Hi;when I used the new snapshot it say ERROR - RequestCycle - The mount path '/' is reserved for the application home pagejava.lang.IllegalArgumentException: The mount path '/' is reserved for the application home page
ok? :)Regards, AliOn 2/20/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,Yet
Martijn Igor; Thanks for your help, unfortunatily I have to deliver something today, and I had to do it in a different way (edit each item alone, client don't like it :)) I will wrap the project and send it to you, although I don't want you to waist you time because someone like me don't fully
On 2/20/06, Ali Zaid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ERROR - RequestCycle - The mount path '/' is reserved for the application home pagejava.lang.IllegalArgumentException: The mount path '/' is reserved for the application home page
That sounds valid - / would be the logical home page (as set with the
hi
i am new to wicket technology and wan't to learn it
can anybody provide me brief document of it
wating for replyt
regards
ketan d.gote
I totally don't get it, the same configurate work when I replace wicket-1.2-20060220.jar with wicket-1.2-20060212.jar? and I have been using this config for the last 4 monthsOn 2/20/06,
Mark Derricutt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/20/06, Ali Zaid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ERROR - RequestCycle
/workspace/Yakhdor_Dealler/Arg /Call
Set name=requestsPerGC2000/Set Set name=statsOnfalse/Set/ConfigureOn 2/20/06,
Ali Zaid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:I totally don't get it, the same configurate work when I replace
wicket-1.2-20060220.jar with wicket-1.2-20060212.jar? and I have been using this config
On 2/20/06, ketan gote [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi
i am new to wicket technology and wan't to learn it
can anybody provide me brief document of it
wating for replyt
There were several introduction to wicket articles posted to Javalobby last month - they'd be a good place to check out:
And why is this URGENT?MartijnOn 2/20/06, Mark Derricutt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/20/06, ketan gote [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi
i am new to wicket technology and wan't to learn it
can anybody provide me brief document of it
wating for replyt
There were several introduction to wicket articles
/Yakhdor_Dealler/Arg /Call
Set name=requestsPerGC2000/Set Set name=statsOnfalse/Set/Configure
On 2/20/06,
Ali Zaid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I totally don't get it, the same configurate work when I replace
wicket-1.2-20060220.jar with wicket-1.2-20060212.jar? and I have been using this config
On 2/20/06, Ali Zaid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you mean by mount? override of getHomePage() in my Application class? well, I have this done, and it used to work.I'm assuming in your Application class you're calling mount(/,
SomePage.class) ?You can't use / here as it conflicts with the
I'm not using mount at all, I'm using only getHomePage()On 2/20/06, Mark Derricutt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/20/06, Ali Zaid
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you mean by mount? override of getHomePage() in my Application class? well, I have this done, and it used to work.I'm assuming in your
Stupid question,
but is it possible to remove the actual span-tags from the output?
getMarkupSettings().setStripWicketTags(true);
removes the wicket:ids and the other wicket tags, but is it possible
to remove the span tags for a label?
My output looks almost like the font hell from early
1. Give me the constructor change and the Java 5 functionality in one pass (Wicket 2.0)+1
-- The more life's risk you take, the more life's reward you get - Me
Mats Norén wrote:
Stupid question,
but is it possible to remove the actual span-tags from the output?
getMarkupSettings().setStripWicketTags(true);
removes the wicket:ids and the other wicket tags, but is it possible
to remove the span tags for a label?
My output looks almost like the font
Hmm...ok, so basically I have to litter my Java code with
setRenderBodyOnly(true) instead. Well, I guess I can live with that.
But it seems a bit weird that the default behaviour for a label is to
leave the span tag. Anyway, thanks for the tip.
On 2/20/06, Alastair Maw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eelco,
I tried the navmenu with a checkout from CVS from friday, and now it
only renders one level or to be more specific the root element.
protected Object onGetObject(Component component)
{
// lazily attach
if (row == null)
{
It is not weird in my opinion to have it leave the span tag. By leaving it in there, you maintain previewability between your rendered output and the actual template. By removing the span tag, you alter the document model, and hence the way the browser will interpret your document. Also, by
Hi Guys;I'm really having bad 24 hours, I would appreciate your help guys, if you have private emails where I can attach my whole project for you to test, and better if we can chat somewhere msn/gmail/skype, I have 2 problems:
1- The TextFields in a listview in Form that we discussed yesterday,
Mats Norén wrote:
Hmm...ok, so basically I have to litter my Java code with
setRenderBodyOnly(true) instead. Well, I guess I can live with that.
But it seems a bit weird that the default behaviour for a label is to
leave the span tag. Anyway, thanks for the tip.
Actually, a better way might be
On 2/20/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is not weird in my opinion to have it leave the span tag. By leaving it
in there, you maintain previewability between your rendered output and the
actual template.
Agreed, it's a valid point. My beef with the span tags are more the
fact
Guys;I O You a big thanks and appology, I'm reaaallly feel bad about this thread, but I was really stupid regarding this problem, I found out that regardless of what I value I enter the set method of the variable updated set the value to zero (logic behind this is that ordered quantity is =
Has anyone else had any trouble with debugging their wicket apps with
Intellij5.1 and Tomcat5?
I keep getting messages Invalid breakpoint. Source code changed.
/Mats
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log
Mats Norén schrieb:
Hmm...ok, so basically I have to litter my Java code with
setRenderBodyOnly(true) instead.
Create a subclass and use that.
Well, I guess I can live with that.
But it seems a bit weird that the default behaviour for a label is to
leave the span tag.
A label can be
On 2/20/06, Timo Stamm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mats Norén schrieb:
Hmm...ok, so basically I have to litter my Java code with
setRenderBodyOnly(true) instead.
Create a subclass and use that.
Good idea, a SimpleText extends Label with a setRenderBodyOnly(true)
would do the trick. Thanks!
I used to define a path of a wicket application just like "/user.page" instead of "/user/*" But the "datePicker" of wicket extension can't work when i define the path "/user.page"
雅虎1G免费邮箱百分百防垃圾信
I see youre problem. When we try to resolve/find a mount target we now throw that error.That is a bit wrong because you haven't mounted anything you just ask to find a mount on /Why that happens i don't know that has something to do with youre config files.
Because when you don't mount youre app
Johan;Thanks for reply, still, what do I need to do? this is new to this build? to be honest with you I don't know what is going on, are you saying my configuration is wrong because I use the /? should I attach my configuration files?
I'm little bit relieved because I managed to push my deadline
can you test where you have defined / as the context that you just specify (so nothing)I did fix it so you have to checkout cvs or wait for a new snashot.johan
On 2/20/06, Ali Zaid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Johan;Thanks for reply, still, what do I need to do? this is new to this build? to be
#QuoteI vote for 2. 2. Do the constructor change in a seperate release (Wicket 1.3) andput Java 5 in the next (Wicket 2.0)On 2/16/06,
Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,This is a non-binding (the developers ultimately decide) call votesconcerning whether we should fold the upcomming
:) That's kind of the whole point of Wicket. Make working with custom
components easy.
Eelco
On 2/20/06, Mats Norén [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/20/06, Timo Stamm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mats Norén schrieb:
Hmm...ok, so basically I have to litter my Java code with
Ok so I've gone over the tutorials for AJAX and wicket
(http://wicket-stuff.sourceforge.net/wicket-contrib-dojo/Tutorials.html),
but I still don't get it. The problem with the tutorials is there is
no ajax! I don't see any code for using XMLHttpRequest or Dojo. More
importantly there isn't any
I have tried as much as possible to debug this problem. it keeps coming and all IDs were normally created...What could be wrong
wicket.markup.MarkupException: Tag 'tr' (line 40, column 21) has a mismatched close tag at '/table' (line 184, column 17)[markup =
Re: deadline. Wicket 1.2 is still officially alpha software. I think
it is a big improvement over 1.1, and it is stable enough to use, but
be careful when working with tight deadlines. Especially with new
functionality like Fragments and Ajax support. I'm not saying that
stuff is not good enough,
What could prevent the Extensions project's DatePicker from popping up
when I click the DatePicker icon?
It works fine in the FormInput example, so it's not my browser settings.
For the sake of help, I've reduced my code to a bare minimum, taken
directly from the JavaDoc. Here's my HTML:
html
May be you take a look at the more simple ajax example first. There
are about 8 in wicket-examples. Unfortunately by now you have to grasp
the ideas from the code. As far as I know there is no user guide yet.
May be you'll something in the wiki, but I'm not sure.
Juergen
On 2/20/06, Charlie
/tr is missing or any of its inner tags are not closed (may be
quotes or ' are somewhere missing)
Juergen
On 2/20/06, Ayodeji Aladejebi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have tried as much as possible to debug this problem. it keeps coming and
all IDs were normally created...What could be wrong
Can you email the markup file RecordInputPage.html?
It is hard to tell what is wrong with your markup. Apparantly you
haven't closed one of your tr rows. To be specific: the tr
starting at line 40, column 21 is not closed, or a sub-tag inside
isn't closed.
Martijn
On 2/20/06, Ayodeji Aladejebi
I'm having this problem on IE, but it works fine on FF. I've opened a bug on this issue.
I am using Wicket Version 1.1.1 and also Wicket extension version 1.1.1...i was doing this in my code
WebMarkupContainer dateLabel = new WebMarkupContainer(dateLabel); add(dateLabel); add(dateOfBirth = new RequiredTextField(dateOfBirth, Date.class)); dobPicker = new
Ive just noticed that it works for
me in Mozilla.
But why, then, does the FormInput examples
DatePicker work for me in IE? Is there some configuration or property
file setting needed to make it work in IE?
Some Cascading stylesheet setting required?
-Original Message-
From:
Yup,
With a little more context:
form wicket:id=recordForm name=form
table width=100% border=0 cellspacing=2 cellpadding=2
tr
td colspan=2 class=sideboxBottomdiv
wicket:id=feedback align=left/div/td
/tr
I vote for #1. I want the latest and greatest -- thats why I'm into wicket!
/Fredrik
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
Greetings,
I have a form with 20 or so drop downs and I'm having a hard time with the
model (conceptually). I just want to bind the contents of the value
attribute for each option tag to my model, not the displayed value of the
option tag. For example, say I want a drop down choice to be
Hello all,
I'm entirely new to Wicket, and thus far impressed with what it seems
to offer. I've put together a couple of sample pages and now I want
to create a sample for my co-workers that re-works one of our existing
pages via Wicket. (Our home-grown template engine has become a pain
point).
Oops, problem solved I think I need to implement IChoiceRenderer. +1 for
RTFM. :)
- Original Message -
From: Jonathan Cone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 2:55 PM
Subject: [Wicket-user] DropDownChoice
Greetings,
I have a form
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
1. Give me the constructor change and the Java 5 functionality in one
pass (Wicket 2.0)
2. Do the constructor change in a seperate release (Wicket 1.3) and
put Java 5 in the next (Wicket 2.0)
3. I don't want either one and I want to stay on Wicket 1.2.
I vote for #2
dont think you need a special imodel or anything here.just use a listview for the order lines and based on the order line type include a proper panel that represents that order line type.-Igor
On 2/20/06, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,I'm entirely new to Wicket, and thus far
To expand a little on what Igor said, you basically want to create two Panels, one for the cancellation type and one for the adjustment type. Then you can use a ListView. In the ListView populateItem method, add whichever Panel you need based on whatever factors you use and make sure to use the
I know that this might be early considering the lenght of the thread,
but what is the voting result? :-).
BR,
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
On 2/17/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
This is a non-binding (the developers ultimately decide) call votes
concerning whether
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Good news. We've just decided you're not trolls. bahrahrhum.
Alexandru Popescu wrote:
I know that this might be early considering the lenght of the thread,
but what is the voting result? :-).
BR,
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
Alexandru Popescu wrote:
I know that this might be early considering the lenght of the thread,
but what is the voting result? :-).
So far I count:
40 votes for both at once (constructor and JDK5)
17 votes for split releases (16 plus me, I'm voting now. :-) )
Al
I am one for a move to Java 5 as fast as possible.
From my perspective Wicket is a young framework and if we are
adventurously enough to choose Wicket, we are adventurously enough to
be on Java 5.
On 21 Feb 2006, at 00:27, Al Maw wrote:
Alexandru Popescu wrote:
I know that this might be
My vote goes to 1.
1. Give me the constructor change and the Java 5 functionality in one
pass (Wicket 2.0)
2. Do the constructor change in a seperate release (Wicket 1.3) and
put Java 5 in the next (Wicket 2.0)
3. I don't want either one and I want to stay on Wicket 1.2.
I don't know what JAR versions the Forminput example is using. I've updated the priority from 5 to 7. Here's the bug:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=684975aid=1434895group_id=119783I tried loading each of the resources the DatePicker adds to wicket:head and that worked fine. The
I'm getting unpredictable exceptions about expired pages, so I'm requesting some information about them. I'm using the latest snapshot of 1.2 (core and extensions).What causes pages to be expired?How can I prevent pages from throwing expiration exceptions?
If a page is expired, how can I present a
when a url is accessed for a page that cannot be found in the pagemap it is considered an expired page. so basically you create a page, some time passes and that page is removed from the pagemap via the page eviction strategy. so if you go back to that page and click a link, that url will try to
I'm seeing this too. I have a page works properly but if I insert:
div wicket:id=noImages id=noImagesNo images/div
into my code suddenly I get a parsing error message from Wicket. It
isn't identical to the one reported by Ayodeji. He got:
wicket.markup.MarkupException: Tag 'tr'
Doh! Turns out this is a user-error because I should be using
WebMarkupContainer instead of WebComponent. The error message is very
misleading though, can we fix that? It should say WebComponent may not
have a body or something like that... I can file a bug report for it if
you wish.
Gili
How many such tags exist? Please do list the others.
wicket:border, wicket:body/
wicket:link
wicket:child/, wicket:extend
wicket:component? .. so we can declare component type in the markup..not sure.
wicket:head
wicket:remove
thanks,
karthik
+1 1. Give me the constructor change and the Java 5 functionality in one
pass (Wicket 2.0)
60 matches
Mail list logo
