On 06/09/2006, at 2:28 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Requiring deployment on OS X is a deal breaker for many places. WO
does not have that huge of a market share to begin with, why
cripple it?
To sell Macs, of course.
At least that was going to be Apple's reason (I think, eventually)
befor
I've been tough Chuck's chapter 11 and implemented the examples for xml serialization of an enterprise object and deserialization of same. All worked fine.Now, though, I'm onto de-serializing a generic stream of XML (sample below). Can someone suggest documentation that I can read to help me unders
I personally believe there should be a stack that includes Wonder... so
I am sticking with my two:
Wonderland
Wonderlust
at least people will "wonder" and not feel "woe".
And all the lipstick stuff... well... whatever.
So WOBuilder... maybe we should create a fund for it?
James
On Sep 5, 200
On 9/5/06 2:07 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Sep 4, 2006, at 1:04 AM, Georg Tuparev wrote:
On Aug 28, 2006, at 6:10 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Personally, I feel that given all the improvements (and yes there
were some steps backwards) that Apple has made to WO (especially
EOF) since WO4.5 and Java'
Chuck and John,
Coincidentally, I am in fact currently working on this today (having spent
several hours finding out that EOF's calls to Get PK stored procs is sadly
hideously broken.
However, unlike Chuck's suggestion, I'm not using a delegate - because I
really don't understand what they are
On 9/5/06, Joe Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/5/06, Karl Gretton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The only danger of using Eclipstick is that someone might come up
> with something to suggest that we are trying to put lipstick on the
> PIG...which WO clearly is NOT!
>
> I personally liked thi
On 9/5/06, Karl Gretton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The only danger of using Eclipstick is that someone might come up
with something to suggest that we are trying to put lipstick on the
PIG...which WO clearly is NOT!
I personally liked this cover: http://static.flickr.com/
70/197986751_d4bd745e2c
Thanks Chuck. I believe your suggestion is the simplest and most
reliable one that I can imaging.
On Sep 5, 2006, at 12:02 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Hi,
On Sep 2, 2006, at 5:25 PM, YL wrote:
I have some content management related entities:
EContent, EPublication, WLink, WCategory
EContent
I have no idea what the specifics of Gen_ID are, but EOF-side this is
the delegate and method that you need to work with:
com.webobjects.eoaccess Interface EODatabaseContext.Delegate
public NSDictionary databaseContextNewPrimaryKey(EODatabaseContext
dbCtxt,
Would it be possible to implement primary key generation using
generators and Gen_ID rather than the EO_PK table? What do you think?
John
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev
The only danger of using Eclipstick is that someone might come up
with something to suggest that we are trying to put lipstick on the
PIG...which WO clearly is NOT!
I personally liked this cover: http://static.flickr.com/
70/197986751_d4bd745e2c_m.jpg
We should surely come up with a .NET v
On Sep 4, 2006, at 3:00 PM, M. Blanc wrote:
On 4 Sep 2006, at 17:28, Marc Oesch wrote:
And I wanted to ask if anybody is actually thinking about a
replacement for WOBuilder or already working on it ?
I'm all for having babies –I personally had three, though my wife
helped a lot– so I ca
On Sep 5, 2006, at 11:23 AM, King Chung Huang wrote:
On Sep 5, 2006, at 12:07 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
- there are so many new cocoa technologies that we could use
(bindings, core graphics, ...)
One of the advantages of WO / Java is that it is cross platform.
Now, moving to Eclipse based t
On Sep 5, 2006, at 2:23 PM, King Chung Huang wrote:
On Sep 5, 2006, at 12:07 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
- there are so many new cocoa technologies that we could use
(bindings, core graphics, ...)
One of the advantages of WO / Java is that it is cross platform.
Now, moving to Eclipse based to
Hi!
(defclass inYourDreamsComponent (WOComponent) ... )
:)
Yours
Miguel Arroz
On 2006/09/05, at 19:19, Ken Anderson wrote:
On Sep 5, 2006, at 2:07 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
As an overall more productive environment, yes. As a language and
core API, never!
AMEN!
___
On Sep 5, 2006, at 12:07 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
- there are so many new cocoa technologies that we could use
(bindings, core graphics, ...)
One of the advantages of WO / Java is that it is cross platform.
Now, moving to Eclipse based tools, it is more cross platform than
it was looking re
On Sep 5, 2006, at 2:07 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:As an overall more productive environment, yes. As a language and core API, never! AMEN! ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists
On Sep 4, 2006, at 1:04 AM, Georg Tuparev wrote:
On Aug 28, 2006, at 6:10 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Personally, I feel that given all the improvements (and yes there
were some steps backwards) that Apple has made to WO (especially
EOF) since WO4.5 and Java's enterprise connections (and recent
Hi,
On Sep 2, 2006, at 5:25 PM, YL wrote:
I have some content management related entities:
EContent, EPublication, WLink, WCategory
EContent stores various contents, can be dynamic wo pages or static
contents, even web references.
EPublication adds business settings to EContents: WCategory
Hi, Benoit,
On Sep 5, 2006, at 11:37 AM, benoit cantin wrote:
Here is an example of what we are doing. An entity called "Artist"
references instances of an entity called "Album". We have 2 Web
components, one which let users customize Artist properties, let's
call it component1, and the ot
First of all, thank you for your answer.
I am working on the same project (a CMS).
Hi, Laetitia,
On Sep 4, 2006, at 5:45 PM, Laetitia Orsini wrote:
Hello,
I'm a newbie and after having developed my first "complex" webobjects
application I wonder if it was the right way to do it... The aim o
Hi, Laetitia,
On Sep 4, 2006, at 5:45 PM, Laetitia Orsini wrote:
Hello,
I'm a newbie and after having developed my first "complex" webobjects
application I wonder if it was the right way to do it... The aim of
the
application is to offer an interface to manage contents stocked in a
database
22 matches
Mail list logo
