On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 06:56:32PM +0200, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
> I'm a bit out of the loop, I guess, on the git stuff. Are we now all
> using gitorious, or are some people still hanging out at sf.net? If
> gitorious is so horrible, perhaps we should try github? I use that for
> another project
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:44:27AM -0400, buginator wrote:
> The timeline is broken.
>
> When you click on old patches, the diff it shows looks wrong.
>
> Check the patches in this ticket.
> http://developer.wz2100.net/attachment/ticket/2151/
Any specific patches? Because the diff looks right t
.
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 2:20 AM, dak180 wrote:
>> - Log -----
>> commit 10f2bdede638766ed0ea198d750a00af95fbf110
>> Author: Giel van Schijndel
>> Date: Wed Oct 13 00:10:03 2010 +0200
>>
>> scriptfuncs: store (possibly) signed v
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 22:06:52 -0400, buginator wrote:
> On 10/11/10, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
>> However, if you see any other problems with Qt branch, then please
>> put them forward now, here, not hide them away for surprises later
>> that you can drop into a random forum thread.
>
> All the
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 02:52:29PM -0400, buginator wrote:
> In order to prevent confusion, it was discussed that we should leave
> the repo up, but delete everything, and then do 1 commit with a readme
> about the move to git.
If by delete everything you mean 'svn rm' style deletion (i.e. a commi
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 12:03:01PM +0200, Kreuvf wrote:
> buginator wrote:
>> Any thought on how we are going to handle the changelog now that we
>> reference commits by SHA-1 ?
>>
>> We can't really use only the first 8 characters or so to make links
>> like the old r ones.
>> Do we just drop
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 00:42:27 -0400, buginator wrote:
> Trying to upload to gitorious, I did:
> git status
> # On branch pre-3.0
> # Your branch is ahead of 'origin/2.3' by 70 commits.
> git push...
> 'Everything up-to-date'
This will create a new remote branch 'pre-3.0' and push your changes t
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:17:27PM -0400, buginator wrote:
> On 9/28/10, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 5:25 AM, buginator wrote:
>>> On 9/27/10, buginator wrote:
It was said that it would be a good idea to get a CVE.
http://cve.mitre.org/cve/obtain_id.html
>>
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 02:44:35AM -0400, buginator wrote:
> Since we have fairly frequent releases, the builds in Debian stable
> end up being quite old. This also means that Ubuntu will pull in old
> versions, and on down the line.
AFAIK Ubuntu pulls in from Debian testing into their own pre-r
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:10:01AM -0500, Guangcong Luo wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 3:17 AM, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
>> Right, lets do that, or until we get there stuff it in functions, e.g.:
>>> int fixed_mul(int a, int b);
>>> int fixed_div(int a, int b);
&g
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 04:20:26PM +0200, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
>> I would like to propse to add a linear algebra library as a dependency
>> to Warzone. One library I have in mind (and have had good experience
>
Hi all,
I would like to propse to add a linear algebra library as a dependency
to Warzone. One library I have in mind (and have had good experience
with in the past) is Eigen [1].
Having a linear algebra library will eventually be required to be able
to reimplement OpenGL's matrix math (which is
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 07:35:51AM +, Guangcong Luo wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
>> Right, my main point against all that fixed point math is that it
>> disguises the actual math going on by adding loads of shifts and muls
>> on
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 09:03:03AM +0200, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1:42 AM, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
>> Moreover, *why* does it need to be in fixed point?
>
> Did you miss all of the discussion about how the FPU rounds
> differently on some platforms
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 10:24:07PM +0200, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 10:12 PM, wrote:
>> Log Message:
>> ---
>> piematrix: prepare for removal of fixed point math
>
> Careful! I believe some of this math is used for game state, and that
> needs to be in fixed poin
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 22:24:07 +0200, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 22:12, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
>> piematrix: prepare for removal of fixed point math
>
> Careful! I believe some of this math is used for game state, and that
> needs to be in fixed poi
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:44:28AM -0400, Safety0ff wrote:
> On 10-09-18 11:32 AM, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
>> What happens when you remove the "invariant gl_Position;"
>> specification?
>>
>> Also do you know which version of GLSL your drivers are using? I&
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:44:28AM -0400, Safety0ff wrote:
> On 10-09-18 11:32 AM, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
>> What happens when you remove the "invariant gl_Position;"
>> specification?
>>
>> Also do you know which version of GLSL your drivers are using? I&
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:38:54PM -0400, buginator wrote:
> On 9/17/10, muggen...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
>> Revision: 11676
>>
>> vertex shader: don't use deprecated ftransform()
>
> error |10:33:24: [loadShaders] Vertex shader compilation has failed
> [shaders/tcmask.vert]
> error |10
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 22:38:54 -0400, buginator wrote:
> On 9/17/10, muggen...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
>> Revision: 11676
>>
>> vertex shader: don't use deprecated ftransform()
>
> error |10:33:24: [loadShaders] Vertex shader compilation has failed
> [shaders/tcmask.vert]
> error |10:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 08:48:19PM -0400, buginator wrote:
> On 9/16/10, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:06:51PM -0400, buginator wrote:
>>> with novideo.ogg file (which has been in all the release candidates.)
>>> The files are pretty small anyw
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 11:06:50PM +0200, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
>> Considering that most places we use "SDL_opengl.h" we only use it to
>> properly include "gl.h" and "glu.h" we could
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:06:51PM -0400, buginator wrote:
> with novideo.ogg file (which has been in all the release candidates.)
> The files are pretty small anyway, and they won't add that much more
> to the final build.
How small? Please give a number.
--
Giel
--
"Given enough eyeballs, all
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 09:51:38AM +0200, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 9:08 PM, wrote:
>> Log Message:
>> ---
>> Replace #ifdef(APPLE) #include <$path/gl.h> sections with
>> which handles this already
>
> Please do not mess around too much with SDL related stuff,
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:53:06PM +, bugina...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> Revision: 11668
>
> http://warzone2100.svn.sourceforge.net/warzone2100/?rev=11668&view=rev
> Author: buginator
> Date: 2010-09-13 23:53:06 + (Mon, 13 Sep 2010)
>
> Log Message:
> ---
> F
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 03:17:17 -0500, Guangcong Luo wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 3:04 AM, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:36 AM, Zarel wrote:
>>> Log Message:
>>> ---
>>> 2.3: Rebalance 0.8.1:
>>> - Removed Cyclone turret
>>
>> Did you check that Cyclone is never
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 05:31:10PM +0200, Christian Ohm wrote:
> On Tuesday, 14 September 2010 at 11:31, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:56:53AM -0400, buginator wrote:
>>> On 9/13/10, Christian Ohm wrote:
>>>> How about doing 2.3.5.x releases
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:56:53AM -0400, buginator wrote:
> On 9/13/10, Christian Ohm wrote:
>> So how long would this bugfix 2.3 live? Until 2.5 is done, and then
>> 2.4 is fixes only? By what criteria will the jump to 2.5 happen?
>
> I am not really sure what the new criteria will be required
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:30:48 -0400, buginator wrote:
> On 9/13/10, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
>> This however, would require significant changes to the drawing code.
>> Keep in mind that these changes would be required for *pure* OpenGL 3.0
>> as well, with "
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 13:17:09 +0200, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
> I've been looking into modifying the rendering code in such a way that
> it can be used to render on OpenGL ES (ES 2.0+ considering that I only
> have hardware to test that version) enabled devices.
>
>
Hi all,
Long time since I've actually written on this mailing list.
I've been looking into modifying the rendering code in such a way that
it can be used to render on OpenGL ES (ES 2.0+ considering that I only
have hardware to test that version) enabled devices.
This however, would require signi
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 07:11:50PM -0500, buginator wrote:
> On 2/19/10, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
>>
>> None of these ^^ commits are necessary.
>>
>> Using another HOST_TRIPLET than mingw32 can be achieved by specifiying
>> "HOST_TRIPLET=${whatever_
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 11:59:56PM +, bugina...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> Revision: 9641
>
> http://warzone2100.svn.sourceforge.net/warzone2100/?rev=9641&view=rev
> Author: buginator
> Date: 2010-02-05 23:59:55 + (Fri, 05 Feb 2010)
>
> Log Message:
> ---
> Cha
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 04:13:19PM +0100, Kamaze wrote:
> I just saw that the server didn't respond, due to some Bind9 hangup.
> Regarding to munin, Bind9 freezed at 2AM CET. Can you _please_ write an
> e-mail to me next time you may notice such a hangup? This would result
> in somewhat smaller
Got this message from Paul Wise on IRC:
> 16:36 < pabs3> Giel: Debian freezes in March 2100, would be good if
> WRP folks could think about which version they want in stable.
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2009/10/msg2.html
Quoted the release announcement here:
> Hi
>
> Rele
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 12:55:12PM +0200, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Elio Gubser wrote:
>> Afaik we're using the database for multiplayer stats and text stats for
>> campaign. (correct me if i'm wrong)
>
> IIRC it is the other way around.
It is the other way arou
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 11:19:55AM +0200, Kreuvf wrote:
> Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
>>> I don't think units can drive over the rearm pads?
>>
>> I could change that. It makes sense.
>
> Hopefully those ground units don't shoo away the VTOLs then, especially during
> re-arming.
Agreed, provided th
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 11:24:54PM +0200, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:43:35PM -0400, bugs buggy wrote:
>> Can someone who doesn't suffer from GNAitus and has good upstream
>> bandwidth, please add the GPL notice ("COPYING" file?), and a
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:43:35PM -0400, bugs buggy wrote:
> Can someone who doesn't suffer from GNAitus and has good upstream
> bandwidth, please add the GPL notice ("COPYING" file?), and a VERSION
> file (which I guess would be 1.0) inside sequences.wz? We may also
> want to include the full te
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 01:08:08PM -0400, bugs buggy wrote:
> On 5/28/09, Kreuvf wrote:
>> This is even worse considering that wz2100.net to the best of my
>> knowledge is the only mirror for the aforementioned resources and
>> down-times happen. So I propose adding the following to the doc-files
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 10:03:09AM +0200, Dennis Schridde wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 24. Mai 2009 23:40:41 schrieb muggen...@users.sourceforge.net:
>> Revision: 7539
>>
>> http://warzone2100.svn.sourceforge.net/warzone2100/?rev=7539&view=rev
>> Author: muggenhor
>> Date: 2009-05-24 21:40:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 08:58:52PM +, zare...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> Revision: 7027
>
> http://warzone2100.svn.sourceforge.net/warzone2100/?rev=7027&view=rev
> Author: zarelsl
> Date: 2009-04-14 20:58:52 + (Tue, 14 Apr 2009)
>
> Log Message:
> ---
> Commit
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 02:19:08PM +0200, Christian Ohm wrote:
> On Wednesday, 8 April 2009 at 11:46, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
> But I'm not sure if the actual problem is in Mesa, or if Warzone is doing
> something strange with the VBOs. If someone knows some simple example programs
> using VBOs (
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 08:09:19PM +0100, Dennis Schridde wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 15. März 2009 18:15:32 schrieb bugs buggy:
>> Was wondering what port should we change 2.2 to use?
>> 2.0.x was using: (do we still have a 2.0 lobby server?)
>> gameserver_port:
>> masterserver_port: 9998
>> 2.1 is
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 08:17:42PM -0500, bugs buggy wrote:
> On 3/5/09, Zarel wrote:
>> 2009/3/4 Zarel :
>> Just kidding. They're not going to sync intrepid. Apparently, once an
>> Ubuntu version has been released, only "critical bugfixes" and
>> "security patches" are allowed. 2.1-beta4 -> 2.1.1
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 07:49:30PM +0100, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Guangcong Luo wrote:
>> Rebalance 0.2.4 - fixes many balance problems. Changes documented on
>> Warzone Guide - currently available at http://guide.wz2100.net/new/
>
> This will be interesting :-
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 01:26:51PM +0100, Dennis Schridde wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 22. Februar 2009 05:44:03 schrieb Giel van Schijndel:
>> Building of the nightly build failed for revision r6682 [1] when
>> trying to build a debug executable.
>>
>> Attached is the full bu
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:20:33PM +0100, Dennis Schridde wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 19. Februar 2009 22:02:01 schrieb Per Inge Mathisen:
>> Last updated 2008-10-08, seems like nobody is using it. I do not want
>> to update it when nobody else is. And you know I hate dead code.
>
> Go for it.
>
> I
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 07:10:22PM +0100, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
> The code is buggy, and we do not have a process in place to ensure
> that it gets better. I dare say that if the only thing that keeps
> Warzone from sliding from bad to worse in terms of bugs is hard work,
> there is no chance th
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:17:58PM +0100, Dennis Schridde wrote:
> Maybe I may still propose something:
> Move the current code into /dirty/ and selectively pick cleaned files
> from there and move them into a sensible location / directory-layout
> in the main tree.
I propose src/dirty/ instead ;-
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 02:19:28PM +0100, Dennis Schridde wrote:
> Am Samstag, 14. Februar 2009 08:40:30 schrieb Kreuvf:
>> bugs buggy wrote:
>>> Inside the .info file itself would be all the author's name, and
>>> whatever else info the map pack creator wants to put inside it. The
>>> game wouldn'
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:34:07AM -0500, bugs buggy wrote:
> Revision: 6634 --
> [snip]
> - I don't think I screwed up start-at-block-declaration rules for
> MSVC, but given the size of these changes I can't be sure.
> [snip]
> Well you did. Though, at least nobody can say you aren't verbose
>
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 05:34:37AM +0100, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
> Building of the nightly build failed for revision r6617 [1] when
> trying to build a non-debug executable.
Broken by r6613.
--
Giel
signature.asc
Description: Digital sig
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 08:58:11AM +0100, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
>>> It is misleading, though, since it can also be ASSERT_AND_RETURN or
>>> just RETURN, depending on how the program is compiled and how gdb
>&g
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 11:45:11PM +0100, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
> No. There are in fact three places now that the expression result is checked:
> 1) Checking if we should log an error
> 2) The assert()
> 3) The return condition
>
> In my patch I only cache it in the first case for the last case
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 08:49:39PM +0100, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
> I want to define a new macro ASSERT_RETURN(expr, retval, ...) that
> asserts in debug builds, and returns with the given return value in
> non-debug builds. This to make it easier to do the right thing when
> coding, which is to f
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 05:25:45PM +0100, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
>On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 04:32:07PM +, Freddie Witherden wrote:
>>> Most of these failures originate from having too few disk space. I
>>> think the size of trunk (in bytes) has increased causing this e
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 02:07:01AM +0100, buildbot+notif...@kynes.de wrote:
> The Buildbot has detected a new failure of nightly_mingw32 on Warzone 2100:
> Resurrection Project.
> Full details are available at:
> http://build.kynes.de/builders/nightly_mingw32/builds/111
>
> Buildbot URL: http://
et/127
[3] http://developer.wz2100.net/ticket/177
[4] http://developer.wz2100.net/ticket/202
[5] http://svn.gna.org/svn/warzone/tags/2.1.1/ChangeLog
[6] http://wz2100.net/download
--
Best regards,
Giel van Schijndel,
The Warzone 2100 Resurrection Project
signature.asc
Description: Di
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 02:00:01AM +0100, buildbot+notif...@kynes.de wrote:
> The Buildbot has detected a new failure of nightly_mingw32 on Warzone 2100:
> Resurrection Project.
> Full details are available at:
> http://build.kynes.de/builders/nightly_mingw32/builds/105
>
> Buildbot URL: http://
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 08:52:33AM +, Freddie Witherden wrote:
> A week or so ago Giel committed some endian changes which fix several
> bugs on big-endian systems, namely loading and saving games. These fixes
> are very important for PowerPC users (mainly OS X, possibly a few Linux
> users
On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 06:22:40PM +0100, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Dennis Schridde wrote:
> > Can you not just skip asserts in the debugger?
>
> Can you? Ever since the crash handler was added, I always end up in a
> non-skippable abort inside it when trying to s
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 07:02:02PM +0100, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
> 6. Ignore patches, import only bugs.
>
> The list of patches is much, much shorter, and the relevant ones more
> easily ported over by hand. Most of them can probably be closed
> outright.
I'd rather import the closed ones as we
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 08:55:18AM +0100, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 10:54 PM, bugs buggy wrote:
>> Other things I have noticed, is there any reason why we have both
>> bug trackers active? I don't really bother to check GNA anymore,
>> since trac is far superior IMO.
>
>
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 04:32:07PM +, Freddie Witherden wrote:
>> Most of these failures originate from having too few disk space. I
>> think the size of trunk (in bytes) has increased causing this error.
>> Considering that I don't have any more diskspace on this system I'll
>> be disabling my
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 05:42:33AM +0100, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
> Building of the nightly build failed for revision r6527 [1] when
> trying to build a debug executable.
Most of these failures originate from having too few disk space. I think
the size of trunk (in bytes) has increased c
Giel van Schijndel schreef:
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 05:34:40AM +0100, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
>> Building of the nightly build failed for revision r6506 [1] when
>> trying to build a non-debug executable.
>
> Seems the changes to NTW caused this.
> make[3]: **
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 05:34:40AM +0100, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
> Building of the nightly build failed for revision r6506 [1] when
> trying to build a non-debug executable.
Seems the changes to NTW caused this.
make[3]: *** No rule to make target
`../data/mods/multiplay/ntw/multiplay/
On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 05:36:23AM +0100, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
> Building of the nightly build failed for revision r6489 [1] when
> trying to build a non-debug executable.
Seems the changes to NTW caused this.
make[3]: *** No rule to make target
`../data/mods/multiplay/ntw/multiplay/
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 02:08:07AM +0100, buildbot+notif...@kynes.de wrote:
> The Buildbot has detected a new failure of nightly_mingw32 on Warzone 2100:
> Resurrection Project.
> Full details are available at:
> http://build.kynes.de/builders/nightly_mingw32/builds/90
>
> Buildbot URL: http://b
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 09:30:42PM +0100, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
> * Switching languages through the menu, on Mac OSX can cause crashes.
PS This is described in ticket:170 [1].
[1] http://developer.wz2100.net/ticket/170
--
Giel
signature.asc
Description: Digital signat
information we need.)
Download
The source code and all available binaries can be found, as usual, at
the download page [3].
[1] http://developer.wz2100.net/ticket/90
[2] http://svn.gna.org/svn/warzone/tags/2.1.0/ChangeLog
[3] http://www.wz2100.net/download
--
Be
buildbot+notif...@kynes.de schreef:
> The Buildbot has detected a new failure of nightly_mingw32 on Warzone 2100:
> Resurrection Project.
> Full details are available at:
> http://build.kynes.de/builders/nightly_mingw32/builds/83
>
> Buildbot URL: http://build.kynes.de/
>
> Buildslave for this
Giel van Schijndel schreef:
> Building of the nightly build failed for revision r6467 [1] when
> trying to build a non-debug executable.
Fixed.
--
Giel
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Warzone-dev mailing list
Warzo
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 09:29:43PM +0100, Kamaze wrote:
> Windows:
> * Minimal installer: Includes only the base files, with the ability
>to download the Music/Mods while installing, containing a guide
>where people can get (URL) the Music and FMV packages and where
>they have to put/c
Dennis Schridde schreef:
> Am Freitag, 5. Dezember 2008 02:07:03 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> BUILD FAILED: failed compile warnings+1
> +chat_parser.y:760: warning: unused parameter 'msg'
Was that way before, except that it was "hidden" that the variable
wasn't used. I.e. it was used to produce s
Dennis Schridde schreef:
> To the packagers of this release: It would have been nice to inform the
> mailinglist of this event. I think it is even listed on the checklist...
My fault. I sincerely apologise.
--
Giel
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Giel van Schijndel schreef:
> Building of the nightly build failed for revision r6387 [1] when
> trying to build a non-debug executable.
Was a sserver side problem, fixed.
--
Giel
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Warzo
Dennis Schridde schreef:
> Am Montag, 24. November 2008 02:06:06 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> The Buildbot has detected a new failure of nightly_mingw32 on Warzone 2100:
>> Resurrection Project. Full details are available at:
>> http://build.kynes.de/builders/nightly_mingw32/builds/60
>>
>> Build
Warzone 2100 Trac schreef:
> #153: XTnvzutg
> -+--
> Spam ticket here...
>
> ---
Kamaze schreef:
> Kreuvf schrieb:
>> And to me the syntax looks a bit crufty (but I guess it is like that
>> because you have a parser at hand for that).
>
> Uhm, thats "normal" JSON-Syntax. That was something I had in my mind,
> because it supports various datatypes and nesting, as well as arrays.
Giel van Schijndel schreef:
> Building of the nightly build failed for revision r6344 [1] when
> trying to build a non-debug executable.
Fixed in r6346.
--
Giel
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Warzone-dev mailin
Dennis Schridde schreef:
> Am Freitag, 14. November 2008 00:21:01 schrieb Giel van Schijndel:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Considering that we've got one release candidate out for 2.1 already
>> (and a proposal for a second one by me) I'd like to set an (informal?)
>&
Hi all,
Considering that we've got one release candidate out for 2.1 already
(and a proposal for a second one by me) I'd like to set an (informal?)
deadline for releasing 2.1.0. I propose to use 13/14 December 2008 for
this purpose.
--
Giel
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi all,
r6285 [1] broke the networking compatibility with 2.1_rc1 while fixing
out-of-sync issues. Therefore I'd like to release a new release
candidate (2) ASAP.
If no one objects I'd like to push 2.1_rc2 out 22nd or 23rd November 2008.
[1] http://developer.wz2100.net/changeset/6285
--
Giel
Hi all,
After taking a close look at the Trac post commit hook I discovered it
had some missing linefeeds ('\n') causing syntax errors, and in turn
causing it not to work.
So I fixed these problems and now when you commit Trac parses the commit
message as follows (to add notices to tickets):
> It
Giel van Schijndel schreef:
> Building of the nightly build failed for revision r6246 [1] when
> trying to build a non-debug executable.
Fixed.
--
Giel
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Warzone-dev mailing list
Warzo
Dennis Schridde schreef:
> Am Donnerstag, 23. Oktober 2008 07:23:06 schrieb bugs buggy:
>> Also, I think we should do a Release Candidate of 2.1, just in case we
>> missed something.
> Good idea.
>
>> (This is just the current 2.1 branch, no need to create
>> a new RC tag or anything right? )
> P
Dennis Schridde schreef:
> Am Donnerstag, 6. November 2008 01:08:31 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> The Buildbot has detected a new failure of nightly_mingw32 on Warzone 2100:
>> Resurrection Project. Full details are available at:
>> http://build.kynes.de/builders/nightly_mingw32/builds/42
>>
>> Bu
Per I. Mathisen schreef:
> Author: per
> Date: Sun Nov 2 22:07:17 2008
> New Revision: 6241
>
> URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/warzone?rev=6241&view=rev
> Log:
> qwzm: Move conversion functions into their own file. Add TODO messages to
> stdout for stuff that doesn't work.
>
> Modified:
>
Giel van Schijndel schreef:
> Building of the nightly build failed for revision r6235 [1] when
> trying to build a debug executable.
Fixed.
--
Giel
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Warzone-dev mailing list
Warzo
bugs buggy schreef:
> On 10/20/08, Per Inge Mathisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Giel van Schijndel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>> and give the users a choice.
>>
>> Users only want a choice until given a choi
Zarel schreef:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 3:26 AM, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Am Montag, 20. Oktober 2008 01:09:50 schrieb Zarel:
>>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Giel van Schijndel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>>> The o
Giel van Schijndel schreef:
> Building of the nightly build failed for revision r6194 [1] when
> trying to build a non-debug executable.
Fixed.
--
Giel
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Warzone-dev mailing list
Warzo
Elio Gubser schreef:
>> The issues that must be done still:
>> *Disable multi-turret support.
>
> hmm, people (at least me) really love that feature and would hazard the
> consequences (imo and what i've read in the forums)
The only reason for not including/enabling this would be that it "looks
b
Dennis Schridde schreef:
> Am Dienstag, 14. Oktober 2008 20:28:32 schrieb Giel van Schijndel:
>> Author: muggenhor
>> Date: Tue Oct 14 20:28:21 2008
>> New Revision: 6153
>>
>> URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/warzone?rev=6153&view=rev
>> Log:
>> F
Zarel schreef:
> 2008/10/12 Giel van Schijndel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Erm Why does it report failure? The build clearly succeeded... (i.e.
>> [1] and [2] are produced as a result of it).
>>
>> [1]
>> http://warzone.mortis.eu/nightly-builds/warzone21
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
> The Buildbot has detected a new failure of nightly_mingw32 on Warzone 2100:
> Resurrection Project.
> Full details are available at:
> http://build.kynes.de/builders/nightly_mingw32/builds/17
>
> Buildbot URL: http://build.kynes.de/
>
> Buildslave for this Build: i3
Zarel schreef:
>> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Kamaze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I would pretty love to have the ability to rate buildings in game. I
>>> would like them mainly for the sake of base aesthetics, but it would
>>> also make the game play a little bit better.
>
> So. Does anyon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
> The Buildbot has detected a new failure of nightly_mingw32 on Warzone 2100:
> Resurrection Project.
> Full details are available at:
> http://build.kynes.de/builders/nightly_mingw32/builds/12
>
> Buildbot URL: http://build.kynes.de/
>
> Buildslave for this Build: i3
1 - 100 of 721 matches
Mail list logo
