Re: Wicket Stuff domain registered: wicketstuff.org

2007-01-22 Thread Jean-Baptiste Quenot
* Igor Vaynberg: email notifications are not setup in jira yet, not sure what smtp server we can use. johan? What about localhost? As long as Postfix is installed, sending mail is trivial. -- Jean-Baptiste Quenot aka John Banana Qwerty http://caraldi.com/jbq/

Re: VOTE: remove Page.before/afterCallComponent()

2007-01-22 Thread Igor Vaynberg
+1 -igor On 1/22/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: this api is simply too fragile. any custom requesttarget impl has to call this in order for it to be consistent, and if its not consistent its useless. the only usecase i could come up with for this is the one we use in teachscape

Re: VOTE: remove Page.before/afterCallComponent()

2007-01-22 Thread Johan Compagner
i thought people where using this, i don't know anymore about what i didn't use it But was it for security or something? On 1/22/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 -igor On 1/22/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: this api is simply too fragile. any custom requesttarget

Re: VOTE: remove Page.before/afterCallComponent()

2007-01-22 Thread Frank Bille
On 1/22/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: this api is simply too fragile. any custom requesttarget impl has to call this in order for it to be consistent, and if its not consistent its useless. +1 because of fragile api.

Re: VOTE: remove Page.before/afterCallComponent()

2007-01-22 Thread Igor Vaynberg
_if_ there is a valid security usecase it should be integrated into our IAuthStrat, not be spread into the page i will post to the user and ask if anyone is using it. -igor On 1/22/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i thought people where using this, i don't know anymore about

Packaging our releases

2007-01-22 Thread Martijn Dashorst
Our current Wicket release distribution consists of several zip files, one for each project. Each zip contains all the dependencies for that particular project, including the wicket dependencies. This means that when you download wicket-1.2.4.zip, wicket-spring-1.2.4.zip and

Re: Packaging our releases

2007-01-22 Thread Igor Vaynberg
On 1/22/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - split zips into source and binary distributions, going with the default maven assemblies +1 - remove site docs from distributions, only include a readme, the docs can be found online (http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKETxSITE) +1 -

wicket-examples FormPage

2007-01-22 Thread Sean Sullivan
I visited the FormPage on wicket-library.com and I'm not sure if its working correctly: http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/ajax?wicket:bookmarkablePage=:wicket.examples.ajax.builtin.FormPage The page is supposed to perform Ajax form validation. When I type data into the field(s), I

Re: wicket-examples FormPage

2007-01-22 Thread Igor Vaynberg
that bug has been fixed already http://81.17.46.170/wicket13/ajax?wicket:bookmarkablePage=:wicket.examples.ajax.builtin.FormPage -igor On 1/22/07, Sean Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I visited the FormPage on wicket-library.com and I'm not sure if its working correctly:

Re: wicket-examples FormPage

2007-01-22 Thread Igor Vaynberg
ah, how could i forget our new domain! :) http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/ajax?wicket:bookmarkablePage=:wicket.examples.ajax.builtin.FormPage http://81.17.46.170/wicket13/ajax?wicket:bookmarkablePage=:wicket.examples.ajax.builtin.FormPage On 1/22/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: wicket-examples FormPage

2007-01-22 Thread Sean Sullivan
Was this a bug in the FormPage class or a bug in the wicket-1.2.4.jar? (I am trying to implement the same type of functionality in my own web application) Sean On 1/22/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: that bug has been fixed already

Re: wicket-examples FormPage

2007-01-22 Thread Igor Vaynberg
it was a bug with wicket and is fixed in 1.3. it had to do with components/page not properly attaching/detaching during ajax requests. -igor On 1/22/07, Sean Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Was this a bug in the FormPage class or a bug in the wicket-1.2.4.jar? (I am trying to implement the

Re: Packaging our releases

2007-01-22 Thread Ryan Sonnek
+1 to Igor's response Use maven conventions as much as possible. Leave the distributions bare bones and get all extra artifacts (source, javadoc) in the maven repository. On 1/22/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Other peops than core devs please voice your opinion. The

Re: Packaging our releases

2007-01-22 Thread Justin Lee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 I just use either maven or ant+maven tasks to dl the jars. I hardly dl the distro bundles at all. Martijn Dashorst wrote: Other peops than core devs please voice your opinion. The distributions are made for you. Martijn - -- Justin Lee

Re: wicket-examples FormPage

2007-01-22 Thread Sean Sullivan
Are you referring to WICKET-156? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-156 Is this fix going to be added to the Wicket 1.2.5 release? Sean On 1/22/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it was a bug with wicket and is fixed in 1.3. it had to do with components/page not properly

Re: wicket-examples FormPage

2007-01-22 Thread Igor Vaynberg
yes thats the one and no, afaik it will not. if you want it you can start a vote to have it included. just keep in mind it is already very time consuming for us to work on 2 branches, not to mentioned 3 -igor On 1/22/07, Sean Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you referring to

Re: Packaging our releases

2007-01-22 Thread Justin Lee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 I just hit reply... Igor Vaynberg wrote: maybe you shouldve posted this to @user? -gior On 1/22/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Other peops than core devs please voice your opinion. The distributions are made for you.

Re: wicket-examples FormPage

2007-01-22 Thread Sean Sullivan
I understand that Wicket 1.2.x is in maintenance mode. However, Wicket 1.2.4is the only version that has been deemed a production-ready release. Should users continue using Wicket 1.2.4 or should they move to the unreleased Wicket 1.3 codebase? Sean On 1/22/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Packaging our releases

2007-01-22 Thread Igor Vaynberg
that was meant for martijn not you -igor On 1/22/07, Justin Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 I just hit reply... Igor Vaynberg wrote: maybe you shouldve posted this to @user? -gior On 1/22/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: wicket-examples FormPage

2007-01-22 Thread Igor Vaynberg
On 1/22/07, Sean Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I understand that Wicket 1.2.x is in maintenance mode. However, Wicket 1.2.4is the only version that has been deemed a production-ready release. really? i thought 1.2, 1.2.1, 1.2.2, 1.2.3 were also production ready...? Should users continue

WebResponse#redirect(String)

2007-01-22 Thread Eelco Hillenius
Hi, I'd like to get rid of the fact that WebResponse#redirect(String) throws an exception when a redirect fails. That method is - like the documentation states - only for internal use, and the code that currently calls it never tries to catch the exception. I don't think the exceptions add much

Re: WebResponse#redirect(String)

2007-01-22 Thread Igor Vaynberg
we are seeing this usually cause by socketclosedexception from nio, so its not like we can recover anyways +1 to just log it -igor On 1/22/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'd like to get rid of the fact that WebResponse#redirect(String) throws an exception when a redirect

Re: Packaging our releases

2007-01-22 Thread Alexandre Bairos
Hi. Answers right after the questions. On 1/22/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Our current Wicket release distribution consists of several zip files, one for each project. Each zip contains all the dependencies for that particular project, including the wicket dependencies. This