Re: interesting URL I landed on

2013-08-10 Thread Theodore Petrosky
don't click my link directly. I noticed it is missing a 'w' upfront. >> ww2.aaa.com/scripts/WebObjects.dll/AAAOnline.woa/208/wo/K6BHnXW5bQrIvIGY7VDWIM/36.WOMetaRefresh On Aug 10, 2013, at 7:10 PM, "Joel M. Benisch" wrote: > URL doesn't seem to be working today > > ---

Re: interesting URL I landed on

2013-08-10 Thread Joel M. Benisch
URL doesn't seem to be working today -- Joel M. Benisch CPCU, President 973-992-6300 x303 PaperFree Corporation 9

Re: interesting URL I landed on

2013-08-10 Thread Gavin Eadie
It's certainly ancient .. I used it as an example when I was pitching WebObjects twelve (?) years ago. On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Theodore Petrosky wrote: > i viewed the page source, OMG was it ugly. Completely table based with all > that ugly Capitalization of everything that makes it har

Re: interesting URL I landed on

2013-08-07 Thread Theodore Petrosky
i viewed the page source, OMG was it ugly. Completely table based with all that ugly Capitalization of everything that makes it hard to read. From what I see, they use it to manage user accounts. the rest is aspx pages. It was weird to see the WebObjects reference in the URL. On Aug 7, 2013, a

Re: interesting URL I landed on

2013-08-07 Thread probert
Yes, and they also use FrontPage (I saw a job posting a couple of months ago from the CAA asking for WebObjects and FrontPage skills). I believe they are still on WO 4.5... w2.aaa.com/scripts/WebObjects.dll/AAAOnline.woa/208/wo/K6BHnXW5bQrIvIGY7VDWIM/36.WOMetaRefresh does triple A use webobj

interesting URL I landed on

2013-08-07 Thread Theodore Petrosky
w2.aaa.com/scripts/WebObjects.dll/AAAOnline.woa/208/wo/K6BHnXW5bQrIvIGY7VDWIM/36.WOMetaRefresh does triple A use webobjects? ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.

Re: Interesting

2012-04-12 Thread Jesse Tayler
why? isn't it kinda expensive? On Apr 12, 2012, at 4:14 AM, Amedeo Mantica wrote: > http://aws.amazon.com/cloudsearch/ > ___ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple

Interesting

2012-04-12 Thread Amedeo Mantica
http://aws.amazon.com/cloudsearch/ ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webo

Re: Interesting DisplayGroup EOEditingContext Interaction

2011-12-12 Thread Michael Gargano
No, no I am not. That was it. Thanks Chuck -Mike On Dec 12, 2011, at 5:12 PM, Chuck Hill wrote: > Are you setting the display group up with a data source like this? > >dataSource = new EODatabaseDataSource(editingContext(), > entityName()); > > ((EODatabaseDataS

Re: Interesting DisplayGroup EOEditingContext Interaction

2011-12-12 Thread Chuck Hill
Are you setting the display group up with a data source like this? dataSource = new EODatabaseDataSource(editingContext(), entityName()); ((EODatabaseDataSource)dataSource).fetchSpecification().setRefreshesRefetchedObjects(refreshesRefetchedObjects()); On 2011-12-12, a

Re: Interesting DisplayGroup EOEditingContext Interaction

2011-12-12 Thread Michael Gargano
After more testing and playing today. It seems that the refresh of the ERXBatchingDisplayGroup is sporadic at best. I tried using just the fetch() and the status field never updated, setting the qualifier to the current qualifier seems to work more often then not, but it still does not work c

Re: Interesting DisplayGroup EOEditingContext Interaction

2011-12-12 Thread Chuck Hill
On 2011-12-09, at 3:54 PM, Michael Gargano wrote: >> >>> If I reload the page on one machine, it updates the status and then >>> subsequently the other machine refreshes with the correct status, but I >>> need to poke it. I don't understand why it works fine on the individual >>> machines whe

Re: Interesting DisplayGroup EOEditingContext Interaction

2011-12-09 Thread Michael Gargano
On Dec 9, 2011, at 6:19 PM, Chuck Hill wrote: > > On 2011-12-09, at 3:05 PM, Michael Gargano wrote: > >> Hey dev. group, >> >> As I was working on one of my application pages today I noticed >> something that I couldn't explain and was hoping one of you nice folks could >> shed some lig

Re: Interesting DisplayGroup EOEditingContext Interaction

2011-12-09 Thread Chuck Hill
On 2011-12-09, at 3:05 PM, Michael Gargano wrote: > Hey dev. group, > > As I was working on one of my application pages today I noticed > something that I couldn't explain and was hoping one of you nice folks could > shed some light on it. > > -Setting the stage- > One of th

Interesting DisplayGroup EOEditingContext Interaction

2011-12-09 Thread Michael Gargano
Hey dev. group, As I was working on one of my application pages today I noticed something that I couldn't explain and was hoping one of you nice folks could shed some light on it. -Setting the stage- One of the pages I'm working on has an AjaxGrid that is periodically (5

Re: Interesting

2009-12-14 Thread Mike Schrag
>>> Unfortunatelly, I am not able to swim without my WOBuoy. >>> But if I could swim like you do, I would I jumped from the WOBoat long time >>> ago . >> ... also ... "boo". everyone on this list could switch at any time to >> any other technology, but we don't because we aren't satisfied wit

Re: Interesting

2009-12-14 Thread Chuck Hill
On Dec 14, 2009, at 12:41 PM, Mike Schrag wrote: Unfortunatelly, I am not able to swim without my WOBuoy. But if I could swim like you do, I would I jumped from the WOBoat long time ago . ... also ... "boo". everyone on this list could switch at any time to any other technology, but we

Re: Interesting

2009-12-14 Thread Mike Schrag
> Unfortunatelly, I am not able to swim without my WOBuoy. > But if I could swim like you do, I would I jumped from the WOBoat long time > ago . ... also ... "boo". everyone on this list could switch at any time to any other technology, but we don't because we aren't satisfied with the overal

Re: Interesting

2009-12-14 Thread Mike Schrag
no, not interesting because i want to switch to rails. interesting to see how they approach the deployment issue and what it means for us with WO -- what we can adapt/steal/learn from. ms On Dec 14, 2009, at 3:00 PM, Jean Pierre Malrieu wrote: > Unfortunatelly, I am not able to swim with

Re: Interesting

2009-12-14 Thread Jean Pierre Malrieu
Unfortunatelly, I am not able to swim without my WOBuoy. But if I could swim like you do, I would I jumped from the WOBoat long time ago . JPM Le 11 déc. 09 à 21:10, Anjo Krank a écrit : Am 11.12.2009 um 20:40 schrieb Mike Schrag: http://developer.apple.com/tools/deployonrailsleopard.html

Re: interesting

2009-12-11 Thread Anjo Krank
Am 11.12.2009 um 20:40 schrieb Mike Schrag: > http://developer.apple.com/tools/deployonrailsleopard.html Heresy!! Where is my stake!1! Cheers, Anjo ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (We

interesting

2009-12-11 Thread Mike Schrag
http://developer.apple.com/tools/deployonrailsleopard.html ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.

Re: Very interesting case

2009-09-22 Thread John & Kim Larson
I've been following your thread and will throw this out at you. I write a lot of components that have to broken up into different forms for layout and continuity purposes, just like you are if you're using a batch nav bar. It is quite a pain to have submit buttons all over the place. Using

Re: Very interesting case

2009-09-22 Thread Chuck Hill
On Sep 22, 2009, at 12:23 PM, Don Lindsay wrote: It is using the WONavigationBar component from WOExtensions. It is a hyperlink, inside that control. That would leave you (rhyme with duct). That works fine to navigation, but does not handle data submission. The answer is, of cours

Re: Very interesting case

2009-09-22 Thread Don Lindsay
It is using the WONavigationBar component from WOExtensions. It is a hyperlink, inside that control. Don On Sep 22, 2009, at 12:22 PM, Chuck Hill wrote: On Sep 22, 2009, at 2:32 AM, Don Lindsay wrote: Hello; I have a displayGroup displaying batches of 5 items per page. When a user cli

Re: Very interesting case

2009-09-22 Thread Chuck Hill
On Sep 22, 2009, at 2:32 AM, Don Lindsay wrote: Hello; I have a displayGroup displaying batches of 5 items per page. When a user clicks the next page, What is "clicks the next page"? If it is a WOHyperlink then the form values will not get submitted. You need to use a WOSubmitButton

Re: Very interesting case

2009-09-22 Thread Don Lindsay
Hello; I have a displayGroup displaying batches of 5 items per page. When a user clicks the next page, which uses displayNextBatch() for the display group, if the user goes back to the previous page, all of their answers have been cleared as if they never entered anything. If I use a WOS

Re: Very interesting case

2009-09-21 Thread Chuck Hill
On Sep 21, 2009, at 2:16 PM, Don Lindsay wrote: I know, I have been piddling with it and probably violated many commandments. That is not something that you can do and expect sane results. It is a binary sort of thing. Either you lock correctly and obey the commandments, or EOF.doCrazy

[Solved] Re: Very interesting case

2009-09-21 Thread Don Lindsay
I was making it too difficult. I was able to solve the issue by using the UserAnswers as the primary Display Group. Don On Sep 21, 2009, at 5:16 PM, Don Lindsay wrote: I know, I have been piddling with it and probably violated many commandments. Let me explain what I am doing and see if

Re: Very interesting case

2009-09-21 Thread Don Lindsay
I know, I have been piddling with it and probably violated many commandments. Let me explain what I am doing and see if anyone has any insight. I have a datamodel with the following: Users (identifier Integer, username string, password string) Pages (identifier Integer, PageDescriptio

Re: Very interesting case

2009-09-21 Thread Chuck Hill
On Sep 21, 2009, at 1:17 PM, Don Lindsay wrote: Hello; I have a component that I am updating a table of answers based on selections made by the user from a worepitition. The code being executed is: try { String sEoQualifierText = "page="; sEoQua

Very interesting case

2009-09-21 Thread Don Lindsay
Hello; I have a component that I am updating a table of answers based on selections made by the user from a worepitition. The code being executed is: try { String sEoQualifierText = "page="; sEoQualifierText += Integer.toString((Integer)thePage()

Re: Interesting...

2008-06-11 Thread Lachlan Deck
On 12/06/2008, at 12:00 AM, Ken Anderson wrote: Yes please... I am definitely Maven challenged... Shall do. On Jun 10, 2008, at 8:36 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote: On 11/06/2008, at 3:36 AM, David LeBer wrote: If you are an ADC member you might want to log into your ADC account and check out t

Re: Interesting...

2008-06-11 Thread Chuck Hill
On Jun 11, 2008, at 7:00 AM, Ken Anderson wrote: Yes please... I am definitely Maven challenged... AKA not Maven brainwashed yet. Chuck and still not very warm towards Maven On Jun 10, 2008, at 8:36 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote: On 11/06/2008, at 3:36 AM, David LeBer wrote: If you are an ADC

Re: Interesting...

2008-06-11 Thread Ken Anderson
Yes please... I am definitely Maven challenged... On Jun 10, 2008, at 8:36 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote: On 11/06/2008, at 3:36 AM, David LeBer wrote: If you are an ADC member you might want to log into your ADC account and check out the downloads section. A BIG thankyou to Pierre for finally ge

Re: Interesting...

2008-06-10 Thread Lachlan Deck
On 11/06/2008, at 3:36 AM, David LeBer wrote: If you are an ADC member you might want to log into your ADC account and check out the downloads section. A BIG thankyou to Pierre for finally getting this through!! Hopefully the bugreport helped :-) Now I've gotta get around to writing up my

Re: Interesting...

2008-06-10 Thread David LeBer
On 10-Jun-08, at 10:36 AM, David LeBer wrote: If you are an ADC member you might want to log into your ADC account and check out the downloads section. And of course Mark hit send before I did... Foiled again! :-) ;david -- David LeBer Codeferous Software 'co-def-er-ous' adj. Literally 'c

Interesting...

2008-06-10 Thread David LeBer
If you are an ADC member you might want to log into your ADC account and check out the downloads section. ;david -- David LeBer Codeferous Software 'co-def-er-ous' adj. Literally 'code-bearing' site: http://codeferous.com blog: http://davidleber.net profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidl

Re: an interesting lockRowComparingAttributes:

2008-04-02 Thread Chuck Hill
On Apr 2, 2008, at 3:27 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote: On 03/04/2008, at 9:11 AM, Chuck Hill wrote: On Apr 2, 2008, at 2:57 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote: On 03/04/2008, at 4:55 AM, Chuck Hill wrote: On Apr 2, 2008, at 10:38 AM, David Avendasora wrote: If the SELECT ... FOR LOCK can't find any rows th

Re: an interesting lockRowComparingAttributes:

2008-04-02 Thread Lachlan Deck
On 03/04/2008, at 9:11 AM, Chuck Hill wrote: On Apr 2, 2008, at 2:57 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote: On 03/04/2008, at 4:55 AM, Chuck Hill wrote: On Apr 2, 2008, at 10:38 AM, David Avendasora wrote: If the SELECT ... FOR LOCK can't find any rows that have fields with values that match exactly wit

Re: an interesting lockRowComparingAttributes:

2008-04-02 Thread Chuck Hill
On Apr 2, 2008, at 2:57 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote: On 03/04/2008, at 4:55 AM, Chuck Hill wrote: On Apr 2, 2008, at 10:38 AM, David Avendasora wrote: If the SELECT ... FOR LOCK can't find any rows that have fields with values that match exactly with what the DB has, then it wouldn't get any

Re: an interesting lockRowComparingAttributes:

2008-04-02 Thread Lachlan Deck
On 03/04/2008, at 4:55 AM, Chuck Hill wrote: On Apr 2, 2008, at 10:38 AM, David Avendasora wrote: If the SELECT ... FOR LOCK can't find any rows that have fields with values that match exactly with what the DB has, then it wouldn't get any rows either. No? Yes, but... SELECT ... FOR LOCK

Re: an interesting lockRowComparingAttributes:

2008-04-02 Thread Chuck Hill
On Apr 2, 2008, at 2:18 PM, Art Isbell wrote: On Apr 2, 2008, at 7:38 AM, David Avendasora wrote: Couldn't this be the same problem though? If the SELECT ... FOR LOCK can't find any rows that have fields with values that match exactly with what the DB has, then it wouldn't get any rows ei

Re: an interesting lockRowComparingAttributes:

2008-04-02 Thread Art Isbell
On Apr 2, 2008, at 7:38 AM, David Avendasora wrote: Couldn't this be the same problem though? If the SELECT ... FOR LOCK can't find any rows that have fields with values that match exactly with what the DB has, then it wouldn't get any rows either. No? Maybe, but I think Chuck's point is

Re: an interesting lockRowComparingAttributes:

2008-04-02 Thread David Avendasora
Couldn't this be the same problem though? If the SELECT ... FOR LOCK can't find any rows that have fields with values that match exactly with what the DB has, then it wouldn't get any rows either. No? Maybe log the SQL and then compare what WO is looking for with what is actually in the DB?

Re: an interesting lockRowComparingAttributes:

2008-04-02 Thread David Avendasora
Yes, but... SELECT ... FOR LOCK is _pessimistic_ locking and EOF should be using optimistic locking. If EOF is issuing pessimistic locking SQL, then something has gone wrong. Ah. I see. Who cares why it isn't returning rows. It shouldn't be doing this in the first place. Maybe log t

Re: an interesting lockRowComparingAttributes:

2008-04-02 Thread Chuck Hill
On Apr 2, 2008, at 10:38 AM, David Avendasora wrote: Couldn't this be the same problem though? No. :-) If the SELECT ... FOR LOCK can't find any rows that have fields with values that match exactly with what the DB has, then it wouldn't get any rows either. No? Yes, but... SELECT ..

Re: an interesting lockRowComparingAttributes:

2008-04-02 Thread Chuck Hill
On Apr 2, 2008, at 4:30 AM, David Avendasora wrote: The fact that Chuck didn't come up with this makes me doubt my memory, but... It seems that when I've run into this in my applications, it usually means that between the time the EO was read out of the database, and the time it is writt

Re: an interesting lockRowComparingAttributes:

2008-04-02 Thread David Avendasora
The fact that Chuck didn't come up with this makes me doubt my memory, but... It seems that when I've run into this in my applications, it usually means that between the time the EO was read out of the database, and the time it is written back in, something in one of the locking fields ch

Re: an interesting lockRowComparingAttributes:

2008-04-01 Thread Chuck Hill
On Apr 1, 2008, at 3:06 PM, Johan Henselmans wrote: I have an interesting time with the following error: Error: com.webobjects.eoaccess.EOGeneralAdaptorException: lockRowComparingAttributes -- com.webobjects.jdbcadaptor.JDBCChannel: lock operation failed to select any rows The

an interesting lockRowComparingAttributes:

2008-04-01 Thread Johan Henselmans
I have an interesting time with the following error: Error: com.webobjects.eoaccess.EOGeneralAdaptorException: lockRowComparingAttributes -- com.webobjects.jdbcadaptor.JDBCChannel: lock operation failed to select any rows The situation: I am using ERProtoypes and a Postgresql database

WOL'ed? May you live in interesting times...

2007-11-15 Thread Johan Henselmans
some testing I found the error: a column in a postgresql table which which included a '1' or a '0', as an integer, seemed to give some null values. The interesting thing was that I could not see any null values just running psql from postgresql (8.2.5, from macports).

Re: Interesting problem with instances

2006-12-14 Thread Guido Neitzer
On 14.12.2006, at 18:52, Chuck Hill wrote: Wow. That is about all I can come up with. I think I would just go find some nice beer and try to not think about it. That's probably the best I can do with my currently completely limited view of such crazy stuff. Cheers, cug

Re: Interesting problem with instances

2006-12-14 Thread Chuck Hill
g on with that thingy, but as it works now I won't disturb you anymore with that. Interesting enough though ... :-/ cug ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@li

Re: Interesting problem with instances

2006-12-14 Thread Guido Neitzer
28m -Xmx384m --> works -Xms256m -Xmx384m --> works not Hae? Okay, I really don't know what crazy thing is going on with that thingy, but as it works now I won't disturb you anymore with that. Interesting enough though ... :-/ cug __

Re: Interesting problem with instances

2006-12-14 Thread Guido Neitzer
On 14.12.2006, at 16:19, Guido Neitzer wrote: I guess there is something totally broken in the settings for this particular application - I have no deep deployment knowledge - some hints where I could look for broken things? I have now removed two arguments from the additional parameters fo

Re: Interesting problem with instances

2006-12-14 Thread Guido Neitzer
On 14.12.2006, at 15:06, Anjo Krank wrote: What happens when you don't set a "key" binding is that WO stores the image in the resource manager under it's own key and removes it when it is accessed. You could try to log the incoming requests and see if there are two for one such url... In

Re: Interesting problem with instances

2006-12-14 Thread Anjo Krank
What happens when you don't set a "key" binding is that WO stores the image in the resource manager under it's own key and removes it when it is accessed. You could try to log the incoming requests and see if there are two for one such url... Cheers, Anjo Am 14.12.2006 um 15:09 schrieb Gui

Re: Interesting problem with instances

2006-12-14 Thread Guido Neitzer
On 14.12.2006, at 13:43, Guido Neitzer wrote: Perhaps this wasn't clear enough: The same image is displayed properly in one instance and not in the other instance. Its the same database entry, the same image, the same page, just a different instance of our DirectAcion application. Okay. I

Re: Interesting problem with instances

2006-12-14 Thread Guido Neitzer
On 14.12.2006, at 13:16, Patrick Middleton wrote: So go looking at all your images, the good and the bad, and see how long the data for each is in the database. Perhaps this wasn't clear enough: The same image is displayed properly in one instance and not in the other instance. Its the sam

Re: Interesting problem with instances

2006-12-14 Thread Patrick Middleton
ld server is off, so there is no way of getting the data from somewhere else but the new server. Interesting enough, other images are displayed without any problem on the "bad" instances. Only some special images - and I currently can't see what's special about that. This

Interesting problem with instances

2006-12-14 Thread Guido Neitzer
data from somewhere else but the new server. Interesting enough, other images are displayed without any problem on the "bad" instances. Only some special images - and I currently can't see what's special about that. This is another images fetched from the bad instance:

interesting: sope has made the java plunge with jope

2006-08-21 Thread Joe Little
http://freshmeat.net/projects/jope/?branch_id=65971&release_id=234508 They need to work on the names. Yes, that picture is of eclipse as the IDE for developing this WO-alike solution. ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. We