Re: [warzone2100-dev] [Warzone2100-commits] SF.net SVN: warzone2100:[8594] trunk/data/base/images/frontend4.png

2009-12-05 Thread Stephen Swaney
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 02:06:29AM -0600, Zarel wrote: > Are > there any other concerns you have about the text? If you do have > further valid concerns, I'd still be happy to remove the text, it's > just that I currently no longer see any reason to do so. The fact that the text is almost unreada

Re: [warzone2100-dev] [Warzone2100-commits] SF.net SVN: warzone2100:[8594] trunk/data/base/images/frontend4.png

2009-12-05 Thread Kreuvf
Zarel wrote: > Furthermore, Buggy and I both give reasons for leaving the text there, > and I believe I've addressed all of the concerns put forth so far. Are > there any other concerns you have about the text? If you do have > further valid concerns, I'd still be happy to remove the text, it's > j

Re: [warzone2100-dev] [Warzone2100-commits] SF.net SVN: warzone2100:[8594] trunk/data/base/images/frontend4.png

2009-12-05 Thread Zarel
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 1:55 AM, Zarel wrote: > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 1:51 AM, Kreuvf wrote: >> That's good. Now there are at least three people that dislike the idea and >> gave >> reasons for it. So, why not just undo this until you can make it a >> translatable >> string? > > ...fine, but on

Re: [warzone2100-dev] [Warzone2100-commits] SF.net SVN: warzone2100:[8594] trunk/data/base/images/frontend4.png

2009-12-04 Thread Zarel
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 1:51 AM, Kreuvf wrote: > That's good. Now there are at least three people that dislike the idea and > gave > reasons for it. So, why not just undo this until you can make it a > translatable > string? ...fine, but only because you asked so nicely. -Zarel ___

Re: [warzone2100-dev] [Warzone2100-commits] SF.net SVN: warzone2100:[8594] trunk/data/base/images/frontend4.png

2009-12-04 Thread Kreuvf
Zarel wrote: > On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Stephen Swaney wrote: >> This is totally beside the point. Your love of argument is showing. > > Love of argument? More like interest in doing things the right way. :[ That's good. Now there are at least three people that dislike the idea and gave r

Re: [warzone2100-dev] [Warzone2100-commits] SF.net SVN: warzone2100:[8594] trunk/data/base/images/frontend4.png

2009-12-04 Thread bugs buggy
On 12/4/09, Zarel wrote: > On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Kreuvf wrote: > > zare...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: > >> Revision: 8594 > >> > http://warzone2100.svn.sourceforge.net/warzone2100/?rev=8594&view=rev > >> Author: zarelsl > >> Better "ready?" checkbox. > > It's only b

Re: [warzone2100-dev] [Warzone2100-commits] SF.net SVN: warzone2100:[8594] trunk/data/base/images/frontend4.png

2009-12-04 Thread Zarel
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Stephen Swaney wrote: > This is totally beside the point.  Your love of argument is showing. Love of argument? More like interest in doing things the right way. :[ >> Once we get a readable font at that size/resolution (and I'm planning >> on eventually making one

Re: [warzone2100-dev] [Warzone2100-commits] SF.net SVN: warzone2100:[8594] trunk/data/base/images/frontend4.png

2009-12-04 Thread Zarel
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Stephen Swaney wrote: > This is totally beside the point.  Your love of argument is showing. Love of argument? More like interest in doing things the right way. :[ >> Once we get a readable font at that size/resolution (and I'm planning >> on eventually making one

Re: [warzone2100-dev] [Warzone2100-commits] SF.net SVN: warzone2100:[8594] trunk/data/base/images/frontend4.png

2009-12-04 Thread Stephen Swaney
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 05:21:40PM -0600, Zarel wrote: > On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Dennis Schridde wrote: > > Am Freitag, 4. Dezember 2009 21:30:58 schrieb Zarel: > >> [...] you have to consider > >> that most people, even if they don't speak English, should know > >> "Ready?" if they play g

Re: [warzone2100-dev] [Warzone2100-commits] SF.net SVN: warzone2100:[8594] trunk/data/base/images/frontend4.png

2009-12-04 Thread Zarel
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Dennis Schridde wrote: > Am Freitag, 4. Dezember 2009 21:30:58 schrieb Zarel: >> [...] you have to consider >> that most people, even if they don't speak English, should know >> "Ready?" if they play games online. > That is not a valid assumption. Are you arguing t

Re: [warzone2100-dev] [Warzone2100-commits] SF.net SVN: warzone2100:[8594] trunk/data/base/images/frontend4.png

2009-12-04 Thread Dennis Schridde
Am Freitag, 4. Dezember 2009 21:30:58 schrieb Zarel: > [...] you have to consider > that most people, even if they don't speak English, should know > "Ready?" if they play games online. That is not a valid assumption. --devu signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___

Re: [warzone2100-dev] [Warzone2100-commits] SF.net SVN: warzone2100:[8594] trunk/data/base/images/frontend4.png

2009-12-04 Thread Stephen Swaney
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 02:30:58PM -0600, Zarel wrote: > On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Kreuvf wrote: > > zare...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: > >> Revision: 8594 > >>           > >> http://warzone2100.svn.sourceforge.net/warzone2100/?rev=8594&view=rev > >> Author:   zarelsl > >> Better "ready?"

Re: [warzone2100-dev] [Warzone2100-commits] SF.net SVN: warzone2100:[8594] trunk/data/base/images/frontend4.png

2009-12-04 Thread Zarel
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Kreuvf wrote: > zare...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: >> Revision: 8594 >>           >> http://warzone2100.svn.sourceforge.net/warzone2100/?rev=8594&view=rev >> Author:   zarelsl >> Better "ready?" checkbox. > It's only better if you know enough English to understan

Re: [warzone2100-dev] [Warzone2100-commits] SF.net SVN: warzone2100:[8594] trunk/data/base/images/frontend4.png

2009-12-04 Thread Kreuvf
zare...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: > Revision: 8594 > > http://warzone2100.svn.sourceforge.net/warzone2100/?rev=8594&view=rev > Author: zarelsl > Better "ready?" checkbox. It's only better if you know enough English to understand "READY?". If not, you are more screwed than before IMH