I recommend Google.
Bitbucket has had way too much downtime. The downtime that happened a
couple of days ago was not the first (speaking from experience).
On Oct 10, 9:16 am, mdipierro wrote:
> http://googlecode.blogspot.com/2009/10/mercurial-server-side-clone-su...
--~--~-~--~~
I need to take snapshots of a websites. This will take a couple
seconds so I need to run it in a separate process from Web2py.
So I am wondering if it is possible to use the DAL inside that
separate python program so I can update the DB when the snapshot is
complete.
--~--~-~--~~-
How would you go about making a generic comment or rating logic for
any model?
Say you have a bunch of models in different tables like this:
Websites
Plugins
Links
etc...
How would you make a generic rating or commenting logic that could
apply to websites/plugins/links or whatever other models
import DAL
from gluon.validators import *
from gluon.html import *
from gluon.http import *
from gluon.sqlhtml import SQLFORM, SQLTABLE, form_factory
from gluon.globals import *
session = Session()
request = Request()
response = Response()
On Sep 10, 8:11 pm, Bottiger w
Ah never mind. I forgot to enable the source analyzer, so you still
have to import the data.
On Sep 10, 7:55 pm, Bottiger wrote:
> I starting to use PyDev now that the extensions are now free. I
> remembered some of you had problems with the autocomplete because of
> the Web2Py globals
I starting to use PyDev now that the extensions are now free. I
remembered some of you had problems with the autocomplete because of
the Web2Py globals. Here is a solution.
When you add a Python Interpreter, go into forced globals. Click new.
Copy and paste the following:
request,response,sessio
I'm working on it.
On Sep 8, 6:05 pm, mdipierro wrote:
> I normally used this;http://www.appliedstacks.com/PoweredBy/web2py
> to track sites.
>
> I invite everybody to submit their sites. For now I will just link
> this, then we'll find a better solution.
>
> Massimo
>
> On Sep 8, 7:05 pm, cesmi
I forgot to mention this. If you want the latest version of OpenID
Auth, download the tip, not AUTH 1.
On Sep 5, 7:20 pm, Bottiger wrote:
> Here is my version of openID for web2py. There are two versions.
>
> http://bitbucket.org/bottiger/web2py-openid/downloads/
>
> CAS 1 is a f
Here is my version of openID for web2py. There are two versions.
http://bitbucket.org/bottiger/web2py-openid/downloads/
CAS 1 is a fixed up version of the one at w2popenid which had some
problems with different providers and python 2.6.
AUTH 1 is the recommended version. It fully replaces the
It works!
On Sep 3, 8:37 pm, mdipierro wrote:
> This is now fixed in trunk, please give it a try.
>
> On Sep 3, 2:03 pm, Bottiger wrote:
>
> > Ok I think I found out the problem.
>
> > response.cookies = Storage().
>
> > I think this is supposed to be Co
Is there any mechanism in the DAL for things like
"INSERT if not exists"
"INSERT or ignore"
upserts?
Or do I need to resort to using executesql?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web2py-users" group
se.cookies[response.session_id_name] =
response.session_id
response.cookies[response.session_id_name]['path'] = '/'
Otherwise you would be assigning a string to a string. With
SimpleCookie, the string response.session_id is wrapped in a "morsel"
object which has a path attribute.
O
It worked when I commented out that line. I would like to store
sessions in database though.
On Sep 3, 6:10 am, mdipierro wrote:
> As a test, can you try commenting the line
> session.connect(request, response, db)
> in your model?
>
> Massimo
>
> On Sep 2, 10:1
Executing shell has stopped working for me. It now displays this error
in the console:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:\Users\admin\Desktop\web2py\gluon\restricted.py", line 178,
in restricted
exec ccode in environment
File "applications\cas\models/db.py", line 34, in
sess
Thank you and Diane, here are my thoughts on the logo.
The logo must be easily recognized at a distance or reduced in size
(when you iconize for example). The logo here has many fine details
such as the mouth and the eyes which can barely be seen as I am
looking at it through Google Groups. At it
...,fields=[]).
>
> On Sep 1, 7:27 pm, Bottiger wrote:
>
> > I have a field called "author" which I want set to "auth.user.id".
> > Users should not be able to edit this field.
>
> > If I have an SQLFORM, is it sufficient to simply omit this fi
I have a field called "author" which I want set to "auth.user.id".
Users should not be able to edit this field.
If I have an SQLFORM, is it sufficient to simply omit this field in
the "fields" argument? Or do I also need to specify "writable = False"
for the field?
--~--~-~--~~---
be useful
>
> http://www.vimeo.com/2720410
>
> On Aug 31, 10:27 pm, Bottiger wrote:
>
> > I have a database schema where users submit their websites in one
> > table, and a list of tags in another table.
>
> > I would like to place an input box inside the SQLFORM w
I have a database schema where users submit their websites in one
table, and a list of tags in another table.
I would like to place an input box inside the SQLFORM where people can
enter tags. What is the best way to do this?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this
Stackless does not scale for multiple CPUs. It is only for cooperative
multitasking. Stackless is meant to solve massive context switching
costs, which I think Web2Py has very little of.
On Aug 17, 7:47 am, mdipierro wrote:
> Just for fun I tried the following:
> 1) Installed Stackless Python 2.
Well I'm not sure about an automated script, as I don't have a
dreamhost account anymore, but I believe you need to fix these 2
things:
1. change yourusername here "#!/home/youruserhere/run/bin/python"
2. place dispatch.fcgi and the web2py folder to the base of the
subdomain folder. Not in subdom
Well its too late now, but as a rule of thumb, only 2% of visitors
ever bother to read the comments of a website.
On Aug 17, 2:28 pm, Yarko Tymciurak wrote:
> Right - I posted a comment on reddit with the link corrections.
>
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Bottiger wrote:
>
&
Aug 17, 1:51 pm, Yarko Tymciurak wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Bottiger wrote:
>
> > Hello Massimo, I've noticed that you posted a reddit story here.
>
> >http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/9bg5i/draft_chapters_of_...
>
> > Unfortunately, th
I am planning to put up a web2py community website soon.
I have only seen one website with a list of Web2Py powered websites
here:
http://www.appliedstacks.com/NewestFirst/web2py
Unfortunately, it is very ugly, not web2py specific, probably isn't
powered by web2py, and some of them are even Dja
Hello Massimo, I've noticed that you posted a reddit story here.
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/9bg5i/draft_chapters_of_new_web2py_book_covers_forms/
Unfortunately, the link to the pdf does not work (at least for me). It
does not appear to be a pdf file, and here is the binary cont
Is it just me or is the logo edge a bit blurry?
On Aug 16, 11:11 am, mdipierro wrote:
> Try the new one..http://www.web2py.com
>
> The fact I posted it does not prevent us form working more on the
> fonts and page layout.
>
> Thank you Peter for the logo.
> Thank you Mateusz for the new page bac
Here are some more logos I whipped up as amusement. I don't have a
strong preference either way, maybe we will find some inspiration from
looking at these.
http://imgur.com/Y2XZu.png
http://imgur.com/1zrdp.png
http://imgur.com/vh5gY.png
http://imgur.com/QHeZD.png
On Aug 15, 7:22 pm, Jonathan Lun
I think it may be ok to remove the regular W, but it is a little too
chunky compared to the other letters right now.
On Aug 15, 1:06 pm, Yarko Tymciurak wrote:
> I think that generally looks nice, but should be an "alternate" Logo -
> I still think we also need the original w/ the full word beca
Sans-serif is cleaner and professional looking, that's why you see so
much of it.
On Aug 13, 6:28 pm, __future__ wrote:
> A ... and I like the font... if I see one more thing with a font like
> B, I am going to gouge my eyes out with a rusty fork
>
> On Aug 13, 6:58 pm
Choice A
I think it would be best if it was changed to a more Sans-Serif font
like B.
On Aug 13, 9:29 am, Massimo Di Pierro wrote:
> Two logos have been proposed for web2py. I love them both and I would
> like your opinions. Here they are attached.
>
> Which one should go on the main web2py p
Do you have any error logs to make sure it isn't a web2py problem?
On Aug 13, 12:20 am, mdipierro wrote:
> I do not know what happened but I restarted and it works.
>
> On Aug 12, 8:29 pm, emaynard wrote:
>
> > Same here in Ohio. Neither Domain name nor IP appear to be working.
>
> > -Eric
>
>
Same here in the US using OpenDNS. I even tried the IP address when it
popped up occasionally and it gave a 503 Service Temporarily
Unavailable error.
On Aug 12, 6:06 pm, Yannick wrote:
> Same here in Canada...
>
> On Aug 12, 8:30 pm, Richard wrote:
>
> > I can't accesswww.web2py.comatthe momen
Massimo are you going to release the chapters for the new DAL engine
soon, or is it going to use the same API as this one?
On Jul 11, 7:57 am, Massimo Di Pierro wrote:
> Chapters 7 and 8 have been revised including corrections from Mr
> Admin, Fran and Jonathan.
>
> web2py_manual_678.pdf
> 19
ssue rather
than a path/import issue.
On Aug 9, 1:03 am, mdipierro wrote:
> I think, this should not work
>
> from w2popenid import Web2pyFetcher
>
> because w2popenid is not in path. Twy
>
> exec('from applications.%s.modules.w2popenid import Web2pyFetcher' %
> requ
I have been trying to create an OpenID version of Auth.
I stumbled upon a very puzzling behavior that I think may be an
underlying consequence of using exec. I do not know for sure though
because the bug is very strange.
First the setup. I am using hcvst's openid provider so I can test
locally.
I'm using OpenDNS and it looks like the DNS records are messed up.
If you visit http://140.192.37.194 it will work fine as usual.
On Aug 7, 9:35 pm, Yarko Tymciurak wrote:
> trywww.web2py.com
>
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 11:33 PM, b00m_chef wrote:
>
> > Just tried to access web2py.com and was no
We should direct people to http://stackoverflow.com to answer
questions in order to boost traffic.
There is a bigger audience there and people regularly seeing Web2Py
being asked may stumble upon it. Google Groups is not a very
convenient way to find questions and answers.
--~--~-~--~
At this point I think it would just be easier to let Massimo decide.
Anyway, OpenID integration with Auth is coming along. It is usable but
has some security concerns because people can change their OID in
their profile.
http://bitbucket.org/bottiger/web2py-openid-cas/overview/
On Aug 6, 7:05
users might not
like it if you displayed their email or First/Last name to the whole
Internet.
On Aug 6, 6:47 pm, Yarko Tymciurak wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Bottiger wrote:
>
> > Well you see, unlike the "username" column, the "email" column is
ined, such as
"first_name"
3. Remove the "username" check and usage completely.
On Aug 6, 6:38 pm, Yarko Tymciurak wrote:
> I see - so you would want an exception to be raised? What do you propose?
>
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Bottiger wrote:
>
> > The fu
The function takes a dictionary where if the username key is defined,
then it assumes that your database has a "username" column which is
incorrect behavior.
On Aug 6, 6:16 pm, Yarko Tymciurak wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:09 PM, Bottiger wrote:
>
> > I am using the
parent = fp.read()
> fp.close()
>
> should read:
>
> try:
> fp = open(t, 'rb')
> parent = fp.read()
> fp.close()
>
> - Yarko
>
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Bottiger wrote:
>
> >
I am trying to incorporate OpenID into Auth.
In my attempt to implement a CAS style plugin into auth, I stumbled
upon a bizzare error.
On line 628 of gluon.tools, there is the following line:
"users = self.db(table_user[username] == keys[username]).select()"
username is defined to be "username
Agree 100%
If you are going to rewrite, best to do it soon instead of later.
A quick look at the available applications:http://www.web2py.com/
appliances
There simply is not that many of them, and most are just proofs of
concept. They are not building blocks for Web2Py except for CAS which
isn'
I haven't had time to verify the other findings, but there are
definitely file handle leakages. I can never delete an application if
I just visited it once.
On Aug 2, 12:21 pm, mdipierro wrote:
> I am about to catch a plane so I will be short. We can talk more about
> this in a couple of days.
>
Massimo, are you saying that there will never be an official Web2Py
incorporation of OpenID and Auth?
On Aug 1, 3:54 pm, mdipierro wrote:
> Sorry it took me so long. I looked into this and it cannot be done
> this way easily as I though. The reason is that OID uses the two
> tables you created (
Google has sunk too much time and effort into adapting Django to
recommend another framework. They also need to attract more users to
GAE which Django has plenty of.
On Aug 1, 3:12 pm, mdipierro wrote:
> Yes, if only they'd understand we support GAE better than Django does.
> Our DAL and our app
Also, I just downloaded winrtgen, the one that is displayed all over
your google results.
No ability for specifying a salt, or even a custom salting function.
On Jul 31, 11:15 pm, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
> On Jul 31, 2009, at 11:11 PM, Bottiger wrote:
>
> > 2. Attackers will
Yes the software is there, but the hardware is a completely different
matter.
On Jul 31, 11:15 pm, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
> On Jul 31, 2009, at 11:11 PM, Bottiger wrote:
>
> > 2. Attackers will specifically target Web2Py's deterministic algorithm
> > with a custom rainb
having the
database reinserted with different ids.
On Jul 31, 9:09 pm, Francisco Gama wrote:
> On Jul 31, 6:26 am, Bottiger wrote:
>
> > > That may not be a good idea, I think. That makes your password longer but
> > > with a possible cryptographic weakness because it'
You will need to do request.body.read() for PUT. Web2Py does not parse
the body of PUT requests.
Example:
Request:
PUT /test/default/ HTTP/1.1
Content-Length: 21
blah blah hello hello
Output:
Body
"blah blah hello hello"
On Jul 31, 12:28 am, 诚子 wrote:
> Hi, I wan't use PUT method and DELE
provider for web2py.
> My first attempt (the whole w2popenid thing is derived from it) is
> here:http://github.com/hcvst/icy-openid
> and intended to replace the php! provider athttp://icy.co.zaasap.
> Can we work together?
>
> Regards,
> HC
>
> On Jul 27, 7:45 am, Bottiger wr
; wrote:
>
> >> On Jul 31, 2009, at 12:16 AM, Bottiger wrote:
>
> >> .
> >> The difference is that with a deterministic transform of the password
> >> (this includes static salt, or salt that's a function of the base
> >> password), the at
Ah, someone here finally understands me.
On Jul 31, 12:38 am, Yarko Tymciurak wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 2:31 AM, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 31, 2009, at 12:16 AM, Bottiger wrote:
>
> > .
> > The difference is that with a deterministic tr
, 12:31 am, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
> On Jul 31, 2009, at 12:16 AM, Bottiger wrote:
>
>
>
> >> If the attacker knows (by reading the web2py source) that you're,
> >> say,
> >> concatenating the base password three times, then he knows that you
> >>
We can probably make a validator called CRYPT2() so we don't have to
break backward compatibility. In my opinion though, this is a rather
insecure default for a framework that bills itself as being very
secure. I have seen many hacklogs where PHP frameworks were often
compromised by sql injection
you used a
random number generator or a function related to the password.
On Jul 30, 11:52 pm, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
> On Jul 30, 2009, at 11:43 PM, Bottiger wrote:
>
>
>
> >> Dictionary attacks work for short
> >> passwords, but are impractical against longer passwords. A
pm, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
> On Jul 30, 2009, at 10:26 PM, Bottiger wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >> That may not be a good idea, I think. That makes your password
> >> longer but with a possible cryptographic weakness because it's
> >> following a known
our salt is. The
only thing that really matters is that it is reasonably different for
each password, and that no one else has made a rainbow table for a
salt that you happened to choose.
On Jul 30, 10:50 pm, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
> On Jul 30, 2009, at 10:26 PM, Bottiger wrote:
>
>
>
g the password as a salt.
In fact, many websites such as Reddit (which I examined the source
code) does this.
On Jul 30, 9:51 pm, Francisco Gama wrote:
> On Jul 31, 5:16 am, Bottiger wrote:
>
> > As long as the salt is different for every password, it pretty much
> > makes i
computational speed, you could double or triple the original password
before putting it through the hash.
On Jul 30, 8:38 pm, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
> On Jul 30, 2009, at 8:30 PM, Bottiger wrote:
>
>
>
> > I know you have the mantra of not breaking backwards compatibility,
> >
pecify a key
> and use the HMAC+SHA512 anyway.
>
> Massimo
>
> On Jul 30, 9:49 pm, Bottiger wrote:
>
> > The CRYPT validator is unsecure because it uses unsalted MD5.
>
> > There are public rainbow tables that have unsalted MD5 passwords of up
> > to 10 ch
The CRYPT validator is unsecure because it uses unsalted MD5.
There are public rainbow tables that have unsalted MD5 passwords of up
to 10 characters long including symbols.
I highly recommend that if no "key" is specified, that CRYPT will
automatically salt the password based on a substring of
Just for reference, even though I was the one who noted that mitsuhiko
was Armin (which is written on his public blog), I am not one of the
supposed people who emailed or stalked him.
On Jul 30, 1:01 am, mdipierro wrote:
> To web2py users.
>
> Please do not stalk Armin. He is a talented develope
I agree that the IRC channel is neglected. When I did benchmarks to
show that the bundled version of flup does not scale for multicore
machines and that the prefork version should be used, no one said
anything. When I mentioned it here, no one has bothered to do anything
about it. And this is stil
erro wrote:
> Sorry allowing ~ is a bad idea. It may allow directory traversal
> attacks.
>
> Massimo
>
> On Jul 29, 2:35 am, Bottiger wrote:
>
> > I was going over Web2Py code, and I noticed that the allowable URLs
> > are a bit narrow.
>
> > As a reference fo
I was going over Web2Py code, and I noticed that the allowable URLs
are a bit narrow.
As a reference for URL handling, I am using RFC 3986:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986
which is has a summary at Wikipedia here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percent-encoding
The default allowable URLs are ne
permits headers etc. to be
> > > > > > send.
>
> > > > > > Please see whether it works for you. My battery is about to die, so
> > > > > > I
> > > > > > don't have time to
> > > > > >
Well I would say that if you started customizing, you would be using
routes.py anyway.
On Jul 25, 10:21 pm, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
> The default application logic right now is: init if present, otherwise
> welcome.
>
> Would it not be useful to be able to specify a default application
> fro
hanged all 8000 to 8080 as per the App Engine Development Server,
> but still
> when I click Submit, I get the 'Invalid Request' page.
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Jul 21, 7:57 pm, Bottiger wrote:
>
> > I've uploaded to my website the mi
you are not showing anything about servers; you are only showing
> network connections. I have one server with 4 network cables feeding, and
> the server listening on all, and passing them on as assigned... can be to
> one instance of a framework, or not...
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009
> whatever way).
>
> While the case you put forth also exists, unless I am missing something I do
> not think it is a generic case.
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Bottiger wrote:
>
> > It is unreasonable because most non-hobbyist sites only have 1
> > c
le domains as it is for web servers to do
> so.
>
> On Jul 23, 9:10 am, Bottiger wrote:
>
> > I think its safe to assume that one single copy of the web2py library
> > serves a single domain. It works for Django.
>
> > Serving multiple domains on a single Web2Py inst
, 12:02 am, Hans Donner wrote:
> Be carefull with this. The same instance may serve on multiple domain
> names
> It's up to the developer to make these choices and decissions.
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 07:20, Bottiger wrote:
>
> > Also a setting like this should
Also a setting like this should be global to all applications while
stuffing it in a model will only apply to one application. So there
needs to be a global site-wide config just like routes.py.
On Jul 22, 7:47 pm, Bottiger wrote:
> Uhhh, so the solution is to make a file called 0.py in
are available for the model files also,
> a filename in controllers such as "0.py" or "0_setup.py" (that's a
> zero) will accomplish this.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> - Yarko
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Bottiger wrote:
>
> > And that
And that is my question. Where can I put it so it is a globally
accessable variable? I don't think Web2Py has a global configuration
file, or does it?
On Jul 22, 3:05 pm, Fran wrote:
> On Jul 22, 11:01 pm, Bottiger wrote:
>
> > Its useful when you need the full URL.
>
Its useful when you need the full URL.
I needed this when getting Massimo's OpenID to work. Right now, its
hardcoded in.
On Jul 22, 2:40 pm, Fran wrote:
> On Jul 22, 10:20 pm, Bottiger wrote:
>
> > Yarko, what I am saying is that URL() does not add the "http://
>
come/default/index, then
>
> URL( r=request, f=afterindex)
>
> will returnhttp://localhost:8000/welcome/default/afterindex
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Bottiger wrote:
>
> > Let's say you simply want the URL for a page such as
>
> >http://127.0.0.1:800
Let's say you simply want the URL for a page such as
http://127.0.0.1:8000/welcome/default/index
You can use URL(f='index') but it gives you a somewhat relative path.
/welcome/default/index
So what is the best way to go about adding the http://127.0.0.1:8000
prefix for the entire website?
--~-
installations behind a load balancer I suggest you
> > > use the "pound" load balancer to keep sessions sticky. In that case
> > > the different processes do not need to share any data.
>
> > > - Has anyone done any work with web2py in a cluster (s
n internal error.
http://www.codexon.com/temp/openid.zip
On Jul 21, 4:27 pm, Bottiger wrote:
> Yes, I accidentally missed your 2nd message and fixed it on my own. I
> also found another error.
>
> So as a canonical reference, here are the 3 things that need to be
> edited to get
rtOpenID'
>
> > Does that help you? (the error message you posted is not helping here)
>
> > The next stop is web2py's response:
> > message
> > :
> > something heppened:{'failure_reason': "return_to does not match return
> > URL. Expec
is no way around it
when you need to scale.
On Jul 21, 12:51 pm, Yarko Tymciurak wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Bottiger wrote:
>
> > "This discussion should probably be moved to the web2py developers
> > group:"
>
> > I don't have access to th
ce it
is schema free.
The map/reduce paradigm also allows you to scale complex queries to
multiple cores and machines. For everything except banking, document
based stores are the future.
On Jul 21, 12:15 pm, Yarko Tymciurak wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Bottiger wrote:
>
&g
extent, but this put it off my radar for my list (but I'm happy
> > for any evidence / additional info to change that)
>
> > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Bottiger wrote:
>
> > > Redis requires the entire database to fit in memory.
>
> > > I've don
nt me to "Massimo's OpenID implementation" that you are referring
> to?
> Perhaps you could send me teh code that your are using?
>
> When I get back from work I'll try to have a look.
>
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:10, Bottiger wrote:
>
> > I'v
e:
> you might try looking at what gets sent back and forth to try to discover
> what's wrong; wireshark or LiveHTTPHeaders for Firefox might help...
>
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 3:10 AM, Bottiger wrote:
>
> > I've been trying to get Massimo's OpenID implementat
I've been trying to get Massimo's OpenID implementation to work, which
seems to be the only OpenID implementation for Web2Py.
It doesn't seem to work with either Yahoo or Google, each time saying:
"Sorry! Something is not quite right with the request we received from
the website you are trying t
If it is truly not computationally intensive, and does not even use a
database, it should not be a problem.
I have benchmarked Web2Py on the static welcome page to 700 requests/
second with a concurrency level of 50.
To increase the level of concurrency (if you have additional CPU
cores), you sh
I remember that I mentioned that the Web2Py editor had graphical
glitches but no one believed me.
I stumbled upon it again while using Chrome, but rest assured, it also
happens in Firefox.
http://imgur.com/8AiTg.png
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message
Redis requires the entire database to fit in memory.
I've done a comparison a couple weeks ago between all of the free
distributed databases and found that mongodb and couchdb are the most
advanced and with the least quirks and requirements.
On Jul 20, 3:44 pm, JohnMc wrote:
> Yarko,
>
> Liked
Is there any reliable way to condense common static files into one
folder?
For example, Jquery, a 56 kb file, is replicated among every
application. If your website is comprised of more than 2 apps, your
users will be forced to download jquery twice.
The only way I have thought of is to use rout
This sounds very similar to RSS feeds and aggregators. It uses http/
rpc to fetch news items and you can optionally mirror them on your
server. You can then filter them with keywords.
There are problems with this with regards to censorship.
1. XML is unencrypted. And easy to use deep packet insp
Kolivas to the footnotes.
Moving development discussion into web2py-developers, which is by one
person's invite only, seems to be moving towards this direction.
On Jul 18, 1:44 pm, Hans Donner wrote:
> Bottiger,
>
> "and I planned to for Web2Py but now it is looking more difficu
I can't shake the feeling that I spurred this move.
I might be a newcomer to Web2Py, but I have already sunk some time
into studying Web2Py such as finding broken links on the main page and
benchmarking the bundled version of flup (which should not be used in
a production environment because of G
pm, mdipierro wrote:
> On Jul 17, 4:54 pm, Bottiger wrote:
>
> > > It parses all views and collapses the three structure associated to each
> > > action into one byte-code compiled view. that means there is no
>
> > parsing and minimal file IO when executing a
lt for a company to do something like:
build a packaged and compressed one click executable web2py that runs
a single application. These little things lessens the usage you can do
with a framework.
On Jul 17, 3:13 pm, mdipierro wrote:
> On Jul 17, 4:54 pm, Bottiger wrote:
>
> > &
wanted a Full-Package framework look towards Django first
and Web2Py second.
On Jul 17, 3:06 pm, mdipierro wrote:
> On Jul 17, 4:15 pm, Bottiger wrote:
>
> > > Since no one else completed, web2py didn't get recognized at the
> > > conference
>
> > You also
D-style license that does not come with the
definition of "derivatives" which is so often a problem in GPL.
On Jul 17, 2:37 pm, mdipierro wrote:
> On Jul 17, 2:43 pm, Bottiger wrote:
>
>
>
> > - Compilation
>
> > Django does this automatically, so I don'
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
