At first place I would avoid svning the tar as it is a binary file and even a
minor change will change the binary and I guess every time the commit will
recognize it as new file will commit the whole tar instead of differences, as a
result it will start eating repository disk space very fast. I
Farrukh Ijaz wrote:
At first place I would avoid svning the tar as it is a binary file and even a
minor change will change the binary and I guess every time the commit will
recognize it as new file will commit the whole tar instead of differences, as a
result it will start eating repository
On 30-Jul-2010, at 3:57 PM, Valerio Luccio valerio.luc...@nyu.edu wrote:
Farrukh Ijaz wrote:
At first place I would avoid svning the tar as it is a binary file and even
a minor change will change the binary and I guess every time the commit will
recognize it as new file will commit the
Hey!
On 30/Jul/2010, at 7:34 AM, Farrukh Ijaz wrote:
On 30-Jul-2010, at 3:57 PM, Valerio Luccio valerio.luc...@nyu.edu wrote:
Farrukh Ijaz wrote:
At first place I would avoid svning the tar as it is a binary file and even
a minor change will change the binary and I guess every time the
Since it's a tgz, I wouldn't count on the diffs being much smaller than the
actual file...
And *I* wouldn't store the binary, only all assets that are needed to create
it: woproject binary, WO systems libs, Wonder libs, etc.
After all, the tgz is next to worthless in a year or two, unless you
Found the bug in EOMdelDOC.
Firefox (and IE, ugh) choke on the following constructs:
script ... /
should be
script .../script
and also
frame ... /
should be
frame ...
Safari and Opera handle all forms.
I've modified the necessary templates and
Hey!
On 30/Jul/2010, at 10:57 AM, Anjo Krank wrote:
Since it's a tgz, I wouldn't count on the diffs being much smaller than the
actual file...
Hrm, that's an interesting point. Has anyone ever measured?
And *I* wouldn't store the binary, only all assets that are needed to create
it:
Hi all,
I would like to display one propertyKey for a recursive relationship and the
rule doesn't seem to work as it does for a normal relationship to a different
entity. Do I need to do something special for this case? The rule I am using
has no effect and I am not sure why.
100 (entity.name
On Jul 30, 2010, at 2:51 PM, David Holt wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to display one propertyKey for a recursive relationship
and the rule doesn't seem to work as it does for a normal
relationship to a different entity. Do I need to do something
special for this case? The rule I am using
On 2010-07-30, at 12:26 PM, Ramsey Gurley wrote:
On Jul 30, 2010, at 2:51 PM, David Holt wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to display one propertyKey for a recursive relationship and the
rule doesn't seem to work as it does for a normal relationship to a
different entity. Do I need to do
On Jul 30, 2010, at 3:58 PM, David Holt wrote:
On 2010-07-30, at 12:26 PM, Ramsey Gurley wrote:
On Jul 30, 2010, at 2:51 PM, David Holt wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to display one propertyKey for a recursive
relationship and the rule doesn't seem to work as it does for a
normal
On 2010-07-30, at 1:04 PM, Ramsey Gurley wrote:
On Jul 30, 2010, at 3:58 PM, David Holt wrote:
On 2010-07-30, at 12:26 PM, Ramsey Gurley wrote:
On Jul 30, 2010, at 2:51 PM, David Holt wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to display one propertyKey for a recursive relationship and
the
Sent from my iPad
On 30-Jul-2010, at 9:12 PM, Mark Ritchie mark.ritc...@mac.com wrote:
And *I* wouldn't store the binary, only all assets that are needed to create
it: woproject binary, WO systems libs, Wonder libs, etc.
After all, the tgz is next to worthless in a year or two, unless you
On Jul 30, 2010, at 4:27 PM, David Holt wrote:
On 2010-07-30, at 1:04 PM, Ramsey Gurley wrote:
On Jul 30, 2010, at 3:58 PM, David Holt wrote:
On 2010-07-30, at 12:26 PM, Ramsey Gurley wrote:
On Jul 30, 2010, at 2:51 PM, David Holt wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to display one
On 30/Jul/2010, at 2:01 PM, Farrukh Ijaz wrote:
That's why when you know your build is stable, just tag it with a name such
as something-stable under tags folder in your svn structure. So next time you
need to produce the same build just checkout the project from tag instead of
trunk and
Does everyone run apache and WO on the same machine? No DMZ? I'm still not
clear on how these cloud servers are supposed to work regarding separation...
Ken
On Jul 29, 2010, at 1:35 AM, Lon Varscsak wrote:
I have a dedicated box on rackspace too...it's pricey, but solid as a rock.
On Jul 30, 2010, at 5:42 PM, Ken Anderson wrote:
Does everyone run apache and WO on the same machine? No DMZ?
That depends on the size of the installation. Usually Apache and some of the
instances can co-exist. You can run Apache on each machine and put a load
balancer in front. For
On 31/07/2010, at 9:18 AM, Mark Ritchie wrote:
On 30/Jul/2010, at 2:01 PM, Farrukh Ijaz wrote:
That's why when you know your build is stable, just tag it with a name such
as something-stable under tags folder in your svn structure. So next time
you need to produce the same build just
I'm just not sure what kind of control you have over the firewall with these
cloud servers...
On Jul 30, 2010, at 8:48 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jul 30, 2010, at 5:42 PM, Ken Anderson wrote:
Does everyone run apache and WO on the same machine? No DMZ?
That depends on the size of the
I honestly have no idea. That is an interesting question.
Chuck
On Jul 30, 2010, at 6:55 PM, Ken Anderson wrote:
I'm just not sure what kind of control you have over the firewall with these
cloud servers...
On Jul 30, 2010, at 8:48 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jul 30, 2010, at 5:42
Thanks for the information Denis. That helps, I was wondering should I use
commons-lang!!!
Cheers,
Shravan Kumar. M
From: Denis Frolov dfro...@demax.ru
To: Shravan Kumar. M mshravan_...@yahoo.com
Cc: WO Dev Group
Hello Hudson builders,
I watched Mike Schrag's session on Hudson from WOWODC09, and got Hudson up and
running in fairly short order building an application project. Thanks Mike!
I'm interested to know how the Hudson users around here handle framework
dependencies for their application
22 matches
Mail list logo
