nt revision of the chapter on Remote Access VPN linked from the
Communitiy wiki:
> http://www.vyatta.com/twiki/bin/view/Community/GlendaleAlpha1
>
>
> - Steve
>
>
> Nathan McBride wrote:
> I see example everywhere on how to setup a site-site vpn. Are there any
> docs on set
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I see example everywhere on how to setup a site-site vpn. Are there any
docs on setting up a vpn that users can connect into using a client?
Is Vyatta capable?
Thanks,
Nate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Usin
> rc script.
>
> Justin
>
> On Feb 5, 2008 4:40 AM, Nathan McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Sorry, but no - Debian Linux under the hood :-)"
> >
> > Ok, and?
> >
> > http://packages.debian.org/etch/linux-igd
> >
> > Na
Hey guys, I finally got my old comp which is running vyatta to now be a
wireless vyatta router. So I can connect my Playstation 3 to the router
and it goes on the network and most things work. However it only has
what playstation calls nat3. This is because it isn't getting all the
ports it need
2008, at 2:00 PM, Jostein Martinsen-Jones wrote:
>
> > Yes, i did change the root password asap!
> >
> > I would much like to see a configuration snippet on how to use
> > rsa-keys.
> > Can I use several rsa-keys so i can login as different users?
> >
&g
> Can I use several rsa-keys so i can login as different users?
>
> 2008/2/4, Nathan McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Yup sure is. I have setup my vyatta router to only allow rsa
> keys.
> Did you change your root password from
Yup sure is. I have setup my vyatta router to only allow rsa keys.
Did you change your root password from 'vyatta'?
Nate
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 18:13 +0100, Jostein Martinsen-Jones wrote:
> Hi
> I am only using ssh. Is it possible to have rsa-keys for all users,
> including vyatta?
> Maybe the at
ls
> Senior Engineer
> Shelton | Johns Technology Group
> A Vyatta Ready Partner
> www.sheltonjohns.com
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jan 29, 2008, at 10:21 PM, Nathan McBride wrote:
>
> > Can't I do another nat rule?
> >
> > On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 22:25 -
ton | Johns Technology Group
> A Vyatta Ready Partner
> www.sheltonjohns.com
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jan 29, 2008, at 10:05 PM, Nathan McBride wrote:
>
> > John just told me he can get to the page too.
> >> From inside the lan I am going to a browser and typing
> > www.no
Hmm, gotcha. I guess that makes sense actually.
I'll see if I can't figure it out.
Nate
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 08:49 +0530, Go Wow wrote:
> Nathan i can even view it, from inside LAN you cannot view it, if i
> remember correctly someone said when you try to enter on NAT'ted ip
> from inside netwo
06 PM, John Mason Jr wrote:
>
> > I just connected and see the Apache 2 test page running on CentOS
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> >
> > Nathan McBride wrote:
> >> First off I appreciate help from everyone, this is a nice change to
> >> some
ace: "eth0"
> protocols: "tcp"
> source {
> network: 0.0.0.0/0
> }
> destination {
> address: 1.2.3.4
> port-name ssh
> }
> inside-address {
>
{
> network: "0.0.0.0/0"
> }
> }
>
> Nate
>
> On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 21:39 -0800, An-Cheng Huang wrote:
> > Hi Nate,
> >
> > The "inside-address" is the internal (private) IP address of your Web
> > server, which
Web server,
> which in your case is 192.168.0.105. The "destination address" should
> actually be the public IP address that outside clients will use to access
> your server, so usually this is the public IP address of your router.
>
> An-Cheng
>
> Nathan McBrid
internal (private) IP address of your Web server,
> which in your case is 192.168.0.105. The "destination address" should
> actually be the public IP address that outside clients will use to access
> your server, so usually this is the public IP address of your router.
>
I went and looked at the old docs. I thought I set them up correctly
but aparently I didn't. I'll im trying to do is to get people on the
internet to view the website on my comp (192.168.0.105). The only
difference that i noticed when I tried to commit the example in the old
docs was that vc3 re
athan it does load from another computer and as far as I know
> masquerading is done when we want to give access of internet to
> internal LAN if this makes sense lol.
>
> On 29/01/2008, Nathan McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, ok. When is masquarading used?
I just made a script to load a firewall with iptables.
I know iptables so until the bug gets fixed I'll just
do it that way. I do have two more questions though.
1). How do I setup 'port-forwarding'. So when you go
through port 80 from the wan it sends it to some ip on
the internal network at
Hmm, ok. Can I just create my full firewall in iptables?
Last time I did that, I changed the default rule for INPUT to DROP
and then added a rule to allow ssh and it didn't seem to work?
Thanks,
Nate
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
can tell, the rule 1 you
> describe below should work properly in version 2.3.1.
>
> - Steve
>
>
> Nathan McBride wrote:
> > So then I probably couldn't view a web page or see my pings because
> > the response packets I was getting were being blocked?
> &
Nate
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 08:05 -0800, Justin Fletcher wrote:
> You shouldn't need the out rule; until a firewall is applied,
> everything is accepted.
> However, the simple rule is protocol any action accept. That should
> do it if you
> want to be thorough :-)
>
>
n Fletcher wrote:
> You shouldn't need the out rule; until a firewall is applied,
> everything is accepted.
> However, the simple rule is protocol any action accept. That should
> do it if you
> want to be thorough :-)
>
> Justin
>
> On Jan 28, 2008 7:28 AM, Nathan
Hey guys,
I just installed Vyatta and have it working. (big step for me)
But I'm having some trouble. I first wanted to know if I should
make the firewall using Vyatta's commands or just iptables?
I tried iptables and it didn't seem to work. I added a rule to allow ssh
but ssh couldn'g go through
23 matches
Mail list logo
