Re: [web2py] Re: Best practice regarding applications

2017-09-07 Thread Chinh Dang
You may also want to consider the availability of your applications. By having all your apps on a single server and if the server is down, all your apps will also be impacted. Unless, you have high availability built in at the server level, i.e. cluster. On Sep 7, 2017 7:00 AM, "Najtsirk"

[web2py] Re: Best practice regarding applications

2017-09-07 Thread Najtsirk
Thanks! On Saturday, 2 September 2017 06:16:17 UTC+2, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: > > It is fine to have one web2py and as many domains as you need. It should > not affect performance provided you take advantage of the cores you have. > That means you want to make sure you use nginx+uwsgi or

[web2py] Re: Best practice regarding applications

2017-09-01 Thread Massimo Di Pierro
It is fine to have one web2py and as many domains as you need. It should not affect performance provided you take advantage of the cores you have. That means you want to make sure you use nginx+uwsgi or gevent or gunicorn and have about one process per core. On Friday, 1 September 2017

[web2py] Re: best practice for create table base on user insert

2017-07-26 Thread 黄祥
yes, the new tables same for all which is base on detail_coa. the idea is to separate it is base on the case e.g. user input data on chart_of_account table e.g. : -cash -bank a -bank b the same thing goes for account table that automatically create chart_of_account table to maintain the data of

[web2py] Re: best practice for create table base on user insert

2017-07-26 Thread Anthony
Is detail_coa the same or nearly the same for all of these tables? If so, do you really need separate tables, rather than a single table that simply includes an extra field on which to partition it? On Tuesday, July 25, 2017 at 11:12:34 PM UTC-4, 黄祥 wrote: > > let say i have table that will

[web2py] Re: Best practice to check for raw_args

2016-12-31 Thread LoveWeb2py
Thank you! On Saturday, December 31, 2016 at 8:56:26 AM UTC-5, Anthony wrote: > > On Friday, December 30, 2016 at 8:26:08 PM UTC-5, LoveWeb2py wrote: >> >> Hi Stifan, >> >> Thank you for replying again. >> >> Is the best way to check for that in the controller? The book says it's >> best to

[web2py] Re: Best practice to check for raw_args

2016-12-31 Thread Anthony
On Friday, December 30, 2016 at 8:26:08 PM UTC-5, LoveWeb2py wrote: > > Hi Stifan, > > Thank you for replying again. > > Is the best way to check for that in the controller? The book says it's > best to handle calls in the controller, but just confirming on the forum. > It is generally

[web2py] Re: Best practice to check for raw_args

2016-12-30 Thread LoveWeb2py
Hi Stifan, Thank you for replying again. Is the best way to check for that in the controller? The book says it's best to handle calls in the controller, but just confirming on the forum. On Friday, December 30, 2016 at 7:27:00 PM UTC-5, LoveWeb2py wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm wondering if it's

[web2py] Re: Best practice to check for raw_args

2016-12-30 Thread 黄祥
why not use if condition to check args that meet with ur requirements? e.g. # if not sure about args value if 'args' in request.args: # bla bla # if sure about args value if request.args == 'args': # bla bla best regards, stifan -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book

[web2py] Re: best practice for internal function

2015-05-13 Thread Niphlod
that this function is also available from outside (ajax) and not just within my controllers def testfunction(dummy=None): return dict() in a controller can't be called as a function from a web request. tl;dr: a function defined with any number of arguments isn't callable in a web

[web2py] Re: best practice for internal function

2015-05-13 Thread Alex
perfect! This seems like a good solution. In most cases I have at least one parameter anyway. -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) --- You

Re: [web2py] Re: best practice for internal function

2015-05-13 Thread Manuele Pesenti
Il 13/05/15 12:52, Alex ha scritto: perfect! This seems like a good solution. In most cases I have at least one parameter anyway. Another option is to put them inside a model sub-directory called with the same name as the controller. The content of this folder will be read only calling that

[web2py] Re: best practice for internal function

2015-05-13 Thread Anthony
From the book http://Functions that take arguments or start with a double underscore are not publicly exposed and can only be called by other functions.: *Functions that take arguments or start with a double underscore are not publicly exposed and can only be called by other functions*. So

[web2py] Re: Best practice for a development environment together with a live environment

2014-02-12 Thread 黄祥
hi carlos, in production and staging environment, which is passed the development and testing stage, pushed the web2py application folder to the path and set ownership and permission using puppet. for development and testing not using puppet, because it is use by developer and system analyst

[web2py] Re: Best practice for a development environment together with a live environment

2014-02-12 Thread Dave S
On Monday, February 10, 2014 6:30:47 PM UTC-8, 黄祥 wrote: please use version control (git, mercury for your code) and then backup it up to another media as well (nas, tape) or you could store it in online backup like (dropbox, google drive) if it's your own project, i don't think so in

[web2py] Re: Best practice for a development environment together with a live environment

2014-02-11 Thread Carlos Zenteno
Stifan - can you tell us more of how you use Puppet with web2py applications? THanks... -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) --- You received

[web2py] Re: Best practice for a development environment together with a live environment

2014-02-10 Thread Cliff Kachinske
I have used rsync to update models, controllers, views, modules and so on. For database updates I create a separate script and test, test, test it. I don't use the DAL. Sometimes I write SQL, sometimes python using the database driver. Going forward it will probably just be SQL. On a

[web2py] Re: Best practice for a development environment together with a live environment

2014-02-10 Thread Tim Richardson
I use git; I think the situation you describe is why version control systems exist. git is nice for lots of reasons; one of them is that you don't need any git 'server' software if your development is on the same machine, and if you do need servers, there are great internet options which you

[web2py] Re: Best practice for a development environment together with a live environment

2014-02-10 Thread pang
I just started using mercurial with bookmarks, it's supposed to be very much like git. It's something great! I work on the trunk head, but when I spot a bug, I update to stable, fix it, then update to trunk and merge it. The bug is fixed in both versions, but I only had to type once. It even

[web2py] Re: Best practice for a development environment together with a live environment

2014-02-10 Thread Dave S
On Monday, February 10, 2014 2:24:14 PM UTC-8, pa...@cancamusa.net wrote: I just started using mercurial with bookmarks, it's supposed to be very much like git. It's something great! I work on the trunk head, but when I spot a bug, I update to stable, fix it, then update to trunk and merge

[web2py] Re: Best practice for a development environment together with a live environment

2014-02-10 Thread 黄祥
please use version control (git, mercury for your code) and then backup it up to another media as well (nas, tape) or you could store it in online backup like (dropbox, google drive) if it's your own project, i don't think so in your company allowed it to do so. i'm usually make a folders

[web2py] Re: Best practice for a development environment together with a live environment

2014-02-10 Thread 黄祥
sorry forgot to tell, i'm use configuration management (e.g. puppet, etc) for push the script to the machine (staging and production). so only the developer and system analyst can commit it (development and testing), and for promote to another environment is their own superior access. best

Re: [web2py] Re: Best practice when making downloads more private.

2013-11-13 Thread Derek
I think you could modify rocket to return a 404 for a request with an etag or if-not-modified request in that particular folder, that should probably do it, to prevent downloads from the same device. for downloads from different devices, the approach like niphlod said would work, set a

[web2py] Re: Best practice when making downloads more private.

2013-11-10 Thread Alan Etkin
I need a way to make downloads private/one time for the user. What is the best practice for this? Some tools I'd use: - File blob storage fields - File group ownership list:reference auth_group field You could check for empty group ownership in case of no authentication needed. This

[web2py] Re: Best practice when making downloads more private.

2013-11-10 Thread 黄祥
* Should I need a special download script? My guess is yes. hm, not sure about the special one. what do you want to achieve using the special download script? * Should I have a special directory and how would I best do that? if you want to store it on directory, you can check it on

[web2py] Re: Best practice when making downloads more private.

2013-11-10 Thread Niphlod
On Sunday, November 10, 2013 7:49:00 AM UTC+1, Encompass solutions wrote: I need a way to make downloads private/one time for the user. What is the best practice for this? * Should I need a special download script? My guess is yes. * Should I have a special directory and how would I best do

Re: [web2py] Re: Best practice when making downloads more private.

2013-11-10 Thread Jason (spot) Brower
Great input! I think I will try the following: Create a special directory to store the data. Setup a special controller with the needed permissions and conditions. Have fun and do a little dance. Does this sound sensible? BR, Jason On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Niphlod niph...@gmail.com

[web2py] Re: best practice for migrating wiki pages, tags, and media between repositories?

2013-02-05 Thread Michael Beller
Still climbing my initial learning curve, the databases/*wiki* files are the web2py table definition files I believe. I will need to export the wiki data as part of the migration process. One option I'm evaluating is to export the wiki data in CSV format. I've exposed the wiki tables to

[web2py] Re: Best practice for prepopulating regular form

2012-10-31 Thread Jim S
form.vars.fieldname = 'fieldvalue' -Jim On Wednesday, October 31, 2012 6:13:20 PM UTC-5, MichaelF wrote: I have a 'regular' form (i.e., FORM, not SQLFORM). I want to prepopulate some of the fields, but I don't know the values to use for them when I first create the form. What's the best

[web2py] Re: Best practice for prepopulating regular form

2012-10-31 Thread MichaelF
Jim, Thanks. I had already tried that, and it doesn't work for me. I wrote a little controller to test it: @auth.requires_login() def test_vars(): form = FORM( FIELDSET('Subject: ', INPUT(_name='subject')), FIELDSET('Other subject: ', INPUT(_name='otherSubject')),

[web2py] Re: Best practice for prepopulating regular form

2012-10-31 Thread Matt
You can do: otherSubject = request.post_vars.otherSubject or 'whatever' form = FORM( FIELDSET('Subject: ', INPUT(_name='subject')), FIELDSET('Other subject: ', INPUT(_name='otherSubject', value = otherSubject)), FIELDSET('Recipients: ', INPUT(_name='recips', )),

[web2py] Re: Best practice using scheduler as a task queue?

2012-07-06 Thread Michael Toomim
This is a nice solution, and clever, thanks! The upside (compared to postgres locks, as discussed above) is this works for any database. The downside is it creates a whole new table. On Thursday, July 5, 2012 2:49:36 PM UTC-7, nick name wrote: This might have been solved in this week, but in

[web2py] Re: Best practice using scheduler as a task queue?

2012-07-05 Thread nick name
This might have been solved in this week, but in case it wasn't: You're tackling a general database problem, not a specific task queue or web2py problem. So you need to solve it with the database: set up another table to refer to you the task table, such as:

[web2py] Re: Best practice using scheduler as a task queue?

2012-06-28 Thread Michael Toomim
On Wednesday, June 27, 2012 5:02:26 PM UTC-7, ptressel wrote: This won't solve your installation / setup issue, but I wonder if it would help with the overrun and timeout problems... Instead of scheduling a periodic task, what about having the task reschedule itself? When it's done with

Re: [web2py] Re: Best practice using scheduler as a task queue?

2012-06-27 Thread Niphlod
I don't know if continuing to give you fixes and alternative implementations is to be considered as harassment at this point, stop me if you're not interested into those. There is a very biiig problem in your statements: if your vision is Woohoo, this scheduler will *automatically handle

Re: [web2py] Re: Best practice using scheduler as a task queue?

2012-06-27 Thread Michael Toomim
I'm totally interested in solutions! It's a big problem I need to solve. The recurring maintenance task does not fix the initialization problem—because now you need to initialize the recurring maintenance task. This results in the same race condition. It does fine with the 40,000 records

Re: [web2py] Re: Best practice using scheduler as a task queue?

2012-06-27 Thread Michael Toomim
The problem with terminating the processes is: • sometimes they don't respond to control-c, and need a kill -9 • or sometimes that doesn't work, maybe the os is messed up • or sometimes the developer might run two instances simultaneously, forgetting that one was already running You're

Re: [web2py] Re: Best practice using scheduler as a task queue?

2012-06-27 Thread Niphlod
I don't find that this is a common scenario, anyway my idea was put the insertion/update of the task at cron @reboot, wrap that code in a try:except pass block and let the maintenance task to do the honours of checking if other 3 functions are ok. maintenance will run let's say, with a period

Re: [web2py] Re: Best practice using scheduler as a task queue?

2012-06-27 Thread Niphlod
uhm. why not having them started with systemd or upstart or supervisord ? Scheduler is by design allowed to run with multiple instances (to process a longer queue you may want to start more of them), but if you're really loosing money why didn't you rely on that services to be sure that

[web2py] Re: Best practice using scheduler as a task queue?

2012-06-27 Thread ptressel
Michael -- Here's a common scenario. I'm looking for the best implementation using the scheduler. I want to support a set of background tasks (task1, task2...), where each task: • processes a queue of items • waits a few seconds It's safe to have task1 and task2 running in parallel,

Re: [web2py] Re: Best practice using scheduler as a task queue?

2012-06-27 Thread Michael Toomim
:) Because I'm a perfectionist, and I want other developers to be able to install my system by just unzipping the code, running ./serve, and have it just work. So I want to use the built-in webserver and scheduler. There's no reason they shouldn't be able to manage these race conditions

[web2py] Re: Best practice using scheduler as a task queue?

2012-06-26 Thread Niphlod
well, after all the time you spent after it, it's quite a bold statement. Current scheduler (in trunk there has been a problem, attached the correct one) reassign RUNNING tasks if a worker is killed in action, but you may want to check if in scheduler_worker table you have entries for dead

[web2py] Re: Best practice using scheduler as a task queue?

2012-06-26 Thread Andrew
Michael, I intend to use the scheduler for infinite looping background tasks. From what I have read in this thread, I see the issue is that you are most concerned about race conditions. I am yet to do this with web2py scheduler, but why not have something in cron at reboot to insert and

Re: [web2py] Re: Best practice using scheduler as a task queue?

2012-06-26 Thread Alec Taylor
Wouldn't lock-free mechanisms be more useful? On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Andrew awillima...@gmail.com wrote: Michael, I intend to use the scheduler for infinite looping background tasks.  From what I have read in this thread, I see the issue is that you are most concerned about race

Re: [web2py] Re: Best practice using scheduler as a task queue?

2012-06-26 Thread Niphlod
problem here started as I can't ensure my app to insert only one task per function, that is not a scheduler problem per se: it's a common database problem. Would have been the same if someone created a db.define_table('mytable', Field('name'), Field('uniquecostraint') ) and have to

Re: [web2py] Re: Best practice using scheduler as a task queue?

2012-06-26 Thread Michael Toomim
All, thank you for the excellent discussion! I should explain why I posted that recommendation. The vision of using the scheduler for background tasks was: Woohoo, this scheduler will *automatically handle locks*—so I don't need to worry about stray background processes running in parallel

Re: [web2py] Re: Best practice using scheduler as a task queue?

2012-06-26 Thread Michael Toomim
In case it is useful to someone, here is the full code I used with locking, using postgresql advisory locks. The benefit of using postgresql's locks are that: • It locks on the database—works across multiple clients • The locks are automatically released if a client disconnects from the db

[web2py] Re: Best practice using scheduler as a task queue?

2012-06-25 Thread Michael Toomim
This scenario is working out worse and worse. Now I'm getting tasks stuck in the 'RUNNING' state... even when there aren't any scheduler processes running behind them running! I'm guessing the server got killed mid-process, and now it doesn't know how to recover. Looks like a bug in the

[web2py] Re: Best practice using scheduler as a task queue?

2012-06-25 Thread Michael Toomim
Er, let me rephrase: I don't recommend using the scheduler for *infinitely looping background tasks*. On Monday, June 25, 2012 4:54:30 PM UTC-7, Michael Toomim wrote: This scenario is working out worse and worse. Now I'm getting tasks stuck in the 'RUNNING' state... even when there aren't

[web2py] Re: Best practice using scheduler as a task queue?

2012-06-25 Thread pbreit
I see Rails is adding some sort of queue: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3899080 --

[web2py] Re: Best practice using scheduler as a task queue?

2012-06-18 Thread Niphlod
I'll get back to you this evening, but for now, maybe it's a fix. You're afraid that starting n web2py processes your code in initialize will duplicate inserts. That is the common behaviour in db transactions. if you're running three processes, and you're not lucky, all three will see

[web2py] Re: Best practice using scheduler as a task queue?

2012-06-17 Thread Michael Toomim
Thanks for the response, niphlod! Let me explain: The task can be marked FAILED or EXPIRED if: • The code in the task throws an exception • A run of the task exceeds the timeout • The system clock goes past stop_time And it will just not plain exist if: • You have just set up the code

[web2py] Re: Best practice using scheduler as a task queue?

2012-06-17 Thread Michael Toomim
To respond to your last two points: You're right that models only runs on every request... I figured if my website isn't getting any usage then the tasks don't matter anyway. :P Yes, I think there are design issues here, but I haven't found a better solution. I'm very interested in hearing

[web2py] Re: Best practice using scheduler as a task queue?

2012-06-13 Thread Niphlod
Maybe I didn't get exactly what you need , but .. you have 3 tasks, that needs to be unique. Also, you want to be sure that if a task crashes doesn't remain hanged. This should never happen with the scheduler the worst situation is that if a worker crashes (here crashes is it

[web2py] Re: Best practice of organizing/present static pages

2011-10-29 Thread Spring
Hi Anthony, you understand my needs perfectly. I will try your solution. Thanks Spring On Oct 29, 1:26 pm, Anthony abasta...@gmail.com wrote: On Saturday, October 29, 2011 1:17:43 AM UTC-4, pbreit wrote: Not the best urls but could you put them in static? I assume he meant the main page

[web2py] Re: Best practice of organizing/present static pages

2011-10-28 Thread Anthony
You could create a single function (maybe call it something like 'content') and pass an argument in the URL to determine the view to display: def content(): response.view = 'default/%s.%s' % (request.args(0), request.extension) if request.args else 'default/index.html' return dict()

[web2py] Re: Best practice of organizing/present static pages

2011-10-28 Thread Anthony
Also, using the parameter-based router, you could make 'content' the default function, so it would be hidden in the URL. On Friday, October 28, 2011 9:58:58 PM UTC-4, Anthony wrote: You could create a single function (maybe call it something like 'content') and pass an argument in the URL to

[web2py] Re: Best practice of organizing/present static pages

2011-10-28 Thread pbreit
Not the best urls but could you put them in static? Even if it's 20 or 50 pages, I would suggest just doing it the web2py way with functions.

[web2py] Re: Best practice of organizing/present static pages

2011-10-28 Thread Anthony
On Saturday, October 29, 2011 1:17:43 AM UTC-4, pbreit wrote: Not the best urls but could you put them in static? I assume he meant the main page content is static but the pages still need to take advantage of web2py views for navigation, etc., so they aren't true static files.

[web2py] Re: Best practice for inserting possible duplicates?

2011-07-02 Thread Anthony
Be careful about using an 'except' without specifying specific exception types -- that code will attempt an insert regardless of the reason for the failure in the 'try' clause. Anthony On Saturday, July 2, 2011 6:05:46 PM UTC-4, Nick Arnett wrote: Getting more comfortable with Web2Py and

Re: [web2py] Re: Best practice for inserting possible duplicates?

2011-07-02 Thread Nick Arnett
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Anthony abasta...@gmail.com wrote: Be careful about using an 'except' without specifying specific exception types -- that code will attempt an insert regardless of the reason for the failure in the 'try' clause. I was wondering if someone would mention that...

[web2py] Re: Best practice for inserting possible duplicates?

2011-07-02 Thread Massimo Di Pierro
Do this instead try: urlID = db.web_page(url=url).id except (KeyError,TyepError): urlID = db.web_page.insert(url=url) or better row = db.web_page(url=url) urlID = row and row.id or db.web_page.insert(url=url) If db.web_page(url=url) fails with an OperationalError (database

Re: [web2py] Re: best practice for an upload with a very long file name

2011-06-29 Thread pbreit
I just ran into a problem with the Ebay API that does not accept image URL lengths over 150 chars. Is the only immediate fix to make that edit to gluon/sql.py? Maybe it should be even shorter of configurable? Is that much entropy needed?

[web2py] Re: Best practice to start background process

2011-04-27 Thread Stodge
I don't know about web2py specific processes, but I believe py2exe can install your python application as a Windows service. On Apr 27, 1:04 pm, teemu teemu.kuulas...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I would like to know what would be the best way to start background process in production environment. I

[web2py] Re: Best practice to start background process

2011-04-27 Thread Ross Peoples
This is a copy paste of something I wrote a month ago or so: I was able to get background processes to work pretty well. I have an import script that takes a minute or two to run and is started by an ajax call from a button in one of my views, and the progress is reported back to the page as

[web2py] Re: Best practice to start background process

2011-04-27 Thread pbreit
I tried the cron@reboot approach but couldn't figure out if my processes were running or failing so I switched to per minute cron tasks. At some point it would be nice to have something like Dealyed Jobs (https://github.com/tobi/delayed_job) or Celery suport (http://celeryproject.org).

[web2py] Re: Best practice to start background process

2011-04-27 Thread Russell
I think that a simple system cron is the most reliable (per minute, per hour, per day). Then use some type of locking mechanism in your web2py script (either database or file). For example: locked = db((db.report_queue.status=='SystemLock')).select().first() if not locked: locked =

[web2py] Re: Best practice

2011-03-17 Thread villas
Hi Dave You should obtain experience with individual controllers and views. The book is well ordered to take you through the learning curve. Try to get to the point where you feel confident about what's going on before moving down the list. The Crud is ideal for fast prototyping and quick apps

Re: [web2py] Re: Best practice

2011-03-17 Thread David Warnock
David, Thanks for the advice. Makes sense to me am working through the book at present. Patience not my strongest point :-) Dave -- Dave Warnock: http://42.blogs.warnock.me.uk Cycling Blog: http://42bikes.warnock.me.uk

[web2py] Re: Best practice for including python libraries with my app

2011-01-15 Thread mart
weather you're looking to distribute or even just for your self, You can always use Distribute. The learning curb isn't huge and has many bultin features (i.e. find_packages() which you may find helpful here). ANyways, here a link. http://packages.python.org/distribute/setuptools.html#id3 Mart

[web2py] Re: Best practice: swapping between different layout.html files within a single application

2010-11-06 Thread toan75
How can do for bytecode compile work in this case? On Oct 22, 3:03 am, mdipierro mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu wrote: Not sure this works. Does it? {{extendvariable}} works as long as you do not bytecodecompile. On Oct 21, 12:29 pm, cjrh caleb.hatti...@gmail.com wrote: On Oct 21, 5:17 pm,

[web2py] Re: Best practice: swapping between different layout.html files within a single application

2010-11-06 Thread mdipierro
I cannot think of an easy way to do it. On Nov 6, 3:52 am, toan75 toa...@gmail.com wrote: How can do for bytecode compile work in this case? On Oct 22, 3:03 am, mdipierro mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu wrote: Not sure this works. Does it? {{extendvariable}} works as long as you do not

[web2py] Re: Best practice: swapping between different layout.html files within a single application

2010-10-21 Thread mdipierro
Download a few of http://web2py.com/layouts and install them. The look at views/plugin_layouts/layouts/*.html Everything you downloaded is kept. TO re-instate cp views/plugin_layouts/layouts/xxx.html views/layout.html On Oct 21, 7:42 am, cjrh caleb.hatti...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I have a

[web2py] Re: Best practice: swapping between different layout.html files within a single application

2010-10-21 Thread cjrh
On Oct 21, 3:15 pm, mdipierro mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu wrote: cp views/plugin_layouts/layouts/xxx.html views/layout.html Perhaps I am missing something, but surely if views/layout.html is replaced, it is replaced for all users? I want to show different users some pages that are generated using

[web2py] Re: Best practice: swapping between different layout.html files within a single application

2010-10-21 Thread annet
I tried something like this in a mock cms application. Depending on the logged in user I set the view in a conditional in the controller or in the function. if auth.has_membership(group_id=user_x): response.view='user_x_view.html' if auth.has_membership(group_id=user_y):

[web2py] Re: Best practice: swapping between different layout.html files within a single application

2010-10-21 Thread cjrh
On Oct 21, 4:05 pm, annet annet.verm...@gmail.com wrote: if auth.has_membership(group_id=user_x):     response.view='user_x_view.html' if auth.has_membership(group_id=user_y):     response.view='user_y_view.html' Ok, but then would do you just keep copies of your view files around, save only

[web2py] Re: Best practice: swapping between different layout.html files within a single application

2010-10-21 Thread annet
I needed different views extending the same layout, what you want is different layouts extended with the same view, right? In the view something like? {{if user_x:}} {{extend 'user_x_view.html'}} {{elif user_y:}} {{extend 'user_y_view.html'}} {{else:}} {{extend 'user_z_view.html'}}

[web2py] Re: Best practice: swapping between different layout.html files within a single application

2010-10-21 Thread cjrh
On Oct 21, 10:03 pm, mdipierro mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu wrote: Not sure this works. Does it? {{extend variable}} works as long as you do not bytecode compile. I'll give it a try in the next few days and keep you posted. Interesting comment about bytecode compiling.

[web2py] Re: Best practice for removing link to active page from menu?

2010-08-06 Thread mwolfe02
I think I understood most of that already. Maybe my explanation of what I was looking for was lacking. Essentially, I am trying to implement the concept discussed here: http://css-tricks.com/pointer-events-current-nav/ but in html instead of css. On Aug 4, 3:59 am, mdipierro

[web2py] Re: Best practice for removing link to active page from menu?

2010-08-04 Thread mdipierro
The ul.../ul code in Django in web2py translates with {{=MENU(response.menu)}} where (using the data in your example) response.menu=[ ('Home',request.function=='home',URL(r=request,f='home'),[]), ('Store Information',request.function=='info',URL(r=request,f=info'), []), ] The latter code

[web2py] Re: Best practice for removing link to active page from menu?

2010-08-04 Thread Iceberg
Yes but that only works in the earlier welcome scaffold shipped with web2py 1.79.x or so. The latest web2py's welcome uses SuperFish menu ( http://users.tpg.com.au/j_birch/plugins/superfish/ ), which is supposed to be capable for that too, but in fact the out-of-box welcome/static/base.css losts

[web2py] Re: best practice for an upload with a very long file name

2010-04-19 Thread mdipierro
Any objection to make this 200? Massimo On Apr 19, 6:22 pm, Rowdy da...@fielden.com.au wrote: mdipierro wrote: I was not aware of this limit. In gluon/sql.py you should replace: newfilename = newfilename[:500] + '.' + extension with something like newfilename = newfilename[:120] +

[web2py] Re: best practice for an upload with a very long file name

2010-04-19 Thread Rowdy
mdipierro wrote: Any objection to make this 200? Massimo The limit seems to be NTFS with a maximum of 226 characters. I have accumulated nearly 60,000 files in a legacy application, and the longest extension is 5 characters (.batch). No objection from me. Rowdy -- Subscription settings:

[web2py] Re: Best practice for logging w/ wsgi?

2010-04-08 Thread Iceberg
Nice to hear that still works. :) Actually yesterday I found it was broken in latest web2py windows binary distribution, but that is not my fault, it is only because that binary build is lack of standard module logging/*. Anyway, you can bypass that by a try...except. Just for your information.