Re: [Wicket-user] Ajax autocompletion troubles

2006-11-03 Thread Erik van Oosten
I verified it just now and it works!!! Congratulations on solving this apparently difficult bug! Thanks, Erik. Matej Knopp schreef: Is that problem still present? Could you please check current svn too? -Matej -- Erik van Oosten http://www.day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/

[Wicket-user] Change default prefix for url

2006-11-03 Thread bednarz-hannover
Hi all ! Is there a way to change the default prefix for url before instances? My current URLs look like: http://127.0.0.1/application?wicket:interface=:22:: How can I change the wicket prefix so the URL is looking like this: http://127.0.0.1/application?portal:interface=:22:: I need this

Re: [Wicket-user] Change default prefix for url

2006-11-03 Thread Igor Vaynberg
and when they see ?portal:interface=:4:some.path:ILinkListener that doesnt look like wicket?if someone is going to go through enough trouble to figure out what framework you are using they will figure it out just by googling ILinkListener or another interface name we encode into the url. or look

Re: [Wicket-user] Change default prefix for url

2006-11-03 Thread Erik van Oosten
Hello Maciej, You can find more here: http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/obfuscating-urls.html. Erik. [EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef: Hi all ! Is there a way to change the default prefix for url before instances? My current URLs look like: http://127.0.0.1/application?wicket:interface=:22::

[Wicket-user] Weird Wiki problem

2006-11-03 Thread Erik van Oosten
Hello, I created a child page from page i18n. When I look at http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/reference-library.html, you can not see a link to the new page. It _is_ visible through http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Reference+library. Why are these different? And also, why is

Re: [Wicket-user] Weird Wiki problem

2006-11-03 Thread Martijn Dashorst
The wiki's is exported every so often (don't know the frequency, Kenneth) to a static space (the preferred linking space) accomodate the scalability issues Apache faces with their infrastructure (something about several tera byte per month). Martijn On 11/3/06, Erik van Oosten [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Wicket-user] Weird Wiki problem

2006-11-03 Thread Erik van Oosten
Okay, understood. Makes sense. I hope the update happens at least once a day. Twice would be nicer :) Thanks, Erik. Martijn Dashorst schreef: The wiki's is exported every so often (don't know the frequency, Kenneth) to a static space (the preferred linking space) accomodate the

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket performance in high availability applications?

2006-11-03 Thread Johan Compagner
why would that be help full in performance?What you should know when the session is created and when pages are created and what does happen to that after that. johanOn 11/3/06, Carfield Yim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I personally think this is nice to show the life-cycle from thecontainer start to

Re: [Wicket-user] Change default prefix for url

2006-11-03 Thread bednarz-hannover
Hello Eric, Hello Igor ! Thank you very much for both responses. I agree to Igors response about my idea in general and am happy to see that wicket is secure :_)) Nevertheless I decided to use obfuscated urls for some other special responses. Erics hint works perfectly. Thank you very much,

[Wicket-user] Global, Thread specific Property

2006-11-03 Thread Korbinian Bachl
Hi, i've got a problem and i dont know how to solve it. I work with PageParameters and the thing that i allways have to pull them around makes me sad. Is there a way how i can have a global object holding the current PageParameters that can be accessed without passing in the PageParameters into

Re: [Wicket-user] Global, Thread specific Property

2006-11-03 Thread Roland Kaercher
Hi Korbinian, if I understand your Problem correctly then you could use a custom subclass of WebSession for that purpose. roland On 11/3/06, Korbinian Bachl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, i've got a problem and i dont know how to solve it. I work with PageParameters and the thing that i

Re: [Wicket-user] A wicket book in chinese is available free

2006-11-03 Thread Francis Amanfo
Whao, it's about time we all go for some chinese language course. Afterall it's the most spoken language in the whole world.Regards,FrancisOn 11/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I Just finished a book about wicket. But it's a pity that it is written in chinese. Maybe most of the

[Wicket-user] Pls add your birthday to my calendar...

2006-11-03 Thread Ketan Gote Ketan
I'm building a birthday calendar and I would really appreciate if you could help me out. Simply click on the link below and enter your birthday into my calendar:

Re: [Wicket-user] Strategy to avoid new instances of pages and panels

2006-11-03 Thread Frank Silbermann
One style of Wicket development is to use a single page for the entire application, switching components within the page. If you did that, your pages could be large components chosen by the single master page. You could keep these page components in application or session storage to be re-used.

Re: [Wicket-user] Set Main Component for Inherited Classes?

2006-11-03 Thread Jonathan Sharp
Should this affect a fragment that I have inside of my ExamplePage? I'm getting a Markup does not contain fragment id=foo. I have the fragment inside of my ExamplePage.html file between the wicket:extends tags. -jsOn 11/2/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: WebMarkupContainer body = new

[Wicket-user] javascript/sending information to a specific wicket component from a page

2006-11-03 Thread Erik Brakkee
Hi, I have made custom component which uses some _javascript_. Now my question is how to pass on information from _javascript_ to the wicket component on the server side. I can imagine things like adding a hidden form field with a specific id based on the wicket id of the custom component in

Re: [Wicket-user] Strategy to avoid new instances of pages and panels

2006-11-03 Thread Johan Compagner
what do you mean with reloads the page?A normal refresh (if url is wicket:interface=xxx) then a page is not recreated.Or do you mean bookmarkable urls?Other links like pageLinks or your own links you can do what ever you want with pooling pages. johanOn 11/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Wicket-user] Strategy to avoid new instances of pages and panels

2006-11-03 Thread bednarz-hannover
Helo Johan, can you explain pooling pages in details and give me some short example? Do you mean putting pages into some kind of singleton or a synchronized pool which holds reuseable pages? How are those pages given back to the pool for reuse? Thank you very much, Maciej -Ursprüngliche

Re: [Wicket-user] Strategy to avoid new instances of pages and panels

2006-11-03 Thread bednarz-hannover
Martijn, isn`t this a problem of the framework itself? When I have page constcted from serveral subcomponents then my JVM will run out of memory after some user. What do you think about string components within the user session and reuse them? Maciej -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von:

Re: [Wicket-user] Global, Thread specific Property

2006-11-03 Thread Korbinian Bachl
Hi Roland, well, yes I could do that. The trick that i want to do is not to have any session involved, as with wicket 2.0 lazy session behaviour exists, and i dont want to create a session. I fact this would be a create once per pageRequest object that can be dumped when the page is rendered -

Re: [Wicket-user] Strategy to avoid new instances of pages and panels

2006-11-03 Thread bednarz-hannover
John, when I use bookmarkable urls I get every time I reload the page a new instance. Is there a way to avoid this? Maciej -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net Gesendet: 03.11.06 16:30:22 An: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net Betreff: Re: [Wicket-user]

Re: [Wicket-user] Strategy to avoid new instances of pages and panels

2006-11-03 Thread Johan Compagner
as martijn said. I am not talking about pooling pages over sessionsThat is a nogo in wicket. No i was talking about a single session reusing pages.So if you create a link that goes back to page X then hold that page there. pooling pages over sessions can't be done. Maybe for completely static

Re: [Wicket-user] Strategy to avoid new instances of pages and panels

2006-11-03 Thread Johan Compagner
for such a things you have different SessionStores or you can do clustering.But even with one server you can handle quite some load. Memory is pretty cheap.johanOn 11/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Martijn,isn`t this a problem of the framework itself? When I have pageconstcted

Re: [Wicket-user] Strategy to avoid new instances of pages and panels

2006-11-03 Thread Johan Compagner
subclass: DefaultRequestTargetResolverStrategyand then resolveBookand do what ever you want there. But don't just return a page from a application wide pooljohan On 11/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: John,when I use bookmarkable urls I get every time I reload the pagea new

Re: [Wicket-user] Strategy to avoid new instances of pages and panels

2006-11-03 Thread bednarz-hannover
Ok, I understand wickets aproach of pageobject bound to sessions. Do you have some trick to avoid new page instances for bookmarkable URLs as mentioned before? Thank you very much, Maciej PS: I am building a new community page using wicket. So I have to test if wicket can handle thousands of

Re: [Wicket-user] Strategy to avoid new instances of pages and panels

2006-11-03 Thread bednarz-hannover
Perfect, this is what I need. Thanks, Maciej -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net Gesendet: 03.11.06 16:55:14 An: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net Betreff: Re: [Wicket-user] Strategy to avoid new instances of pages and panels subclass:

Re: [Wicket-user] Strategy to avoid new instances of pages and panels

2006-11-03 Thread Johan Compagner
with that new in new user request you don't mean really new users but new request?But thousands user requests per minute?That looks incredible high if every users does something every 10 seconds and you have 5000? request per minute = +/-80 requests per second. Then you have 800 live users at the

Re: [Wicket-user] Strategy to avoid new instances of pages and panels

2006-11-03 Thread bednarz-hannover
Exactly, you are right and my project will run into this direction. I think I have to do some kind of external loadbalancing and frontend filters to handly this huge traffic. Your calculation is similiar to my expectations and mirrors my previous experiences with public portals. My best, Maciej

Re: [Wicket-user] Weird Wiki problem

2006-11-03 Thread Gwyn Evans
I think we've uncovered a weakness with the auto-export system. The problem is that the pages are auto-exported on demand, such that any edits you make to http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/General+i18n+in+Wicket are effectively immediately replicated to the static page on

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket performance in high availability applications?

2006-11-03 Thread Ryan
Thanks for the tips. Of course they have spawned a few more questions. I appreciate you taking the time to answer them! 1) You mentioned tweaking the number of history items kept in the session as something to make sure to pay attention to. I understand wicket keeps a history of the component

[Wicket-user] [Fwd: Emory Utilities]

2006-11-03 Thread cowwoc
Cross-post from the JINI mailing list that might be of some interest to the wicket development team. Can't you use this to fix the JAR reloading problem you discussed earlier? Gili Original Message Seems like some of these classes (especially the URIClassLoader that

Re: [Wicket-user] How can I prevent duplicate header contributions?

2006-11-03 Thread Erik van Oosten
I solved it already. I added the following to the behavior: public void bind(Component component) { super.bind(component); component.add(HeaderContributor.forJavaScript(this.getClass(), javascriptfile.js)); } Erik. Erik van Oosten schreef: Hello, I used Igor's

Re: [Wicket-user] Global, Thread specific Property

2006-11-03 Thread Johan Compagner
First of all why are you using so many pageparams?Is it that you have to push state to the browser constantly?RequestCycle.get().getRequest().getRequestParameters().getParameters()johan On 11/3/06, Korbinian Bachl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi,i've got a problem and i dont know how to solve it. I

Re: [Wicket-user] Global, Thread specific Property

2006-11-03 Thread Korbinian Bachl
Hi Johan, thank you. The idea behind this is to have a 100% configurable URL paradigm. I know i can get it via the request cycle, but my idea is following: i globally want to configure a URL paradigm like that: /preParam1/.../preParamN/PageName/PageParam1/.../PageParamN where preParams

Re: [Wicket-user] Global, Thread specific Property

2006-11-03 Thread Eelco Hillenius
Such things typically are best done in RequestCycle. You can provide a custom request cycle, and then override onBeginRequest to set your thread scoped variable, and onEndRequest to clean it up again. You can access the request cycle by doing RequestCycle.get(), though you might also decide to

Re: [Wicket-user] Set Main Component for Inherited Classes?

2006-11-03 Thread Igor Vaynberg
no, make sure you specified the markupProvider parameter of the fragment's constructor-igorOn 11/3/06, Jonathan Sharp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Should this affect a fragment that I have inside of my ExamplePage? I'm getting a Markup does not contain fragment id=foo. I have the fragment inside of my

Re: [Wicket-user] javascript/sending information to a specific wicket component from a page

2006-11-03 Thread Igor Vaynberg
look into how the Palette is built, it does just that. or if you want you can use ajax.-igorOn 11/3/06, Erik Brakkee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hi, I have made custom component which uses some _javascript_. Now my question is how to pass on information from _javascript_ to the wicket component on

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket performance in high availability applications?

2006-11-03 Thread Igor Vaynberg
On 11/3/06, Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the tips. Of course they have spawned a few more questions.I appreciate you taking the time to answer them!1) You mentioned tweaking the number of history items kept in thesession as something to make sure to pay attention to. I understand

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket performance in high availability applications?

2006-11-03 Thread Eelco Hillenius
It threw me for a loop when I saw that nested components need to be added to their parent and not the page. That is quite a different paradigm from what I am used to. =) It's a commonly overlooked aspect in discussions about component oriented frameworks. Page is just another component, though

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket performance in high availability applications?

2006-11-03 Thread Eelco Hillenius
1) You mentioned tweaking the number of history items kept in the session as something to make sure to pay attention to. I understand wicket keeps a history of the component tree in the session on a render by render basis? Do you know of a good source where I can learn more about this

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket performance in high availability applications?

2006-11-03 Thread Martijn Dashorst
On 11/3/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When the API is fixed, we can churn out betas and it'll be a few months until all the nitty gritty details are settled (though so far, there have not been that many urgent problems with 2.0). The biggest hurdle I can think of now, apart from

Re: [Wicket-user] Strategy to avoid new instances of pages and panels

2006-11-03 Thread Eelco Hillenius
On 11/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Martijn, isn`t this a problem of the framework itself? When I have page constcted from serveral subcomponents then my JVM will run out of memory after some user. Well, every user (session) will use memory, correct. But only to a certain

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket performance in high availability applications?

2006-11-03 Thread Eelco Hillenius
The biggest hurdle I can think of now, apart from API stabilization is the legal stuff. This will take us a while to get it according to Apache standards. And until the book is done, I hardly see us working on the legal things. Why not? We have more than 10 active people in our team! :)

Re: [Wicket-user] Global, Thread specific Property

2006-11-03 Thread Korbinian Bachl
Hi Eelco, this might work! But how can i provide a custom request cycle? I found no info so far, and wiki also tells nothing. Best Regards, Korbinian -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Eelco Hillenius Gesendet: Freitag, 3.

Re: [Wicket-user] [Fwd: Emory Utilities]

2006-11-03 Thread Eelco Hillenius
It looks nice, but I can't find what licence they use, and I wouldn't want to have an extra dependency for Wicket (so it would only be ok if we would include the class in our project). Furthermore, the JAR reloading problem only exists when in development mode. When you turn on deployment mode

Re: [Wicket-user] Global, Thread specific Property

2006-11-03 Thread Eelco Hillenius
Override wicket.protocol.http.WebApplication#getDefaultRequestCycleFactory() Eelco On 11/3/06, Korbinian Bachl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Eelco, this might work! But how can i provide a custom request cycle? I found no info so far, and wiki also tells nothing. Best Regards, Korbinian

Re: [Wicket-user] [Fwd: Emory Utilities]

2006-11-03 Thread Marc-Andre Houle
I don't know lot about licence, but it seem's it can be used as you want : Licence link found on this page : http://dcl.mathcs.emory.edu/util/index.phpLink to the licence : http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomainOn 11/3/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:It looks nice, but

Re: [Wicket-user] A wicket book in chinese is available free

2006-11-03 Thread Eelco Hillenius
Very cool! http://chillenious.wordpress.com/2006/11/03/chinese-wicket-book-available-now/ Thanks, Eelco On 11/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I Just finished a book about wicket. But it's a pity that it is written in chinese. Maybe most of the users in the mail list can't

Re: [Wicket-user] [Fwd: Emory Utilities]

2006-11-03 Thread Eelco Hillenius
A yeah. For some reason I missed that. Duh. If one of our mentors is reading with us, could you confirm that including the classes we are interested in wouldn't be a problem? Other devs, what do you think of this? Eelco On 11/3/06, Marc-Andre Houle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't know lot

[Wicket-user] Wicket Hosting?

2006-11-03 Thread Jonathan Sharp
What wicket friendly hosting providers would people recommend?-js - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket Hosting?

2006-11-03 Thread Juergen Donnerstag
There is no specific requirement which Wicket imposes on the provider. Use any provider you like. wicket-library is hosted at Kattare, which works well. No real problems so far. Juergen On 11/3/06, Jonathan Sharp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What wicket friendly hosting providers would people

Re: [Wicket-user] [Fwd: Emory Utilities]

2006-11-03 Thread Igor Vaynberg
shouldnt this be fixed on the container level, we get our classloader from the container no?-igorOn 11/3/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:A yeah. For some reason I missed that. Duh. If one of our mentors is reading with us, could you confirm thatincluding the classes we are interested

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket Hosting?

2006-11-03 Thread Nick Heudecker
I've been happy with eApps.com.On 11/3/06, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is no specific requirement which Wicket imposes on the provider.Use any provider you like. wicket-library is hosted at Kattare, which works well. No real problems so far.JuergenOn 11/3/06, Jonathan Sharp

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket performance in high availability applications?

2006-11-03 Thread Carfield Yim
Actually may be using the term life cycle is not really accurate, the thing I interested to know is like how many component is cached, what is the level of caching? Say I have a component used in difference page, are thoses component render difference times or it render once then put to the cache

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket performance in high availability applications?

2006-11-03 Thread Igor Vaynberg
the entire component hierarchy is stored in sessionit goes something like thisyou create a page and all its components, that page is stored in sessionwhen you click a link on that page wicket pulls out the appropriate page from the session , finds the appropriate link component, and invokes the

[Wicket-user] are unicode resource bundles supported?

2006-11-03 Thread Dmitry Kandalov
I found wicket-Feature Requests-1494546 at http://www.nabble.com/--wicket-Feature-Requests-1494546---unicode-resource-bundles-tf1677225.html#a4547980 but there is no answer whether this feature is implemented or not (specifically in 1.2.3). -- View this message in context:

[Wicket-user] bug in WicketTester?

2006-11-03 Thread Dmitry Kandalov
I put BookmarkablePageLink on WebPage like this: firstPage.add( new BookmarkablePageLink( link, SecondPage.class, new PageParameters( id=1 ) ) ); and then I test it using WicketTester: wicketTester.startPage( FirstPage.class ); wicketTester.clickLink( link ); The problem is that wicketTester

[Wicket-user] ballet

2006-11-03 Thread Jasper Merritt
NET as the reporting development tool. NET Web Sample Applications package. To resolve it, ensure that all fonts the report uses are installed on the computer that the application is deployed to. If you are using the Crystal Reports Designer, use the Standard Report Wizard to create the