Le 07-09-04 à 03:14, Anjo Krank a écrit :
Hi,
can it be that the wiki(s) are still pretty much of a mess right now?
- the old site at the wikibooks is still online, even after 2
month, no one knows if new stuff has been written there
- there is only one note at the top of the first page tel
Hi!
On 2007/09/04, at 08:14, Anjo Krank wrote:
- there is only one note at the top of the first page telling
people this stuff is deprecated, no redirect
I find this one extremely important. Is it possible to deprecate
an entire wikibook? Or lock it, not allowing modifications?
Yours
Le 07-09-04 à 05:03, Andrew Lindesay a écrit :
Hello Anjo;
Yes I tend to agree with you. I was quite impressed the old wiki
material could be migrated and I'm sure the old stuff is there as a
"just in case", but it would be sage to get the old material
removed to avoid confusion.
I mu
Le 07-09-04 à 03:14, Anjo Krank a écrit :
Hi,
can it be that the wiki(s) are still pretty much of a mess right now?
- the old site at the wikibooks is still online, even after 2
month, no one knows if new stuff has been written there
So far, it seems only the Flex and XUL pages are new.
Hello Anjo;
Yes I tend to agree with you. I was quite impressed the old wiki
material could be migrated and I'm sure the old stuff is there as a
"just in case", but it would be sage to get the old material removed
to avoid confusion.
I am happy enough with any definitive community wiki,
Hi,
can it be that the wiki(s) are still pretty much of a mess right now?
- the old site at the wikibooks is still online, even after 2 month,
no one knows if new stuff has been written there
- there is only one note at the top of the first page telling people
this stuff is deprecated, no re
Hi,
Steven Mark McCraw:
Over the course of the weekend, the WebObjects wikibook (at http://
en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Programming:WebObjects) has been imported
into the confluence wiki at objectstyle.org:
http://wiki.objectstyle.org/confluence/display/WO/Home
This effort was the result of feed
Hello Steven;
Here is a WikiBooks document;
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Programming:WebObjects/
Web_Applications/Deployment/Tomcat_Deployment
Here is the import into confluence;
http://wiki.objectstyle.org/confluence/display/WO/
Programming__WebObjects-Web+Applications-Deployment-Tomca
Hi Andrew,
When you say "typographical elements", what do you mean? Can you
give me a specific example of what is different between the two wikis
for the page you linked to (at first glance, I can't see any
differences between the confluence wiki entry and the wikibook entry)?
Also, I ha
Hello Steven;
Thanks for undertaking that migration. Unfortunately many of the
typographical elements are broken in documents such as;
http://wiki.objectstyle.org/confluence/display/WO/
Programming__WebObjects-EOF-Modeling-Entities
As well as this, images are missing that were present in
Awesome. This is great!
Finally a comprehensive community documentation collection.
On Jul 8, 2007, at 12:01 PM, Steven Mark McCraw wrote:
Hi All,
Over the course of the weekend, the WebObjects wikibook (at http://
en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Programming:WebObjects) has been imported
into the c
Hi All,
Over the course of the weekend, the WebObjects wikibook (at http://
en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Programming:WebObjects) has been imported into
the confluence wiki at objectstyle.org:
http://wiki.objectstyle.org/confluence/display/WO/Home
This effort was the result of feedback from many on
Thanks Andrus, you'd be the guy to know. I see from the css that the
fonts used are verdana and arial, both fonts that should be avoided,
verdana for style and arial for the moral reason that it's a cheap
rip off of helvetica so MS didn't have to pay licence fees.
http://www.xs4all.nl/~sbpo
On Jul 3, 2007, at 3:34 AM, Ian Joyner wrote:
I appreciate the effort to provide a better level of documentation
at the objectstyle confluence site. However, I'd have to say, I
like the look of the wikibook a lot better (even though it wastes
space on the LHS). Is it possible to give a con
I appreciate the effort to provide a better level of documentation at
the objectstyle confluence site. However, I'd have to say, I like the
look of the wikibook a lot better (even though it wastes space on the
LHS). Is it possible to give a confluence site a better look, or is
this locked i
You can dump the entire wikibook to an xml file and write an importer
from the xml to confluence from that.
ms
On Jul 2, 2007, at 5:30 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
I used it to migrate from MediaWiki to Confluence, it works great.
BUT, you need :
- Access to the API (XML-RPC) of Confluence t
I used it to migrate from MediaWiki to Confluence, it works great.
BUT, you need :
- Access to the API (XML-RPC) of Confluence to upload the converted
files
- Access to the database of the wiki source (MediaWiki or other)
Wonder if this tool can help (Wikibooks is still MediaWiki, right)
Wonder if this tool can help (Wikibooks is still MediaWiki, right)
http://intient.com/wiki/index.php/Mediawiki_to_Confluence_Translator
Andrus
On Jul 2, 2007, at 11:18 PM, Andrew Lindesay wrote:
Hello Mark;
It would be good if there is an intention to extract and re-import
the material at
Hello Mark;
It would be good if there is an intention to extract and re-import
the material at some point. I keep some of my own general WO notes
in there -- like this sort of content;
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Programming:WebObjects/Web_Services/
Controlling_WSDL_Service_Location
I
Andrew,
I am sympathetic to your concerns. There has been some thought given
to migrating the pages over, but there was also a large volume of
concern expressed that the content be reorganized, so a straight
programmatic migration doesn't seem to be what everyone wants. We
expect most o
Hello;
Gee; that really is a shame because I've loaded quite a few pages
into the Wikipedia books site. Can it be migrated over somehow?
Given the volume of stuff there it may be worth just staying on the
Wikipedia books site?
cheers.
. and should content be out here instead of wi
Steven, there is an example of this approach shown here where one of
the links has no page yet...
http://wiki.objectstyle.org/confluence/display/WONDER/Tutorials
On Jul 2, 2007, at 10:45 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
So maybe mark up the non-existent content in a Wiki way - by
creating a link t
On Jul 2, 2007, at 5:34 PM, Steven Mark McCraw wrote:
When you have chosen a topic that you want to write on, edit the
entry for that topic and change the '**' on the end to '(under
construction)'. As soon as you have your article in place, you can
just remove the '(under construction)' f
23 matches
Mail list logo
