> this page was his first attempt at a tableless css-only layout, and
> on that basis, i think it's great
It is?!?! I thought Matt had been XHTML+CSS for ages now!
I stand corrected and applaud Matt for getting his first CSS only version
better than anything I churned out for my first 3 months!
> Having looked at it hard now (in case I missed a serious revision
> or I'm just wrong) I guess what I'm thinking is that the layout
> looks a tad haphazrd -
master of the universe, perhaps you did not realize, this page was his first
attempt at a tableless css-only layout, and on that basis, i t
In response to Amanda and a pre-emptive apology to Matt:
We've all got our own tastes and I'm not saying the absense of fancy
graphics or intricate design makes the site in anyway a lesser piece of
development, so sorry if I gave that impression.
Having looked at it hard now (in case I missed a s
Something's just wrong. Can't quite put my finger on it, but it's
just...well...wrong. Looks bland, rushed and maybe even amateurish. I think
you might need to rip it all out and start again.
There's no arguing with taste, of course, but I have to say it didn't
strike me that way ... I can see ho
I'm really not sure about this one Matt...
Something's just wrong. Can't quite put my finger on it, but it's
just...well...wrong. Looks bland, rushed and maybe even amateurish. I think
you might need to rip it all out and start again.
If your client it happy with it then I don't think you're pain
I think you need to dump it and start all over ...
Subject: [wdvltalk] [SCR] http://www.interactwiththe.net/ict/
The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send Your Posts To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To set a persona
On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 16:42, rudy wrote:
> >> "About Us" wraps
> >
> > Ok, I haven't got a clue about how to solve this. any ideas?
>
> About Us
>
>
> > This doesn't happen on my windows box running @ 800x600,
> > so not sure how to get around this either...
>
> of course it happens at 800x60
>> liquid design has nothing to do with resolutions, and everything
>> to do with how wide the user lets the available browser window be
>
> OK, that's cool, I'll get in into my head now! :)
see below
>> "About Us" wraps
>
> Ok, I haven't got a clue about how to solve this. any ideas?
About U
--- Matthew Macdonald-Wallace wrote: ---
: Nice idea, I'm just not sure how to do it! :)
I empathize. The gazingus scripts are totally object oriented and
can be real mind blowsers. I sat around for two days with two
other developers just trying to wrap our heads aroun
Stephen,
On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 16:06, Stephen Caudill wrote:
> --- Matthew Macdonald-Wallace wrote: ---
>
> : All,
> :
> : you've been great so far, please can you take another look at
> : http://www.interactwiththe.net/ict/
> :
> : The menu should now be visible in al
On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 16:02, rudy wrote:
> > you've been great so far, please can you take another look at
> > http://www.interactwiththe.net/ict/
> >
> > The menu should now be visible in all browsers and it should (fingers
> > crossed) scale ok to lower resolutions
>
> matt, you've got to stop t
--- Matthew Macdonald-Wallace wrote: ---
: All,
:
: you've been great so far, please can you take another look at
: http://www.interactwiththe.net/ict/
:
: The menu should now be visible in all browsers and it should
: (fingers crossed) scale ok to lower resolutions
Sc
> you've been great so far, please can you take another look at
> http://www.interactwiththe.net/ict/
>
> The menu should now be visible in all browsers and it should (fingers
> crossed) scale ok to lower resolutions
matt, you've got to stop talking about resolutions, and start talking about
brows
--- Cheryl D. Wise wrote: ---
: Do you have the auto image resize turned on? I couldn't get it
: that small because of the large bubble image at the top?
Not before there was scroll, before the floats fished out.
-Stephen
http://www.mechavox.com/
The WDVL Discus
Do you have the auto image resize turned on? I couldn't get it that small
because of the large bubble image at the top?
Cheryl D. Wise
Certified Professional Web Developer
MS-MVP-FrontPage
www.wiserways.com
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
713.353.0139 Office
-Original Message-
From: Stephen C
--- Matthew Macdonald-Wallace wrote: ---
: I was doing it because it seemed easier than Javascript, mine's a
: bit rusty... :)
:
:: - try the lovely, degradable XHTML, CSS and extremely
::clever javascript menu from gazingus.org[1]
:
: Now in
--- Matthew Macdonald-Wallace wrote: ---
: All,
:
: Please take a look at http://www.interactwiththe.net/ict/ and let
: me know what you think.
:
: There seems to be a weird thing in IE on the work computer where
: "Government Bids" doesn't show up properly.
:
: Can so
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Macdonald-Wallace"
> Please take a look at http://www.interactwiththe.net/ict/ and let me
> know what you think.
I'm using IE6 SP1 on Win98 and I only see a menu with Home, About Us,
Services and Clients. And although the source says there is a sub men
This shows up in IE, but not Mozilla:
"Brilliant at keeping an audience alive"
John Peel - Board Member
South East England
Development Agency
"They take a problem and make the solution happen"
Manny Gatt - Chief Executive
Business Link Nottingham
Erik
-Original Message-
From: Matthew
Removing the prolog won't invalidate xhtml. Your page will likely be
served as text/html and not application/xhtml+xml. So arguably it will
actually improve the page.
The overflow goes on the container not the img tag. Not in the office so I
can't give you the url to look at but its hebig's url. S
No, it isn't necessary not even for xhtml strict as long as you have the
character info in a meta tag as Drew says. It is only necessary if it is
true xml.
Here's a list of browsers that have problems with the xml prolog
http://www.webstandards.org/learn/reference/prolog_problems.html
Zeldman h
Drew,
Ta for having a look,
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 15:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Matt, I still see the xml prolog. You need to remove that since it throws
> ie6 into quirks mode. Put the charset in a meta tag.
Won't this invalidate the xhtml?
> No scroll on ie6, win2k server until you get d
Matt, I still see the xml prolog. You need to remove that since it throws
ie6 into quirks mode. Put the charset in a meta tag.
No scroll on ie6, win2k server until you get down to the logo image size.
Incidently, if you add overflow:hidden to the image container it will hide
the excess image when
Works well in all the browsers I tested with IE 6, Opera 7.21, Mozilla, NN
4.x. Note that in NN 4.x resizing is slow but does eventually happen. If you
have many NN 4.x visitor, especially those with earlier versions you might
want to put in the Netscape resize fix.
While I like simple, it might
KoaFar,
On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 18:47, K.F. Wu wrote:
> At 08:18 AM 1/7/2004, Matt wrote:
> >I'm currently writing the CSS for the xhtml to display it properly, as a
> >liquid layout. (/me doesn't do tables anymore!)
>
> Since the page is just an png image file, not an html, I have no way to
> rev
At 08:18 AM 1/7/2004, Matt wrote:
I'm currently writing the CSS for the xhtml to display it properly, as a
liquid layout. (/me doesn't do tables anymore!)
Since the page is just an png image file, not an html, I have no way to
review your code (Nice-view page though). But I noticed that you seemed
On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 16:04, rudy wrote:
> > This is the first attempt at the new site:
> >
> > http://www.interactwiththe.net/ict/mainPage.png
>
> it is nice and simple (which is *very* important in my book)
>
> and rather easy to make liquid ;o)
>
> the previous version did have a bunch of ic
> This is the first attempt at the new site:
>
> http://www.interactwiththe.net/ict/mainPage.png
it is nice and simple (which is *very* important in my book)
and rather easy to make liquid ;o)
the previous version did have a bunch of icons in the main body area, are
you planning to do away with
--- Matthew Macdonald-Wallace wrote: ---
: All,
:
: This is the first attempt at the new site:
:
: http://www.interactwiththe.net/ict/mainPage.png
:
: Please note that this is purely an image for mock-up purposes.
:
: To give you a comparison, the old site (not design
Matt,
At 1024 resolution it looks great, a lot cleaner than the previous version.
One concern might be that you are losing a lot of space at the top of the
screen with the corporate identity stuff. It takes up about a third on 800
by 600 and you also have a vertical scroll, but I assume that's ju
30 matches
Mail list logo
