After creating the Symbolic link I have not had any problems. I hope
that continues.
thanks annet
Jose
I submitted a ticket at webfaction, this is their reply:
"That is correct, this does not completely prevent the problem from
recurring.
Using a static-only symlink app is just a step in helping with the
memory
usage. In order to solve the memory issue, you would need to find the
root
cause of the
> I did not have to do something to the apache-setup. The creation
> of this static-only app did not solve my problem and in the end I have
> switched to a uwsgi-setup. A search in this mailing list's archives will
> provide a lot of information on that setup.
When I was having memory problems, I
On 24 oct, 07:46, Johann Spies wrote:
> Should I change something in httpd.conf?
>
> When I did it some weeks ago the support people of Webfactional was very
> helpful. I did not have to do something to the apache-setup. The creation
> of this static-only app did not solve my problem and in t
Should I change something in httpd.conf?
>
>
When I did it some weeks ago the support people of Webfactional was very
helpful. I did not have to do something to the apache-setup. The creation
of this static-only app did not solve my problem and in the end I have
switched to a uwsgi-setup. A sea
On 24 oct, 04:19, annet wrote:
> Hi Jose,
>
> I had the same problem a week ago, Sean solved it doing the following:
>
> In the Control Panel, under Domains/websites Applications, add a new
> Application:
>
> Name: init_static
> App category: Symbolic link
> App type: Symbolic link to static-o
Hi Jose,
I had the same problem a week ago, Sean solved it doing the following:
In the Control Panel, under Domains/websites Applications, add a new
Application:
Name: init_static
App category: Symbolic link
App type: Symbolic link to static-only app
App doc: This creates a symlink from ~/web
On 23 oct, 19:53, Massimo Di Pierro
wrote:
> Can you try run your app locally with 1.99.2 and see if you can
> reproduce any memory problem. What version did you upgrade from?
I do not remember, but I'm sure it was a version of more than 1 year.
Jose
Can you try run your app locally with 1.99.2 and see if you can
reproduce any memory problem. What version did you upgrade from? Di
you have also with 1.98.2? I cannot think of any change that results
in more memory usage, actually the opposite.
Massimo
On Oct 23, 5:31 pm, Jose wrote:
> Hello
>
9 matches
Mail list logo
