be installed.
from an applicable legal disclaimer I've seen recently (quantum.com)
This file contains certain forward-looking
Mark,
thanks for the advice on ALSA. I got that set up and it does work.
On Wednesday 24 April 2002 11:59 pm, you wrote:
I think I setup a Mandrake 8.2 on a system with ac97. Is your machine a
Sony VAIO, slight purplish-silver color with a fold-out cover for the
floppy? Is it a system with
On Thursday 25 April 2002 13:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
People interested showing at the demo or who have some favorite
pet applications should speak-up now with what other applications
should be installed
Just a couple of suggestions:
GnuCash
Evolution
Mozilla 1.0 RC1 (it just
begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 11:05:43AM -0700, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you send a kill -9 and the process does not die instantly, then
you have a kernel bug... there is no way to block or hide from
Mike,
thanks for all the info! however, working on possible kernel bugs and even
driver bugs is WAY over my head! i will submit a bug report to the via8233
driver maintainer though.
i have gotten ALSA up and running thoughi can finally listen to some
music.
Kai
On Thursday 25 April
Hi,
What is the correct syntax to set/change environmental variable in Linux
(RedHat 7.2)?
For example for the variable $DISPLAY, is it xterm -display $DISPLAY
or setenv DISPLAY $DISPLAY? Is there a man page that explains this?
Thanks!
Alfredo
___
(This should really be on VOX, but... whatever :^) )
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 04:03:10PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Overview
Major installed packages include:
- X11 4.1, Gnome, KDE,
- Abiword, Gnumeric, Koffice, Openoffice,
- Mozilla, Konqueror, lynx, links
- Most of
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 11:05:43AM -0700, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
[...]
as you point out, processes in uninterruptable sleep can't be killed
with SIGKILL. the process is put to sleep while the kernel waits for
some event to happen. this corresponds to process status D.
as you point out,
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 09:07:12PM -0700, Ryan wrote:
Blasted thing won't take my password, I tried formating the partition a few
times, didn't help.
Anyone using this wanna share?
Interesting. Do you know what kernel driver is being used? I may know about
it, since I researched
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 01:20:52PM -0700, Rod Roark wrote:
Just a couple of suggestions:
GnuCash
Evolution
done.
Mozilla 1.0 RC1 (it just keeps getting better!)
Mozilla plugins (Flash, Java, audio/video)
0.9.9 is packaged and installed. I'll dig around for 1.0 once
it's
Mike said:
Bill said:
The Gimp ( www.gimp.org )
XMMS ( www.xmms.org )
Some XMMS visualization plug-ins ( )
XVNC [*] ( www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/xvnc.html )
And, if you have time,
Also, what servers are installed? (I assume Apache - what's enabled?
OpenSSH, too, I'm presume. Anything else?)
-bill!
___
vox-tech mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 12:36:02PM -0700, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you send a kill -9 and the process does not die instantly, then
you have a
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 03:10:28PM -0700, Henry House wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 11:05:43AM -0700, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
[...]
as you point out, processes in uninterruptable sleep can't be killed
with SIGKILL. the process is put to sleep while the kernel waits for
some event to
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 03:14:57PM -0700, nbs wrote:
All of them? Cool! Thanks!
Yes, it only takes a few seconds to run apt-cache search on
the packages you mention (to find their true package names) then
do a apt-get install on the list of names.
Asteroids 3D (
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 06:58:19PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
not packaged, or I'm missing it.
No prob.
But when it's not packaged then I'd need to go find the source,
figure out how to compile it and junk, which could take an hour
for each package. ;)
No ... I
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 04:23:30PM -0700, Chris McKenzie wrote:
Also, be aware
of symmetric versus assymetric processes and processes that require you
to have something or know something. Assymetric processes that require
you to have or know something are usually preferred.
Chris,
The
On Wednesday 24 April 2002 11:31 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my bad, I kinda expect a verbose tcpdump...
tcpdump -tteni eth0
-tt switches to a better time format,
-e shows ethernet mac address info
-n doesn't do name/server lookups so it's harder to hide errors.
-i eth0 : you know this
Sure, I wasn't trying to intend a pun, I just mispelled.
ok. I will give you examples for have and know.
Being carded before buying alcohol is a process that requires you to
have ID as opposed to buying anything else in which case it only requires
you to have money. If you don't have it,
begin Chris McKenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sure, I wasn't trying to intend a pun, I just mispelled.
Modern encryption, assymetric processes.
Alright, say I had a very rare piece of software, OpenStep 4.2/i386 and I
wanted to send it to you. However, you live in some remote jungle where
you
Interesting, I never thought about that before. The locking
(and corresponding unlocking) could easily be done by xor'ing
against some string of pseudo-random characters that only
the encryptor knows how to produce.
-- Rod
http://www.sunsetsystems.com/
On Thursday 25 April 2002 07:13 pm,
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Rod Roark wrote:
Interesting, I never thought about that before. The locking
(and corresponding unlocking) could easily be done by xor'ing
against some string of pseudo-random characters that only
the encryptor knows how to produce.
The most advanced encryption
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, ME wrote:
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Rod Roark wrote:
Interesting, I never thought about that before. The locking
(and corresponding unlocking) could easily be done by xor'ing
against some string of pseudo-random characters that only
the encryptor knows how to
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 08:47:34PM -0700, ME wrote:
The most advanced encryption available is found when you use 2XOR
(double-XOR) with your data and the same key.
Like those ebooks! Wait, no that was ROT13
-bill!
___
vox-tech mailing list
[EMAIL
You probably already have this set up on the computer and just forgot to mention it in
the
overview, but the computer needs to act as a DHCP server at Installfests so we can set
up
computers for DHCP networking and not have to wait for two minutes each time as we
restart
computers
On Thursday 25 April 2002 09:43 pm, nbs wrote:
Like those ebooks! Wait, no that was ROT13
not ROT26?
-bill!
___
vox-tech mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
I suggested a similar idea a while back and Peter volunteered me to setup
my laptop has the DHCP server at IFs. I've been to every single one of
the IFs with my DHCP-ready laptop ever since... unless I couldn't make it
for some reason (translation: done it once.)
-Mark
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Ken
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 06:36:47PM -0700, Ryan wrote:
in playing with things some more, I can't get nat to connect to ANY
services on bob...
Cool, based on that last trace one or two things is happening:
- You have no process listing to UDP port 123 on nat
- Your firewall rules on nat
39 matches
Mail list logo
