When web2py switched from cherrypy to rocket, now I can't seem to start it
on any resource-constrained VPNs (currently running w/ 96MB RAM).
To me, this is a really big downer since I love web2py's ability to create
prototype applications using nothing but a shell and a browser (using
minimal
The benchmarks are in. As you can see from the attached PDF, there is a
strong case for Rocket.
How I conducted these benchmarks:
CPU: Athlon 4050e 2.1 GHz
RAM: 3GB
OS: Windows 7 Ultimate
Python 2.6.1
Rocket 0.3.1
Cherrypy 3.1.2
I used ApacheBench to run the numbers you see.
The wsgi app
Python 2.6.4, not 2.6.1 oops.
On 3/12/2010 10:13 AM, Timothy Farrell wrote:
The benchmarks are in. As you can see from the attached PDF, there is
a strong case for Rocket.
How I conducted these benchmarks:
CPU: Athlon 4050e 2.1 GHz
RAM: 3GB
OS: Windows 7 Ultimate
Python 2.6.1
Rocket 0.3.1
We moved from cherrypy wsgiserver to Rocket, by Timothy Farrell.
I included an older version, need to include the latest one.
It needs to be tested but let's wait I post the latest version before
we do so.
Why?
@Tim, you made a very convincing case to me some time ago. Can you
share your
The code has changed since version 0.1, Let me re-run some benchmarks.
I'll have time to tomorrow.
For those curious, the basic difference is that Rocket handles a few
concurrent connections as fast as wsgiserver and many concurrent
connections much much faster. It's also smaller, with
Is Rocket a port of CherryPy? Or is made from zero? isn't 0.2 an earlier
release yet?
What's the principal difference from CherryPy? cleaner code, smaller.. and
more?
I'm questioning just for info of us the users, doesn't know so much about
it.
Thanks for all.
Regatds!!
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at
One at a time:
Is Rocket a port of CherryPy? Or is made from zero?
No, it's my own code from the ground up. I did consult wsgiserver code
in some areas, but I think that anyone who would examine the code would
be satisfied to say it is not a derivative work.
isn't 0.2 an earlier release
On Mar 11, 2010, at 8:59 AM, Timothy Farrell wrote:
One at a time:
Is Rocket a port of CherryPy? Or is made from zero?
No, it's my own code from the ground up. I did consult wsgiserver code in
some areas, but I think that anyone who would examine the code would be
satisfied to say it
snip
For a production system, I'm more interested in stability than performance. And
despite the admitted arbitrariness of version-numbering choices, it's hard to
make the case to management that moving to an 0.x server is safe.
What do *you* mean by labeling Rocket 0.x?
That's a fair
On Mar 11, 2010, at 10:24 AM, Timothy Farrell wrote:
For a production system, I'm more interested in stability than performance.
And despite the admitted arbitrariness of version-numbering choices, it's
hard to make the case to management that moving to an 0.x server is safe.
What do
10 matches
Mail list logo
