Hi All,
can someone tell me if there is anything else which can cause a timeout?
we have set setSessionTimeOut to be an hour in Application class, but we are
intermittently experiencing timeouts when the hour has not been reached.
Thanks in advance
Bearko
___
The reason we don't do it ourself is that a lot of that stuff calls into
erxfileutils and that uses path names. Fixing it would be a lot of work and
make code more complicated without a lot of real gain (at least from when I
last looked at it).
So unless any of the committers actually need to u
On Jul 21, 2010, at 11:12 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
>> Is anybody using 5.4?
>>
>> It is too bad that Wonder doesn't work so well with the jar frameworks;
>> sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn't...
> fixes welcome :)
>
> ms
>
Well the following line in my Application fixes this problem:
r
On 23/07/2010, at 10:20 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>> 1. It only works when I call a.addObjectToBothSidesOfRelationshipWithKey(b,
>> "b"). (Don't get me wrong—that's great, an enormous improvement on what I
>> was doing 5 minutes ago.)
>
> Did you add versions of this method to both entities?
Yes
On Jul 22, 2010, at 5:22 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
> On 23/07/2010, at 8:25 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>
>> OK, now that we are all on the same page :-), see the JavaDocs for
>> EOEnterpriseObject:
>>
>> inverseForRelationshipKey
>>
>> String inverseForRelationshipKey(String relationshipKey)
>> Return
On 23/07/2010, at 8:25 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
> OK, now that we are all on the same page :-), see the JavaDocs for
> EOEnterpriseObject:
>
> inverseForRelationshipKey
>
> String inverseForRelationshipKey(String relationshipKey)
> Returns the name of the relationship pointing back to the receiver
On Jul 22, 2010, at 3:39 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
> On 23/07/2010, at 7:42 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>
How are you modeling these relationships?
>>>
>>> Originally, just this: a mandatory, to-one relationship from A to B.
>>> Consider it to be a parent (B) with optional child (A). Every chil
On Jul 22, 2010, at 3:37 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
> On 23/07/2010, at 7:32 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>
>> On Jul 22, 2010, at 2:56 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry, I should have tried to be clearer. Basically, I've got a parent
>>> object B (which will always be created first). At some point
On 23/07/2010, at 7:42 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>>> How are you modeling these relationships?
>>
>> Originally, just this: a mandatory, to-one relationship from A to B.
>> Consider it to be a parent (B) with optional child (A). Every child has a
>> parent (hence the current mandatory to-one from
On 23/07/2010, at 7:32 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
> On Jul 22, 2010, at 2:56 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
>
>> Sorry, I should have tried to be clearer. Basically, I've got a parent
>> object B (which will always be created first). At some point, B may obtain
>> at most one child A, but it doesn't nece
On Jul 22, 2010, at 2:49 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
> On 23/07/2010, at 12:09 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>
>>> I know this topic comes up on the list from time to time, but I just need a
>>> quick sanity check.
>>
>> Nope, not sane. :-)
>
> Well spotted. Now on with this:
>
>>> I have two entities
On Jul 22, 2010, at 2:56 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
> Sorry, I should have tried to be clearer. Basically, I've got a parent
> object B (which will always be created first). At some point, B may obtain
> at most one child A, but it doesn't necessarily. So every B has zero or one
> child As. E
Hi David,
On 23/07/2010, at 6:33 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
> I'm not 100% clear on how this is modeled.
>
> 1) Does the A.b() relationship propagate PKs?
No.
> 2) Are you saying that the A.b().a() may be null?
No, never. A.b().a() would always give A.
> In other words, are you saying A.fe
On 23/07/2010, at 12:09 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>> I know this topic comes up on the list from time to time, but I just need a
>> quick sanity check.
>
> Nope, not sane. :-)
Well spotted. Now on with this:
>> I have two entities, A and B. For every A, there is a corresponding B. For
>> some
On 22/07/2010, at 11:42 PM, Ramsey Gurley wrote:
> One-to-optional-one relationship... Not doable as far as I know. In another
> discussion on the topic, Chuck Hill suggested:
>
>> You could model it as a right-outer join and optional, but I think that EOF
>> is still going to have a hissy fi
Hi Joe,
I've been really impressed with the updated confluence site itself.
<>
<>
The search has become especially useful to me. I hope that the
extension can match it, but if not, the confluence wiki itself is
still only a click away.
And no, I don't think you put up your notes about ERM
I was trying out the new extension, and wanted to see what I last
posted on ERModernLook (or if I ever did get around to adding my
notes). I was lazy, and did a search for "ERModern" but came up blank.
Only by searching full names like ERModernLook did results come up.
This is relative to the searc
Hi Paul,
I'm not 100% clear on how this is modeled.
1) Does the A.b() relationship propagate PKs?
2) Are you saying that the A.b().a() may be null? In other words, are you
saying A.fetchAllAs().valueForKey(B_KEY) may not return an Array with the same
objects that B.fetchAllBs(ec, B.A.isNotNull
Well, he did say non-WO, and that he actually wanted to write Swing instead of
letting the rule engine do all that hard work for him.
If a guy is a masochist, who am I to stand in the way?
Now, stand around and watch? That I could _easily_ do all day, especially if
there's beer involved.
Dave
Check out
http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Category:OWASP_Enterprise_Security_API
They have a very good Java based implementation of security code that you
can integrate with your java based project to help you sanitize your
user/externally provided data. It is not sufficient to check for
On 22/07/2010, at 1:00 PM, Mr. G Brown wrote:
> On Jul 21, 2010, at 8:12 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
>
>> Or your deployment needs fixing to not assume jar frameworks :)
Mike: Now that you're moving (have moved?) to the inside... I'm sure you'll
have need to broaden your horizons ;-)
>> On Jul 21,
On 22/07/2010, at 9:28 PM, Patrick Middleton wrote:
> Some of our customers are commissioning penetration testing reports, which
> are flagging vulnerabilities in our WebObjects applications. The problem
> reported is with URLs such as
> .../wa/MyDirectAction?wosid=XYZ%22%3E%3Cscript%3Ealert%2
I don't follow: *is* this an actual problem with the default coding style? IMO,
you wouldn't ever say "oh noez! your session $ID" is no longer valid! but I'll
use it anyway."
What *should* happen is that WO gives you a new page when the instance doesn't
find the existing session (SessionExpire
Wouldn't a simple check on hasSession do the trick? No session = no action =
pageWithName(OhNoYouDidNot)
-G
On Jul 22, 2010, at 9:40 AM, Patrick Middleton wrote:
>
> On 22 Jul 2010, at 12:49, Anjo Krank wrote:
>
>> Why would you "preserve" the session id when it's no longer valid?
>>
>> Ch
On 22 Jul 2010, at 12:49, Anjo Krank wrote:
Why would you "preserve" the session id when it's no longer valid?
Cheers, Anjo
Am 22.07.2010 um 13:28 schrieb Patrick Middleton:
in order to sanitize inputs -- mostly by removing anything
containing the likes of '
Preserve the session id whe
Wow, Dave didn¹t use this as an opportunity to plug D2JC?
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.co
On 2010-07-22, at 01:16 , Emmanuel GEZE wrote:
> It work's fine with Safari v 5.0 (6533.16) but not in nightly webkit v 5.0
> (6533.16, r63854).
... and here an article about it
http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/FAQ
cheers, Edgar
> Thank you for this usefull extension.
>
> Emmanuel
>
> Le 21 juil.
On Jul 22, 2010, at 5:00 AM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I know this topic comes up on the list from time to time, but I just need a
> quick sanity check.
Nope, not sane. :-)
> I have two entities, A and B. For every A, there is a corresponding B. For
> some subset of all Bs, each h
One-to-optional-one relationship... Not doable as far as I know. In
another discussion on the topic, Chuck Hill suggested:
You could model it as a right-outer join and optional, but I think
that EOF is still going to have a hissy fit when it does not find
the row. Worth a try and a good
Hello,
I know this topic comes up on the list from time to time, but I just need a
quick sanity check.
I have two entities, A and B. For every A, there is a corresponding B. For
some subset of all Bs, each has a corresponding A. Currently I have modelled
this with a single relationship from
Hi,
Is there a way to check if an editing context is disposed so I could create new
one?
E.g.
private EOEditingContext _editingContext;
public EOEditingContext editingContext() {
if(_editingContext == null) { // Or _editingContext is disposed off
_editingContext = ERXEC
Why would you "preserve" the session id when it's no longer valid?
Cheers, Anjo
Am 22.07.2010 um 13:28 schrieb Patrick Middleton:
> in order to sanitize inputs -- mostly by removing anything containing the
> likes of 'http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archiv
Hi folks!
Some of our customers are commissioning penetration testing reports,
which are flagging vulnerabilities in our WebObjects applications.
The problem reported is with URLs such as .../wa/MyDirectAction?
wosid=XYZ%22%3E%3Cscript%3Ealert%28123%29%3C%2Fscript%3E , direct
actions that
Am 22.07.2010 um 05:00 schrieb Mr. G Brown:
>> We only accept 5.4 fixes now, not issues. None of the comitters use or
>> condone the use of 5.4 and thus we can't really test or debug problems with
>> it.
Note that the poster showed remarkable constraint.
Now, if that was *me* who'd have writ
It work's fine with Safari v 5.0 (6533.16) but not in nightly webkit v 5.0
(6533.16, r63854).
Thank you for this usefull extension.
Emmanuel
Le 21 juil. 2010 à 18:30, Edgar Klein a écrit :
> I really like this extension :).
>
> On 2010-07-21, at 09:50 , ISHIMOTO Ken wrote:
>
>> Version 0.86
35 matches
Mail list logo
