Hello;
I see the following which looks good, but doesn't really explain the
mechanics -- does anybody know how this has changed?
Radar #5084084
Enhance EOF prototyping support
Description:
Enhance EOModel prototyping support to make it recognize the
Database Management System used just li
Thanks Guido;
OK I have not used prototypes before as database product changes are
relatively infrequent. I'll take a look - thanks for the advice.
cheers.
I'm wondering about writing a WOA which I would like to give to
different people to run against different database products.
Howev
On 19.02.2008, at 00:12, Andrew Lindesay wrote:
I'm wondering about writing a WOA which I would like to give to
different people to run against different database products.
However, the model has the 'externalType' in the model file which
can be used by some plugins such as the PG JDBC ada
Hello;
I'm wondering about writing a WOA which I would like to give to
different people to run against different database products. However,
the model has the 'externalType' in the model file which can be used
by some plugins such as the PG JDBC adaptor plugin from Wonder. I
wonder; has
Hello Cheong;
The "typical" transaction behaviour would be for either all of a
transaction to be stored corrected in the database server or none of
the transaction would be stored. Kieren is describing a situation
where some of a transaction is stored and some is not stored so you
can't
May be by default, you pay less, if you'd need to. MyISAM is cheaper..
Thanks Kieran for useful info, and thought by default MySQL should do so.
Is FrontBase do the same roll back if timeout?
Cheong Hee
Message: 13
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:58:45 +1100
From: Lachlan Deck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I was really surprised too when I looked over the upgrade notes
before upgrading some slaves to 5.0. very strange decision.
Ah well missing stuff like this is the risk we take by not being
paying "MySQL Enterprise Customers" :-(
So basically one just needs to just add a line to /et
On 19/02/2008, at 8:53 AM, Kieran Kelleher wrote:
Any of you who use MySQL with InnoDB (you should be using InnoDB!),
then note the following change in the upgrade notes. I would think
you would want the whole transaction to be rolled back on
timeout.
Incompatible change: As of My
Any of you who use MySQL with InnoDB (you should be using InnoDB!),
then note the following change in the upgrade notes. I would think
you would want the whole transaction to be rolled back on
timeout.
Incompatible change: As of MySQL 5.0.13, InnoDB rolls back only the
last statem
OK -
I need to join on a table that has multiple records. However, I want
only to join on the record with the latest date.
I need this to be an left outer join.
Thanks,
James Cicenia
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Because er.extensions.qualifiers is new and ERXFullTextQualifier is
older than it :)
It does depend on ERXSQLHelper at least ... That's required to
generate sql for that in a "db-independent" way.
ms
On Feb 18, 2008, at 4:22 PM, John Huss wrote:
Ah, I see it. Is there a reason this is in
Hi,
I had a problem deploying a WO app, built with ant. EOs, in another
framework, couldn't be found at runtime due to a NoClassDefFoundError.
But, all was well when running in Eclipse.
After digging around for a while I noticed that the a framework class
path was missing on in the WOA
Ah, I see it. Is there a reason this is in the package "er.extensions"
instead of "er.extensions.qualifiers"?
Does this depend on the Wonder version of the FrontBasePlugIn or is the old
plugin ok?
John
On Feb 18, 2008 3:10 PM, Mike Schrag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ERXFullTextQualifier in Wo
ERXFullTextQualifier in Wonder ...
ms
On Feb 18, 2008, at 4:02 PM, John Huss wrote:
Is there already a qualifier coded somewhere to use LookSee in
Frontbase?
The sql needs to look like this I guess:
SELECT * FROM ATable
WHERE SATISFIES(indexName, 'searchTerm');
How are people doing this?
Is there already a qualifier coded somewhere to use LookSee in Frontbase?
The sql needs to look like this I guess:
SELECT * FROM ATable
WHERE SATISFIES(indexName, 'searchTerm');
How are people doing this?
Thanks,
John
___
Do not post admin requests
On 19/02/2008, at 7:53 AM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
On 19/02/2008, at 7:35 AM, Pierre Bernard wrote:
I am not really sure what you want to do, but chances are you will
find help here:
http://code.google.com/p/houdah-webobjects-frameworks/wiki/
QualifierAdditions
In the qualifier support class
Hi there,
On 19/02/2008, at 7:35 AM, Pierre Bernard wrote:
I am not really sure what you want to do, but chances are you will
find help here:
http://code.google.com/p/houdah-webobjects-frameworks/wiki/
QualifierAdditions
In the qualifier support classes (HoudahEOAccess framework) you
wi
Hi!
I am not really sure what you want to do, but chances are you will
find help here:
http://code.google.com/p/houdah-webobjects-frameworks/wiki/QualifierAdditions
In the qualifier support classes (HoudahEOAccess framework) you will
find implementations of qualifier migration.
With a li
Just out of curiosity: are these hand-written rules? If yes, how many
page configs do you have?
Cheers, Anjo
Am 18.02.2008 um 20:51 schrieb Dominique Schoenenberger:
Our application has 6500 D2W rules (including rules from
JavaDirectToWeb and Wonder frameworks).
We noticed that the applic
I do the same ... I haven't tried "find updated" in probably 2 years.
It just so happened that when he posted that original message, his
build # WAS actually the latest build because the build server had
stopped (as far as his update site was concerned). But it definitely
could be update
Our application has 6500 D2W rules (including rules from
JavaDirectToWeb and Wonder frameworks).
We noticed that the application become slower with time when we have
more than 4500 D2W rules. We don't know yet exactly what it is but we
would like to know if anybody has noticed something whe
On 18.02.2008, at 12:36, Mike Schrag wrote:
It actually was "broken" until last night (it was building
superunstable instead of nightly).
With never, I meant, "for years". I often had to go through "Find new"
and not "Find updated" for Eclipse to find ANYTHING at the remote
site, even if
Did you try "Search for new features to install" and then select the
WOLips site? The update feature never worked reliably for me.
It actually was "broken" until last night (it was building
superunstable instead of nightly).
ms
___
Do not post admi
I'm using the most recent 3.3.2 build and I'm not seeing any
performance issues with Debug As ...
ms
On Feb 18, 2008, at 12:14 PM, Johann Werner wrote:
A little caveat:
in the past weeks I had trouble debugging in eclipse 3.3.2. Running
a WO app through eclipse is fine but as soon as I sw
On 18.02.2008, at 07:53, Theodore Petrosky wrote:
You mentioned that the was fixed I tried to update
my eclipse 3.3.1.1 and it reports that everything is
up to date.. WOLipt 3.3.4742. I notice that the
original poster is using eclipse 3.3.2. Is this the
recommended Eclipse to run?
Did you
On 18.02.2008, at 08:21, Archibal Singleton wrote:
That's exactly it (remembered that it had this rather descriptive
method name :-)
Keep in mind, that this might or might not work for your specific
databases. The code was originally written to transfer data from
FrontBase to PostgreSQL a
Hi there,
I'm wondering if there's something akin to the above but that allows
migrating *to* some other entity (rather than from).
e.g., I'm wanting to 'and' the restricting qualifiers for the pk
relations of my join entities (dynamically) so that they are likewise
restricted.
Anything
A little caveat:
in the past weeks I had trouble debugging in eclipse 3.3.2. Running a
WO app through eclipse is fine but as soon as I switch to debug mode
the execution of the WO app gets incredibly slow (and I mean really
slow as not to say nearly useless).
With some old 3.3.2 stream bu
The build server was configured to change the way the nightly build
works ... Try again. I always recommend 3.3.2 prerelease if you're on
Leopard, but if you're on Tiger, 3.3.1 is fine.
ms
On Feb 18, 2008, at 9:53 AM, Theodore Petrosky wrote:
You mentioned that the was fixed I tried t
On 18 Feb 2008, at 09:49, Timo Hoepfner wrote:
ERXJDBCUtilities
._copyDatabaseDefinedByEOModelAndConnectionDictionaryToDatabaseWithConnectionDictionary
(...)
That's exactly it (remembered that it had this rather descriptive
method name :-)
Thanks a lot Timo!
= tmk =
_
trying to figure out the googlemail work around.
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman
You mentioned that the was fixed I tried to update
my eclipse 3.3.1.1 and it reports that everything is
up to date.. WOLipt 3.3.4742. I notice that the
original poster is using eclipse 3.3.2. Is this the
recommended Eclipse to run?
Ted
Message: 5
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:44:10 -0500
From:
ERXJDBCUtilities._copyDatabaseDefinedByEOModelAndConnectionDictionaryToD
atabaseWithConnectionDictionary(...)
Sample usage:
public class MigrationTool {
public static void main(String[] args) {
// 1. Create target database
// 2. Create tables in target da
Hello,
I seem to recall that a few weeks ago (*), Mike posted a small code
snippet showing how to use some Wonder utility methods (ie not
javaeoutil IIRC) to transfer data from one DB to another using 2
different DB connection dictionaries.
I've searched the various WO lists but can't see
thanks,
works here too. but since i fell in love with mikes component-validation
for wolips i try to avoid this syntax.
Guido Neitzer schrieb:
On 18.02.2008, at 02:52, Dennis Cruel wrote:
I filed a bug report.
The only workaround i found is to not use inline-bindings for
components which
On 18.02.2008, at 02:52, Dennis Cruel wrote:
I filed a bug report.
The only workaround i found is to not use inline-bindings for
components which use WOImage.
You can write
That works here.
cug
--
Real-World WebObjects class at the Big Nerd Ranch
March 2008, Frankfurt, Germany
http://w
I filed a bug report.
The only workaround i found is to not use inline-bindings for components
which use WOImage.
Guido Neitzer schrieb:
On 15.02.2008, at 03:18, Dennis Cruel wrote:
Is this a bug or am i missing something?
Seems like a bug. I get the same. Did you report it to Apple?
cug
37 matches
Mail list logo
