I am using wicket ajax debug console and ids seems to be correct. Adding
an AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior (AjaxSelfUpdatingTimerBehavior) actually
adds those:
protected void onBind()
{
getComponent().setOutputMarkupId(true);
}
- Juha
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> yes looks like it. if you look
I have had a look at the AutoCompleteTextField component and although it
looks promising, it will require some extended functionality.
In particular if the getChoices(String input) method only returns one
choice, then that value should be entered into the test field.
What is the best approach t
ah, right. frames. seems like things would be simpler if we synced on
session
for page requests (not for other resources, like images, of course). i
thought
we were syncing on session a while back. what was the reason we changed
this?
igor.vaynberg wrote:
>
> like i said, we sync on pagema
like i said, we sync on pagemap not session. so if you use frames there is a
chance two requests for the same session will be processed simultaneously.
-igor
On 4/1/07, Jonathan Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i'm missing something here still. what thread other than the request
thread
wil
i'm missing something here still. what thread other than the request thread
will ever be accessing this?
igor.vaynberg wrote:
>
> copy on write has the advantage when it comes to iterating over the list.
> the locking needs to be there because we lock on pagemaps and not on
> session, so two
This is a slippery slope and can easily become an excuse to do
whatever it is that one wants an excuse to do. It's impossible to
argue against supposed silent, anonymous individuals. They may
think anything or have any problem whatsoever... whatever suits
the argument at hand.
I think we're
This doesn't have to do with object construction so much as it has to
do with the construction of the object tree. It's actually one of the
problems our - now ditched - constructor refactor solved. Anyway, we
have solutions for it. We are currently trying to decide which is the
best solution.
Eelc
>>> The problem is that if the error is thrown i get a No page found for
>>> component. I understand that the cause of the error is that the
"error
>>> component" not being instantiated because of the constructor not
being
>>> finished (or i think that's the cause).
Maybe wicket use cases for whic
> 1.2.6
>
> we no longer need bodycontainer in 1.3 because we have a much more
elegant
> system for handling such things
Are you saying that overriding getVariation on a page will work properly
in 1.3 already?
>
> -igor
Separate threat but kind of related:
>> Apparently the usecase is prett
This might help:
http://herebebeasties.com/2007-03-01/jsp-and-wicket-sitting-in-a-tree/
Martijn
On 4/1/07, Ilya Sterin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to utilize Wicket in a new application. We initially were
> going to use jsf and decided to utilize wicket for its cleaner
> architectur
I answer myself: VARIATIONS!
Thanks anyway,
Keep on with good work,
Francisco
- Message d'origine
De : Francisco Treacy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
À : wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Envoyé le : Dimanche, 1 Avril 2007, 22h35mn 33s
Objet : specifying html template
Hi,
We all know that in Wic
there is an example of custom markup loading in wicket-examples. you might
also want to search the list for getvariation() to see if that will fit your
usecase
-igor
On 4/1/07, Francisco Treacy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
We all know that in Wicket for a given ExampleView.java we have an
E
Hi,
We all know that in Wicket for a given ExampleView.java we have an
ExampleView.html associated markup.
How can I dynamically specify the HTML template from my Java page?
I'm exceptionally needing this:
if (product.getReference().equals("C25-L")) {
// trigger some code to use C25-
I'm trying to utilize Wicket in a new application. We initially were
going to use jsf and decided to utilize wicket for its cleaner
architecture and development model. Although, the abstraction from
jsp is great, I'm now faced with the difficulty of having a bunch of
reusable jsp tag libraries/co
On 4/1/07, Nino Wael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I do know that radio and check are directly attached to their imodel. But
the imodel does not provide an alternate value for them.
I just dont see why not to provide an ichoicerender on these components
when providing it for the radiochoice and dr
I do know that radio and check are directly attached to their imodel. But the
imodel does not provide an alternate value for them.
I just dont see why not to provide an ichoicerender on these components when
providing it for the radiochoice and dropdown choice.
We have no way of controlling the
> well, we do a lot of iterations. anytime formcomponent.isvalid() is called
> we iterate over messages to see if there are any for that component. in my
> apps that is called a couple of times per formcomponent per request. i went
> with copyonwrite because the iterator isnt synced at all.
Ok, ma
Hi
I'm using an AjaxFormSubmitBehavior to render a little indicator on
the ongoing Ajax request.
I've done it this way :
class AjaxFormSubmitIndicator extends
AjaxFormSubmitBehavior
implements IAjaxIndicatorAware {
Has anybody used wurfl and wicket together ? If so
could you provide me the details of the implmentation
?
thanks,
kancha
Get your own web address.
Have a HUGE year through Yahoo! Small Business.
http://smal
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/
Thanks for taking so much interest. The session idea is nice.
Jonathan Locke wrote:
>
>
> if you can wait, i think we're going to be fixing this so you don't have
> to make any changes.
>
>
> serban.balamaci wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the answer. Do you mean that instead of doing the loading o
well, we do a lot of iterations. anytime formcomponent.isvalid() is called
we iterate over messages to see if there are any for that component. in my
apps that is called a couple of times per formcomponent per request. i went
with copyonwrite because the iterator isnt synced at all. we dont
select
22 matches
Mail list logo
