Start working on a WOBuilder clone and get to point where you could
release a version. Even version 0.0.1 would be fine.
There's an editor for SOPE called WOEditor which may serve as some input
for a 0.0.1...
_
A SOPE template editor is available for Mac OS X, it's downloadable at:
http://
There is one thing I don't understand. Isn't true that you have to
make a baby first and then give it a name?
Start working on a WOBuilder clone and get to point where you could
release a version. Even version 0.0.1 would be fine. Then you could
start thinking about the name.
Just my two
On 25 Aug 2006, at 00:44, Marc Oesch wrote:
> Or how about WonderLand ?? or WonderLust?
WonderLand would be really good IMO to describe the entire collection
you described.
Did you do that with Ruby on Rails ? - No, with Wonderland !
Keep it simple, WonderLips is the obvious winner.
Isn
> Or how about WonderLand ?? or WonderLust?
WonderLand would be really good IMO to describe the entire collection
you described.
Did you do that with Ruby on Rails ? - No, with Wonderland !
Keep it simple, WonderLips is the obvious winner.
Isn't this too close to WOLips (and they don't wan
On 24 Aug 2006, at 23:34, James Cicenia wrote:
Or how about WonderLand ?? or WonderLust?
Keep it simple, WonderLips is the obvious winner.
are we coding lipsticks ? :-)
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects
On Aug 24, 2006, at 3:10 PM, M. Blanc wrote:
On 24 Aug 2006, at 23:34, James Cicenia wrote:
Or how about WonderLand ?? or WonderLust?
Keep it simple, WonderLips is the obvious winner.
snicker.
--
Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their
overall knowledge of
On 24 Aug 2006, at 23:34, James Cicenia wrote:
Or how about WonderLand ?? or WonderLust?
Keep it simple, WonderLips is the obvious winner.
Cheers
--mbj
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list
Or how about WonderLand ?? or WonderLust?
A complete stack with a wizard to step you through the complete
installation
of Eclipse, Wonder, WebObjects, EModeler, RModeler, Builder and even a
version of the the D2W Assistant!
I think then we could use the "stack" as the rallying point for
ev
Hello,
Ruby on Rails just sounds better than WOLips and WOBuilder... Now
Project Wonder >sounds great to me.. so I am thinking..
...
hmmm, WonderBuilder... sounds not so bad to me.
WonderBuilderI really like this name.
I think I read the people at WOLips understandably don't want to
cha
On 24 Aug 2006, at 13:14, James Cicenia wrote:maybe we should lobby Apple for a one time grant of money alternatively maybe we should lobby apple to donate the WOBuilder source code to the community ... ? i read somewhere on the list that an apple rep suggested making WOBuilder work with eclipse is
Hi, James,
I didn't mean to throw cold water on any good ideas, I just didn't
see "My Dream App" as a productive route to reach the goal of an
integrated set of WO development tools to replace Apple's offerings.
As I mentioned, it might be more productive in its side effects (i.e.
PR) if
Jerry -
You are probably correct.
I am an Eclipse user and love it for Java development. Haven't moved
up to the latest version. I am waiting for a rev on the new
Powerbooks as I rarely buy a rev1 Apple product. I figured that would
be a good time to make my transition.
However, maybe, w
Hi, James,
My reading of the page you referenced and the page at http://
mydreamapp.com/ says that we submit ideas to:
* a set of judges
* the "Killer App Dream Team"
* the (already 2000) voters
who will collectively decide which idea gets implemented, not by us,
but by the "Killer
http://news.yahoo.com/s/macworld/20060821/tc_macworld/
mydreamapp20060821_0
Why don't we submit a killer WebObjects development environment
application suite?
- James Cicenia
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webob
14 matches
Mail list logo
