On Wednesday, July 25, 2007, 2:01:49 PM, Johan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but this rename is fine by me
except the wicket:bookmarkablePage that can be shorted like
w:bookmarkablePage
because the urls really says that it is bookmarkable
(and all old urls must still work so
On Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 9:19:51 AM, Johan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ugh. We still seem to be changing lots of fundamental stuff, don't we. :-)
I vote:
[x] deprecate them for beta3
We could possibly remove them for rc1, but that makes migration from
1.2.x harder, doesn't it?
i
On Wednesday, June 13, 2007, 10:21:21 AM, Martijn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/13/07, Oleg Taranenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wednesday, June 13, 2007, 10:44:32 AM, you wrote:
It is in fact the project you are trying to run that is at fault here.
Wicket doesn't prescribe which logging
[X] yes accept wicket-contrib-velocity
/Gwyn
On Friday, May 4, 2007, 12:23:37 PM, Upayavira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, do we want to propose graduation?
[X] Yes, propose Wicket for Graduation
/Gwyn
Hi Jean-Baptiste,
Friday, April 27, 2007, 9:25:43 AM, you wrote:
Could you please test if it works for you so that we can fix it
for the release?
At this stage, I'd have thought that the only way it could get to be
part of the ongoing 1.3.0-incubating-beta1 (which is what I assume
you're
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
Hi Martijn,
Wednesday, April 25, 2007, 5:25:26 PM, you wrote:
We have 12 PPMC members and 4 mentors. Until now we have had 1 vote
from a PPMC member and one from a mentor. Can we get some weight
behind this release please?
+1 to release here.
Did a quick scan over all seemed well - was
Wednesday, April 18, 2007, 11:04:12 PM, Martijn wrote:
There is a vote already in place for switching the development
branches around. Now it is time to name the release after 1.3 (and not
1.3.1 :).
Apache Wicket 1.3 will be followed by:
[+1] Apache Wicket 2.0 (i.e. becomes our old 2.0
Thursday, April 19, 2007, 10:51:15 AM, Jean-Baptiste wrote:
Can you please wait at least 24 or 48 hours before taking action,
and wait for more developers to express their opinion?
For European people like me the vote started yesterday evening
when leaving the office, and the switch from
Hi Martijn,
Tuesday, April 10, 2007, 10:41:37 AM, you wrote:
IIUC this would solve the issues uncovered by the IPMC. Does anyone
else have something I missed?
Did you need to do something with wicket-threadtest, as wasn't the
source showing up at '/src' in the release?
/Gwyn
+1
/Gwyn
On 31/03/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the subject says it all.
i kinda jumped the gun on this one and committed already by mistake :( my
appologies.
if the vote doesnt pass i will revert it.
-igor
--
Download Wicket 1.2.5 now! - http://wicketframework.org
Likewise... :-)
[x] Yes release the damned thing already
/Gwyn
On 29/03/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I forgot +1 myself
On 3/28/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And you can find the stuff here:
Should we be pointing toward any explanation/summary of what's got
licence headers vs what's not?
Just wondering if we're going that have questions raised on that, that
we might be able to try satisfy, or at least respond to, as part of
the email.
/Gwyn
On 29/03/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL
+1 (binding)
Sig hashes validate wicket-examples jar runs when dropped into a
copy of Tomcat I had around.
The header-checking unit test fails on a couple of files but on visual
inspection they seem correct, so I suspect the test data first. (e.g.
Windows/Unix issues)
/Gwyn
On 26/03/07,
On 27/03/07, Gwyn Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The header-checking unit test fails on a couple of files but on visual
inspection they seem correct, so I suspect the test data first. (e.g.
Windows/Unix issues)
Just for info, this is an issue with the Wicket LicenceChecker
UnitTest, specific
, you cannot vote -1 without giving a reason
-igor
On 3/25/07, Gwyn Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adding a setting:+0 Reversing the present order:-1
/Gwyn
On 25/03/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For me the argument still remains: you break a lot of stuff in a
silent way
+1
On 19/03/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hibernate 3.2 has switched from using an int to a long for returntype of
their count queries. jpa also uses a long. so i figure its time to switch
idataprovider to the long as well so that it maps nicely. since we have
broken 1.3 already,
+1
On 20/03/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Like the subject says.
Martijn
--
Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org
Without being 100% sure about what you're aiming for, this is what I'm
doing in one of my projects, which might help?
pom.xml:
plugin
artifactIdmaven-assembly-plugin/artifactId
configuration
outputDirectorytarget/release/outputDirectory
+1
/Gwyn
On 14/03/07, Al Maw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's been a lot of comment and discussion lately about the future
direction of Wicket, and the trunk/2.0 branch in particular.
We've done some hard thinking and we now have a roadmap for the future.
When What
Hi,
Anyone else getting 1.x test errors or is it just my setup?
Using https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wicket/branches/wicket-1.x
Updated (to r517607)
Ignoring the Velocity warnings (anyone else get them?), I get 5 test
errors - See attatched.
/Gwyn
;java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
java.lang.StringBuffer.append(Ljava/lang/CharSequence;)
Ljava/lang/StringBuffer;
...
Sorting out the JAVA_HOME PATH cleared it all.
/Gwyn
On 13/03/07, Gwyn Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was HEAD at the time!
Anyway, specifically focussing on 1.x\jdk-1.4\wicket
As I mentioned in another thread, my preference would be 'checkpoint',
maybe with a date, but as long as we don't raise any expectations
about it, then I'm not against making it semi-public if/when we get it
cleared.
/Gwyn
On 11/03/07, Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/11/07, Eelco
+1
/Gwyn
On 07/03/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this vote is to release 1.3beta
-igor
On 08/02/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, this is a vote to grant Jean-Baptiste commit rights for Wicket and
welcome him as part of the core team.
Your votes please?
+1 from me
/Gwyn
On 11/12/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ ] sure put it in 1.2.x
[ X] nah, people can do it themselves, let's not worry about it
My feeling is that at this point, we should be actively avoiding a new
1.2 release and not adding things.
On this specific point, surely existing
Nice - go for it.
/Gwyn
On 11/12/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vincent delivered, and came up with a nice follow up to the previous design.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12346927/wicket_v2.png
Any feedback on this one? Can we move forward and rework
There's one comment there already, but if someone wants to check if
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/spring.html is current, maybe link to
that as well?
/Gwyn
On 30/11/06, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe igor can add a comment about the spring integration.
My believe is that we
There'd be a problem accessing the version in the MANIFEST.MF if
you're not running Wicket from a Jar, but no problem with, that I'm
aware of. The implementation in Settings.getVersion() calls
getImplementationVersion() on the Package, which afaik, works fine.
/Gwyn
On 11/11/06, Johan
On 19/10/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How is the export facilities of confluence,
Just to answer this one, it's in-place seems to be triggered by the
updates, rather than periodical, so very fast.
From the docs, the Auto-Export plugin can have a different template
per
purtier)
Martijn
On 10/19/06, Gwyn Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19/10/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How is the export facilities of confluence,
Just to answer this one, it's in-place seems to be triggered by the
updates, rather than periodical, so very fast.
From
As part of the move to Apache, the Wicket WIKI has moved to a new home
on the Apache Confluence site, and can now be found at:
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/
Notes on the move are at http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/wiki-move.html
Many of the pages have been converted, but a number do remain!
Hi,
I'm not sure how much of an edge case this is, but I'm running a few
(currently 3) Wicket web-apps in an EAR under WebLogic, which means
that there's a class-loading hiearachy of:
EAR (EJBs) at 'Level 1', with WAR1, WAR2 WAR3 all at their own 'Level 2's.
Level 2 classes can see Level 1
34 matches
Mail list logo
