Pretty sure. I'm using Maven2 and the JAR name is
wicket-1.3.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar
On 3/29/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
is something from 2.0, are you sure you have the right jars?
-igor
On 3/28/07, Peter Thomas < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks Eelco & Igor I got
is something from 2.0, are you sure you have the right jars?
-igor
On 3/28/07, Peter Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Eelco & Igor I got the api and src and made the changes for
AbstractValidator - will also try to add some stuff to the wiki page as soon
as I finish refactoring.
But
Thanks Eelco & Igor I got the api and src and made the changes for
AbstractValidator - will also try to add some stuff to the wiki page as soon
as I finish refactoring.
But I have a big problem with the usage of wicket:message attribute (tag
works fine). This is the error:
wicket.markup.MarkupE
we only have an unofficial release for it that is a zip. search the list for
it, it is in martijn's dir somewhere.
other then that all the jars/src/and javadocs are available from that
wicketstuff.org maven repo.
all the new classes in wicket.validator package have pretty good javadocs so
that m
http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/apache/wicket/wicket/1.3.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT/wicket-1.3.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT-javadoc.jar
It would be good if someone could write a couple of scentences on how
to migrate from the old to the new ones. It's not difficult, but
indeed a bit different.
Ee
Ok, my bad - the documentation does mention the package change to
wicket.validation.validator.AbstractValidator
But the API looks a lot different, can you quickly point me to the online
Javadoc corresponding to 1.3.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT - also if it is
downloadable as a zip or something.
Thanks,
hmm, it is briefly mentioned under
Validation Changesi dont remember if we still have abstract validator or
not, see the source of other alidators and if they extend something.
-igor
On 3/28/07, Peter Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Igor,
I now see that there is a 1.3.0-incubating-SNAPSHO
Igor,
I now see that there is a 1.3.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT (as opposed to
1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT which I was using earlier).
I assume this is the latest version and just switched. But Looks like
wicket.markup.html.form.validation.AbstractValidator has disappeared. I
don't see a mention of this
peter can you try updating to the lastest snapshot and trying again?
-igor
On 3/28/07, Peter Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Matej - I am using wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar dated 2007-03-12
Let me know if you need any more details. On the Page in question I had
tried setVersioned wi
Matej - I am using wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar dated 2007-03-12
Let me know if you need any more details. On the Page in question I had
tried setVersioned with both true and false, same result.
Thanks,
Peter.
On 3/28/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Peter, are you using 1.x
On 3/28/07, Chris Colman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Easy if you deal with the parameters in the constructor and deal with
adding children, accessing markup etc., in the overridden init (or
commonInit) method.
In cases where people have a number of constructors they normally create
their own se
> the fact remains that getvariation() call from webpage constructor is
a
> bug we need to fix.
Yeah, that's my numero uno motivation at this point also.
> further we already have listener methods you can use - onattach and
> ondetach
>
> what you want can be just as easily accomplished on every
Hi all,
I'm migrating a spring-mvc project to wicket. In this project domain objects
are directly exposed to the ui (without DTOs in between). The objects are
validated using the spring bean validation framework (part of
springmodules). This module creates a unique Validator (a spring interface)
Also take a look at wicket.examples.customresourceloading in
wicket-examples. Maybe nothing you didn't know yet... but maybe :)
Eelco
On 3/28/07, Chris Colman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > there is also an example in wicket-examples
> >
> > -igor
> >
> > On 3/28/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTE
the fact remains that getvariation() call from webpage constructor is a bug
we need to fix.
further we already have listener methods you can use - onattach and ondetach
what you want can be just as easily accomplished on every component
class mypage extends webpage {
private boolean initted=fa
> > I believe that with the minor change that I have made everything is
> > still being done in the exact same order so there should be no
> > consequences of this change. It's just that all the stuff done in
> > commonInit is now being slightly deferred so that it uses completely
> > constructed o
On 3/28/07, Chris Colman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i am against this because i do not think the value it brings is worth the
complexity it adds.
you can persuade me by coming up with examples that actually demonstrate the
advantage. it is common practice in wicket to use imodel to deffer lookup
> i'm not sure what i think about this yet. can you show us the
> exact code modifications and use cases you have coded up?
> (boiled down to the important parts, if possible)
Ok, here's the changed bits you requested. Only 3 Java classes need
minor changes in the framework:
[I added the deferr
> there is also an example in wicket-examples
>
> -igor
>
> On 3/28/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Wow, that's even for version 1.0. :) I guess we should have just one
> > page, explaining 1.3 and as a note mentioning the difference for
1.2.
> > I think we can ditch anythi
i'm not sure what i think about this yet. can you show us the
exact code modifications and use cases you have coded up?
(boiled down to the important parts, if possible) also, it would
be good if you could explain how this solves any problems
other than getVariation().
Chris Colman wrote:
>
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-432
-igor
On 3/28/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/28/07, Chris Colman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > there is a reason why some of the stuff is done where it is. now,
>
> I believe that with the minor change that I have made eve
On 3/28/07, Chris Colman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> there is a reason why some of the stuff is done where it is. now,
I believe that with the minor change that I have made everything is
still being done in the exact same order so there should be no
consequences of this change. It's just that
Awesome, builds now.
Thanks,
Andrew
On 3/28/07, James McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are you using mvn to build? I changed the wicket dependency in the
WICKET_1_2 branch from SNAPSHOT to 1.2.5, so maybe this will help you.
Let me know if it doesn't.
best,
jim
On 3/27/07, Andrew Berma
> there is a reason why some of the stuff is done where it is. now,
I believe that with the minor change that I have made everything is
still being done in the exact same order so there should be no
consequences of this change. It's just that all the stuff done in
commonInit is now being slightly
thank you...I just figured it out..with help from the IRC
-B
svenmeier wrote:
>
> CheckGroup selectedPensCheckGroup = new CheckGroup("selectedPens",
> selectedPensModel);
> add(selectedPensCheckGroup);
> ListView pensList = new ListView("pens", pensModel)
> {
> protected void populateIt
CheckGroup selectedPensCheckGroup = new CheckGroup("selectedPens",
selectedPensModel);
add(selectedPensCheckGroup);
ListView pensList = new ListView("pens", pensModel)
{
protected void populateItem(ListItem item)
{
item.add(new Check("check", item.getModel()));
>
>
> the output from StaticImage ends up being
>
>
Try:
Eelco
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business t
Are you using mvn to build? I changed the wicket dependency in the
WICKET_1_2 branch from SNAPSHOT to 1.2.5, so maybe this will help you.
Let me know if it doesn't.
best,
jim
On 3/27/07, Andrew Berman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can this only be built against version 1.3 of Wicket? I'm unable t
there is also an example in wicket-examples
-igor
On 3/28/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wow, that's even for version 1.0. :) I guess we should have just one
page, explaining 1.3 and as a note mentioning the difference for 1.2.
I think we can ditch anything pre 1.2
Eelco
On
wicket 1.3 uses relative urls. we are working on building context-path
support for this right now. should be done sometime this week. then all you
will have to do is
add(new ContextImage("img", "images/foo.gif")); and wicket will build the
proper path from anywhere, even if the page is mounted.
Wicket 1.3, pulled from the apache incubator.
Jason
On 3/28/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
what wicket version are you using?
-igor
On 3/28/07, Jason Roelofs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hmm, thanks, that does help, but the resulting output does not get
> processed by Wicket
Wow, that's even for version 1.0. :) I guess we should have just one
page, explaining 1.3 and as a note mentioning the difference for 1.2.
I think we can ditch anything pre 1.2
Eelco
On 3/28/07, Gwyn Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which repoints readers to
> http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/co
what wicket version are you using?
-igor
On 3/28/07, Jason Roelofs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hmm, thanks, that does help, but the resulting output does not get
processed by Wicket's rendering engine like other tags.
This means that while the image tags I manually write out end up saying
Hmm, thanks, that does help, but the resulting output does not get processed
by Wicket's rendering engine like other tags.
This means that while the image tags I manually write out end up saying
the output from StaticImage ends up being
What can I call or do to fix this (find the app conte
search the list for StaticImage
-igor
On 3/28/07, Jason Roelofs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How do I go about setting what image to use? I have:
/images/green-check.png
/images/yellow-alert.png
And I want to choose which one of these to display on page creation time.
I though it could be som
so this would associate my object with a checkbox? how do i place the select
objects in a collection from there?
-B
svenmeier wrote:
>
> I'm not sure I fully understand what you're trying to do, but
> CheckGroup/Check components are a nice solution for managing the selection
> of multiple obj
use a visitor to visit all form component feedback borders and add them to
the target.
-igor
On 3/28/07, ZedroS Schwart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quick update :
I've found some help here :
http://www.nabble.com/FeedbackPanel%2C-Form%2C-which-component-is-caousing-feedback--tf2427268.html#a6
How do I go about setting what image to use? I have:
/images/green-check.png
/images/yellow-alert.png
And I want to choose which one of these to display on page creation time. I
though it could be something simple like:
add(new Image("image", "images/green-check.png"));
but that did really n
you should be able to write your own behavior that does what you want
easily. just look at how formcomponentupdating one works.
-igor
On 3/28/07, ChuckDeal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there a way to store the value of multiple form components using
AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior? Is th
Peter, are you using 1.x? this can be caused by ajax requests being
non-versioned in 1.2. In 1.x, the changes should be merged to latest
version.
On 3/28/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> matej didnt you fix this in 1.x svn?
>
> -igor
>
>
>
> On 3/28/07, Peter Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED
matej didnt you fix this in 1.x svn?
-igor
On 3/28/07, Peter Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I have a panel A that is replaced by another panel B over Ajax using
Component.replaceWith(). Panel B contains a few Links.
Say I navigate to this Page and trigger the event that causes panel
I think I found one solution, what I did was to add the normal textfield
an AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior associated to the onchange event. In the
code of onUpdate() I add an AttributeModifier that replaces the value of the
"value" attribute, then I replace the textfield in the form and use
He said that he was watching the show and Artie was at his heaviest and smoking
a cigarette. '' The black guy thought it was James Brown. 9:45am Artie Up To
2000 Calories Already This Morning.
Back then there weren't many beds around so people would share them all the
time. The caller was in t
Quick update :
I've found some help here :
http://www.nabble.com/FeedbackPanel%2C-Form%2C-which-component-is-caousing-feedback--tf2427268.html#a6767963
but I'm still looking for how to tell the FormComponentFeedbackBorder
to render itself..
++
ZedroS, digging in !
On 3/28/07, ZedroS Schwart <[EM
Is there a way to store the value of multiple form components using
AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior? Is there already a behavior that does
this? I have used the AjaxFormSubmitBehavior in another part of my app and
it is slllooo and wouldn't have acceptable performance for what I am
trying
Which repoints readers to
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/control-where-html-files-are-loaded-from.html
Got a minute to do a quick comment on the two of them?
/Gwyn
On 28/03/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/custom-resource-paths.html
>
> Eelco
>
> On
Hi,
I have a panel A that is replaced by another panel B over Ajax using
Component.replaceWith(). Panel B contains a few Links.
Say I navigate to this Page and trigger the event that causes panel B to
replace Panel A. Then I click one of the Link(s) within Panel B that brings
up another page.
Hi
I'm playing with Ajax and Wicket, which is quite fun, but I've an
issue with AjaxSubmitButton and FormComponentFeedbackBorder.
I guess I should use target.addComponent(Component) ; to declare in my
AjaxSubmitButton that I want the feedback border to be updated.
However, I'm using a CommonForm
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/custom-resource-paths.html
Eelco
On 3/28/07, Chris Colman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to store the HTML markup in a separate directory that is
> not part of the web app or web server directory structure?
>
> If necessary I could mimic the classpath i
Is it possible to store the HTML markup in a separate directory that is
not part of the web app or web server directory structure?
If necessary I could mimic the classpath in the separate directory so
the HTMLs are stored in similarly named directories to their
corresponding Java classes.
I've lo
I'm not sure I fully understand what you're trying to do, but CheckGroup/Check
components are a nice solution for managing the selection of multiple objects.
No need to introduce a boolean property in your domain objects.
Please take a look at FormInput.java from wicket examples:
CheckGroup chec
51 matches
Mail list logo
