RE: Re: [wdvltalk] Alphanumeric Ordered List

2004-11-26 Thread Trusz, Andrew
-Original Message- From: Gerenday, Perry (P.) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 2:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Re: [wdvltalk] Alphanumeric Ordered List BJ wrote: Try: dt1./dt ddtext text text/dd dt2a./dt ddtext text text/dd (etc

RE: Re: [wdvltalk] Alphanumeric Ordered List

2004-11-26 Thread Trusz, Andrew
-Original Message- From: Gerenday, Perry (P.) Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 2:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Re: [wdvltalk] Alphanumeric Ordered List BJ wrote: Try: dt1./dt ddtext text text/dd dt2a./dt ddtext text text/dd (etc) This will give you the same block

Re: Re: [wdvltalk] Alphanumeric Ordered List

2004-11-23 Thread Bj
Try: dt1./dt ddtext text text/dd dt2a./dt ddtext text text/dd (etc) This will give you the same block layout as li would Bj From: Perry Gerenday [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2004/11/23 Tue AM 05:00:45 GMT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [wdvltalk] Alphanumeric Ordered List Stephen

RE: [wdvltalk] Alphanumeric Ordered List

2004-11-23 Thread Trusz, Andrew
-Original Message- From: Perry Gerenday [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 12:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [wdvltalk] Alphanumeric Ordered List Stephen Caudill wrote: Any reason why you couldn't just do this: 1. XX * x

RE: Re: [wdvltalk] Alphanumeric Ordered List

2004-11-23 Thread Gerenday, Perry (P.)
BJ wrote: Try: dt1./dt ddtext text text/dd dt2a./dt ddtext text text/dd (etc) This will give you the same block layout as li would H, That has promise. I actually had to look up what the dt dd tags where for. I've never used them.

[wdvltalk] Alphanumeric Ordered List

2004-11-22 Thread Gerenday, Perry (P.)
I've been searching and experimenting but I can't find the answer to this problem. I need to create an ordered this something like this: 1. XX * x * xx 2a. * xx 2b. * xx * xx 3. X Creating

Re: [wdvltalk] Alphanumeric Ordered List

2004-11-22 Thread Stephen Caudill
Any reason why you couldn't just do this: 1. XX * x * xx 2. a.X * xx b.X * xx * xx 3. X In answer to your question, no. You can't make an ordered list display numbers

Re: [wdvltalk] Alphanumeric Ordered List

2004-11-22 Thread Perry Gerenday
Stephen Caudill wrote: Any reason why you couldn't just do this: 1. XX * x * xx 2. a.X * xx b.X * xx * xx 3. X Thanks Stephen, but your example shows the second list item plus

RE: [wdvltalk] Alphanumeric Ordered List

2004-11-22 Thread Cheryl D Wise
I have to agree with Stephen on this one if the customer wants 2a and 2b to be the same level as the whole numbers a fake list is the only way to do. Semantically Stephen's example is the correct way to do it. Cheryl D. Wise Certified Professional Web Developer Microsoft FrontPage MVP