[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

yes it is acting as a router for the bridge i'm starting to think that myacurite was getting work done to it and couldn't always replay back and like you said the bridge doesn't like that On Friday, November 18, 2016 at 10:31:33 PM UTC-6, Jerome Helbert wrote: > > I wasnt trying to suggest hardwa

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

I wasnt trying to suggest hardware failures or anything like that, I was just asking about how things are hooked up on your network. You second post seems to make it seem like your fedora system is acting as your router? So the bridge traffic is still flowing out into the internet and to the my

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

bridge/smarthub -> netgear EN104 ethernet hub -> linux -> DSL -> web On Friday, November 18, 2016 at 7:00:31 PM UTC-6, Radar wrote: > > i sniff on a AMD Phenom 9750 Quad-Core 64-bit fedora 19 system to weewx > 3.5.0 that use tcpdump and a perl script that had no trouble. its been > running for o

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

i sniff on a AMD Phenom 9750 Quad-Core 64-bit fedora 19 system to weewx 3.5.0 that use tcpdump and a perl script that had no trouble. its been running for over 3 years now on the same system was checking out the interceptor driver to weewx 3.6.1 in sniff mode that was getting the errors On Th

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

radar, What exactly is setup? Are you running the driver as a sniffer on a device like your router that is sniffing the traffic as it flows to the myacurite servers, or are you hijacking the traffic to send it somewhere else? If it's the former, I'm not sure the bridge is very happy when it does

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

Botched FW upgrades almost never result in "partial" instabilities... It will almost always result in a bricked device. On Saturday, November 12, 2016 at 7:11:43 PM UTC-6, Radar wrote: > > changed the 3 calls and is running right now > > it could be that the bridge didn't take the firmware right

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

thanks every one for the help and this great software On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 9:11:48 PM UTC-6, Jerome Helbert wrote: > > port 80 basically implies http, so that extra bit ought to be pretty > redundant... > > On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 8:20:16 PM UTC-6, Radar wrote: >> >> loo

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

port 80 basically implies http, so that extra bit ought to be pretty redundant... On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 8:20:16 PM UTC-6, Radar wrote: > > looks like its not going to die again, the only things i can find are > changed the > > pcap_filter = "src 192.168.2.14 and dst port 80" > to >

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

looks like its not going to die again, the only things i can find are changed the pcap_filter = "src 192.168.2.14 and dst port 80" to pcap_filter = "src 192.168.2.14 and dst port 80 and http" and don't know if this had any thing to do with but the bridge was asking dhcpd for a new address and

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

interceptor v0.7a it's been running for 23 hours now On Monday, November 14, 2016 at 10:47:16 AM UTC-6, mwall wrote: > > radar, > > could you try interceptor v0.7a (commit 5d0fe66) > > this logs more details about what is actually being parsed from the pcap > sniffs > > m > -- You received this

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

radar, could you try interceptor v0.7a (commit 5d0fe66) this logs more details about what is actually being parsed from the pcap sniffs m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

your right the 104 boot version is the old one with a red web page that's what mine is 104 Boot Firmware Version, 224 Application Version the newer version of Boot Firmware has a black/dark page On Saturday, November 12, 2016 at 9:10:18 AM UTC-6, Brad Tucker wrote: > > I think the 104 boot versio

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

changed the 3 calls and is running right now it could be that the bridge didn't take the firmware right it is over 3 years old so might not be able to fix it On Saturday, November 12, 2016 at 9:05:44 AM UTC-6, mwall wrote: > > On Saturday, November 12, 2016 at 9:37:25 AM UTC-5, Radar wrote: >> >

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

here is the rpm info for libpcap and pylibpcap in case you need it Name: libpcap Epoch : 14 Version : 1.4.0 Release : 1.fc19 Architecture: x86_64 Install Date: Sat 13 Sep 2014 10:29:31 PM CDT Group : Development/Libraries Size: 312168 License : BSD with adver

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

I think the 104 boot version means it is older hardware just updated. I have seen people with a much later boot version. Not positive on the details though. Good luck. B -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

i'm not liking fedora 19 to much right now for hiding the debug out put but i have it running right now will post back when it quits it might take some time thanks for all the help every one On Saturday, November 12, 2016 at 8:28:17 AM UTC-6, mwall wrote: > > > > On Saturday, November 12, 2016 a

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

On Saturday, November 12, 2016 at 9:37:25 AM UTC-5, Radar wrote: > > it might be > this is from running it with ./weewxd ../weewx.conf --log-label=weewx-3.6.1 > well, i'd rather not debug your syslog configuration (i find that exercise particularly frustrating on recent ubuntu systems) so as a q

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

thanks it was just a shoot in the dark my bridge is over 3 years old On Saturday, November 12, 2016 at 8:55:48 AM UTC-6, Brad Tucker wrote: > > Hello Radar, > > I see you and Matt are already trouble shooting your problems but to > answer your question, I believe I am using a new hub. I only bou

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

Hello Radar, I see you and Matt are already trouble shooting your problems but to answer your question, I believe I am using a new hub. I only bought the unit weeks ago. With that said here is what the bridge reports. Boot firmware version : 104 Application version : 224 Hope this helps, Brad

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

it might be this is from running it with ./weewxd ../weewx.conf --log-label=weewx-3.6.1 On Saturday, November 12, 2016 at 8:28:17 AM UTC-6, mwall wrote: > > > > On Saturday, November 12, 2016 at 9:08:24 AM UTC-5, Radar wrote: >> >> here is it running by its self using >> PYTHONPATH=. python user/

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

On Saturday, November 12, 2016 at 9:27:33 AM UTC-5, Radar wrote: > > i don't send to WU and thought that maybe something in the http get might > be messing it up so was running tcpflow because of this in the stack trace > logdbg("SNIFF: %s" % _obfuscate_passwords(data)) >> >> there are two

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

On Saturday, November 12, 2016 at 9:08:24 AM UTC-5, Radar wrote: > > here is it running by its self using > PYTHONPATH=. python user/interceptor.py --debug --mode=sniff --iface=p5p1 > --filter="src host 192.168.2.14 && dst port 80" --device=acurite-bridge > > raw data: > dateutc=now&action=upda

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

i don't send to WU and thought that maybe something in the http get might be messing it up so was running tcpflow because of this in the stack trace logdbg("SNIFF: %s" % _obfuscate_passwords(data)) On Saturday, November 12, 2016 at 8:11:44 AM UTC-6, Radar wrote: > > this is the part of the config

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

On Saturday, November 12, 2016 at 9:08:24 AM UTC-5, Radar wrote: > > here is it running by its self using > PYTHONPATH=. python user/interceptor.py --debug --mode=sniff --iface=p5p1 > --filter="src host 192.168.2.14 && dst port 80" --device=acurite-bridge > please set debug=1 in weewx.conf -- Y

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

this is the part of the config file [Interceptor] # This section is for the network traffic interceptor driver. # The driver to use: driver = user.interceptor # Specify the hardware device to capture. Options include: # acurite-bridge - acurite internet bridge

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

here is it running by its self using PYTHONPATH=. python user/interceptor.py --debug --mode=sniff --iface=p5p1 --filter="src host 192.168.2.14 && dst port 80" --device=acurite-bridge raw data: dateutc=now&action=updateraw&realtime=1&id=24C86E01765D&mt=tower&sensor=7411&humidity=51&tempf=52.1

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

On Saturday, November 12, 2016 at 8:52:20 AM UTC-5, Radar wrote: > > can i ask if you are using a new bridge/smarthub or one you updated > the reason is i use a old bridge i upgraded the firmware on when i use the > interceptor 0.15 driver in sniff mode and it dies after some time > > and tcpflow

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

can i ask if you are using a new bridge/smarthub or one you updated the reason is i use a old bridge i upgraded the firmware on when i use the interceptor 0.15 driver in sniff mode and it dies after some time and tcpflow put out data that looks like this this could just be how tcpflow printed th

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

This commit looks good! Thanks! On Tuesday, November 8, 2016 at 4:06:48 PM UTC-6, mwall wrote: > > On Tuesday, November 8, 2016 at 3:58:04 PM UTC-5, Jerome Helbert wrote: > > Filter was an issue because the class Consumer init function uses >> pcap_filter: >> > > right you are! fixed at 2c1a2dd

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

On Tuesday, November 8, 2016 at 3:58:04 PM UTC-5, Jerome Helbert wrote: Filter was an issue because the class Consumer init function uses > pcap_filter: > right you are! fixed at 2c1a2dd -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To un

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

Filter was an issue because the class Consumer init function uses pcap_filter: def __init__(self, parser, mode='listen', address=DEFAULT_ADDR, port=DEFAULT_PORT, handler=None, iface=DEFAULT_IFACE, pcap_filter=DEFAULT_FILTER): but you are still using filter as an argument name in the __main func

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

On Tuesday, November 8, 2016 at 8:55:31 AM UTC-5, Jerome Helbert wrote: > > Finally got a chance to check out the driver (latest commit 2ad77b7 > ), > > had to make some changes to get it to run

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

Finally got a chance to check out the driver (latest commit 2ad77b7 ), had to make some changes to get it to run at all. 1. I see you had to change from filter to pcap_filter 1. The weewx.

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

also should mention that python-libpcap is dependent on the libpcap C libraries. On Sunday, November 6, 2016 at 10:11:15 AM UTC-6, Jerome Helbert wrote: > > I looked over the commit, looks good. I will try to get a chance to pull > it down and try it out later today. > > When I was first writing

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

I looked over the commit, looks good. I will try to get a chance to pull it down and try it out later today. When I was first writing this stuff into the hackulink driver (and every time I would do a system reinstall) I found there a range of python pcap modules, and they had APIs that all vari

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

On Saturday, November 5, 2016 at 10:24:08 PM UTC-4, Jerome Helbert wrote: > > I posted a modified version of the interceptor a few weeks ago, I used the > libpcap libraries to sniff the data stream directly (no need to run tcpdump > or ngrep or any of that external to the driver. > >> >>> je

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

On Saturday, November 5, 2016 at 10:24:08 PM UTC-4, Jerome Helbert wrote: > > I posted a modified version of the interceptor a few weeks ago, I used the > libpcap libraries to sniff the data stream directly (no need to run tcpdump > or ngrep or any of that external to the driver. My setup has w

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

Hello Jerome, Can you explain how to install and use your modified interceptor? Ive been having problems with the tcpdump method and may give this a try. Thanks, Braad On Saturday, November 5, 2016 at 7:24:08 PM UTC-7, Jerome Helbert wrote: > > I posted a modified version of the interceptor a f

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

I posted a modified version of the interceptor a few weeks ago, I used the libpcap libraries to sniff the data stream directly (no need to run tcpdump or ngrep or any of that external to the driver. My setup has weewx running directly on the machine that is routing traffic to myacurite.com. This

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

the perl script was made to work with tcpdump it won't work with the new tcpflow that puts out every thing on one line On Wednesday, November 2, 2016 at 7:21:17 PM UTC-5, Brad Tucker wrote: > > Only thing I noticed is you are running it off the bridge device. I can't > get any data off my bridge

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

Only thing I noticed is you are running it off the bridge device. I can't get any data off my bridge device. only eth0. I also see a stream similar to yours when its communicating with weatherunderground. Is it possible you didn't let it run long enough? Im assuming you let it run for a min or t

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

Looks like yours minus the good stuff. [root@weewx ~]# tcpdump -A -n -p -l -i bridge0 -s0 -W tcp dst port 80 | stdbuf -oL strings -n8 | stdbuf -oL grep "&" tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on bridge0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

what does you output look like on tcpdump w/o the perl script? mine always looked strange but it worked... Also don't do it off the bridge but use eth0 or your main ethernet to the router. sudo tcpdump -A -n -p -l -i eth0 -s0 -W tcp dst port 80 | stdbuf -oL strings -n8 | stdbuf -oL grep "&" out

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

With just the tcpflow command, it shows this. [root@weewx ~]# tcpflow -C -0 -s tcp dst port 80 tcpflow: listening on bridge0 GET /weatherstation/updateweatherstation?dateutc=now&action=updateraw&realtime=1&id=24C86E08150D&mt=5N1x38&sensor=2701&windspeedmph=0&humidity=86&tempf=58.8&baromin=30.

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

On Wednesday, November 2, 2016 at 6:53:13 PM UTC-4, Pat Hayes wrote: > > I've been following this thread thanks to Brad letting me know of it. It > seems I ran into a snag. It seems the interceptor driver doesn't like the > input. > pat, it looks like your tcpflow/acurite-lwp.pl combination is

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

> Hello everyone! > I've been following this thread thanks to Brad letting me know of it. It seems I ran into a snag. It seems the interceptor driver doesn't like the input. syslog Nov 2 18:48:22 weewx weewx[20752]: interceptor: MainThread: parse failed for dateutc=now&action=updateraw&re

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

I too would love to use tcpflow but had problems with it as well. Ive been using tcpdump in the meantime... sudo tcpdump -A -n -p -l -i eth0 -s0 -W tcp dst port 80 | stdbuf -oL strings -n8 | stdbuf -oL grep "&" | ./acurite-lwp2.pl Gluck, Brad On Wednesday, November 2, 2016 at 3:53:13 PM UTC-7,

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

MHall, I went ahead and upgraded the driver and added barometer.*.* to the map. It all appears to be working now. I can now open the standard skin. I get all the values filling in. I removed the Pond Temp, and added Living Room and a new Value for Office and they all work!!! Thanks so much for

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

On Tuesday, November 1, 2016 at 2:08:14 AM UTC-4, Brad Tucker wrote: > > Thanks for the help Mwall. > For some reason it is still not mapping the barometer. i have included my > sensor map as well as logs. > >> >> the wu format sends barometric info in every packet, whereas the chaney format di

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

Thanks for this Radar. Also thanks for commenting your new code! Helps a ton. Ill let it run for a bit but it seems like it works well. For some reason I can't get the Barometer data to map but once I figure that out I should be in a good place. Thanks Again, Brad On Monday, October 31, 2016 at

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

Thanks for the help Mwall. For some reason it is still not mapping the barometer. i have included my sensor map as well as logs. Thanks! B *This is what I have used for my sensor map:* [[sensor_map]] # bridge pressure = pressure..* inTemp = temperature..* inHumi

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

glad to help think i got the double humidity fixed attached the fix i hope script if you still want it but tcpflow looks better fit for the interceptor driver that's the same tcpdump line that i use too On Monday, October 31, 2016 at 3:47:51 PM UTC-5, Brad Tucker wrote: > > Radar, > > Thanks a

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

glad to help think i got the double humidity fixed attached the fix i hope script if you still want it but tcpflow looks better fit for the interceptor driver i use tcpdump -A -n -p -l -i eth0 -s0 tcp dst prot 80 | stdbuf -oL strings -n8 | stdbuf -oL grep "&" | ./acurite-lwp.pl On Monday, Octo

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

Fantastic. Thanks Mwall! Not sure Ill get to this tonight, being halloween and all, but Ill def tackle it late night or tomorrow sometime. Thanks for the info. Also thanks for the nice drivers. I played around with the SDR driver and had a blast. Im a ham operator so playing with computers, and

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

On Monday, October 31, 2016 at 4:47:51 PM UTC-4, Brad Tucker wrote: > > 2. Any idea on why the Barometric Pressure is not logging? > you need an entry for 'barometer' in your sensor_map. for example: [Interceptor] ... [[sensor_map]] barometer = barometer..* m -- You received

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

On Monday, October 31, 2016 at 6:03:30 PM UTC-4, Brad Tucker wrote: > > I tried to figure out, based on what I have, a mock sensor map. Im sure I > have called out some of the values incorrect. would you please take a look > and let me know if Im on the right track? If you can point me to more

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

Good info in here Thanks Mwall! couple of questions for you, before I tackle the sensor map. I tried to figure out, based on what I have, a mock sensor map. Im sure I have called out some of the values incorrect. would you please take a look and let me know if Im on the right track? If you can

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

On Monday, October 31, 2016 at 4:47:51 PM UTC-4, Brad Tucker wrote: > I also have 2 Tower Sensors attached so I included logs for this incase > one of them is conflicting... > brad, if you want to capture data from two different towers, you should distinguish them in your sensor map and possib

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

Thanks for the reply mwall. Good to hear its working as expected and that I can change it if I like. Thanks! Brad On Monday, October 31, 2016 at 2:28:35 PM UTC-7, mwall wrote: > > On Monday, October 31, 2016 at 4:47:51 PM UTC-4, Brad Tucker wrote: >> >> 3. Why does the Console say ""checkversio

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

On Monday, October 31, 2016 at 4:47:51 PM UTC-4, Brad Tucker wrote: > > 3. Why does the Console say ""checkversion": "126" when my bridge is the > latest 2.24 firmware? > brad, this is the response from the interceptor. you can change the response by doing this in your weewx config file: [Int

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

Radar, Thanks again for script and all the help. I ran my tcpdump through your script and it actually logs data!!! I have added some of the logs so you can see. One thing Ive noticed is it doesn't log barometric pressure. Not sure why. I did see that after getting processed by the perl script i

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

i use tcpdump with the script On Sunday, October 30, 2016 at 11:25:29 PM UTC-5, Brad Tucker wrote: > > Im on GitHub now looking at the code for 1.46, Thanks for the perl script > as well. I will def give this a shot in the morning. > -B > > On Sunday, October 30, 2016 at 9:23:19 PM UTC-7, Radar w

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

Im on GitHub now looking at the code for 1.46, Thanks for the perl script as well. I will def give this a shot in the morning. -B On Sunday, October 30, 2016 at 9:23:19 PM UTC-7, Radar wrote: > > sorry it is tcpflow 1.4.6 > > On Sunday, October 30, 2016 at 11:18:18 PM UTC-5, Radar wrote: >> >> he

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

sorry it is tcpflow 1.4.6 On Sunday, October 30, 2016 at 11:18:18 PM UTC-5, Radar wrote: > > here is the one i used to play with interceptor driver > > On Sunday, October 30, 2016 at 11:09:01 PM UTC-5, Brad Tucker wrote: >> >> Ha! Of course the most important part ;) I have 1.44 but I'll dig for t

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

here is the one i used to play with interceptor driver On Sunday, October 30, 2016 at 11:09:01 PM UTC-5, Brad Tucker wrote: > > Ha! Of course the most important part ;) I have 1.44 but I'll dig for the > source and see what I can find. > > Thanks for the help! > Brad > > -- You received this me

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

Ha! Of course the most important part ;) I have 1.44 but I'll dig for the source and see what I can find. Thanks for the help! Brad -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

it puts it on one line i had to download version 1.4.4 its not yet in fedora rpm so had to compile from source i'm looking for the script i used when i was playing with interceptor driver can't remember it's name or where i left it :) On Sunday, October 30, 2016 at 10:59:23 PM UTC-5, Brad Tucker

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

If only it was that easy. I'm not a coder and I haven't touched perl in a good 20years... on your tcpflow you have -0 in the syntax. My version on the pi doesn't understand -0. What should the -0 do? Thanks, B -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

the perl script is not part of weewx i made it long time ago i don't have it for download (it's real messy) it does a little more than just feed weewx it prints to the console too you should be able to write one to suit you don't know about nc On Sunday, October 30, 2016 at 10:31:53 PM UTC-5, Bra

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

Thanks for the reply Radar. Is your perlscript available for download or is it currently part of the weewx pacakage and I'm missing it? I'll give tcpflow a shot as well. Any idea why nc only stays alive for a short period? Thanks! Brad -- You received this message because you are subscribed t

[weewx-user] Re: Interceptor using bridge new Accurate firmware

i use a perl script to put the obs on one line then feed it to weewx if you have tcpflow 1.4.4 you can try tcpflow -C -p -0 -i eth0 On Sunday, October 30, 2016 at 10:01:59 PM UTC-5, Brad Tucker wrote: > > I have setup a bridge running raspberry pi. It is connected as follows: > > Acurite Bridge