At 10:11 AM 10/26/2001 -0700, Tavis Rudd wrote:
> > Yeah, but then I keep getting swamped with other things.
>
>well, are you going to post your notes? ;-)
Not right now. There are more pressing tasks at hand that will be delivered
first anyway, so I might as well focus on them.
-Chuck
___
Tavis Rudd wrote:
>
> On Thursday 25 October 2001 12:24, Ian Bicking wrote:
> > Well, what the heck, I set it up. It's at:
> >
> > http://webware.colorstudy.net/twiki
>
> learning time ... ;)
>
> > I'm thinking of doing the Parnassus-like page for Webware
> > on the same site -- where people
On Thursday 25 October 2001 14:47, Chuck Esterbrook wrote:
>
> Sure, I would like to see Webware SIGs and/or projects.
> We can host both the webpages, mailing lists and CVS via
> Webware's sourceforge area if we want. Or a project could
> have its own SF area and just be included in the "Webware
At 03:04 PM 10/25/2001 -0700, Tavis Rudd wrote:
>On Thursday 25 October 2001 14:53, Chuck Esterbrook wrote:
> > At 12:15 PM 10/25/2001 -0700, Tavis Rudd wrote:
> > >* what to do with one-shot
> >
> > Say what?
>
>I was paraphrasing you:
>"""
>- We often use OneShot.cgi for development and while it
On Thursday 25 October 2001 14:53, Chuck Esterbrook wrote:
> At 12:15 PM 10/25/2001 -0700, Tavis Rudd wrote:
> >* what to do with one-shot
>
> Say what?
I was paraphrasing you:
"""
- We often use OneShot.cgi for development and while it
works, the delay
can be inhibit productivity. We should be
At 12:15 PM 10/25/2001 -0700, Tavis Rudd wrote:
>* what to do with one-shot
Say what?
___
Webware-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
At 10:10 AM 10/25/2001 -0700, Tavis Rudd wrote:
>Python uses SIGS with communication via email lists and
>PEPs. Zope uses 'projects' with communication via wikis.
>Both approaches have worked wonderfully in some cases and
>failed miserably in others. I feel some time invested now
>in setting up s
| Clark Evans has some issues, but they also look to be op sys or
| Python+opsys specific. He is investigating other configurations and will
| get back to us.
I'm on hold doing any further investigation until a new box
shows up here on Saturday or Monday (I hope). Then I'll
first try OpenBSD.
On Thursday 25 October 2001 12:24, Ian Bicking wrote:
> Well, what the heck, I set it up. It's at:
>
> http://webware.colorstudy.net/twiki
learning time ... ;)
> I'm thinking of doing the Parnassus-like page for Webware
> on the same site -- where people can post useful servlets
> they made,
Tavis Rudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I just set up a Wiki for another project, and it would be
> > easy to add a Webware section to it. It's only useful if
> > people really use it -- a critical mass has to be reached
> > -- but if people are interested it would be easy to set
> > up.
>
> I
At 12:15 PM 10/25/01 -0700, Tavis Rudd wrote:
>On Thursday 25 October 2001 11:30, Ian Bicking wrote:
> > I just set up a Wiki for another project, and it would be
> > easy to add a Webware section to it. It's only useful if
> > people really use it -- a critical mass has to be reached
> > -- but
On Thursday 25 October 2001 11:30, Ian Bicking wrote:
> Tavis Rudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What do people think?? Does anyone have experience
> > setting up a wiki? What other options are there?
> > Clearly, this would fall into the 'separate community
> > effort' category and should fun
Tavis Rudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do people think?? Does anyone have experience
> setting up a wiki? What other options are there? Clearly,
> this would fall into the 'separate community effort'
> category and should function without requiring effort from
> you (Chuck). There's
On Thursday 25 October 2001 01:39, Chuck Esterbrook wrote:
> >I think there should be a formal plan to deal with these
> >ideas. It should address and prioritize the following:
>
> We'll do some outlining, but I think there is enough
> laundry items to go after 0.6.1 without formalizing a big
>
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 06:15:11PM -0700, Tavis Rudd wrote:
> * packaging Cheetah 1.0 and FunFormKit 1.0 with the Webware
> distro (once they're released)
As long as Cheetah can continue its development at its own
pace, and not be held back to adhere to Webware's release
schedule.
I like Chuck'
At 06:15 PM 10/24/2001 -0700, Tavis Rudd wrote:
>Hi guys,
>what are your thoughts about Webware after 0.6? i.e. "what
>issues need to be addressed before 1.0"
After 0.6? Why 0.6.1, of course. ;-)
The largest project for 1.0 is an automated regression test suite for WebKit.
>I assume that 0.6
Hi guys,
what are your thoughts about Webware after 0.6? i.e. "what
issues need to be addressed before 1.0"
I assume that 0.6 will:
--
* fix the console hanging and socket binding problems that
Jeff's been working on
* incorporate the fixes to Session handling t
17 matches
Mail list logo
