On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 15:35:09 -0500 Gerard Krol
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 05:26:09 -0500 Gerard Krol
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> I'm having no problems with GNA here, but maybe they are
>already
>>> over.
>>>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 05:26:09 -0500 Gerard Krol
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The patch in 835 which is (i think),
pimemode.c:void pie_ScreenFlip(CLEAR_MODE clearMode)
if (screen_GetBackDrop()) { screen_Upload(NULL);}
Is wrong.
On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 05:26:09 -0500 Gerard Krol
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> The patch in 835 which is (i think),
>> pimemode.c:void pie_ScreenFlip(CLEAR_MODE clearMode)
>> if (screen_GetBackDrop()) { screen_Upload(NULL);}
>>
>> Is wrong.
>>
>I don't hope so, tha
On 3/4/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Didn't think of default values... Just used the ?automake? manual (or someone
else's manual on automake, don't remember) which said that it should be done
this way.
So which gcc switches are the issue here? We can define a WZ_CFLAGS_2
for on
Am Sonntag, 4. März 2007 schrieb Per Inge Mathisen:
> On 3/4/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > If ${WZ_FLAGS} are to be able to override the default flags
> > > (for example, -O2), it has to be *after* ${CFLAGS} when we
> > > sum up compiler flags. Otherwise the setting of some f
Am Sonntag, 4. März 2007 schrieb Dennis Schridde:
> Am Sonntag, 4. März 2007 schrieb Dennis Schridde:
> > Author: devurandom
> > Date: Sun Mar 4 14:04:36 2007
> > New Revision: 843
> >
> > URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/warzone?rev=843&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Remove now unneeded binary blob reader.
Am Sonntag, 4. März 2007 schrieb Per Inge Mathisen:
> On 3/4/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Perhaps you could point out the problems the code created on your box...
> >
> > What do you need _GNU_SOURCE for? Maybe we can replace the GNU
> > extension which caused a problem with a
Am Sonntag, 4. März 2007 schrieb Dennis Schridde:
> Am Sonntag, 4. März 2007 schrieb Per Inge Mathisen:
> > On 3/4/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > It can't... At least on compile time it is fixed in one way or the
> > > other. And if eg. 3 is defined to SIGQUIT at compiletime,
Am Sonntag, 4. März 2007 schrieb Per Inge Mathisen:
> On 3/4/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It can't... At least on compile time it is fixed in one way or the other.
> > And if eg. 3 is defined to SIGQUIT at compiletime, it can never change
> > ever thereafter... If a library co
On 3/4/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It can't... At least on compile time it is fixed in one way or the other.
And if eg. 3 is defined to SIGQUIT at compiletime, it can never change ever
thereafter... If a library compiled with SIGQUIT being 3 would communicate
with a program com
Am Sonntag, 4. März 2007 schrieb Per Inge Mathisen:
> By the way, I do not believe the mapping of signal numbers to signal
> symbols (eg SIGSEGV) is mandated to be the same on all systems by a
> standard. So the wz_strsignal()'s array of strings for signal names
> may for all I know be system-speci
Am Sonntag, 4. März 2007 schrieb Per Inge Mathisen:
> On 3/4/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Perhaps you could point out the problems the code created on your box...
> >
> > What do you need _GNU_SOURCE for? Maybe we can replace the GNU
> > extension which caused a problem with a
By the way, I do not believe the mapping of signal numbers to signal
symbols (eg SIGSEGV) is mandated to be the same on all systems by a
standard. So the wz_strsignal()'s array of strings for signal names
may for all I know be system-specific.
- Per
_
On 3/4/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Custom implementation of strsignal, which is a GNU extension.
Can we safely assume a list of signals that is the same for all OSes?
I think you should at least strip out those that are not POSIX, like
SIGWINCH.
See http://www.opengroup.org/
On 3/4/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Perhaps you could point out the problems the code created on your box...
What do you need _GNU_SOURCE for? Maybe we can replace the GNU
extension which caused a problem with a POSIX function... Without knowing
which function this is, I have n
On 3/4/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If ${WZ_FLAGS} are to be able to override the default flags
> (for example, -O2), it has to be *after* ${CFLAGS} when we
> sum up compiler flags. Otherwise the setting of some flags
>
> >from within configure will be rather pointless.
I did
Am Sonntag, 4. März 2007 schrieb Dennis Schridde:
> Author: devurandom
> Date: Sun Mar 4 14:04:36 2007
> New Revision: 843
>
> URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/warzone?rev=843&view=rev
> Log:
> Remove now unneeded binary blob reader.
This of course is the wrong commit message.
Probably caused by th
Am Sonntag, 4. März 2007 schrieb Per I. Mathisen:
> Author: per
> Date: Sun Mar 4 13:35:51 2007
> New Revision: 842
>
> URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/warzone?rev=842&view=rev
> Log:
> Fix includes to make it compile again on my box.
>
> Modified:
> trunk/lib/framework/exceptionhandler.c
Perh
Am Sonntag, 4. März 2007 schrieb Per I. Mathisen:
> Author: per
> Date: Sun Mar 4 13:32:02 2007
> New Revision: 841
>
> URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/warzone?rev=841&view=rev
> Log:
> If ${WZ_FLAGS} are to be able to override the default flags
> (for example, -O2), it has to be *after* ${CFLAGS}
I think the xdg-mail app in http://portland.freedesktop.org/wiki/ is
supposed to solve the problem of how to send email from an
application. But how it could deal with people like me who uses gmail
over http and pine over ssh, I do not know. I doubt it can. I suspect
many today use webmail and sim
Am Sonntag, 4. März 2007 schrieb Christian Ohm:
> On Sunday, 4 March 2007 at 0:22, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
> > On 3/4/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >So what do you think should be done?
> > >Leave it as is (was before my commits) and don't try to automate the
> > >backtrace
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The patch in 835 which is (i think),
pimemode.c:void pie_ScreenFlip(CLEAR_MODE clearMode)
if (screen_GetBackDrop()) { screen_Upload(NULL);}
Is wrong.
I don't hope so, that was my first commit ;)
This breaks shadows & backdrops. You can tell instant at CAM_3A.
22 matches
Mail list logo
